Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “CLaDS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,765 records · Page 98
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Examination of Intergranular Crack on SC0234

The microstructure of the SC0234 weld was evaluated per DA-SPEC-01067, ''General Purpose Heat Source (GPHS) Plutonium-238 Dioxide Fueled Clad Product Specification'' and it was determined that the weld microstructure conformed to the quality requirements. During the examination of weld cross section, the metallographic analysis revealed the presence of a surface crack. Prior visual examination per RPS-TA55-303 had not revealed the crack, nor did the surface photography performed per RPS-TA55-302. The presence of the crack does not violate any of the product specifications called out on DA-SPEC-01067. Although there is a well-documented history of weld hot crack susceptibility in the early development of the DOP-26 iridium alloy, a surface crack such as this had not been documented during welding at Los Alamos. In the interest of better understanding the cause; the product engineer/program recommended further examination of the crack. This report discusses the examination of the crack found in the weld cross section of simulant clad SC0234. Metallography, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy techniques (EDS) where used in the analysis of the crack and the surrounding weld microstructure.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Report on Assessment of Advanced Reactor Fuel Performance

Three activities have been performed in FY 2019 to support the Advanced Fuel Cycle Campaign, which include assessment of annular fuel performance in an ultra-high burnup sodium-cooled reactor (SFR), modeling of annular fuel behavior during a transient scenario, and feasibility of a sustainable closed fuel cycle utilizing melt-refining process. Annular fuel performance parameters, including temperature profile, swelling strain, and cumulative damage fraction (CDF), in a 3000 MWt Sustainable Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SSFR) were assessed using the BISON fuel performance code. The SSFR is once-through ultra-long-life core based on a 34-batch fuel management scheme with 1.5-year cycle length. The fuel residence time in the SSFR is 51 years and the average discharged burnup is about 30%. Annular fuel has potential to irradiate for ultra-high burnup without major fuel-cladding mechanical interaction. This feature is achieved by using a low smeared density (~55%). In the SSFR design, however, 75% smeared density and a thick fuel pin were preferred to maintain criticality for 51 years. Due to the high smeared density and thick fuel pin configuration, the annular fuel was predicted to suffer premature cladding failure before reaching the discharge burnup of the SSFR. The current fuel creep model predicts a prominent creep strain due to gravity over the half-century irradiation, which may significantly affect the evolution of CDF. Thus, in order to use the annular fuel in an ultra-high burnup core such as the SSFR, a low smeared density and thin annular fuel is strongly recommended.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Test Plan for Investigation of Hydrogen Generation in SNF Canisters

This report presents a test plan to investigate radiolytic hydrogen generation in spent nuclear fuel (SNF) canisters containing Zr-based cladding materials. The initial primary contributor to the generation of radiolytic hydrogen is estimated to be the residual physisorbed water on the ZrO 2 film, post-dry out. Over the longer term the primary hydrogen source is associated with the aluminum hydroxides and water vapor. The proposed testing to be conducted in FY22 would consist of lab-scale testing on non-radioactive surrogates of oxidized ZIRLO tubing and unalloyed zirconium using a miniature steel canister (“mini-canister") designed to allow intermittent, in-situ sampling of the canister gas during irradiation. The mini-canister approach for irradiation with in-situ monitoring system was used in a recent and on-going study [McNamara and Verst, 2020a & 2020b; Verst et al., 2021] to measure radiolytic hydrogen generation from aluminum SNF cladding surrogate materials. This proposed testing will form part of the overall materials performance evaluation of the commercial SNF-in-canister system and is part of the technical bases for their continued safe dry storage

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2021

Isotopic and Fuel Lattice Parameter Trends in Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuel, Volume II: BWR

