Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “solid electrolyte interface”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

All‐Solid‐State Batteries With Mechanically Stable Interfaces Consisting of a Zero‐Strain Cation‐Disordered Rocksalt Cathode

Interface stabilization is critical to the development of working all‐solid‐state batteries. Rigid cathode/solid electrolyte interfaces often disintegrate due to anisotropic volume change of cathode‐active materials, resulting in irreversible capacity loss. Herein, we demonstrate that Li 1.211 Mo 0.467 Cr 0.3 O 2 (LMCO), a pioneering cation‐disordered rocksalt oxide (DRX) cathode that has intrinsically small volume change upon lithium intercalation, can be integrated with a thiophosphate‐based solid electrolyte for all‐solid‐state batteries. Interface stability of the all‐solid LMCO cell was investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, X‐ray micro‐computed tomography, and electron microscopy. Since LMCO was initially synthesized as a layered phase exhibiting a large volume change, interface disintegration can be observable in the early cycles. As layered LMCO phase‐transformed into DRX LMCO in subsequent cycles, reintegration of the interfaces occurs within a pressurized cell as a result of its zero‐stain behavior. Consequently, the DRX LMCO cathode maintains interface integrity, and thus electrical wiring, over an extended number of cycles, leading to improved capacity retention with small internal cell resistance.

DRX↗
DOE OSTI2021

Review on Interface and Interphase Issues in Sulfide Solid-State Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li-Metal Batteries

All-solid-state batteries have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional Li-ion batteries owing to their higher energy density and safety, which stem from their use of inorganic solid-state electrolytes instead of flammable organic liquid electrolytes. Among various candidates, sulfide solid-state electrolytes are particularly promising for the development of high-energy all-solid-state Li metal batteries because of their high ionic conductivity and deformability. However, a significant challenge remains as their inherent instability in contact with electrodes forms unstable interfaces and interphases, leading to degradation of the battery performance. In this review article, we provide an overview of the key issues for the interfaces and interphases of sulfide solid-state electrolyte systems as well as recent progress in understanding such interface and interphase formation and potential solutions to stabilize them. In addition, we provide perspectives on future research directions in this field.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Molecular Interlocking Multidimensional Modulations of Cathode‐Electrolyte Interface for Constructing High Energy Density Quasi‐Solid‐State Batteries

Gel polymers are regarded as a promising candidate electrolyte for lithium-metal quasi-solid-state batteries, primarily due to their high ionic conductivity and solid-liquid synergistic properties. However, challenges such as interfacial side reactions, limitations in Li + transport caused by interfacial issues, and leaching of transition metals from the cathode have yet to be effectively solved. Herein, a novel gel electrolyte modulation strategy based on electrostatic filler assembly is proposed to address the issues of ineffective capacity utilization and inadequate cycling stability of high-energy-density cathode materials in solid-state lithium-ion batteries. It constructs a 3D interpenetrating charge-bridge network that effectively tackles the phase-separation challenge between fillers and electrolytes at the molecular level. Meanwhile, the molecular interlocking structure effectively inhibits the electrolyte erosion. More critically, it optimizes and stabilizes the cathode-electrolyte interface film, which facilitates the conduction of Li + -ions through a size-sieving mechanism. Consequently, this strategy enables effective adaptation across diverse high-energy-density cathode materials with satisfactory capacity performance (170.4 mAh g −1 at 4.5 V/1 C for LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 and 194.0 mAh g −1 at 4.3 V/1 C for LiNi 0.9 Co 0.08 Mn 0.02 O 2 ). In conclusion, this investigation offers a straightforward and effective reference for addressing the critical challenges of ionic transport and interface stabilization in the design of gel electrolytes.

cathode-electrolyte interface↗
DOE OSTI2024

In-situ electrochemical optical techniques in the investigation of lithium interfacial phenomena with a liquid and a solid-state electrolyte

