Engineering Papers⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20205010139

FUN3D Manual: 13.7

Robert T Biedron·Jan-Renee Carlson·Joseph M Derlaga·Peter A Gnoffo·Dana P Hammond·Kevin E Jacobson·William T Jones·Bil Kleb·Elizabeth M Lee-Rausch·Eric J Nielsen·Michael A Park·Christopher L Rumsey·James L Thomas·Kyle B Thompson·Aaron C Walden·Li Wang·William A Wood
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 13.7, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for formal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.

Explore related subjects

FUN3DAerodynamicsComputational Fluid DynamicsFluid MechanicsMathematicsPropulsion Systems

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert T Biedron, Jan-Renee Carlson, Joseph M Derlaga, Peter A Gnoffo, Dana P Hammond, Kevin E Jacobson, William T Jones, Bil Kleb, Elizabeth M Lee-Rausch, Eric J Nielsen, Michael A Park, Christopher L Rumsey, James L Thomas, Kyle B Thompson, Aaron C Walden, Li Wang, William A Wood. 2020-11-30. FUN3D Manual: 13.7. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205010139

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2022

Identification of Best Practices for Predicting Inlet Performance Using FUN3D Part 2: Installed Inlets.

A series of studies were performed to assess the impacts of boundary condition type and placement, grid refinement, and modeling parameters such as turbulence model and flux limiter on the predicted inlet performance for installed inlet configurations using the FUN3D flow solver. Two configurations were considered for the study; a wall-mounted Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) inlet and the C607 propulsion model tested in the 8x6 Supersonic Wind Tunnel at the NASA Glenn Research Center. The results of the studies were to be used to recommend best practices, as well as to assess the accuracy of FUN3D for inlet predictions. The results of BLI inlet stud-ies showed a minimal impact of grid refinement on the predicted inlet performance for a constant mass flow rate through the inlet. For the C607 propulsion model, the results showed that while the FUN3D predictions at the Aerodynamic Inter-face Plane (AIP) qualitatively agree with the experimental data, FUN3D showed a tendency to overpredict the circumferential distortion metric (IDCmax) and un-derpredict both the radial distortion metric (IDRmax) and the pressure recovery at the AIP (PRAIP ), with the differences between FUN3D and the experimental data increasing with increasing grid refinement and Mach number. Additionally, the outflow boundary location studies performed for both geometries showed that the solution at the AIP was not significantly impacted by the outflow boundary location as long as it was not placed at the location of the AIP. The modeling parameter studies did not indicate a path forward for improved predictions for either inlet con-figuration. Finally, comparisons between the mass flow plug and outflow geometry versions of the C607 propulsion model illustrated favorable agreement, which indi-cates that the differences observed are not caused by the outflow boundary model for this problem. This problem poses significant challenges to Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solvers due to the presence of shocks and flow separation in the inlet.

FUN3D↗
NASA NTRS2019

Comparison of Space Launch System Aerodynamic Surface Pressure Measurements from Experimental Testing and CFD

A comparison of surface pressure coefficient measurements obtained using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) measurements with predictions from the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FUN3D is presented for the NASA SLS Block 1B crew vehicle. Overall, the flow features over the SLS configuration were captured by both the PSP data and CFD data at freestream Mach numbers (M(sub ∞)) of 0.8 and 1.3. Overall, the flow features over the SLS are captured by the PSP data but the intensities of large pressure gradients are less intense than what was predicted by the CFD data. Several examples of this observation are given including the flow interaction at the booster nose cone edge, core body, and forward booster attachment hardware at M(sub ∞) = 0.8.

FUN3D↗
NASA NTRS2011

An Overview of Ares-I CFD Ascent Aerodynamic Data Development And Analysis Based on USM3D

An overview of the computational results obtained from the NASA Langley developed unstructured grid, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solver USM3D, in support of the Ares-I project within the NASA s Constellation program, are presented. The numerical data are obtained for representative flow conditions pertinent to the ascent phase of the trajectory at both wind tunnel and flight Reynolds number without including any propulsion effects. The USM3D flow solver has been designated to have the primary role within the Ares-I project in developing the computational aerodynamic data for the vehicle while other flow solvers, namely OVERFLOW and FUN3D, have supporting roles to provide complementary results for fewer cases as part of the verification process to ensure code-to-code solution consistency. Similarly, as part of the solution validation efforts, the predicted numerical results are correlated with the aerodynamic wind tunnel data that have been generated within the project in the past few years. Sample aerodynamic results and the processes established for the computational solution/data development for the evolving Ares-I design cycles are presented.

FUN3D↗