SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Analysis of aircraft systems involves many disciplines: aerodynamics, structural dynamics, aeroacoustics, etc. - rotorcraft aeromechanics is a typical example. Gradient-based, multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) requires sensitivity analysis for all disciplines. Adjoint-based sensitivity analysis capabilities for: - Coupled aero/structure FUN3D/DYMORE system; - Coupled aero/acoustics FUN3D/ANOPP2 system.
The maximum principle is applied to minimum-time optimal-control problems, and an optimization algorithm is presented which can be implemented on a hybrid computer. The state and adjoint equations are set up on ASTRAC 2, a high-speed analog computer capable of 1000 differential equation solutions per second. The optimization algorithm is implemented on a PDP-9, an 18-bit, digital computer. The optimization scheme has global and local search phases and uses a vector optimization criterion. Second and third-order bang-bang control systems are studied as examples.
The purpose of this work is to use level set topology optimization to improve the design of a representative wing box structure for the NASA common research model. The objective is to minimize the total compliance of the structure under aerodynamic and body force loading, where the aerodynamic loading is coupled to the structural deformation. A taxi bump case was also considered, where only body force loads were applied. The trim condition that aerodynamic lift must balance the total weight of the aircraft is enforced by allowing the root angle of attack to change. The level set optimization method is implemented on an unstructured three-dimensional grid, so that the method can optimize a wing box with arbitrary geometry. Fast matching and upwind schemes are developed for an unstructured grid, which make the level set method robust and efficient. The adjoint method is used to obtain the coupled shape sensitivities required to perform aerostructural optimization of the wing box structure.
Traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes grid methods applied to aerodynamic shapeoptimization can struggle with the deformation of surface and volume grids at componentintersections, such as at wing-fuselage junctions. To overcome this, we propose an approachwhich utilizes curvilinear overset grids for the discretization of the domain, with the presenceof the body modeled using an immersed boundary method. This approach handles complexgeometries without the need for their explicit integration into the grid. The goal of this approachis to reduce grid generation time and allow for greater geometric freedom for component-basedaerodynamic shape optimization. Two different methods are presented: a source-term-basedand a ghost-node-based immersed boundary method. Flow analyses and adjoint solutionsobtained using the proposed methods show promising comparisons with standard body-fittedgrid methods. Preliminary aerodynamic shape optimization results obtained using one of theimmersed boundary methods are also presented.
A novel algorithm is presented that provides an improvement over a traditional parameter optimization method when solving time-optimal, finite-burn pseudo-rendezvous spacecraft trajectory problems. A hybrid optimization procedure is described that converts a set of multiple-impulses, representing high- or low-thrust maneuvers, to an exact time-optimal finite-burn trajectory for a thrust limited, constant exhaust velocity spacecraft. The Hybrid Method applies a control law derived from the Euler-Lagrange system of equations within the classical Indirect Method to a modern Direct Method. An iterative adjoint-control transformation and an evolving constraint vector are introduced to solve the optimal control two-point boundary value problem. This method requires no prior knowledge of the solution, which adds simplicity to the trajectory design process and aids automation. Examples are shown for low-thrust apogee raise maneuvers, non-coplanar Earth orbit transfers, and a modified Deep Space 1 low-thrust trajectory. A numerically significant improvement to objective cost is shown across all application problems compared to a traditional solution method, as well as a significant improvement to convergence speed for a select class of problems.
The study applies mathematical methods of control theory to the problem of control of fluid flow with the long-range objective of developing effective methods for the control of turbulent flows. Model problems are employed through the formalism and language of control theory to present the procedure of how to cast the problem of controlling turbulence into a problem in optimal control theory. Methods of calculus of variations through the adjoint state and gradient algorithms are used to present a suboptimal control and feedback procedure for stationary and time-dependent problems. Two types of controls are investigated: distributed and boundary controls. Several cases of both controls are numerically simulated to investigate the performances of the control algorithm. Most cases considered show significant reductions of the costs to be minimized. The dependence of the control algorithm on the time-descretization method is discussed.
