Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Pilot-Scale Waste Glass Melter

The INL has been developing a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a Joule-heated ceramic-lined waste glass melter. The purpose is to better understand the dynamics of heat transfer within the system, in order to provide support for the optimization of the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) that will be used for vitrification of legacy tank waste. The simulation presented here is for the DM1200 pilot-scale system, which has been operated by the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) over the past several decades. This system is about one-third of the scale of the full size WTP melter. Experimental data from this system is being used to validate computational simulations. The examination of the melter with a fully coupled CFD model should give an accurate assessment of the heat transfer into the reactive cold cap region. Heat is provided to the cold cap region from conduction and convection from the molten glass pool as well as radiation from the hot plenum above the cold cap. The CFD model implements a mathematical model of the cold cap developed for the assessment of the melting rate during the vitrification of tank waste. This sub-model implemented directly into the CFD model combines the mass and enthalpy balance of the cold cap together with the conversion kinetics of the feed. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI1961

Laboratory Development of a Pot Calcination Process for Converting Liquid Wastes to Solids

Simulated Darex, Purex, Thorex, and TBP-25 wastes were batch-evaporated and calcined to solids. The weight of residue was decreased to ~ 8% of the original waste for Darex, to ~ 4% for Purex, to ~ 2% for Thorex, and ~ 7% for TBP-25 by calcination to 1200°C. Semicontinuous evaporation and calcination to solids at 900°C of Darex and Purex wastes gave volume reduction factors of ~ 8 and 7 to 10, respectively. The nitrate contents of the residues from batch calcination to 800°C were from ~ 0.07 to 0.5 wt % while the nitrate contents of the residues from semicontinuous calcination to 900°C were from ~ 0.1 to 0.7 wt %. Sodium, calcium, and magnesium additives to Purex waste decreased the percent of sulfate volatilized into the condensate from ~ 30% to <0.5%. Replacement of the atmosphere above the waste with nitric oxide decreased ruthenium volatility from 50 to 60% of that originally present in Purex waste to 0.5 to 3.5%. The thermal conductivities for the calcined wastes, measured in situ, were all >0.1 Btu/hr ft °F at ~ 400°F and increased almost linearly with increasing temperature to >0.3 Btu/hr ft °F at ~ 1600°F in all cases studied.

052001* -- Nuclear Fuels-- Waste Processing↗
DOE OSTI2019

Development of Processing Technology for Radioactively Contaminated Water at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant - 19656

During the operation of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, distillation by evaporation was the main method for processing radioactively contaminated water. When the plant was decommissioned, the evaporation facility was mothballed and floor drain treatment was suspended in 2016. At present, the existing tanks with the capacity of 26,000 m{sup 3} are more than 60% full with radioactively contaminated floor drains, which requires alternative processing methods. The current process flow for radioactive waste management at State Specialized Enterprise 'Chernobyl NPP' includes processing of accumulated liquid radioactive wastes at a liquid radioactive wastes processing plant. Under the processing technology, liquid radioactive waste is immobilized at the plant by cementation and the resulting solid radioactive waste is then buried in a near-surface storage. Key factors for the selection of alternative radioactively contaminated water processing methods are the possibility to clear the processed water (no control monitoring), which requires the same degree of processing as for drinking water, and minimization of radioactive waste generation due to the lack of free space for solid waste disposal in the near-surface storage. Floor drains that require processing contain radionuclides such as {sup 137}Cs, {sup 90}Sr, {sup 60}Co and {sup 40}K. The current level of the total beta and gamma activity is about 4*105 Bq/kg. The following criteria are set for the Chernobyl NPP site for water to be disposed to the sewerage system: - Max. 37 Bq/kg for the total beta and gamma containing radionuclide activity; - Max. 0.7 Bq/kg for the total alpha containing radionuclide activity. METOIL produces inorganic sorbents for removing radionuclides from liquids and develops sorbent-based technology for a variety of applications related to liquid radioactive waste processing. In 2017-2018, experts from the Chernobyl NPP and METOIL ran several joint laboratory tests to evaluate the efficiency of inorganic sorbents made by METOIL for processing floor drains at the Chernobyl NPP. The test procedure included treatment of radioactively contaminated water in a two-stage sorption process: static sorption (sorbents are mixed in a liquid) and dynamic sorption (the liquid is filtered through a sorbent column). NIKET and MODIKS sorbents were provided for the tests. The results of the test measurements showed that the total alpha containing radionuclide activity is less than 0.026 Bq/kg and the total beta and gamma containing radionuclide activity is 9.2 Bq/kg. The physical and chemical parameters after processing also met the water disposal criteria. High sorption capacity of the sorbents used for the tests allows processing hundreds of water volumes with just one sorbent volume. At present, preparations are underway for full-scale tests at a pilot plant with a capacity of minimum 10 m{sup 3}/day. At a later stage, spent sorbents may be immobilized by inclusion into the cement matrix, which will substantially reduce the amount of radioactive waste to be buried. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Niagara Falls Storage Site - Interim Waste Containment Structure - 16199

The Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) is a 77.3-hectare (ha) (191-acre) property that is owned by the United States Government and located in the township of Lewiston, Niagara County, New York. The NFSS is part of the former Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW) that was used by the War Department beginning in 1942 for the production of trinitrotoluene (TNT). During the 1940's and 1950's, the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission brought various radioactive wastes and uranium processing byproducts (residues) resulting from our nation's atomic energy program to the LOOW for storage. Site operations caused soil, sediment, and groundwater contamination that lead to several remedial actions, which culminated in the construction of the Interim Waste Containment Structure (IWCS) on the NFSS. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)-Buffalo District is the lead Federal agency for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) remediation of the NFSS. As the lead agency, USACE is conducting a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) pursuant to the protocols set forth in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLA activities at the NFSS have transitioned from the site RI activities to the FS evaluation of potential remediation alternatives. USACE recognizes the need to implement a focused CERCLA FS process and, therefore, has established three separate operable units (OUs) for NFSS: the IWCS OU, the Balance of Plant (BOP) OU [i.e., all on-site areas outside the boundary of the IWCS], and the Groundwater OU. This paper will discuss the following: - Provide background information on the NFSS including the nature of the materials within the IWCS. - Explain the steps of the CERCLA and associated processes the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) employs. - Describe the OUs for the NFSS property and the subunit designations used in the FS evaluations for the IWCS OU. - Provide the current project status within the CERCLA framework and path forward for all OUs and Vicinity Properties (VPs). Identify the Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) preferred by USACE and the regulatory agencies and explain the differences between the two positions. - Provide the comparative evaluation of the remedial alternatives assessed in the FS. - Identify the justifications for the USACE - Buffalo District selecting the preferred remedial alternative within the Proposed Plan. The remedial action objectives for the IWCS OU are designed to provide short- and long-term protection of human health and the environment. CERCLA requires that any action taken be protective of human health and the environment as well as be compliant with identified ARARs. USACE evaluated 'No Action' and four potential remedial alternatives for the IWCS OU that ranged from leaving all of the wastes in-place and installing a final cover to partial and full removal of the contents. The four alternatives met the remedial action objectives defined identified for the IWCS OU. In accordance with the statutory requirements of CERCLA Section 121, remedial alternatives must comply with two threshold criteria, overall protection of human health and the environment and compliance with ARARs, in order to be carried forward for further evaluation. If a remedial alternative meets the threshold criteria, it is evaluated against the following five balancing criteria: - Long-term effectiveness and permanence; - Reduction in toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment; - Short-term effectiveness; - Implementability; and, - Cost. The Feasibility Study evaluation led to the preferred remedial alternative selection and this will be the focus of this paper. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Emerging Technologies and Techniques for Wide Area Radiological Survey and Remediation