Commercial light water reactor (LWR) operators and fuel vendors in the United States are pursuing changes to nuclear fuel that include extended enrichment (EE) and accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) designs to further improve reactor safety and plant economics. Extended fuel enrichments above 5% 235 U pin enrichment and up to 10% 235 U are a subset of high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) that may be deployed in commercial US LWRs in the near term. ATF features, such as cladding coatings or alternative cladding materials, are designed to improve fuel system performance under accident conditions. One goal of EE is to improve fuel cycle economy by enabling fuel to be depleted to higher burnup than the typical current limits (62 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium [GWd/MTU]). Adoption of EE, ATF, and high burnup (HBU) fuels in the US commercial fleet requires a clear understanding of the effects on core physics parameters and used fuel isotopic content, as well as confidence in the accuracy of computer code predictions over an expanded range of materials, enrichment, and burnup. A thorough understanding of the applicability and adequacy of benchmark data (e.g., criticality, decay heat, isotopic content) for computer code validation is necessary to ensure that appropriate safety margins are maintained. As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) agreement number 31310019N0008, “SCALE Code Development, Assessment and Maintenance,” the effects of EE, ATF, and HBU are being assessed for selected representative LWR fuel designs. The project is divided into phases, and this report summarizes the findings of the Phase 1 work, which focuses on lattice physics parameter and used fuel isotopic changes for a conventional GE14 10 x 10 boiling water reactor (BWR) design with GNF-2 part length rod patterns to model a modern BWR assembly design.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Post Examination of Candidate NpO 2 Targets for 238 Pu Production

Four targets composed of sintered NpO 2 pellets enclosed in Zircaloy cladding were irradiated in the High Flux Isotope Reactor for 2 to 4 cycles to determine if an oxide pellet and Zircaloy cladding would be usable candidates for 238 Pu production. The pellets were sintered to a high fraction of theoretical density (TD) and melt wires were placed in small holes that had been drilled in the center of selected pellets to determine if the pellet centers exceeded desirable operating temperatures. After irradiation, the targets were punctured to determine the internal target pressure and the fission gas release. None of the targets had excessive pressure, and fission gas release was in the range of 4 to 38%. The targets were then cut into segments for radiochemical analysis, and metallography (MET) mounts were created to examine the pellet microstructure and to search for the melt wires to determine if they had melted. Three of the four targets resulted in successful MET mounts; the two-cycle pellets were too friable to be handled. No signs of pellet melting were noted, and unfortunately, none of the melt wires could be recovered. The results indicate that this pellet/clad design offers a practical option for 238 Pu production.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

High Temperature Steam Oxidation of Irradiated FeCrAl in the Severe Accident Test Station

FeCrAl-UO2 test capsules were fabricated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and irradiated at the Advanced Test Reactor. Following irradiation, samples were sectioned from the irradiated rod and oxidation kinetics were evaluated to access the candidate cladding high-temperature oxidation performance following irradiation. The irradiation was performed at approximately 400°C to a burnup of 10 GWd/MT. The high-temperature oxidation tests were conducted in the ORNL Severe Accident Test Station at 1200 and 1300°C. Weight measurements were taken before and after oxidation testing. Cross-sections of the cladding were metallographically mounted and optical microscopy was performed. Measurements of the oxidation layer before and after high-temperature testing were collected. The results indicate the irradiated FeCrAl C35M alloy provided good thermal stability up to 1200°C.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Effects of 18 O Exchange on Neutron Emission Rates of Aging 238 PuO 2 LWRHUs