An overview of twenty years of adjoint-based aerodynamic design research at NASA Langley Research Center is presented. Adjoint-based algorithms provide a powerful tool for efficient sensitivity analysis of complex large-scale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Unlike alternative approaches for which computational expense generally scales with the number of design parameters, adjoint techniques yield sensitivity derivatives of a simulation output with respect to all input parameters at the cost of a single additional simulation. With modern large-scale CFD applications often requiring millions of compute hours for a single analysis, the efficiency afforded by adjoint methods is critical in realizing a computationally tractable design optimization capability for such applications.
This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.0,including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for for-mal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.1
Cartesian-mesh methods are perhaps the most promising approach for addressing the issues of flow solution automation for aerodynamic design problems. In these methods, the discretization of the wetted surface is decoupled from that of the volume mesh. This not only enables fast and robust mesh generation for geometry of arbitrary complexity, but also facilitates access to geometry modeling and manipulation using parametric Computer-Aided Design (CAD) tools. Our goal is to combine the automation capabilities of Cartesian methods with an eficient computation of design sensitivities. We address this issue using the adjoint method, where the computational cost of the design sensitivities, or objective function gradients, is esseutially indepeudent of the number of design variables. In previous work, we presented an accurate and efficient algorithm for the solution of the adjoint Euler equations discretized on Cartesian meshes with embedded, cut-cell boundaries. Novel aspects of the algorithm included the computation of surface shape sensitivities for triangulations based on parametric-CAD models and the linearization of the coupling between the surface triangulation and the cut-cells. The objective of the present work is to extend our adjoint formulation to problems involving general shape changes. Central to this development is the computation of volume-mesh sensitivities to obtain a reliable approximation of the objective finction gradient. Motivated by the success of mesh-perturbation schemes commonly used in body-fitted unstructured formulations, we propose an approach based on a local linearization of a mesh-perturbation scheme similar to the spring analogy. This approach circumvents most of the difficulties that arise due to non-smooth changes in the cut-cell layer as the boundary shape evolves and provides a consistent approximation tot he exact gradient of the discretized abjective function. A detailed gradient accurace study is presented to verify our approach. Thereafter, we focus on a shape optimization problem for an Apollo-like reentry capsule. The optimization seeks to enhance the lift-to-drag ratio of the capsule by modifyjing the shape of its heat-shield in conjunction with a center-of-gravity (c.g.) offset. This multipoint and multi-objective optimization problem is used to demonstrate the overall effectiveness of the Cartesian adjoint method for addressing the issues of complex aerodynamic design. This abstract presents only a brief outline of the numerical method and results; full details will be given in the final paper.
Studies are conducted to determine the dynamic response of beams and plates to loads which are extreme within a certain class of admissible loads. Two approaches to this problem are suggested. In approach one, Pontryagin's maximality principle is regarded as an additional constraint. The optimality of design is then determined by standard numerical techniques. The "adjoint variable approach' to sensitivity of structural design is applied for a given inhomogeneous term. The inhomogeneous term is an extremal element of admissible load vectors, which constitute a closed subspace of a Sobolev space. Again, the maximality principle is invoked. While only beam and plate theory problems are used as examples, generalizations are easy to perceive.
A recently developed method for solving optimal trajectory problems uses a piecewise-polynomial representation of the state and control variables, enforces the equations of motion via a collocation procedure, and thus approximates the original calculus-of-variations problem with a nonlinear-programming problem, which is solved numerically. This paper identifies this method as a direct transcription method and proceeds to investigate the relationship between the original optimal-control problem and the nonlinear-programming problem. The discretized adjoint equation of the collocation method is found to have deficient accuracy, and an alternate scheme which discretizes the equations of motion using an explicit Runge-Kutta parallel-shooting approach is developed. Both methods are applied to finite-thrust spacecraft trajectory problems, including a low-thrust escape spiral, a three-burn rendezvous, and a low-thrust transfer to the moon.