An in-situ electrochemical optical diagnosis is the key to the investigation of electrode interface during a redox reaction. Because the morphology changes particularly, dendrite formation, dendrite shapes, solid electrolyte interface formation and gas generation can be revealed visually. The challenge of ensuring uniform current density on a flat Li anode in a liquid electrolyte was addressed and uniform Li plating was demonstrated. The dendrite shape change under different reduction current density was discussed. Here the Li dendrite shape change and the performance of Li anodes with a surface lamination of graphite and red phosphate were used as examples to demonstrate the capability of the in-situ optical cell. An in-situ electrochemical optical cell used in the investigation of the increasingly popular solid-state Li batteries has its own challenges. Due to the untransparent nature of a solid-state electrolyte, an optical investigation on a solid-state electrolyte Li battery needs to be done by exposing the cross-section of the cell. In addition, it is very difficult to assemble an optical cell with a brittle and fragile solid-state electrolyte in a glove box. A set of formation and transfer dies, and an optical cell were introduced. The Li dendrite growth at the interface can be observed in a solid-state Li cell.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Challenges in Lithium Metal Anodes for Solid-State Batteries

In this Perspective, we highlight recent progress and challenges related to the integration of lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries. While prior reports have suggested that solid electrolytes may be impermeable to lithium metal, this hypothesis has been disproven under a variety of electrolyte compositions and cycling conditions. Herein, we describe the mechanistic origins and importance of lithium filament growth and interphase formation in inorganic and organic solid electrolytes. Multimodal techniques that combine real and reciprocal space imaging and modeling will be necessary to fully understand nonequilibrium dynamics at these buried interfaces. Currently, most studies on lithium electrode kinetics at solid electrolyte interfaces are completed in symmetric Li–Li configurations. To fully understand the challenges and opportunities afforded by Li-metal anodes, full-cell experiments are necessary. Lastly, the impacts of operating conditions on solid-state batteries are largely unknown with respect to pressure, geometry, and break-in protocols. Given the rapid growth of this community and the diverse portfolio of solid electrolytes, we highlight the need for detailed reporting of experimental conditions and standardization of protocols across the community.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Maintaining a Flat Li Surface during the Li Stripping Process via Interface Design

Electroplating has been the main focus in mitigating the dendrite growth on the Li-metal electrode; however, the stripping process is equally critical, since the nonsmooth Li surface during stripping will lead to nonuniform local current density, planting the seeds for dendrite growth. In this paper, density functional theory (DFT) and kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) techniques were combined to investigate the vacancy evolution in Li interfaced with different solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) materials. It was found that the lithiophilic interface, such as Li/Li 2 O, repels vacancies into the bulk Li, so Li atoms can quickly fill the Li vacancies near the Li/Li 2 O interface and maintain a smooth Li surface. In contrast, the lithiophobic interface, such as Li/LiF, traps Li vacancies toward the interface, and the accumulated Li vacancies form voids and roughen the surface. The predicted critical stripping current density, below which a smooth Li surface will be maintained, is therefore much faster at the lithiophilic interface than that at the lithiophobic interface. It was further revealed that the lithiophilicity at different SEI or coating materials can be ranked as Li/Li 2 O > Li/LiPON > Li/Li 2 CO 3 > Li/LiF based on the calculated interfacial adhesion and accumulation of electron density at the interface. Furthermore, this suggests that interface and coating design at nanoscale can be effective for maintaining a smooth Li surface during the stripping process, solving another challenge to achieving a dendrite-free Li-metal electrode in both liquid and solid electrolytes.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Tuning the Anode–Electrolyte Interface Chemistry for Garnet-Based Solid-State Li Metal Batteries

Lithium (Li) metal anode is a promising candidate for high energy density solid-state batteries. However, the interface issues, including large interfacial resistance and Li dendrite generation, have always frustrated the attempt to commercialize solid-state Li metal batteries (SSLBs). Here, we report that infusing the garnet-type solid electrolytes (GSEs) with air-stable electrolyte Li 3 PO 4 (LPO) dramatically reduces the interfacial resistance to ~1 Ω cm 2 and achieves a high critical current density of 2.2 mA cm -2 under ambient condition due to enhanced interfacial stability to Li metal anode. The coated and infused LPO electrolytes not only improve the mechanical strength and Li-ion conductivity of grain boundaries, but also form a stable Li-ion conductive but electron-insulating LPO-derived solid-electrolyte interphase between Li metal and GSEs, and consequently eliminates the Li dendrites growth and prevents the direct reduction of GSEs by Li metal over a long cycle life. This interface engineering approach together with grain-boundary modification on GSEs represents a promising strategy to revolutionize the anode-electrolyte interface chemistry for SSLBs and provides new design strategy for other-types of solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Atomic layer deposited aluminum nitride for interface protection of lithium germanium thiophosphate solid electrolytes

