Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Silicon anodes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Optimal Microstructure of Silicon Monoxide as the Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Because of its metastable nature, silicon monoxide (SiO) consists of Si nanodomains in an amorphous matrix of SiO 2 . The microstructure of SiO, including SiO 2 , Si domains, and interphase (SiO x ) between domains, was modified via an annealing treatment in argon gas and thoroughly characterized by in-situ and ex-situ X-ray diffraction, pair distribution function, and electron energy loss spectroscopy. Two microstructure transformation routes were observed during the annealing process: (1) at a temperature of <800 °C, the annealing treatment was found to affect mainly the structural conformation of the amorphous SiO 2 matrix and the interphase, while (2) an annealing temperature of >800 °C led to significant Si nanodomain growth. Here, we found that the microstructure has a great impact on the electrochemical performance of SiO. The optimized microstructure of SiO appears to be achieved through annealing treatment at 800 °C or less, which results in interphase (SiO x ) reduction without causing significant Si domain growth. This work provides a deep insight into the domain and interphase transformation of SiO upon heat treatment. The improved understanding of the relationship between SiO microstructure and its electrochemical behavior will enable proper design and development of high-energy SiO for lithium-ion batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

First Principles Study of Aluminum Doped Polycrystalline Silicon as a Potential Anode Candidate in Li‐ion Batteries

Addressing sustainable energy storage remains crucial for transitioning to renewable sources. While Li‐ion batteries have made significant contributions, enhancing their capacity through alternative materials remains a key challenge. Micro‐sized silicon is a promising anode material due to its tenfold higher theoretical capacity compared to conventional graphite. However, its substantial volumetric expansion during cycling impedes practical application due to mechanical failure and rapid capacity fading. A novel approach is proposed to mitigate this issue by incorporating trace amounts of aluminum into the micro‐sized silicon electrode using ball milling. Density functional theory (DFT) is employed to establish a theoretical framework elucidating how grain boundary sliding, a key mechanism involved in preventing mechanical failure is facilitated by the presence of trace aluminum at grain boundaries. This, in turn, reduces stress accumulation within the material, reducing the likelihood of failure. To validate the theoretical predictions, capacity retention experiments are conducted on undoped and Al‐doped micro‐sized silicon samples. In conclusion, the results demonstrate significantly reduced capacity fading in the doped sample, corroborating the theoretical framework and showcasing the potential of aluminum doping for improved Li‐ion battery performance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

SiO 2 Is Wasted Space in Single-Nanometer-Scale Silicon Nanoparticle-Based Composite Anodes for Li-Ion Electrochemical Energy Storage

The electrode processing conditions of silicon-based composite anodes play a pivotal role in the resulting interfacial chemical speciation and, thus, the electrochemical cycling behavior of the electrode. Systematically investigating how small chemical changes to the surface of the silicon nanoparticle (NP) affect larger, electrode-level properties is a strategy that will inform design principles to maximize electrode energy density and extend electrode lifetime. Here, we incorporate silicon nanoparticles (NPs) with an average diameter of 5.5 nm synthesized from the gas phase through a nonthermal plasma method into composite anode half-cell coin cells. We perform chemistry to functionalize the native hydride-terminated silicon NP surface with N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) to improve slurry properties and reduce the silicon reactivity prior to composite electrode fabrication. We construct composite electrodes from these silicon NPs and observe an 86% capacity retention over 100 cycles at a rate of C/5, with an initial silicon specific capacity of 2600 mAh/g. We expose the same Si NPs to water that completely oxidizes these small-diameter NPs to SiO 2 and find that the SiO 2 NPs in the same electrode configuration exhibit no obvious lithium alloying capacity in the electrochemical potential range of lithium silicide alloy formation. As this result stands in contrast to existing literature, we provide a discussion on the origin of the discrepancies.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Not all fugitives are bad: The case for using them to form low tortuosity - high porosity electrodes

This work focuses on the inclusion of an insoluble fugitive phase during slurry processing to form composite battery electrodes. The fugitive phases consist of natural derived products like alginic acid, sucrose, rice and potato starch, and carrageenans such as Irish Moss and synthetic pore-formers based on polymethyl methacrylate. The fugitive phases can be anaerobically thermally removed (350 °C) during binder crosslinking and electrode drying steps, resulting in electrodes with low tortuosities (approaching theoretical Bruggemann limits for spherical particles) and high porosities approaching 80%. The resulting ∼3 mg/cm 2 loaded electrodes suffer from poor electrical connectivity, lowering the effective material utilization, but represent an approach that could be utilized for the formation of solid-state batteries with infilling of materials into well-defined pores and optimized transport pathways.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Binary Cation Matrix Electrolyte and Its Effect on Solid Electrolyte Interphase Suppression and Evolution of Si Anode

An unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) has been recognized as one of the biggest challenges to commercializing silicon (Si) anodes for high-energy-density batteries. This work thoroughly investigates a binary cation matrix of Mg 2+ +Li + electrolyte and its role in SEI development, suppression, and evolution of a Si anode. Findings demonstrate that introducing Mg ions dramatically reduces the SEI growth before lithiation occurs, primarily due to the suppression of solvent reduction, particularly ethylene carbonate (EC) reduction. The Mg 2+ alters the Li + cation solvation environment as EC preferably participates in the oxophyllic Mg 2+ solvation sheath, thereby altering the solvent reduction process, resulting in a distinct SEI formation mechanism. The initial SEI formation before lithiation is reduced by 70% in the electrolyte with the presence of Mg 2+ cations. While the SEI continues to develop in the postlithiation, the inclusion of Mg ions results in an approximately 80% reduction in the postlithiation SEI growth. Continuous electrochemical cycling reveals that Mg 2+ plays a crucial role in stabilizing the deep-lithiated Si phases, which effectively mitigates side reactions, resulting in controlled SEI growth and stable interphase while eliminating complex Li x Si y formation. Mg ions promote the development of a notably more rigid and homogeneous SEI, characterized by a reduced dissipation (ΔD) in the Mg 2+ +Li + ion matrix compared to the solely Li + system. In conclusion, this report reveals how the Mg 2+ +Li + ion matrix affects the SEI evolution, viscoelastic properties, and electrochemical behavior at the Si interface in real time, laying the groundwork for devising strategies to enhance the performance and longevity of Si-based next-generation battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hydrophobic versus Hydrophilic Interfacial Coatings on Silicon Nanoparticles Teach Us How to Design the Solid Electrolyte Interphase in Silicon-Based Li-Ion Battery Anodes

Herein, we evaluate the effect of covalently attached molecular coating hydrophobicity on the surface of the silicon nanoparticle (Si NP) active anode material for Li-ion batteries. The experiments are a means to identify the interfacial properties that help minimize electrochemical side reactions during cycling. Preformed coatings on the Si NP surfaces prior to electrode fabrication mimic the ionically conducting and electronically insulating properties of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Hydrophilic oligomers such as polyethylene oxide (PEO) and other related structures are commonly identified as Li+-conducting components of the SEI. Here, we study the effect of such hydrophilic PEO versus hydrophobic alkyl molecular coatings on Si NP anode electrochemical performance. We also study the effect of the PEO oligomer length and the resulting effective thickness of the interfacial coating on the electrochemical performance. We find that PEO oligomers electrochemically isolate Si NPs when the PEO coating thickness approaches the electron tunneling distance of ~2.5 nm. Surprisingly, the thickness of the PEO-based coatings has a negligible effect on their ability to minimize electrochemical side reactions as measured by Coulombic efficiency. These results reveal how the interfacial coating on silicon anode materials should differ from an operando-formed SEI layer and discuss design strategies for an ideal interfacial active material coating based on these results.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

On the Efficacy of Repeat Voltage Holds for Conditioning and Calendar Life Testing of Graphite and Silicon Cells

Voltage-hold (V-hold) protocols have shown promise toward calendar lifetime analysis of cells with graphite (Gr) and silicon (Si) anodes. In this work, repeat V-holds are performed on Gr and Si cells paired with lithium iron phosphate cathodes to delineate their beneficial role in formation and conditioning. We find that V-hold at the top of charge supplements constant current cycling in conditioning the cell to higher capacities for both Gr and Si cells after the first V-hold. A reduced order model provides the irreversible capacity proportions of each V-hold. With each repeat V-hold, parasitic loss of lithium to the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) decreases on both Gr and Si cells. Gr cells show the square-root-of-time capacity loss behavior within 200 h of V-hold, indicative of its fast relaxation and low impact of reference performance test cycles on the SEI growth. Lifetime estimates from repeat V-holds on Gr can reach years. Si exhibits longer transition times from kinetic to diffusion-limited SEI growth, evidenced by the 400 h and 200 h holds showing square-root-of-time and linear behavior, respectively. Lifetime predictions from repeat V-holds on Si only reach 1–2 months, highlighting its limitations. Recommended duration of V-holds for Si cells should be ≥400 h.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Long cycle and calendar life of Si-based Li-ion batteries enabled by localized high-concentration electrolytes and their surprising water tolerance