The adjoint-based design capability in FUN3D is extended to allow efficient gradient-based optimization and design of concepts with highly integrated and distributed aero-propulsive systems. Previous work by the authors demonstrated the derivation and application of design sensitivities of flow power and vehicle forces with respect to design variables associated with actuator disk size, loading, and installation on the aircraft. In this work, calculations of propulsive power, shaft power, and propeller efficiency using blade element-based disk loading, along with sensitivity derivatives needed to perform adjoint-based design, have been implemented. This includes the derivation of additional design sensitivities for actuator disk variables with respect to the radial distributions of blade pitch angle and chord length. The blade element-based loading implementation allows us to tailor the actuator disk loading to provide greater design authority and calculate the torque imparted on the flow for the modeling of swirl effects. The design capability is demonstrated by the optimization of NASA's parallel hybrid electric PEGASUS aircraft concept. The optimization objective is the minimization of shaft power at the aerodynamic interface planes for the wing-mounted and tail-cone boundary layer ingestion propulsors, subject to vehicle performance and propulsive constraints.
This paper discusses the calculation of sensitivities. or derivatives, for optimization problems involving systems governed by differential equations and other state relations. The subject is examined from the point of view of nonlinear programming, beginning with the analytical structure of the first and second derivatives associated with such problems and the relation of these derivatives to implicit differentiation and equality constrained optimization. We also outline an error analysis of the analytical formulae and compare the results with similar results for finite-difference estimates of derivatives. We then attend to an investigation of the nature of the adjoint method and the adjoint equations and their relation to directions of steepest descent. We illustrate the points discussed with an optimization problem in which the variables are the coefficients in a differential operator.
Variational methods (VM) sensitivity analysis employed to derive the costate (adjoint) equations, the transversality conditions, and the functional sensitivity derivatives. In the derivation of the sensitivity equations, the variational methods use the generalized calculus of variations, in which the variable boundary is considered as the design function. The converged solution of the state equations together with the converged solution of the costate equations are integrated along the domain boundary to uniquely determine the functional sensitivity derivatives with respect to the design function. The application of the variational methods to aerodynamic shape optimization problems is demonstrated for internal flow problems at supersonic Mach number range. The study shows, that while maintaining the accuracy of the functional sensitivity derivatives within the reasonable range for engineering prediction purposes, the variational methods show a substantial gain in computational efficiency, i.e., computer time and memory, when compared with the finite difference sensitivity analysis.
Approximation to linear bounded phase coordinate control problem and continuous adjoint solution for optimum controller
Recent developments in the field of data assimilation have pointed to variational analysis (essentially least-squares fitting of a model solution to observed data) using the adjoint method as a new direction that holds the potential of major improvements over the current optimal interpolation method. This paper describes the initial effort in the development of a 4D variational analysis system. Although the development is based on the Goddard Laboratory for Atmospheres General Circulation Model (GCM), the methods and procedures described in this paper can be applied to any model. The adjoint code that computes the gradients needed in the analysis can be written directly from the GCM code. An easy error-detection technique was devised in the construction of the adjoint model. Also, a method of determining the weights and the preconditioning scales for the cases where model-generated data, which are error free, are used as observation is proposed. Two test experiments show that the dynamics part of the system has been successfully completed.
The detailed outer mold line shaping of a Mach 1.6, demonstrator-sized low-boom concept is presented. Cruise trim is incorporated a priori as part of the shaping objective, using an equivalent-area-based approach. Design work is performed using a gradient-driven optimization framework that incorporates a three-dimensional, nonlinear flow solver, a parametric geometry modeler, and sensitivities derived using the adjoint method. The shaping effort is focused on reducing the under-track sonic boom level using an inverse design approach, while simultaneously satisfying the trim requirement. Conceptual-level geometric constraints are incorporated in the optimization process, including the internal layout of fuel tanks, landing gear, engine, and crew station. Details of the model parameterization and design process are documented for both flow-through and powered states, and the performance of these optimized vehicles presented in terms of inviscid L/D, trim state, pressures in the near-field and at the ground, and predicted sonic boom loudness.
Nonlinear bang-bang optimal control problems solution based on differential dynamic programming, noting use of Pontryagin adjoint variables