Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “TCCR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

13 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) Batch 1

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR 1A unit processes dissolved salt fed from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST, IONSIV TM R9120-B, 30x60) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. In support of the TCCR 1A program, SRNL analyzed samples taken from Tank 11H (without tank mixing) before, during, and at the completion of TCCR 1A Batch 1 processing. Tank 11H serves as the receipt tank for the filtered and cesium removed product from the TCCR 1A system. Processing of Batch 1 commenced on January 13, 2022 and completed on February 17, 2022, after processing approximately 70,100 gallons. A pre-production sample was collected from the heel remaining in Tank 11H just before Batch 1 processing began. In addition, five interim surface samples were collected from Tank 11H during processing, and both a surface and a variable depth sample (VDS, ~7” from tank bottom) were collected just after processing completed. Analysis of all samples included density and gamma spectroscopy, in addition to a more comprehensive suite of analytes for the pre- and post-production samples. The density of the pre-production sample was the highest of all samples measured and was then observed to decrease for the first two interim samples, followed by becoming fairly consistent for the remainder of the samples (~1.3 g/mL). The density of 1.3 g/mL is similar to the density measured for one of the three Tank 10H qualification samples (HTF-10-21-126). The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease as additional decontaminated effluent from the TCCR columns was added to Tank 11H during processing; however, an increase in activity was observed during periods of no processing which can be attributed to leaching of 137 Cs from the known solids in Tank 11H. The Cs isotope concentrations in the Tank 11H postproduction surface sample were determined to be 99.7-99.8% lower than the concentrations measured in the Tank 10H feed as measured by mass spectrometry.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of Tank 9H Dissolution Batches in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 1 Preparations

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently preparing the first batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A will consist of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. Two batches of salt (Batch 1A and Batch 1B) have been dissolved in Tank 9H and subsequently transferred to Tank 10H to prepare Batch 1 for TCCR 1A. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from each batch of dissolved salt prior to transfer for characterization. SRNL received both a surface and a variable depth sample from Batches 1A and 1B. In both cases no solids were observed in the surface sample, but were observed in the depth sample. For Batch 1A the variable depth sample was only slightly cloudy, while for Batch 1B the variable depth sample contained a significant amount (10.14 wt%) of solids. The solids were determined to be primarily aluminum containing phases, with only a small fraction (0.22 wt%) being sludge solids. In general, the samples from Batch 1A were more concentrated salt solutions than Batch 1B, with sodium concentrations of 8.53 and 8.57 M for the surface and filtered depth samples in Batch 1A, respectively. The sodium concentrations in Batch 1B samples ranged from 4.27 M for the surface sample to 7.57 M for the depth sample filtrate, indicating some stratification within the tank. The 137 Cs activity as well as the total Cs concentration in the filtered Batch 1A depth sample were approximately double the activity and concentration measured in the filtrate from the Batch 1B depth sample. The total Cs concentration in the Batch 1A depth sample filtrate was 22.4 mg/L, while for the Batch 1B depth sample filtrate the total Cs concentration was calculated to be 12.0 mg/L. These Cs concentrations are significantly higher than was measured in Batches 1-3 from Tank 10H dissolved saltcake which was previously processed through the original TCCR unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 9H Salt Dissolution Batch 2B in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The second batch of salt to make up processing Batch 2 (Batch 2B) has recently been dissolved in Tank 9H and transferred to Tank 10H where it was composited with the first part of the batch (Batch 2A) in preparation for processing through the TCCR 1A unit. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the recent batch (2B) of dissolved salt for characterization. Two samples from Batch 2B were received for characterization, a surface sample and a variable depth sample (VDS). Neither sample contained significant solids, although the VDS appeared slightly cloudy as compared to the surface sample. The sodium concentrations of both the surface and VDS filtrate samples were approximately 5.8 M, and the 137 Cs activity was 9.8E+07 dpm/mL in the surface sample and 9.5E+07 dpm/mL in the VDS. The total Cs concentrations were 2.5 mg/L and 2.4 mg/L in the surface sample and VDS, respectively, using the gamma activity and the Cs isotopic ratios determined by ICP-MS. The alpha activity was below the detection limit in both samples. Nitrate was the dominant anion present, and the samples were primarily concentrated sodium nitrate solutions with hydroxide, nitrite, and carbonate present at 0.1 – 0.2 M. In general, the Batch 2B samples were more dilute than the previously characterized Batch 2A samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 9h Salt Dissolution Batch 2C In Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The third batch of salt to make up processing Batch 2 (Batch 2C) has recently been dissolved in Tank 9H and transferred to Tank 10H where it was composited with the first part of the batch (Batches 2A and 2B) in preparation for processing through the TCCR 1A unit. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the recent batch (2C) of dissolved salt for characterization.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

VERSE-LC TCCR Model Calibration using Batch 1A, Batch 2, and Batch 3 Column Data

The objective of this work is to utilize on-line gamma monitoring data collected during Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Column Batch 3 operations to calibrate the parameters (essentially, the correction/dilution factors (CF or DF)) used in the VERSE-LC models for the prediction of cesium breakthrough while processing Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H dissolved saltcake High-Level Waste through a packed cylindrical bed of Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST). Calibrated VERSE-LC models could be applied to aid in evaluating future TCCR operations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 9H Salt Dissolution Batch 2A in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 2 Preparations