Silicon-based anodes promise an increase in energy density for Li-ion batteries, yet they suffer from a poor calendar life. Researchers have posited that fluorinated lithium salt forms reactive side products that destroy the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), even without cycling. HF is one such reactive side product formed from trace water contamination in the electrolyte. Some electrolytes, such as localized high concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) may improve cell stability in highly reactive systems, such as Li metal and Si. In the present study, LHCEs containing 200-300 ppm of water retained up to 8% greater capacity (1200-1300 mAh/g Si) in calendar life tests over 200 days compared to dried electrolytes (< 20 ppm water). Calendar aging took place at 100% state of charge. Cells with 200-300 ppm water performed comparably to cells with 20 ppm water in cycle life tests (900-1000 mAh/g Si) . Even adding 1000 ppm water did not lead to rapid capacity fade in cells undergoing cycle life tests. Nano-FTIR spectroscopy revealed chemical and structural differences in the SEI for cells with 1000 ppm water compared to 200-300 ppm water. The SEI differences, including increased Li2O concentration, may have contributed to improved calendar life. This research reveals the capabilities of LHCEs to improve the calendar and cycle life of Si-based Li-ion batteries, despite the presence of a highly reactive contaminant.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

The Effect of Sulfuric Acid Anodization on the Electrochemical Properties of Aluminum Alloy AlSi 10 Mg Prepared by Selective Laser Melting

Aluminum alloy, AlSi 10 Mg, prepared by selective laser melt (SLM) fabrication was anodized in 9.8% sulfuric acid (Type II) at 15 V for a total of 23 min. Experiments were performed to study the potentiostatic anodization process and its effects on the oxide coating morphology, thickness, and electrochemical properties of the alloy. Prior to anodization, the alloy microstructure is composed of aluminum cells encapsulated in a silicon network. Anodizing the abraded and polished AlSi 10 Mg surface produced a porous oxide layer with a thickness of 5μm. The oxide coating weight was 698 ± 29 mg/ft 2 . The oxide coating forms in the aluminum cells that are isolated from one another by the silicon eutectic phase. In electrochemical tests, the anodic and cathodic potentiodynamic polarization currents were suppressed by factors of 15× and 215×, respectively, as compared to the unanodized controls. The data indicate the anodic oxide coating suppresses the cathodic more than the anodic reaction rate. Linear polarization resistance (R p ) values increased by 279× after anodization. The corrosion current density values (j corr ) decreased by 133× after anodization. Taken together, the electrochemical data indicate the anodic oxide coating (unsealed) increases the corrosion resistance of the SLM alloy by two orders of magnitude.

Electrochemistry↗
DOE OSTI2024

Modeling Reversible Volume Change in Automotive Battery Cells with Porous Silicon Oxide-Graphite Composite Anodes

Automotive battery manufacturers are working to improve the individual cell and overall pack design by increasing durability, performance, and range, while reducing cost, and active material volume change is a key aspect that needs to be considered during this design process. Recently, silicon oxide-graphite composite anodes are being explored to increase total anode capacity while maintaining a tolerable amount of cell level reversible volume expansion due to the relatively lower reversible volume change of the silicon oxide compared to pure battery grade or metallurgical grade silicon. To predict the blended anode response and contribution to the overall cell volume change, we integrated the mechanical behavior of the individual active materials with the multi-species, multi-reaction model to predict the state-of-lithiation of the active materials in the cell at a given potential. The resulting simulations illustrate the tradeoff in volume change between the silicon oxide and the graphite during cell operation. This type of modeling approach will allow designers to virtually consider the impact of cell level and pack level design changes on overall system mechanical performance for automotive and grid storage applications, namely that relatively small addition of silicon containing materials can drive a significant increase in the volume change at the cell level, as demonstrated by the 5 wt% addition of silicon oxide accounting for half of the overall volume change in the cell.

Garrick, Taylor R. (ORCID:0000000322518129)↗
DOE OSTI2021

Facile Synthesis of Micrometer-sized Hierarchical Porous Si@C Anodes for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries

Extensive studies have been conducted to determine if replacing graphite anodes with silicon is feasible since silicon possesses a high capacity and is an abundant resource; however, Si anodes suffer significant volume changes during cycling, which pulverizes its structure and subsequently causes rapid capacity fading. We used SiO2 nanoparticles (nSiO2) and low-cost coal-derived humic acid as a feedstock to synthesize high performance Si-C anodes for Li-ion Batteries through spray drying, calcination, and magnesiothermic reductions. Our Si-C anodes features micrometer-sized porous Si coated with a graphitized carbon shell (mpSi@C). The hierarchical graphitized carbon shell and porous silicon structure relieve the mechanical stress of the Si phase upon cycling, which stabilizes the structure. This mpSi@C composite design allows for a high initial discharge capacity of 2199.9 mAh g-1 at 0.1 A g-1 and a cycling performance of 68% capacity retention after 100 cycles at 1.0 A g-1. The multipoint contact between the Si anode and C structure allows for a remarkable performance rate of 566.3 mAh g-1 at 5.0 A g-1.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2025

