Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “solid electrolyte interface”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

Investigating the Chemical Reactivity of Lithium Silicate Model SEI Layers

Silicon anodes suffer from an unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer that contributes to undesirable capacity fade with cycling. A key part to addressing this unstable SEI formation is to examine how certain components of the SEI react with the electrolyte over time. One SEI component that has not been thoroughly studied in the context of the chemical reactivity against the electrolyte is lithiated silicate. Four model silicate thin films with increasing lithium content were deposited by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering to study how the lithiation of the native oxide on a silicon anode affects the chemical stability of the anode surface. SiO2, Li2Si2O5, Li2SiO3, and Li3SiOx films were exposed to 1.2 M LiPF6 in the 3:7 wt% ethylene carbonate/ethyl methyl carbonate (EC/EMC) electrolyte for periods of time that are representative of the amount of time it takes to undergo cell formations. Soaked samples were rinsed, dried, and characterized by a combination of attenuated total reflectance-infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), focused ion beam-secondary electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profiling. It was found that the rate of the decrease in film thickness of the silicates exposed to the electrolyte over time increases as a function of the lithium content in the thin film. This reaction involves HF etching and LiPF6 salt degradation leading to silicate loss and fluorination throughout the bulk. Understanding this chemical instability is critical to determining the overall mechanism of SEI degradation over time.

ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS,ENERGY STORAGE↗

Comparative Study of Vinylene Carbonate and Lithium Difluoro(oxalate)borate Additives in a SiO x /Graphite Anode Lithium-Ion Battery in the Presence of Fluoroethylene Carbonate

The SiO x /graphite composite is recognized as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), owing to the high theoretical capacity of SiO x combined with the excellent stability of graphite. However, the inherent disadvantage of volume expansion in silicon-based anodes places significant challenges on the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and severely degrades the electrochemical performance. Rational formulation of electrolyte, including its additives, is crucial in accommodating and optimizing the composition of the SEI and enhancing the cell performance. In this work, we present a comparative study of vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) additives combined with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) in the electrolyte for SiO x /graphite∥LiNi 1–x–y–z Co x Mn y Al z O 2 full cells. VC outperformed LiDFOB as an additive, delivering higher capacity cycling, higher Coulombic efficiency, and better cycle stability up to 400 cycles. XPS and impedance analyses reveal that LiDFOB contributed to SEI/CEI with both a lower proportion of LiF and a higher proportion of poly(VC), which tended to produce higher cell impedance. XRD and XANES further indicated that using the LiDFOB additive, the NCMA cycled to a shallower degree than that of the VC additive. Although the VC additive maintained a higher capacity up to 400 cycles, microstrain and SEM analyses show a higher strained NCMA along with clear evidence of cracking over the surface of the NCMA particle in VC-based electrolyte but not in LiDFOB. In conclusion, this suggests that the negative influence of LiDFOB at the anode (inferior SEI) supersedes the negative impact of both a cracked NCMA and a deeper cycled NCMA and SiO x -based anode.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Quantification of Inactive Lithium and Solid–Electrolyte Interphase Species on Graphite Electrodes after Fast Charging

Rapid charging of Li-ion batteries is limited by lithium plating on graphite anodes, whereby Li+ ions are reduced to Li metal on the graphite particle surface instead of inserting between graphitic layers, which directly contributes to cell capacity loss because of the low reversibility of the Li plating/stripping process. Furthermore, precisely identifying the onset and amount of Li plating is therefore vital in order to remedy these issues. We demonstrate a titration technique with a detection limit of 20 nmol (5 × 10 –4 mAh) of Li that can be used to quantify inactive Li that remains on the graphite electrode after fast charging. The titration is extended to quantify the total amount of solid carbonate species and lithium acetylide (Li 2 C 2 ) within the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI), and electrochemical modeling is used to determine the Li plating exchange current density (10 A/m 2 ) and stripping efficiency (65%) of plated Li metal on graphite. These techniques provide a highly accurate measure of the onset of Li plating and quantitative insight into graphite SEI evolution during fast charging.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Stable Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layer Formed by Electrochemical Pretreatment of Gel Polymer Coating on Li Metal Anode for Lithium–Oxygen Batteries