The Lightweight Radioisotope Heater Unit (LWRHU) provides about 1 Watt of thermal power to critical electrical and mechanical systems in the extreme temperatures of space, maintaining the operating temperature of the spacecraft’s scientific and general operating equipment. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) designed and tested the LWRHU in the 1970s through early 1980s. The first production campaign at LANL was in the early 1980s in support of the Galileo mission in which over 100 LWRHUs were manufactured. In the mid-1990s, almost 200 LWRHUs were manufactured in support of the Cassini mission. After the primary Cassini manufacturing campaign, the Department of Energy (DOE) approved the fabrication of more than 10 additional LWRHUs as spares in 1998. The LWRHU assembly contains the following components: a fuel pellet, a vented capsule, a pyrolytic graphite insulator, and a fine-weave pierced fabric (FWPF) graphite aeroshell. The fuel pellet is a hot-pressed 238 PuO 2 cylindrical pellet that is sintered to create a ceramic pellet. The pellet is encapsulated in a platinum-rhodium encapsulation. The welded fueled clad is placed inside a pyrolytic graphite thermal insulation to protect the fuel from the heat produced in reentry events. The exterior layer of the LWRHU assembly is the FWPF aeroshell. Before sintering, PuO 2 granules are heated in a furnace at temperatures greater than or equal to 700°C under an enriched 16 O atmosphere in order to reduce trace quantities of 18 O. Because 18 O undergoes an (α,n) reaction, 18 O needs to be removed as much as possible to meet radiation emission requirements set by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), as well as other agencies. The relative abundances of the oxygen isotopes are indicated by neutron emission rate (NER) measurements. LWRHUs are vented with a sintered platinum frit vent (George 1986). During extraterrestrial operation, the vent in the cladding allows helium from the decay of plutonium to escape and relieves pressure from the system while preventing the solids from escaping (Rinehart 1996, Tate 1982 & 1985). This vent is protected during manufacture by a platinum-30 rhodium cover. The capsule vent is activated by milling a 0.025-inch diameter hole through the protective cover to a nominal depth of 0.015 inches, generally immediately before the LWRHU is loaded into the aeroshell (George 1986). Prior to long-term storage, LWRHUs are vented and thus potentially allow infiltration of 18 O from the ambient atmosphere. Although NER decreases with age due to the reduction in emitted alpha particles, it might be expected that NER reduction is mitigated by the exchange of 18 O. However, this is not necessarily the case and no trend was observed relating NER to age other than the natural decay of 238 Pu (Mulford 2021). The most probable and dominant factor for determining specific NER was manufacturing discrepancies between individual units. It is important to understand the lack of observed 16 O- 18 O exchange and to compare LWRHU pellets as much as possible.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Closed Fuel Cycle Waste Treatment Strategy

This study is aimed at evaluating the existing waste management approaches for nuclear fuel cycle facilities in comparison to the objectives of implementing an advanced fuel cycle in the U.S. under current legal, regulatory, and logistical constructs. The study begins with the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Integrated Waste Management Strategy (IWMS) as a general strategy and associated Waste Treatment Baseline Study (WTBS). The tenets of the IWMS are equally valid to the current waste management study. However, the flowsheet details have changed significantly from those considered under GNEP. In addition, significant additional waste management technology development has occurred since the GNEP waste management studies were performed. This study updates the information found in the WTBS, summarizes the results of more recent technology development efforts, and describes waste management approaches as they apply to both a nominal case study and near-term target reprocessing flowsheets. Many of the waste management technologies discussed also apply to other potential flowsheets that involve reprocessing. The report summarizes the waste arising from aqueous reprocessing of a typical light-water reactor (LWR) fuel to separate actinides for use in fabricating metal sodium fast reactor (SFR) fuel and from electrochemical reprocessing of the metal SFR fuel to separate actinides for recycle back into the SFR in the form of metal fuel. The primary streams considered and the recommended waste forms include: • Tritium separated from either a low volume gas stream or a high volume water stream. The recommended waste form is low-water cement in high integrity containers (HICs). • Iodine-129 separated from off-gas streams in aqueous processing. There are a range of potentially suitable waste forms. As a reference case, a glass composite material (GCM) formed by the encapsulation of the silver Mordenite (AgZ) getter material in a low-temperature glass is assumed. A number of alternatives with distinct advantages are also considered including a fused silica waste form with encapsulated nano-sized AgI crystals. • Carbon-14 separated from LWR fuel treatment off-gases and immobilized as a CaCO3 in a cement waste form. • Krypton-85 separated from LWR and SFR fuel treatment off-gases and stored as a compressed gas. • An aqueous reprocessing high-level waste (HLW) raffinate waste which is immobilized by the vitrification process in one of three forms: a single phase borosilicate glass, a borosilicate based glass ceramic, or a multi-phased crystalline synthetic rock (Synroc). • An undissolved solids (UDS) fraction from aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel that is either included in the borosilicate HLW glass or is immobilized in the form of a metal alloy in the case of glass ceramics or Synroc. • Zirconium-based LWR fuel cladding hulls and stainless steel (SS) fuel assembly hardware that are washed and super-compacted for disposal or as an alternative with high promise the purification and reuse (or disposal as low-level waste, LLW) of Zr by reactive gas separations. • Electrochemical process salt HLW which is incorporated into a glass bonded Sodalite waste form known as the ceramic waste form (CWF). • Electrochemical process UDS and SS cladding hulls which are melted into an iron based alloy waste form. Mass and volume estimates for each of the recommended waste forms based on the source terms from the reference mass balances are reported. In addition to the above listed primary waste streams, a range of secondary process wastes are generated by aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel, metal SFR fuel fabrication, and electrochemical reprocessing of SFR fuel. These secondary wastes have been summarized and volumes estimated by type and classification. The important waste management data gaps and research needs have been summarized for each primary waste stream and selected waste process.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Microstructural Analysis of Iron-Chromium-Aluminum Samples Exposed to Loca-Type Conditions Followed by Quench