Comparative Study of Vinylene Carbonate and Lithium Difluoro(oxalate)borate Additives in a SiO x /Graphite Anode Lithium-Ion Battery in the Presence of Fluoroethylene Carbonate

The SiO x /graphite composite is recognized as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), owing to the high theoretical capacity of SiO x combined with the excellent stability of graphite. However, the inherent disadvantage of volume expansion in silicon-based anodes places significant challenges on the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and severely degrades the electrochemical performance. Rational formulation of electrolyte, including its additives, is crucial in accommodating and optimizing the composition of the SEI and enhancing the cell performance. In this work, we present a comparative study of vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) additives combined with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) in the electrolyte for SiO x /graphite∥LiNi 1–x–y–z Co x Mn y Al z O 2 full cells. VC outperformed LiDFOB as an additive, delivering higher capacity cycling, higher Coulombic efficiency, and better cycle stability up to 400 cycles. XPS and impedance analyses reveal that LiDFOB contributed to SEI/CEI with both a lower proportion of LiF and a higher proportion of poly(VC), which tended to produce higher cell impedance. XRD and XANES further indicated that using the LiDFOB additive, the NCMA cycled to a shallower degree than that of the VC additive. Although the VC additive maintained a higher capacity up to 400 cycles, microstrain and SEM analyses show a higher strained NCMA along with clear evidence of cracking over the surface of the NCMA particle in VC-based electrolyte but not in LiDFOB. In conclusion, this suggests that the negative influence of LiDFOB at the anode (inferior SEI) supersedes the negative impact of both a cracked NCMA and a deeper cycled NCMA and SiO x -based anode.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Li2O-Based Cathode Additives Enabling Prelithiation of Si Anodes

Low first-cycle Coulombic efficiency is especially poor for silicon (Si)-based anodes due to the high surface area of the Si-active material and extensive electrolyte decomposition during the initial cycles forming the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Therefore, developing successful prelithiation methods will greatly benefit the development of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) utilizing Si anodes. In pursuit of this goal, in this study, lithium oxide (Li2O) was added to a LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 (NMC622) cathode using a scalable ball-milling approach to compensate for the initial Li loss at the anode. Different milling conditions were tested to evaluate the impact of particle morphology on the additive performance. In addition, Co3O4, a well-known oxygen evolution reaction catalyst, was introduced to facilitate the activation of Li2O. The Li2O + Co3O4 additives successfully delivered an additional capacity of 1116 mAh/gLi2O when charged up to 4.3 V in half cells and 1035 mAh/gLi2O when charged up to 4.1 V in full cells using Si anodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nanoscale Three-Dimensional Imaging of Degradation in Composite Si-Containing Anodes

The use of silicon (Si) in next-generation lithium-ion battery (LIB) anodes has the potential to dramatically improve electrochemical performance over current LIB graphite (Gr) anodes, due to silicon’s higher specific capacity.1 However, widespread implementation of Si-containing anodes is inhibited by issues such as significant Si volume expansion during lithiation and an unstable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), resulting in unreliable performance and poor cycle life. Currently, composite anodes with both Si and graphite active materials are used to increase capacity and mitigate some of the limitations associated with Si. In composite electrodes with a heterogeneous distribution of components with varying electrical properties (including Si, Gr, conductive carbon additive, and binder), it is important to understand the local distribution of each component to correlate with electrochemical processes, particularly localized degradation and heterogeneous aging, and to optimize performance. To investigate Si-containing composite anodes in the nanoscale, we use scanning spreading resistance microscopy (SSRM), a form of scanning probe microscopy (SPM) that probes local electronic resistivity. By examining the intrinsic electronic resistivity contrast between the anode components, separate phases can be distinguished and understood within the composite structure.2 This work studies the effect of electrochemical cycling in two different electrolytes on component distribution and aging by comparing the electrical and structural evolution of composite Si-graphite electrodes and SEI before and after charge-discharge cycling. 1. W. J. Zhang. A review of the electrochemical performance of alloy anodes for lithium-ion batteries J. Power Sources 196 13–24 (2011). 2. C. Stetson, Z. Huey, A. Downard, Z. Li, B. To, A. Zakutayev, C.-S. Jiang, M. Al-Jassim, D. Finegan, S.-D. Han and S. DeCaluwe: Three-Dimensional Mapping of Resistivity and Microstructure of Composite Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano Letters Accepted (2020).

ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