Lithium germanium thiophosphate (LGPS) is an attractive solid-state electrolyte material due to its exceptionally high ionic conductivity (~1.2 × 10 –2 S cm –1 ), comparable to many organic liquid electrolytes commonly used in batteries. Despite the high conductivity of LGPS, the susceptibility of LGPS to deleterious degradation reactions has impeded its commercial adoption into solid-state batteries. In particular, the poor voltage stability of LGPS with high-voltage cathode or lithium metal potentials often results in dramatically increasing cell impedance during galvanic cycling. Here, we use aluminum nitride (AlN) as a protection layer for Li metal anode, applied directly to the LGPS at 250 °C using plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition, to enhance cell performance by preventing LGPS-Li metal reactions. We compare the surface chemistry and electrochemical cycling performance of atomic layer-deposited AlN grown using both plasma N 2 and NH 3 precursors. Galvanostatic cycling and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy show that AlN-coated LGPS cells perform better than bare LGPS cells in contact with Li metal anodes, with the AlN able to improve cycling longevity by over a factor of 3 in certain cases. Finally, we utilize x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) line scans to highlight the slow room-temperature reactivity between AlN and evaporated lithium metal, and a computational model is built to aid further XPS analysis.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Operando Infrared Nanospectroscopy of the Silicon/Electrolyte Interface during Initial Stages of Solid-Electrolyte-Interphase Layer Formation

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is a critical component in Li-ion batteries; however, its nanoscale structure and composition and unstable nature make it difficult to characterize and ascertain primary functional mechanisms. We use operando nanoscale Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (nano-FTIR) with a broadband synchrotron IR source to study the SEI formation on a thin-film Si electrode at nanometer-scale spatial resolution as a function of time and voltage. By probing the Si/carbonate electrolyte interface through a 25 nm-thick amorphous Si window/electrode, we detect molecular vibrational modes within a 10s of nanometers region adjacent to the Si surface and observe that PF6 – anions react to form LiF at 0.5 V. Spatially resolved nano-FTIR spectra showcase subtle nanoscale heterogeneities in the initial solid/liquid interface and the resulting deposited LiF. With its nanoscale resolution and high chemical specificity, operando nano-FTIR provides unique insights into the dynamics and heterogeneous formation of SEIs and opens opportunities for connecting nanoscale interfacial properties to bulk performance metrics.

Dopilka, Andrew↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Review on Solid State Batteries: Life Cycle Perspectives

This report briefly reviews the characteristics of solid-state batteries (SSBs) and the life-cycle analysis (LCA) studies that have been completed for SSBs. Compared with conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), SSBs offer improved safety and potentially higher energy density — both enabled by replacing liquid electrolytes with solid electrolytes and using lithium metal anodes. Several challenges impede the commercialization of SSBs, primarily related to the stability of the interface between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes. Several options are under consideration for SSB electrolyte and cathode chemistries. As a result, the production processes for these components and the corresponding battery packs are still under development and can differ significantly from those used for conventional LIB pack production. A robust comparison of SSBs with LIBs through LCA is important to analyze the environmental benefits and challenges associated with this alternative battery system. While the literature provides only a few LCA studies focused on SSBs, with significant uncertainty in their life-cycle inventories (LCIs), those studies collectively suggest that solid electrolyte manufacturing is the major environmental hotspot, followed by cathode and anode production.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Control of Two Solid Electrolyte Interphases at the Negative Electrode of an Anode‐Free All Solid‐State Battery based on Argyrodite Electrolyte