Technologies to survey and decontaminate wide-area contamination and process the subsequent radioactive waste have been developed and implemented following the Chernobyl nuclear power plant release and the breach of a radiological source resulting in contamination in Goiania, Brazil. These civilian examples of radioactive material releases provided some of the first examples of urban radiological remediation. Many emerging technologies have recently been developed and demonstrated in Japan following the release of radioactive cesium isotopes (Cs-134 and Cs-137) from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in 2011. Information on technologies reported by several Japanese government agencies, such as the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and the National Institute for Environmental Science (NIES), together with academic institutions and industry are summarized and compared to recently developed, deployed and available technologies in the United States. The technologies and techniques presented in this report may be deployed in response to a wide area contamination event in the United States. In some cases, additional research and testing is needed to adequately validate the technology effectiveness over wide areas. Survey techniques can be deployed on the ground or from the air, allowing a range of coverage rates and sensitivities. Survey technologies also include those useful in measuring decontamination progress and mapping contamination. Decontamination technologies and techniques range from non-destructive (e.g., high pressure washing) and minimally destructive (plowing), to fully destructive (surface removal or demolition). Waste minimization techniques can greatly impact the long-term environmental consequences and cost following remediation efforts. Recommendations on technical improvements to address technology gaps are presented together with observations on remediation in Japan.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Managing work flow and logistic at waste processing facilities using the waste compliance and tracking system - 15392

Work flow and logistics at a busy radioactive waste processing complex or permitted treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) can pose a monumental challenge. An efficient operation requires good communication between engineering, logistics, and waste operators. The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has implemented an application that facilitates seamless communication of work flow requirements, between engineering, logistics, and waste operations personnel in the field. The Waste Compliance and Tracking System (WCATS), a comprehensive waste management system designed at LANL, provides four key elements to support logistics: (a) the container work path, (b) directed unit operation requests, (c) notification of pending operations, and (d) real-time status tools for office and field workers. The combination of these elements allows everyone to function as a team, with a shared knowledge of what is needed to accomplish facility objectives. The first element is like a road map indicating which unit operations are needed and in what sequence they should be performed; this is referred to as a 'work path'. It automatically routes a waste item or container from operation to operation. For example, a given work path might indicate that waste items require radiological survey, radioassay, and a technical review, in that order. When the work path is assigned to a container, the system enforces the correct order of operations. Directed unit operation 'requests', the second element, fills a gap between pre-planned, formal 'work path' activities and the need for flexibility to direct preparatory operations or deal with unexpected issues, like staging or mining containers in preparation for a shipment or transferring containers from one storage unit to another to clear a path for building maintenance. Logistics engineers prepare these 'requests', and the system monitors the status and completion of the work. The third element, notifications, allows team members to subscribe to and receive notice that an operation is pending, initiated, or complete. This functionality supports a range of communication options, including e-mail, cell phone, pager, or application in-box messaging. Notifications allow waste operations personnel to multi-task, and remain in the loop on the status of facility-wide activities. Finally, the fourth element provides tools that communicate work path pending operations and directed requests to field workers on their mobile computer, allowing them to mine or pick containers from storage units, and leverage the capabilities of a bar-code scanner to avoid selection mistakes. Oversight and summary tools are provided, allowing logistics personnel to monitor work path and request task status, identify work-flow bottlenecks, and maximize the efficiency of waste operations. The Waste Compliance and Tracking System (WCATS) provides an innovative, comprehensive set of tools that allow large-scale radioactive waste processing facilities to manage logistics, maximize efficient use of the workforce, and create a team environment, where everyone from management to the waste handlers have an understanding of the work load and what needs to be accomplished. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

AVANTech's Liquid Radwaste (LRW) Processing System Upgrade at the Farley Nuclear Plant - 20328

This paper looks at the Liquid Radioactive Waste (LRW) processing system configuration at Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (Plant Farley). A combination of factors led the staff at Plant Farley to seek a better way to manage and process liquid waste. These factors were: - Reduce effluent activity; - Reduce waste volume; - Improve cost efficiency. The LRW processing system changes made at Plant Farley are identified and discussed. The information and technologies cited in this paper are directly applicable to other nuclear power plants who might contemplate an upgrade of LRW processing systems or of individual system components. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Vitrification Process for Idaho HLW Calcine - 18433