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently preparing the second batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A consists of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. The first batch of salt to make up Batch 2 (Batch 2A) has been dissolved in Tank 9H and will later be transferred to Tank 10H. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from the batch of dissolved salt for characterization.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Summary of Results from November 2021 Qualification Samples for Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A)

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 1 for processing through the TCCR 1A unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Summary of Results from Batch 1 Qualification Samples for Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A)

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each waste supernate batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 1 for processing through the TCCR 1A unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Cesium Batch Contact Equilibrium Testing of Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) Sieve Cuts in SRS Average Simulant and Examination of CST Samples Aged in Caustic and Simulant in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR-1A)

Batch contact testing to determine cesium equilibrium loading on Crystalline Silicotitanate ion exchange media in Savannah River Site Average Waste Simulant at 25 °C indicated that smaller diameter particles isolated by sieving pretreated CST media may load slightly higher (<10%) amounts of cesium, though the differences are within analytical uncertainty. In addition, ion exchange media sub-samples stored in 2-4 M NaOH and caustic simulant solutions for ~2.5 years were examined by optical microscopy and the 3 M NaOH sample was also analyzed to determine whether changes in the particle size distribution occurred during storage. No visual indications of particle attrition or agglomeration were observed for any sample. Particle size analysis indicated that a slight decrease occurred in the average particle diameter following contact with 3 M NaOH (541 µm average diameter versus 566 µm for the pretreated CST prior to contact). A small increase (from 0 to <0.5 wt. %) in the number of particles ranging from 271 and 322 µm was also observed for the CST sample contacted with 3 M NaOH relative to a sample of the original pretreated material. However, this small change could be due to sub-sampling differences or analytical uncertainty. It does not appear that small particles are formed to a significant degree during CST caustic contact or that small particles which do form (presumably from attrition of larger particles during pretreatment) load significantly more cesium than the bulk material. Minimal other negative consequences were observed associated with CST extended caustic or simulant contact, except for the tendency for more concentrated salt solutions to form some salt crystals which deposit on the media over time.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Tank Closure Cesium Removal Ion Exchange Column CST Characterization: SRNL-STI-2024-00072 (Rev.0) pdf

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) recently suspended operation of the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system which utilized an ion exchange (IX) process to remove radioactive cesium from waste supernate. During the demonstration phase, a total of three batches of Tank 10H dissolved salt waste were processed through the original TCCR columns. Subsequently, dissolved salt waste from Tank 9H was processed through TCCR in a phase referred to as TCCR 1A with four new IX columns. All eight columns have now been moved to Interim Safe Storage (ISS). For each batch processed through the TCCR IX columns, SRNL performed a number of analyses on surface and variable depth samples as well as batch equilibrium contact tests (BECT) to determine equilibrium loadings of Cs on the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) IX media. The BECTs were performed by lowering “teabags” containing ~0.1 g of CST each into the tank for a period of at least 10 days. The teabags were then retrieved and sent to SRNL for digestion and analysis.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

High Solids Performance Testing in a Scaled TSCR System

The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) project is a technology demonstration that will pretreat Hanford tank waste supernatant in support of the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) mission. The TSCR system employs two key separation technologies: dead-end filtration (DEF) and ion exchange (IX) using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) media. DEF will be used to remove undissolved solids from tank waste to protect the functionality of the IX columns and the IX system will remove Cs-137 from tank waste. The separation technologies (DEF and IX) used in TSCR are technically mature and have also been successfully deployed at the Savannah River site in a similar facility known as the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system. While testing with simulants and real waste has been successfully performed under conditions expected during the initial operation of TSCR, test data is absent for assessing off normal high solids loading that may be in the TSCR waste feed. Normal TSCR treatment operations are expected to handle wastes with solids content on the order of 200 ppm, and off normal solids loading could be much larger than the nominal level. The testing program described in this report was conducted to understand the consequence of operating the TSCR system at elevated solids loadings up to the high-solids limit of 15,000 ppm [i.e., 1.5-wt%] identified in the TSCR design basis. Although the system is not required to make throughput above the nominal solids loading, the testing was intended to provide important information related to potential off normal operations. At off normal levels near the high-solids limit, there are potential implications for TSCR performance in the areas of throughput, DEF pressure drop, filter backflush frequency, and IX column pressure drop. In addition, intrusion of solids into the IX column was postulated to impact the Cs-137 loading behavior by promoting channeling or flow maldistribution in the column; since the magnitude of the postulated effect was unknown, assessing it was also of interest. The testing was performed using representative waste simulants and a prototypic, integrated TSCR system designed and assembled specifically to conduct the high solids performance assessment. Overall, the scaled TSCR testing demonstrated that full-scale unit operations can succeed in fulfilling their processing objectives in the presence of solids up to 3,000 ppm, but there are potential performance challenges to filtration operations at solids loadings as low as ~500 ppm. The severity of the challenge is likely to be dependent on the type and size distribution of solids, of which the current testing only examined a single type and size distribution. To provide some flexibility for future full-scale operations, the results of the testing suggest two possible risk reduction strategies that can be implemented without any changes in TSCR design or configuration. One option would be to enact an administrative limit on the solids loading to protect TSCR from feeds that are likely to require a high DEF swap frequency. Another option is to permit operation of the DEFs at differential pressures greater than 2 psid before swapping filters. The selection of a higher differential pressure target is not anticipated to adversely impact DEF backflushing efficacy and would reduce both swap frequency and the amount of waste sent to AP-108.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