Abstract Anode‐free all solid‐state batteries (AF‐ASSBs) employ “empty” current collector with three active interfaces that determine electrochemical stability; lithium metal – Solid electrolyte (SE) interphase (SEI‐1), lithium – current collector interface, and collector – SE interphase (SEI‐2). Argyrodite Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl) solid electrolyte (SE) displays SEI‐2 containing copper sulfides, formed even at open circuit. Bilayer of 140 nm magnesium/30 nm tungsten (Mg/W‐Cu) controls the three interfaces and allows for state‐of‐the‐art electrochemical performance in half‐cells and fullcells. AF‐ASSB with NMC811 cathode achieves 150 cycles with Coulombic efficiency (CE) above 99.8%. With high mass‐loading cathode (8.6 mAh cm −2 ), AF‐ASSB retains 86.5% capacity after 45 cycles at 0.2C. During electrodeposition of Li, gradient Li‐Mg solid solution is formed, which reverses upon electrodissolution. This promotes conformal wetting/dewetting by Li and stabilizes SEI‐1 by lowering thermodynamic driving force for SE reduction. Inert refractory W underlayer is required to prevent ongoing formation of SEI‐2 that also drives electrochemical degradation. Inert Mo and Nb layers likewise protect Cu from corroding, while Li‐alloying layers (Mg, Sn) are less effective due to ongoing volume changes and associated pulverization. Mechanistic explanation for observed Li segregation within alloying Li x Mg layer is provided through mesoscale modelling, considering opposing roles of diffusivity differences and interfacial stresses.

Wang, Yixian [Materials Science and Engineering Pr↗
DOE OSTI2024

Functionalization of Cathode–Electrolyte Interface with Ionic Liquids for High-Performance Quasi-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: A Low-Sulfur Loading Study

We introduce a quasi-solid-state electrolyte lithium-sulfur (Li–S) battery (QSSEB) based on a novel Li-argyrodite solid-state electrolyte (SSE), Super P–Sulfur cathode, and Li-anode. The cathode was prepared using a water-based carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) solution and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) as the binder while Li6PS5F0.5Cl0.5 SSE was synthesized using a solvent-based process, via the introduction of LiF into the argyrodite crystal structure, which enhances both the ionic conductivity and interface-stabilizing properties of the SSE. Ionic liquids (IL) were prepared using lithium bis(trifluoromethyl sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) as the salt, with pre-mixed pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethyl sulfonyl)imide (PYR) as solvent and 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) as diluent, and they were used to wet the SSE–electrode interfaces. The effect of IL dilution, the co-solvent amount, the LiTFSI concentration, the C rate at which the batteries are tested and the effect of the introduction of SSE in the cathode, were systematically studied and optimized to develop a QSSEB with higher capacity retention and cyclability. Interfacial reactions occurring at the cathode–SSE interface during cycling were also investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy supported by ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. This work offers a new insight into the intimate interfacial contacts between the SSE and carbon–sulfur cathodes, which are critical for improving the electrochemical performance of quasi-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Three-dimensional Zn-based alloys for dendrite-free aqueous Zn battery in dual-cation electrolytes

Aqueous zinc-ion batteries, in terms of integration with high safety, environmental benignity, and low cost, have attracted much attention for powering electronic devices and storage systems. However, the interface instability issues at the Zn anode caused by detrimental side reactions such as dendrite growth, hydrogen evolution, and metal corrosion at the solid (anode)/liquid (electrolyte) interface impede their practical applications in the fields requiring long-term performance persistence. Despite the rapid progress in suppressing the side reactions at the materials interface, the mechanism of ion storage and dendrite formation in practical aqueous zinc-ion batteries with dual-cation aqueous electrolytes is still unclear. Herein, we design an interface material consisting of forest-like three-dimensional zinc-copper alloy with engineered surfaces to explore the Zn plating/stripping mode in dual-cation electrolytes. The three-dimensional nanostructured surface of zinc-copper alloy is demonstrated to be in favor of effectively regulating the reaction kinetics of Zn plating/stripping processes. The developed interface materials suppress the dendrite growth on the anode surface towards high-performance persistent aqueous zinc-ion batteries in the aqueous electrolytes containing single and dual cations. This work remarkably enhances the fundamental understanding of dual-cation intercalation chemistry in aqueous electrochemical systems and provides a guide for exploring high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries and beyond.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Na 3 Zr 2 Si 2 PO 12 Solid Electrolyte Membrane for High‐Performance Seawater Battery