The majority of the liquid wastes produced from reprocessing of several types of spent nuclear fuel at the Department of energy's (DOE) Idaho site have been volume reduced by calcination. The resulting ∼155,600 ft{sup 3} of calcined waste is stored in 43 shielded stainless steel bins, which have a 500-year design life. The calcined material is both a high-level waste and a RCRA hazardous waste, which complicates treatment and disposal options. In addition to a potential direct disposal option, treatment options that have been considered include steam reforming, hot isostatic pressing (HIP), and vitrification. This paper describes testing and evaluation of a vitrification option for the calcine. Vitrification to produce a borosilicate glass has the advantage that it is the only treatment that provides a waste form that meets the current HLW repository waste acceptance criteria. It is therefore the lowest risk option in terms of regulatory and legislative concerns. The present work addressed several key questions: (i) Calcine waste loadings in glass, which determine the number of HLW canisters produced and the required glass production rate (throughput) for the system design; (ii) Melt rate per unit glass pool surface area of the melter, which determines the sizing of the vitrification system; and (iii) The ability to meet waste form acceptance requirements (PCT and TCLP) while achieving reasonable waste loadings. These are issues of fundamental importance to the sizing estimates for the unit operations and overall flow-sheet and they, therefore, directly impact the cost and schedule estimates. Fully compliant, high-waste-loading glasses were developed for two of the four Idaho calcine wastes. The results demonstrate that waste loadings of 35 wt% waste oxides are achievable for the two alumina calcines and about 30 wt% is achievable for the two zirconia calcines. Testing of these formulations in a joule-heated ceramic melter showed glass production rates of over 5000 kg/(m2/d) for the Alumina calcine and over 8500 kg/(m{sup 2}/d) for the Zirconium-Na Blend calcine. These extremely high production rates translate directly into smaller system size and shorter mission duration and, therefore, reduced costs. Based on these results, a preliminary design for the full-scale vitrification system was developed. The system consists of waste receipt, vitrification, off-gas treatment, and canister sealing and decontamination equipment. The calcine is blended with the appropriate glass forming chemicals (or glass frit) and fed to the melter as a solid stream. The melter has a glass pool surface area of about 2.5 m{sup 2} and is equipped with a bubbling system to increase processing rates. Glass production rates of about 6 metric tons per day are projected. The vitrification system would be installed into the existing Idaho Waste Treatment Unit Facility (IWTU) so that no new facilities are required to house the treatment system, thus greatly reducing overall cost, duration, and risk. The system would be designed to treat all of the calcine waste within a period of 12 years at an operating efficiency of 80%, producing a total of about 8500 canisters each weighing two metric tons. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Managing Hanford's Direct Feed Low Activity Waste Program - 20002

The Office of River Protection (ORP) is responsible for the management and completion of the River Protection Project (RPP) mission, which comprises both the Hanford Site tank farms operations and the completion and operation of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project. The RPP mission is to safely retrieve, treat, and immobilize Hanford's high-level and low-activity tank waste and close the tank farms to protect the Columbia River. The Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) Program is a major subset of the overall RPP mission, providing disposition of low-activity waste. The scope is to retrieve, treat, and immobilize the low-activity waste at the Low-Activity Waste Facility. DFLAW will begin operations no later than December 2023. The DFLAW Program overarches a suite of individual projects, activities, and infrastructure upgrades. The major projects and activities include multiple contractors under both ORP and the Richland Operations Office, underscoring the need for effective integration, coordination, and collaboration. The objectives of the DFLAW Program leadership team are to: - Effectively coordinate and integrate the projects that comprise the DFLAW Program - Manage the interfaces between the projects so that the integrated DFLAW Program is completed successfully - Ensure the DFLAW portfolio of projects operate as required without gaps or conflicts at the interfaces. DOE is accomplishing these objectives through a newly established leadership model that integrates the DOE and contractor work streams and promotes a teamwork model to enable collaborative success. Long considered one of the most formidable cleanup challenges at Hanford, the Department of Energy and its contractors are on the verge of achieving a cleanup commitment that has been decades in the making. DOE is preparing to vitrify (turn to glass) Hanford's chemical and radioactive tank waste using the DFLAW process. The Modified Consent Decree milestone for completing hot commissioning of the Hanford Site's Low- Activity Waste Facility is Dec. 31, 2023. While this milestone may seem distant under normal project management circumstances, it is a relatively short period of time for the operational and cultural transformation necessary to successfully begin treating tank waste at Hanford. Direct feed means separating the waste at a tank farm to remove the more radioactive portion (i.e., solids and cesium) so that the resulting low-activity (less radioactive) waste can be fed directly to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's Low-Activity Waste Facility. Starting DFLAW will require a singular, intensive leadership focus, along with a sustained, collective commitment to excellence and teamwork by the Department and its contractors. Major upgrades to Hanford's infrastructure will occur prior to startup. Supporting DFLAW operations requires significant integration between the DFLAW facilities - the Waste Treatment Plant, Hanford's tank farms, effluent treatment facilities, disposal facilities - and between all of the site contractors to achieve success. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