The QUENCH-19 experiment was performed to examine the behavior of FeCrAl-alloy B1236Y3 as a potential nuclear fuel cladding and accident conditions. Over the course of the test, a surrogate bundle achieved a temperature of just over 1400°C. Post-test characterization revealed that the FeCrAl formed a thin layer of aluminum oxide that protected most of the underlying cladding and surrogate fuel pin. However, a few pins were heavily corroded and even destroyed primarily by thermocouple-FeCrAl interactions and subsequent steam, FeCrAl, and ZrO 2 interactions. Absent these effects, it is suggested that FeCrAl’s performance may be acceptable under these conditions.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Advanced Low-Temperature Chlorination of Zirconium

Recovery of Zr from nuclear fuel is of high interest because the Zr cladding material comprises up to 50% of the high-level radioactive waste (HLW) that requires disposition. An ideal Zr-recovery process would not only recover the bulk Zr from the fuel or cladding but would also provide decontamination from the components that give rise to the HLW designation. A simplified decontamination pathway providing recovered Zr in compliance with low-level radioactive waste acceptance criteria could significantly reduce the burden of HLW requiring geologic disposition. A newly developed advanced low-temperature chlorination process presents an opportunity to recover a ZrCl4 product that is effectively decontaminated from the elements of concern. This advanced low-temperature chlorination process uses a mixture of the sulfur-containing chlorination compounds sulfur monochloride (S 2 Cl 2 ) and thionyl chloride (SOCl 2 ).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Dissolution Flowsheet for Skull Oxide Generated during U-Mo Alloy Casting for High Performance Research Reactor Fuel

The Savannah River National Laboratory was requested to develop dissolution flowsheets for high assay low enriched U scrap generated during the fabrication of high performance research reactor fuel. The scrap streams include U-10Mo and U-10Mo-Zr foils, rejected Al-clad fuel plates, and skull oxide from casting molds. Flowsheets for the dissolution of the U-10Mo-Zr foils and Al-clad U-10Mo-Zr mini-plates received from BWX Technologies, Inc were developed and demonstrated in the first phase of this project. In the second phase (this work), the skull oxide from a U-10Mo casting mold was obtained from the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) and small-scale experiments were performed to demonstrate dissolution flowsheets.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Transverse Rupture Strength of Uranium Dioxide

Uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) fuel is used as fuel in light water reactors (LWRs). While the fuel pellet is technically the first engineering barrier for radionuclide release, pellet fracturing at intermediate- to high-burnup values releases fission gases into the fuel rod plenum [1, 2]. Therefore, the true engineering barrier is the fuel cladding, which performs very well in LWR environments [3]. The extreme temperature gradients generated by fission energy and the low thermal conductivity of UO 2 quickly induce radial cracking in UO 2 during operation [4]. Cracks in the fuel provide opportunities for fuel relocation, increased fission gas release, and pellet-cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI) [5]. The ability to predict and engineer the fracture of UO 2 fuel pellets using modern computational tools is therefore a key engineering goal that has been the focus of ongoing experimental and computational efforts [6, 7]. Accurate predictions of fuel pellet cracking during operation requires knowledge of more complex phenomena, but improved understanding of the fundamental fracture behavior of unirradiated UO 2 is first necessary.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Update on the Investigation of Commercial Drying Cycles Using the Advanced Drying Cycle Simulator

The purpose of this report is to document updates on the apparatus to simulate commercial vacuum drying procedures at the Nuclear Energy Work Complex at Sandia National Laboratories. Validation of the extent of water removal in a dry spent nuclear fuel storage system based on drying procedures used at nuclear power plants is needed to close existing technical gaps. Operational conditions leading to incomplete drying may have potential impacts on the fuel, cladding, and other components in the system during subsequent storage and disposal. A general lack of data suitable for model validation of commercial nuclear canister drying processes necessitates well-designed investigations of drying process efficacy and water retention. Scaled tests that incorporate relevant physics and well-controlled boundary conditions are essential to provide insight and guidance to the simulation of prototypic systems undergoing drying processes. This report documents a new test apparatus, the Advanced Drying Cycle Simulator (ADCS). This apparatus was built to simulate commercial drying procedures and quantify the amount of residual water remaining in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel assembly after drying. The ADCS was constructed with a prototypic 17×17 PWR fuel skeleton and waterproof heater rods to simulate decay heat. These waterproof heaters are the next generation design to heater rods developed and tested at Sandia National Laboratories in FY20. This report describes the ADCS vessel build that was completed late in FY22, including the receipt of the prototypic length waterproof heater rods and construction of the fuel basket and the pressure vessel components. In addition, installations of thermocouples, emissivity coupons, pressure and vacuum lines, pressure transducers, and electrical connections were completed. Preliminary power functionality testing was conducted to demonstrate the capabilities of the ADCS. In FY23, a test plan for the ADCS will be developed to implement a drying procedure based on measurements from the process used for the High Burnup Demonstration Project. While applying power to the simulated fuel rods, this procedure is expected to consist of filling the ADCS vessel with water, draining the water with applied pressure and multiple helium blowdowns, evacuating additional water with a vacuum drying sequence at successively lower pressures, and backfilling the vessel with helium. Additional investigations are expected to feature failed fuel rod simulators with engineered cladding defects and guide tubes with obstructed dashpots to challenge the drying system with multiple water retention sites.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Research and Test Reactor Fuels

PRO-RR is the research reactor focused program element of the broader Proliferation Resistance Optimization program (PRO-X) under the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). PRO-X provides a framework for integrating proliferation resistance in nuclear system designs to minimize weapons usable nuclear materials (WUNM) production and diversion pathways while optimizing systems performance for peaceful use missions. PRO-RR applies the PRO-X mission objectives to research reactor system design. This document serves as one of the foundational documents for the PRO-RR-Fuel System Design technical team by documenting current research reactor fuels usage. The PRO-RR-Fuel System Design technical team consists of subject matter experts from Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) and Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). In order to determine the preferred fuel of use in upcoming research and test reactors to optimize proliferation resistance, performance, and safety, it is useful to assess the fuels that have been used in the past, or are currently in use. This report reviews the historical and current fuels used in research and test reactors to inform future fuel selection. Chapter 2 discusses the low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuels currently in use in terms of thermal power level and utilization of the reactor. Chapter 3 summarizes the fabrication processes for common fuel types. Chapter 4 discusses in detail the fuel types in use in research and test reactors. A review of the cladding types in use is presented in Chapter 5, and a historical review of research and test reactor fuel fabricators is presented in Chapter 6. The data collection strategy used the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) research reactor database [1] as a starting point. Information on the fuel used was gathered on research reactors (other than critical assemblies) that were listed as operational, planned, or in temporary shutdown in the IAEA database. Data on the fuel type, geometry, enrichment, uranium loading, cladding type, and fabricator were collected for each of the reactors available in the public domain. Sources of data included conference papers, journal articles, and facility and fabricator websites. Data on research reactors operating on LEU fuels are presented in Appendix A, while Appendix B presents data collected on all reactors at the time of publication of this report. Appendix C presents data collected on reactors that were part of the M3 research and test reactor conversion program.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Implementation of an Orificing Optimization Algorithm in the DASSH Subchannel Analysis Code