Lithium (Li)-oxygen (O2) batteries (LOBs) exhibit the highest theoretical specific energy density among candidates of the next-generation energy storage systems, but the instability of Li metal anode (LMA), air electrode, and electrolyte largely limit the practical energy density of these batteries. Herein, we report an effective method to protect LMA against side reactions between LMA and crossover contaminants such as highly reactive oxygen moieties. A solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer rich in inorganic components was formed on a LMA coated with polyethylene oxide thin-film through an in-situ electrochemical pre-charging step under oxygen atmosphere. This uniformly distributed stiff SEI layer interacted with flexible polymer matrix and formed a submicron-sized gel-like polymer layer. This polymer supported SEI layer leads to much longer cycle life (130 vs. 65 cycles) as compared to those of pristine cell under the same testing conditions (1.0 mAh cm-2 at 0.2 mA cm-2 in the voltage range of 2 to 5 V without any catalysts). It is also very effective during low voltage (2 to 4.5 V) cycling with a redox mediator (0.1 and 0.15M (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl) oxidanyl). Therefore, this approach can be used to stabilize LMA/electrolytes interphase and improve the cycle life of rechargeable LOBs.

lithium-oxygen batteries, lithium metal anodes, ar↗

Quantifying Graphite Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Chemistry and its Impact on Fast Charging

The solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) enables the remarkable capacity retention of lithium-ion batteries, yet a comprehensive quantitative description of the SEI composition remains elusive. Using a combination of differential electrochemical mass spectrometry and mass spectrometry titration, we quantify graphite SEI components formed under electrolytes of varying salt concentrations. We find that, regardless of salt concentration, a conversion of initially deposited lithium ethylene dicarbonate to monocarbonates (likely lithium ethylene monocarbonate) and noncarbonate species occurs, and the extent of this conversion increases with electrolyte aging. Here, we additionally demonstrate that as the concentration increases (up to 2.0 M LiPF6), the SEI becomes progressively thinner with more LiF and less solid carbonates deposited. Finally, we reveal that less dead lithium formation and less solid carbonate deposition occur during prolonged fast charging for higher-concentration electrolytes. Because of the advantages imparted by a thinner SEI, the onset state of charge for lithium plating for the 2.0 M electrolyte is later than that predicted by a standard electrochemical model, underscoring the importance of explicit SEI effects in future electrochemical models.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Kinetic pathways of fast lithium transport in solid electrolyte interphases with discrete inorganic components

The transport of lithium ions in the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) has been previously accepted to proceed in two steps: a fast pore diffusion through the outer, porous organic layer followed by a slow knock-off or vacancy diffusion in the inner, dense inorganic layer. The second step is believed to be the rate-limiting step during fast-charging. In this study, we have intentionally constructed a thicker SEI (SEI-rich) structure on the surface of monoclinic Nb 2 O 5 (H-Nb 2 O 5 ) by adding LiNO 3 into a conventional ethylene carbonate based electrolyte. The electrochemical performance of two electrodes, one SEI-rich and one with few SEI (SEI-lean), was found to be almost the same, including their fast-charging capability and cycling stability, despite the significant difference in their SEI structure. Importantly, analysis using cryogenic scanning/transmission electron microscopy showed the discrete decoration of individual inorganic particles (e.g., Li 2 O) and amorphous species (LiN x O y /organic components) over the surface of H-Nb 2 O 5 . These discrete inorganic particles are in contradiction to the formation of dense inner inorganic layer, which has been commonly postulated. Based on these findings, we propose a new mechanism for Li ion transport through the SEI: one-step pore diffusion, without the second step slow diffusion. This one-step pore diffusion process provides an extremely fast Li ion transport, and effectively removes the kinetic limitation of Li ion transport in the SEI for fast charging. Finally, these results strongly suggest that the influence of SEI structure on the transport kinetics of lithium ions is much less significant than previously accepted. These results offer a new understanding of possible lithium ion transport pathway within SEI and may have implications for the future designs of fast-charging battery materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Understanding Solid Electrolyte Interphase Nucleation and Growth on Lithium Metal Surfaces