ROV used in Sludge Retrieval and Treatment Project - 18575

The Orano-operated waste treatment site at La Hague, France, has treated large quantities of nuclear waste through-out its many decades of operation. During a period of over twenty years, a significant amount of the radioactive sludge resulting from the liquid waste treatment processes was placed into a set of adjoining tanks, called the STE2 silos. Now that those tanks are reaching capacity, a project has begun to retrieve this waste, transfer it to another location for homogenisation and characterization, and to then send it to another facility for conditioning and long-term storage. Because of the conditions inside and around these tanks, the waste retrieval process has many limitations. For example, the high radiation levels require that the retrieval be done efficiently, with a high removal rate and that operation be done remotely. The sludge retrieval tool will be operated and navigated while hidden inside the tank, under a significant amount of supernatant liquid, but needs to be accessible for maintenance and modifications and able to be transferred from one tank to the next. Additionally, the highly viscous consistency of the sludge requires special suction capabilities. All of these conditions need to be met, by a system that fits into the tanks' 900 mm (<3 ft) access ports. After almost three years of profound engineering, construction and testing efforts, a final design has been approved. The tool consists of a 250 kg (∼550 lb), remotely-operated vehicle (ROV) with an Archimedes-type screw attachment. It is delivered into and retrieved from the tank through a shielded glovebox that allows for maintenance and exchange of attachments. Sludge is sucked through a rotating screw and out a second tank opening with a consideration for limiting external water usage. To locate and navigate the tool, cameras detect LEDs attached to the ROV's buoys, and then calculate the ROV's position and orientation. With preliminary design and testing of the prototype complete, the project is preparing to award the ROV manufacturing contract and finalize the design of auxiliary systems, such as the rinsing and maintenance processes and localization instrumentation. After extensive final testing, the gloveboxes will be placed over the tanks in mid-2020, with entry into the first tank expected in April 2024. The ideas and experiences Orano is currently gathering during this effort will be of interest to laboratories and facilities that will soon be retrieving waste sludge from their aging storage tanks. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

WOW Technology's Innovative Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment - 16128