Abstract Seawater batteries (SWBs) have gained tremendous interest in the electrochemical energy storage research field because of their low cost, natural abundance, and potential use for long‐duration energy storage. Advancing a SWB to demonstration projects is plagued by the poor electrochemical performance stemming from the poor interfaces of the solid electrolyte (SE), as well as the structural and chemical instabilities and sluggish ionic transport properties. In this study, the anode compartment of a surrogate SWB is constructed with a Na | SE | hard carbon configuration, and tailored dopants are introduced into the Nasicon‐type Na 3 Zr 2 Si 2 PO 12 (NZSP) SE membrane. After doping with TiO 2 , a much more densely packed pellet with uniformly distributed porous structure is obtained. Changes in surface chemistry and local structure in the bulk are observed, which are believed to contribute to the improved ionic conductivity and higher critical current density of the TiO 2 ‐doped NZSP. Stable cycling performance with reversible capacities based on different Na storage mechanisms are also demonstrated.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Understanding LIB Battery Electrodes Through Classical Electrochemical Interface Theory

Classical models of the electrochemical interface can be applied to complex and dynamic electrodes to understand important mechanisms that are relevant to device-level phenomena like calendar aging or cycle life. Here, we show that negative alloy electrodes with wide electrochemical windows cannot be assumed to have static interfaces throughout all states of charge. Under high states of charge, the interface -including the solid electrolyte interphase - has characteristics that resemble a highly polarized electrode far from the point of zero charge. Under these conditions, the interface can be understood through the Helmholtz model. At lower states of charge, the interface capacitance decreases and the space charge layer length increases. This transformation resembles a metal electrode approaching the point of zero charge which is understood through the Gouy-Chapman-Stern-Grahame model of the electrochemical interface. This transformation happens at both silicon and carbon-coated silicon interfaces. From voltage-limited cycling experiments, in the limit of the diffuse double layer, the silicon electrode impedance rises significantly in the first few cycles. This rise is related to the continuous electrochemical reduction of electrolyte components from an interface that is not electronically screened from the electrolyte. In other words, an electrode interface for batteries should resemble a 'Helmholtz-like' structure.

anode↗
DOE OSTI2023

Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries' safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li 6 PS 5 Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFPAs delithiation, insulating the electrolyte-electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 , LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li 6 PS 5 Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO 3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP-sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon-electrolyte interface.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

The role of ionic liquids in resolving the interfacial chemistry for (quasi-) solid-state batteries

Interfacial issues impede the advancement of current solid state battery technology; thus, interface engineering approaches are necessary to enable solid-state configuration. The advantage of solid-state cells stems from their low flammability and high electrochemical stability. Ionic liquids are viscous and nonflammable compounds that possess the requisite physical properties while optimizing the interface between solid electrodes and solid electrolytes, accelerating interfacial ion transport and enabling the fabrication of engineered interphases via the supply of robust chemical building blocks. In conclusion, this review summarizes the roles of ionic liquids in solid-state batteries focusing on the interface, with insights into their functionality as well as highlighting their applicability in the next generation battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Method—Using Microelectrodes to Explore Solid Polymer Electrolytes

Solid polymer electrolytes are an emerging technology in electrochemistry driven by their use in energy applications such as fuel cells, electrolyzers, and solid-state batteries. Compared to traditional liquid electrolytes, solid polymer electrolytes provide safer, cheaper, and potentially improved device performance. However, there is a lack of standard experimental methods for studying solid electrolytes. Microelectrodes have inherent benefits capable of filling this experimental gap due primarily to their integration into model electrochemical cells with solid electrolytes that represent complex interfaces, enabling additional insight into reaction processes. In this tutorial review, we explore the use of microelectrodes to study solid polymer electrolytes, beginning with a brief history of the field including common experimental cell designs and their benefits and drawbacks. Methods of evaluating essential kinetic and mass-transport parameters are then examined. In addition, the key studies of the past 30 years utilizing microelectrode cells and solid polymer electrolytes are summarized, with important results highlighted and compared. Finally, future studies of solid polymer electrolytes with microelectrodes and potential new avenues of research are commented on.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