Experiments and theory are needed to decode the exact structure and distribution of components of a passivation layer formed at the anode surface of Li metal batteries, known as the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI). Due to the inherent dynamic behavior as well as the lithium reactivity, the SEI structure and its growth mechanisms are still unclear. This study uses molecular simulation and computational chemistry tools to investigate the initial nucleation and growth dynamics of LiOH and Li2O that provide us with thermodynamics and structural information about the nucleating clusters of each species. Following the most favorable pathways for the addition of each of the components to a given nascent SEI cluster reveals their preferential nucleation mechanisms and illustrates different degrees of crystallinity and electron density distribution that are useful to understand ionic transport through SEI blocks.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Effect of H + Exchange and Surface Impurities on Bulk and Interfacial Electrochemistry of Garnet Solid Electrolytes

Contact loss and current constriction pose significant challenges at the Li metal interface of solid-state batteries. For garnet-structured Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO), these effects are amplified by Li + /H + exchange and surface contamination reactions, which lead to conductivity losses and poor Li wetting. In this study, we utilize a variety of surface treatment processes across 37 cells to selectively induce proton exchange and contamination reactions in LLZO. The resulting bulk and surface chemistry is systematically characterized and correlated to changes in electrochemical properties. Additionally, we combine impedance analysis and finite element method modeling to deconvolute sources of impedance contributions at the Li metal interface. Specifically, we show that constriction impedance at the Li metal interface arises not solely from voids, but also from ionically-resistive surface contaminants. Further, these findings emphasize the connection between ionic conductivity and constriction, demonstrating that micron-scale ionically-resistive components increase constriction even with identical contact geometries. Finally, we leverage our comprehensive dataset to highlight unstable overpotential growth as a failure mechanism, additionally showing that the phase of a cell’s impedance is a sensitive indicator for the onset of interfacial instability. Overall, this study clarifies the impacts of proton exchange and surface contamination on electrochemical properties at the Li|solid electrolyte interface and elucidates insights that are generalizable to other solid-state battery systems.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

All‐Solid‐State Batteries With Mechanically Stable Interfaces Consisting of a Zero‐Strain Cation‐Disordered Rocksalt Cathode

Interface stabilization is critical to the development of working all‐solid‐state batteries. Rigid cathode/solid electrolyte interfaces often disintegrate due to anisotropic volume change of cathode‐active materials, resulting in irreversible capacity loss. Herein, we demonstrate that Li 1.211 Mo 0.467 Cr 0.3 O 2 (LMCO), a pioneering cation‐disordered rocksalt oxide (DRX) cathode that has intrinsically small volume change upon lithium intercalation, can be integrated with a thiophosphate‐based solid electrolyte for all‐solid‐state batteries. Interface stability of the all‐solid LMCO cell was investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, X‐ray micro‐computed tomography, and electron microscopy. Since LMCO was initially synthesized as a layered phase exhibiting a large volume change, interface disintegration can be observable in the early cycles. As layered LMCO phase‐transformed into DRX LMCO in subsequent cycles, reintegration of the interfaces occurs within a pressurized cell as a result of its zero‐stain behavior. Consequently, the DRX LMCO cathode maintains interface integrity, and thus electrical wiring, over an extended number of cycles, leading to improved capacity retention with small internal cell resistance.