WOW presents its revolutionary technology and equipment for liquid radioactive waste treatment: outperforming ultimate water decontamination and purification process, enhanced sludge concentration, no secondary waste nor consumables, fully automated, remote controlled and self-decontaminating device. The WOW's technology is based upon a never before observed discovery of fluid dynamics science: the possibility of performing a molecular separation between solute and suspended elements and the solvent. The combination of such a molecular separation process with a standard vacuum evaporation improves the abatement performances by thousands of times, with respect to those of the state of the art vacuum evaporators. In addition to this, no secondary waste is produced during the process, as no filters, membranes, resins or additives are used. WOW equipment, automated and remote controlled, self decontaminates after use and can be designed and constructed either tailored to the application needs or with a modular approach for enhanced transportability and application flexibility. After the preliminary verification by CNR, the Italian National Research Center, WOW Technology's decontamination device was tested c/o LENA, the Laboratory of Applied Nuclear Energy of the University of Pavia, Italy with a simulated solution 6000 times more contaminated than the nuclear reactor's cooling water of Fukushima-Daiichi NPP. In addition to that, WOW's technology was also used in a real case at the Radiochemistry laboratory of the Pavia's University Chemistry department. Both the above mentioned contaminated fluids have been successfully decontaminated without production of additional or secondary waste. WOW's technology has already performed on industrial scale c/o the Nuclear Repository of S.S.M. in Saluggia, Italy: 45000 liters of acid radioactive solution have been successfully decontaminated to a Decontamination Factor (DF) of 335000 for Cs-137 by one single evaporation step and without using any additional tool to control steam. [Performances independently certified by: National Physics Laboratory (UK) and Pavia University Radiochemistry Laboratory, Chemistry Department (Italy)]. The high decontamination factors and the high volume reduction of the sludge make this technology suitable for the ultimate treatment of highly contaminated liquid waste such as the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear reactor's cooling water. The WOW's technology addresses as well to interventions in both, operating and decommissioning nuclear power plants and any other nuclear and radioactive facility whose produced and/or stored radioactive liquid solutions, including acid liquid solutions, can be successfully treated, the waste volume reduced and no secondary waste produced. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Low-Level Waste Minimization and Management Planning at the Western Waste Management Facility, Ontario Power Generation - 19235

The purpose of this study was to examine the strategies intended to mitigate the temporary storage restrictions for Low-Level radioactive waste at the Western Waste Management Facility to enable continued accommodation of waste generation rates, and to recover storage capacity from 2018-2023 to optimize long-term sustainability for radioactive waste management. The management options considered were based on existing waste processing technologies and programs available at the Western Waste Management Facility, in combination with third party volume-reduction services. Completed analysis measured the consumption of Low-Level Waste storage space as influenced by the projected volumes from nuclear generating stations, and the various processing scenarios developed; such as reducing the volume of surplus processable waste on-site, and the reduction of specific waste streams previously considered to be non-processable. Results from the quantitative analysis indicated which strategies will be most effective for minimizing waste volumes for long-term storage and for recovering low-level storage space at the Western Waste Management Facility. The strategic path forward is presented in short- to long-term management objectives. Results from this study will contribute to the waste stream planning and management of major reactor refurbishment projects and to the technological advancements and innovation of radioactive waste processing and minimization. With further understanding of the refurbishment-specific waste types and volumes, it is expected that Nuclear Waste Management and the nuclear generating stations will achieve increasingly improved minimization results with the progression of each refurbished reactor. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Hanford WTP LAW Melter Startup and Tuning Feed Material Development - 17065

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site in southeast Washington state is home to 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste stored in underground tanks, the result of more than four decades of plutonium production. To address this challenge, the U.S. Department of Energy contracted Bechtel National, Inc., to design and build the world's largest radioactive waste treatment plant. The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will use vitrification to immobilize most of Hanford's waste. Vitrification involves blending the waste with glass-forming materials, and heating it to high temperature to form molten glass, then pouring it into stainless steel containers. In this glass form, its radioactivity will decay over hundreds to thousands of years. In advance of full operation of WTP, a sequential process of commissioning will be undertaken to ensure the plant operates safely and within design requirements. The first phase of WTP operations will focus on the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility and its supporting facilities and systems. Commissioning of the LAW Facility will employ a progressive approach to address the complexity of system operation and introduction of hazards. This approach starts with introduction of low hazard and simple testing configurations, and incrementally increasing the complexity and hazardous makeup of testing feed materials, culminating in fully integrated treatment of radioactive tank waste during hot commissioning. Testing with simulants that are chemically similar to radioactive tank waste introduces significant chemical hazards into treatment systems in the form of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and anhydrous ammonia. A method of testing to allow tuning and demonstration of equipment and to develop operator proficiency prior to introducing these chemical hazards was deemed necessary. To that end, the development and testing of a new 'tuning feed' material is in progress. The tuning feed is important because its use will enable the first-time integration of all LAW Facility process systems. The tuning feed must include key physical and chemical characteristics that correspond to the commissioning simulant and low activity tank waste, without the inherently hazardous materials or toxic off-gas constituents that result from tank waste treatment. Tuning feed is being developed to provide representative melter feed rheology, glass chemistry, cold cap formation, and off-gas generation rate in order to predict system response to actual tank waste to the extent practical. The tuning feed must also be compatible with process equipment and other process streams that will be encountered during the cold commissioning testing program. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Improving Effectiveness of Waste Management Processes with Information and Communications Technology (ICT) - 19524