The Ducted Assembly Steady-State Heat transfer code (DASSH) performs full-core subchannel thermal hydraulics calculations in liquid metal fast reactors. One of the applications of subchannel codes is to optimize coolant flow orificing. As a design activity, the primary task is to determine the best way to divide assemblies into groups and distribute coolant flow rates among them. This report documents an algorithm implemented in DASSH to automatically optimize coolant orificing. Over the course of multiple iterations, DASSH determines the orifice grouping and flow distribution that minimizes peak coolant, clad, or fuel temperatures across all timesteps for a user-specified number of assembly groups. The total coolant flow rate in the reactor is constrained to achieve the specified core-average outlet temperature. The flow rate to each orifice group may also be constrained by the allowable pressure drop. The distribution of coolant flow among groups is accelerated using a predictor-corrector algorithm based on interpolated results from single-assembly parametric calculations. The assembly orificing grouping is initially predicted based on assembly power but can be refined if results demonstrate that an assembly would fit better in another group. The algorithm is demonstrated with two case studies. The first is a simple model for a reactor core consisting of just fuel assemblies; the pin power distributions are specified to create a situation where the initial assembly grouping prediction is suboptimal. This example is used to describe the initial grouping, demonstrate convergence over multiple iterations, and highlight the impact of regrouping. Then, the algorithm is applied to minimize peak clad and fuel temperatures in an example sodium-cooled fast reactor, the Versatile Test Reactor. The multicycle optimization confirms prior calculations for the reference core design. The example highlights how optimizing for different peak temperatures affects the results and demonstrates the use of the pressure drop constraint to limit the maximum flow rate.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

FY22 Progress Report on BISON Metallic Fuel Model Development and V&V Using EBR-II Legacy Data

In this report, the activities and achievements made by Argonne National Laboratory for the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) BISON code metallic fuel validation and verification project in FY2022 are summarized. The FIPD-BISON integration powered metallic fuel low-burnup swelling framework has been enhanced to cover both radial and axial swelling analyses. Axial-dependent as-fabricated fuel radius profiles have been used to improve the accuracy in evaluating radial swelling strain. The simulations of the IFR experiment X447, which was focused on FCCI/CCCI induced cladding degradation and failure, have been converted into a BISON metallic fuel assessment case with detailed documentation, which is also the first FIPD-BISON integration powered assessment case in BISON. A FIPD-BISON integration repository has been established to be an optional submodule of BISON to support FIPD-BISON integration powered assessment cases. Preliminary trials to simulate the in-cell out-of-pile transient experiment have been made after implementing some essential models such as cladding plasticity models and liquid phase penetration models. The initial results are promising and help identify gaps that need to be filled in FY2023 and beyond, to eventually achieve OPTD-BISON integration powered assessment cases.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Second Target Station High-Fidelity Target Activation Comparison