DRX↗

Review on Interface and Interphase Issues in Sulfide Solid-State Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li-Metal Batteries

All-solid-state batteries have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional Li-ion batteries owing to their higher energy density and safety, which stem from their use of inorganic solid-state electrolytes instead of flammable organic liquid electrolytes. Among various candidates, sulfide solid-state electrolytes are particularly promising for the development of high-energy all-solid-state Li metal batteries because of their high ionic conductivity and deformability. However, a significant challenge remains as their inherent instability in contact with electrodes forms unstable interfaces and interphases, leading to degradation of the battery performance. In this review article, we provide an overview of the key issues for the interfaces and interphases of sulfide solid-state electrolyte systems as well as recent progress in understanding such interface and interphase formation and potential solutions to stabilize them. In addition, we provide perspectives on future research directions in this field.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Molecular Interlocking Multidimensional Modulations of Cathode‐Electrolyte Interface for Constructing High Energy Density Quasi‐Solid‐State Batteries

Gel polymers are regarded as a promising candidate electrolyte for lithium-metal quasi-solid-state batteries, primarily due to their high ionic conductivity and solid-liquid synergistic properties. However, challenges such as interfacial side reactions, limitations in Li + transport caused by interfacial issues, and leaching of transition metals from the cathode have yet to be effectively solved. Herein, a novel gel electrolyte modulation strategy based on electrostatic filler assembly is proposed to address the issues of ineffective capacity utilization and inadequate cycling stability of high-energy-density cathode materials in solid-state lithium-ion batteries. It constructs a 3D interpenetrating charge-bridge network that effectively tackles the phase-separation challenge between fillers and electrolytes at the molecular level. Meanwhile, the molecular interlocking structure effectively inhibits the electrolyte erosion. More critically, it optimizes and stabilizes the cathode-electrolyte interface film, which facilitates the conduction of Li + -ions through a size-sieving mechanism. Consequently, this strategy enables effective adaptation across diverse high-energy-density cathode materials with satisfactory capacity performance (170.4 mAh g −1 at 4.5 V/1 C for LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 and 194.0 mAh g −1 at 4.3 V/1 C for LiNi 0.9 Co 0.08 Mn 0.02 O 2 ). In conclusion, this investigation offers a straightforward and effective reference for addressing the critical challenges of ionic transport and interface stabilization in the design of gel electrolytes.

cathode-electrolyte interface↗

In-situ electrochemical optical techniques in the investigation of lithium interfacial phenomena with a liquid and a solid-state electrolyte

An in-situ electrochemical optical diagnosis is the key to the investigation of electrode interface during a redox reaction. Because the morphology changes particularly, dendrite formation, dendrite shapes, solid electrolyte interface formation and gas generation can be revealed visually. The challenge of ensuring uniform current density on a flat Li anode in a liquid electrolyte was addressed and uniform Li plating was demonstrated. The dendrite shape change under different reduction current density was discussed. Here the Li dendrite shape change and the performance of Li anodes with a surface lamination of graphite and red phosphate were used as examples to demonstrate the capability of the in-situ optical cell. An in-situ electrochemical optical cell used in the investigation of the increasingly popular solid-state Li batteries has its own challenges. Due to the untransparent nature of a solid-state electrolyte, an optical investigation on a solid-state electrolyte Li battery needs to be done by exposing the cross-section of the cell. In addition, it is very difficult to assemble an optical cell with a brittle and fragile solid-state electrolyte in a glove box. A set of formation and transfer dies, and an optical cell were introduced. The Li dendrite growth at the interface can be observed in a solid-state Li cell.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Challenges in Lithium Metal Anodes for Solid-State Batteries

In this Perspective, we highlight recent progress and challenges related to the integration of lithium metal anodes in solid-state batteries. While prior reports have suggested that solid electrolytes may be impermeable to lithium metal, this hypothesis has been disproven under a variety of electrolyte compositions and cycling conditions. Herein, we describe the mechanistic origins and importance of lithium filament growth and interphase formation in inorganic and organic solid electrolytes. Multimodal techniques that combine real and reciprocal space imaging and modeling will be necessary to fully understand nonequilibrium dynamics at these buried interfaces. Currently, most studies on lithium electrode kinetics at solid electrolyte interfaces are completed in symmetric Li–Li configurations. To fully understand the challenges and opportunities afforded by Li-metal anodes, full-cell experiments are necessary. Lastly, the impacts of operating conditions on solid-state batteries are largely unknown with respect to pressure, geometry, and break-in protocols. Given the rapid growth of this community and the diverse portfolio of solid electrolytes, we highlight the need for detailed reporting of experimental conditions and standardization of protocols across the community.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Maintaining a Flat Li Surface during the Li Stripping Process via Interface Design

