Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Optical Metrology”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Performance of the Center-Of-Curvature Optical Assembly During Cryogenic Testing of the James Webb Space Telescope

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) primary mirror (PM) is 6.6 meters in diameter and consists of 18 hexagonal segments, each 1.5 meters point-to-point. Each segment has a 6 degree-of-freedom hexapod actuation system and a radius-of-curvature (ROC) actuation system. The full telescope was tested at its cryogenic operating temperature at Johnson Space Center (JSC) in 2017. This testing included center-of-curvature measurements of the PM wavefront error using the Center-of-Curvature Optical Assembly (COCOA), along with the Absolute Distance Meter Assembly (ADMA). The COCOA included an interferometer, a reflective null, an interferometer-null calibration system, coarse and fine alignment systems, and two displacement measuring interferometer systems. A multiple-wavelength interferometer was used to enable alignment and phasing of the PM segments. By combining measurements at two laser wavelengths, synthetic wavelengths up to 15 millimeters could be achieved, allowing mirror segments with millimeter-level piston errors to be phased to the nanometer level. The ADMA was used to measure and set the spacing between the PM and the focus of the COCOA null (i.e., the PM center-of-curvature) for determination of the ROC. This paper describes the COCOA, the PM test setup, the testing performed, the test results, and the performance of the COCOA in aligning & phasing the PM segments and measuring the final PM wavefront error.

JWST↗
NASA NTRS2004

Metrology system for Space Interferometry Mission system testbed 3

In a 3-baseline interferometer fourteen metrology gauges are used to monitor changes in the two baselines and calculate the length of the third. Simulation for estimating the third baseline indicates measurement capability of better than 1 nm error.

interferometry↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiple Methods of Determining the Gravity-Sag of Light-Weighted Optics

Characterizing Gravity-sag (G-sag) is an essential part of developing a large space-based optic. A method to back out gravity sag of a light-weighted optic using a CGH will be demonstrated. The results from the G-sag CGH determination is compared to the G-sag and Zero-G figure obtained during horizontal G-sag testing. The results from the CGH testing are also compared to the G-sag figure determined from modeling.

gravity sag↗
NASA NTRS2001

Adjustable Focus Optical Correction Lens (AFOCL)

This report describes a metrology plan that was developed for the characterization of PLZT-based devices, such as the Adjustable Focus Optical Correction Lens (AFOCL) in support of and as part of the deliverables for NASA contract NAS8-00118. The areas to be investigated include intensiometric effects (those that limit or alter the intensity of the light transmitted through the optic); interferometric effects (the phase change induced through the optic); and polarimetric effects (evaluating the differential lag between two polarization states propagating through the optic). These distinct phenomena are often coupled together in real applications consequently, there is a need to develop different standardized testing apparatus to: (1) isolate one effect from another; (2) gather information for understanding the physical effects; (3) anchor wavefront corrector modeling efforts; (4) develop the ability to decouple different effects; (5) demonstrate the suitability of PLZT technology to perform wavefront correction. The Center for Applied Optics (CAO) at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) is skilled in the characterization of transmission wavefront shaping devices using traditional interferometers available within the CAO Optical Metrology Laboratory and their Advanced Polarization Test Facility. Besides the imaging and interferometers available, the polarimetry facility has at its disposal, a Mueller Matrix Imaging Polarimeter (MMIP) which is well suited to the characterization of SLMs, polarizers, and thin film coatings within the visible and near-IR spectrums. In addition, the phase-shifting interferometry facilities at NASA-MSFC and the unique interferometers they processes are some of the most advanced available and may be of value especially for performing real-time optical performance evaluation of AFOCL test components.

Peters, Bruce R.↗
NASA NTRS2002

Formation metrology and control for large separated optics space telescopes

In this paper we present formation flying performance analysis initial results for a representative large space telescope composed of separated optical elements [Mett 02]. A virtual-structure construct (an equivalent rigid body) is created by unique metrology and control that combines both centralized and decentralized methods. The formation may be in orbit at GEO for super-resolution Earth observation, as in the case of Figure 1, or it may be in an Earth-trailing orbit for astrophysics, Figure 2. Extended applications are envisioned for exo-solar planet interferometric imaging by a formation of very large separated optics telescopes, Figure 3. Space telescopes, with such large apertures and f/10 to f/100 optics, are not feasible if connected by massive metering structures. Instead, the new virtual-structure paradigm of information and control connectivity between the formation elements provides the necessary spatial rigidity and alignment precision for the telescope.

formation flying virtual-structure telescopes↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Camera Calibration and Alignment Metrology at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Laboratory