The development of the Second Target Station (STS) target system at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is well underway. The target system at STS consists of a rotating target disk that contains 21 segments of tungsten clad in tantalum clad in steel. A key aspect of the design of the target system is to account for the delayed heating and material damage caused by the delayed dose from decaying radionuclides. These radionuclides are a product of either spallation reactions or transmutation of the nuclei in the target system. These radionuclides build up in the target system components over the lifetime of the facility, and the radiation that is emitted can deposit energy in the components causing significant component heating and material damage. Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Version 6.2 transports the various particle species and calculates the spallation products and neutron fluxes throughout the target system. These spallation products and neutron fluxes along with the material definition of each component are relayed to the CINDER2008 transmutation code to calculate the radionuclide inventories and the corresponding decay gamma emission spectra. MCNP6.2 coupled with CINDER2008 is the computational method-of-choice for the analysis discussed in the following sections of this report. The analysis focuses on validating major assumptions in calculating the radionuclide inventory in the STS target system: all of the target segments are fresh, unirradiated material when the protons are incident on the segment, the average of the 21 segments of the target is sufficient to represent a single segment, and that averaging the proton pulse structure over time does not significantly affect the radionuclide inventory. The position-averaged, high-fidelity, and single-tally computational methods are used to validate the assumptions and provide a point of comparison to evaluate how the assumptions impact the radionuclide inventories. A more detailed explanation of the three computational methods is provided in Section 2. The position-averaged and single-tally methods are less computationally expensive when compared with the high-fidelity method where 54,000 individual calculations are needed to calculate 1 hr of STS operation. Section 3 details the comparison of the three methods to show that the assumptions made in the position-averaged method do not significantly impact the radionuclide inventory after 1 hr of operation. The discussions and results in this report are for 1 hr of operation. Due to the computational cost associated with calculating the transmutation and activation using the high-fidelity method, only 1 hr of operation has been calculated. The discrepancies observed after 1 hr of operation are not extrapolated out to longer operational times, and this report does not address how the discrepancies between the computational methods may manifest for longer operational periods.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Preliminary Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of the UTA–2 Subcritical Linear Accelerator–Driven System

The National Nuclear Security Administration’s mission includes establishing a reliable supply of 99 Mo without highly enriched uranium. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) supports this objective through collaborative research and development with industrial partners. Niowave Inc., a current partner, is currently designing a subcritical linear accelerator-driven system (ADS) and preparing for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s licensing process. Niowave’s system has the potential to efficiently supply medical radioisotopes. The technology includes a superconducting electron accelerator and a pile of both natural and low-enriched uranium (LEU) targets. The process fissions uranium and many valuable isotopes can then be extracted from the targets. Niowave is currently iterating through conceptual and detailed design processes for several system sizes. This report discusses UTA–2, which is at the demonstration stage. UTA–2 will validate numerical modeling results with experimental measurements before progressing to the detailed design of UTA–3, the commercial-sized ADS. The thermal-hydraulic behavior of the UTA–2 core design was numerically investigated using STAR-CCM+, as described in this report. STAR-CCM+, a state-of-the-art computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software that was commercially developed by Siemens, has an extensive user base and a set of validation studies. It is also compliant with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ Nuclear Quality Assurance 1 standard. Three cases are investigated in this report. Case 1 quantified the temperature field within the UTA–2 assembly and water tank using only conduction as the method of thermal energy transport. This simplified approach was overly conservative and yielded wetted cladding temperatures above the coolant saturation temperature. In this case, the maximum temperature of the wetted cladding surface of the highest power rod exceeded the saturation temperature of water by 63.8°C. Because of the overly conservative approach taken in Case 1 and its negative subcooled margin, buoyancy-driven natural circulation flow physics were implemented in Case 2. Adding coolant motion significantly distributed the thermal energy of the system through convective heat transfer. This relatively small amount of convective heat transfer significantly reduced system temperatures and increased the subcooled margin from –63.8 to 61.3°C. This margin confirmed that no boiling was expected during normal operation of UTA–2 at 230 W. Case 3 had no additional physics models but considered an overpower event during which the power of each LEU and natural uranium rod was at its respective peak values. This resulted in a study with the total assembly power equal to 176% of the nominal power of 230 W considered in Cases 1 and 2. The resulting natural circulation flows were slightly enhanced. The subcooled margin decreased slightly to 46.3°C, which is still a significant margin to local boiling of the water within the tank. This margin confirmed that no boiling was expected during an abnormal operation of UTA–2 at 406 W.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