Electroplating has been the main focus in mitigating the dendrite growth on the Li-metal electrode; however, the stripping process is equally critical, since the nonsmooth Li surface during stripping will lead to nonuniform local current density, planting the seeds for dendrite growth. In this paper, density functional theory (DFT) and kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) techniques were combined to investigate the vacancy evolution in Li interfaced with different solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) materials. It was found that the lithiophilic interface, such as Li/Li 2 O, repels vacancies into the bulk Li, so Li atoms can quickly fill the Li vacancies near the Li/Li 2 O interface and maintain a smooth Li surface. In contrast, the lithiophobic interface, such as Li/LiF, traps Li vacancies toward the interface, and the accumulated Li vacancies form voids and roughen the surface. The predicted critical stripping current density, below which a smooth Li surface will be maintained, is therefore much faster at the lithiophilic interface than that at the lithiophobic interface. It was further revealed that the lithiophilicity at different SEI or coating materials can be ranked as Li/Li 2 O > Li/LiPON > Li/Li 2 CO 3 > Li/LiF based on the calculated interfacial adhesion and accumulation of electron density at the interface. Furthermore, this suggests that interface and coating design at nanoscale can be effective for maintaining a smooth Li surface during the stripping process, solving another challenge to achieving a dendrite-free Li-metal electrode in both liquid and solid electrolytes.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Tuning the Anode–Electrolyte Interface Chemistry for Garnet-Based Solid-State Li Metal Batteries

Lithium (Li) metal anode is a promising candidate for high energy density solid-state batteries. However, the interface issues, including large interfacial resistance and Li dendrite generation, have always frustrated the attempt to commercialize solid-state Li metal batteries (SSLBs). Here, we report that infusing the garnet-type solid electrolytes (GSEs) with air-stable electrolyte Li 3 PO 4 (LPO) dramatically reduces the interfacial resistance to ~1 Ω cm 2 and achieves a high critical current density of 2.2 mA cm -2 under ambient condition due to enhanced interfacial stability to Li metal anode. The coated and infused LPO electrolytes not only improve the mechanical strength and Li-ion conductivity of grain boundaries, but also form a stable Li-ion conductive but electron-insulating LPO-derived solid-electrolyte interphase between Li metal and GSEs, and consequently eliminates the Li dendrites growth and prevents the direct reduction of GSEs by Li metal over a long cycle life. This interface engineering approach together with grain-boundary modification on GSEs represents a promising strategy to revolutionize the anode-electrolyte interface chemistry for SSLBs and provides new design strategy for other-types of solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Atomic layer deposited aluminum nitride for interface protection of lithium germanium thiophosphate solid electrolytes

Lithium germanium thiophosphate (LGPS) is an attractive solid-state electrolyte material due to its exceptionally high ionic conductivity (~1.2 × 10 –2 S cm –1 ), comparable to many organic liquid electrolytes commonly used in batteries. Despite the high conductivity of LGPS, the susceptibility of LGPS to deleterious degradation reactions has impeded its commercial adoption into solid-state batteries. In particular, the poor voltage stability of LGPS with high-voltage cathode or lithium metal potentials often results in dramatically increasing cell impedance during galvanic cycling. Here, we use aluminum nitride (AlN) as a protection layer for Li metal anode, applied directly to the LGPS at 250 °C using plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition, to enhance cell performance by preventing LGPS-Li metal reactions. We compare the surface chemistry and electrochemical cycling performance of atomic layer-deposited AlN grown using both plasma N 2 and NH 3 precursors. Galvanostatic cycling and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy show that AlN-coated LGPS cells perform better than bare LGPS cells in contact with Li metal anodes, with the AlN able to improve cycling longevity by over a factor of 3 in certain cases. Finally, we utilize x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) line scans to highlight the slow room-temperature reactivity between AlN and evaporated lithium metal, and a computational model is built to aid further XPS analysis.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