It is increasingly common to see spacecraft equipped with cameras for the purpose of navigation. Images are either sent to Earth or processed autonomously on-board to provide information about the vehicle’s position, velocity, and/or attitude. These can be images of stars or celestial bodies for absolute navigation, or images of another spacecraft for relative navigation. While monocular cameras do not provide range information, the images they capture can be processed to determine bearing vectors to target objects within the camera’s field of view. For a camera to be effective in navigation, it must be carefully calibrated and aligned. This involves accurately modeling the optical effects that govern the projection of line-of-sight directions onto the camera’s pixels and determining the camera’s orientation relative to the spacecraft’s reference frame. Engineers at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Lab regularly perform camera inspection, calibration, and alignment metrology. This was done for the Orion Optical Navigation (OpNav) Camera, the Orion Docking Camera (DCAM), and for numerous cameras belonging to commercial partners. The nature of optical navigation means that cameras must be well-calibrated and their attitude well understood to provide high accuracy bearing measurements to the navigation filter. The stringent accuracy requirements for Orion could not have been met using traditional checkerboard camera calibration or by simply relying on design drawings. This paper details the hardware, software, techniques, and algorithms used by the EOL team to achieve this level of accuracy.

Paul D Mckee↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Camera Calibration and Alignment Metrology at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Laboratory

It is increasingly common to see spacecraft equipped with cameras for the purpose of navigation. Images are either sent to Earth or processed autonomously on-board to provide information about the vehicle’s position, velocity, and/or attitude. These can be images of stars or celestial bodies for absolute navigation, or images of another spacecraft for relative navigation. While monocular cameras do not provide range information, the images they capture can be processed to determine bearing vectors to target objects within the camera’s field of view. For a camera to be effective in navigation, it must be carefully calibrated and aligned. This involves accurately modeling the optical effects that govern the projection of line-of-sight directions onto the camera’s pixels and determining the camera’s orientation relative to the spacecraft’s reference frame. Engineers at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Lab regularly perform camera inspection, calibration, and alignment metrology. This was done for the Orion Optical Navigation (OpNav) Camera, the Orion Docking Camera (DCAM), and for numerous cameras belonging to commercial partners. The nature of optical navigation means that cameras must be well-calibrated and their attitude well understood to provide high accuracy bearing measurements to the navigation filter. The stringent accuracy requirements for Orion could not have been met using traditional checkerboard camera calibration or by simply relying on design drawings. This paper details the hardware, software, techniques, and algorithms used by the EOL team to achieve this level of accuracy.

Paul McKee↗
NASA NTRS2008

NASA Tech Briefs, July 2008

Topics covered include: Torque Sensor Based on Tunnel-Diode Oscillator; Shaft-Angle Sensor Based on Tunnel-Diode Oscillator; Ground Facility for Vicarious Calibration of Skyborne Sensors; Optical Pressure-Temperature Sensor for a Combustion Chamber; Impact-Locator Sensor Panels; Low-Loss Waveguides for Terahertz Frequencies; MEMS/ECD Method for Making Bi(2-x)Sb(x)Te3 Thermoelectric Devices; Low-Temperature Supercapacitors; Making a Back-Illuminated Imager with Back-Side Contact and Alignment Markers; Compact, Single-Stage MMIC InP HEMT Amplifier; Nb(x)Ti(1-x)N Superconducting-Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors; Improved Sand-Compaction Method for Lost-Foam Metal Casting; Improved Probe for Evaluating Compaction of Mold Sand; Polymer-Based Composite Catholytes for Li Thin-Film Cells; Using ALD To Bond CNTs to Substrates and Matrices; Alternating-Composition Layered Ceramic Barrier Coatings; Variable-Structure Control of a Model Glider Airplane; Axial Halbach Magnetic Bearings; Compact, Non-Pneumatic Rock-Powder Samplers; Biochips Containing Arrays of Carbon-Nanotube Electrodes; Nb(x)Ti(1-x)N Superconducting-Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors; Neon as a Buffer Gas for a Mercury-Ion Clock; Miniature Incandescent Lamps as Fiber-Optic Light Sources; Bidirectional Pressure-Regulator System; and Prism Window for Optical Alignment. Single-Grid-Pair Fourier Telescope for Imaging in Hard-X Rays and gamma Rays Range-Gated Metrology with Compact Optical Head Lossless, Multi-Spectral Data Compressor for Improved Compression for Pushbroom-Typetruments.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1990

Glass sample characterization

The development of in-house integrated optical performance modelling capability at MSFC is described. This performance model will take into account the effects of structural and thermal distortions, as well as metrology errors in optical surfaces to predict the performance of large an complex optical systems, such as Advanced X-Ray Astrophysics Facility. The necessary hardware and software were identified to implement an integrated optical performance model. A number of design, development, and testing tasks were supported to identify the debonded mirror pad, and rebuilding of the Technology Mirror Assembly. Over 300 samples of Zerodur were prepared in different sizes and shapes for acid etching, coating, and polishing experiments to characterize the subsurface damage and stresses produced by the grinding and polishing operations.

Ahmad, Anees↗
NASA NTRS2014

Rules for Optical Testing

Based on 30 years of optical testing experience, a lot of mistakes, a lot of learning and a lot of experience, I have defined seven guiding principles for optical testing - regardless of how small or how large the optical testing or metrology task: Fully Understand the Task, Develop an Error Budget, Continuous Metrology Coverage, Know where you are, Test like you fly, Independent Cross-Checks, Understand All Anomalies. These rules have been applied with great success to the inprocess optical testing and final specification compliance testing of the JWST mirrors.

Stahl, H. Philip↗
NASA NTRS2014

Ambient Optomechanical Alignment and Pupil Metrology for the Flight Instruments Aboard the James Webb Space Telescope

The James Webb Space Telescope science instruments are in the final stages of being integrated into the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) element. Each instrument is tied into a common coordinate system through mechanical references that are used for optical alignment and metrology within ISIM after element-level assembly. In addition, a set of ground support equipment (GSE) consisting of large, precisely calibrated, ambient, and cryogenic structures are used as alignment references and gauges during various phases of integration and test (I&T). This GSE, the flight instruments, and ISIM structure feature different types of complimentary metrology targeting. These GSE targets are used to establish and track six degrees of freedom instrument alignment during I&T in the vehicle coordinate system (VCS). This paper describes the optomechanical metrology conducted during science instrument integration and alignment in the Spacecraft Systems Development and Integration Facility (SSDIF) cleanroom at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The measurement of each instrument's ambient entrance pupil location in the telescope coordinate system is discussed. The construction of the database of target locations and the development of metrology uncertainties is also discussed.

Optomechanical Alignment↗
NASA NTRS2002

SIM testbed 3 real-time control software

SIM System Testbed 3 (STB3) features three optical interferometers sharing a common baseline, as a dynamic representation of the SIM instrument. An artificial star feeding the interferometers is installed on a separate optics bench. All three interferometers use photons captured by avalanche photo diodes (APDs) to measure the position and quality of fringes, and additional pointing precision is achieved by fast steering mirrors (FSMs) that keep the star images centered on the beam combining optics using a CCD camera. Each interferometer uses internal metrology to measure changes in its optical pathlength. External metrology beams measure changes in the baseline vector. This system acquires and tracks white light fringes with one interferometer, while the other two acquire and track laser light fringes representing the bright guide stars that will be used by SIM. The white light source represents a dim star that cannot supply enough photons for the Science interferometer to lock onto fringes in closed-loop mode; instead it operates open-loop, using pathlength corrections fed to it from the two guide interferometers and the external metrology subsystem to reject disturbances and maintain the fringes. This tracking mode is known as Pathlength Feed Forward (PFF). The precise real-time behavior required to achieve this result is implemented by a complex set of interacting software control loops. This paper describes how these loops take advantage of the benefits of the RTC Core architecture, and how they work together to accomplish STB3's objectives.

interferometry↗
NASA NTRS1991

Endoscopic measurement using radial metrology with digital correlation

Radial metrology combines standard optical measurement techniques with a unique panoramic annular lens (PAL) system to study material properties and deformations on the inner surfaces of the cavities found, for example, inside pipes, tubes, and boreholes. A PAL profilometer using speckle metrology is analyzed and the equations obtained from the analysis are used to calibrate the PAL profilometer when it is used to profile the inner surface of a cylindrical pipe and to measure the deformation of the pipe when it is subjected to diametral compression.

Matthys, Donald R.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Surface characterization and testing II; Proceedings of the Meeting, San Diego, CA, Aug. 10, 11, 1989

Various papers on surface characterization and testing are presented. Individual topics addressed include: simple Hartmann test data interpretation, optimum configuration of the Offner null corrector, system for phase-shifting interferometry in the presence of vibration, fringe variation and visibility in speckle-shearing interferometry, functional integral representation of rough surfaces, calibration of surface heights in an interferometric optical profiler, image formation in common path differential profilometers, SEM of optical surfaces, measuring surface profiles with scanning tunneling microscopes, surface profile measurements of curved parts, high-resolution optical profiler, scanning heterodyne interferometer with immunity from microphonics, real-time crystal axis measurements of semiconductor materials, radial metrology with a panoramic annular lens, surface analysis for the characterization of defects in thin-film processes, Spacelab Optical Viewport glass assembly optical test program for the Starlab mission, scanning differential intensity and phase system for optical metrology.

Greivenkamp, John E.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Structural considerations for fabrication and mounting of the AXAF HRMA optics

A methodology is described which minimizes optics distortion in the fabrication, metrology, and launch configuration phases. The significance of finite element modeling and breadboard testing is described with respect to performance analyses of support structures and material effects in NASA's AXAF X-ray optics. The paper outlines the requirements for AXAF performance, optical fabrication, metrology, and glass support fixtures, as well as the specifications for mirror sensitivity and the high-resolution mirror assembly. Analytical modeling of the tools is shown to coincide with grinding and polishing experiments, and is useful for designing large-area polishing and grinding tools. Metrological subcomponents that have undergone initial testing show evidence of meeting force requirements.

Cohen, Lester M.↗