Improving the effectiveness of waste estimation, tracking, management and disposal processes is a key objective for Waste Management. Project Teams face common challenges producing waste estimates that are accurately accounted for in the project plan, tracking and reporting waste record actuals against the estimate, and communicating the status of waste through the organization. These challenges impact the effectiveness of waste management from a cost and schedule perspective, which can have a significant impact on the bottom line and on future business. By leveraging information and communications technology (ICT) waste management project teams can create a mobile workforce that closes the gaps between creating estimates and tracking actuals against estimates by gathering real time data at each step in the process. This results in significant gains on schedule and cost, improved communication and visibility across the project team, and an improvement in the overall effectiveness of waste processing and disposal procedures. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Development of Microwave Technology for TENORM Waste Treatment - 17377

The sludge and scales generated by the oil and gas industry usually contain radionuclides of the thorium and uranium decay chains, the so-called technologically enhanced, naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM) waste. The handling of this waste must consider both the radiation risks presented by those radionuclides and its chemical toxicity, due to the decomposition of oil residues, which may generate hydrogen sulfide and other hazardous compounds. In the case of Brazil, Public Law 10.308 limits the management options for radioactive waste generated by offshore oil production rigs to drumming and storage; it prohibits disposal of any radioactive waste in sea-waters, seabed or oceanic islands. This paper describes the results of the work to develop a treatment process using a specially designed microwave oven, which removes simultaneously water and hydrocarbons from the sludge, thus reducing the volume, the chemical toxicity and the chemical reactivity of the waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Successes and Challenges of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit's 50-Day Demonstration Run - 20151

The Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) has been tasked with using steam reforming technology to treat 3.4 million liters (900,000 gallons) of radioactive sodium-bearing waste (SBW) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The project has been hampered by a number of processing issues associated with process equipment during simulant testing, with the two main issues involving the fluidizing gas distribution system in the main reactor vessel, the denitration mineralization reformer (DMR), and high differential pressures in the main filter vessel, the process gas filter (PGF). Following the replacement of the fluidizing gas distribution system in the DMR, a successful 30-day demonstration run was performed that revealed unacceptable bridging in the filter bundles of the PGF. The bundles were replaced with new ones, and a 50-day demonstration run was performed. The main purpose of this run was to operate the IWTU over a range of operating conditions. Overall, the run was a success; however, there were multiple challenges that arose from the run. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Testing Results from the Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Full-Scale Ion Exchange Column Test and Engineering Scale Integrated System Test - 18634

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection's (ORP) primary mission is to retrieve and treat Hanford's tank waste and close the Tank Farms to protect the Columbia River. Mixed radioactive waste is stored in 177 underground tanks at the Hanford Site as reported in DOE/ORP 2003- 02, Environmental Impact Statement for Retrieval, Treatment, and Disposal of Tank Waste and Closure of the Single Shell Tanks at the Hanford Site, Richland WA, Inventory and Source Term Data Package. The 177 underground tanks are estimated to contain about 56 million gallons of waste. The Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project provides for the early production of immobilized low activity waste (ILAW) by feeding LAW directly from Tank Farms to the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant's (WTP's) LAW Facility, bypassing the Pretreatment Facility. Prior to the transfer of feed to the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility, tank supernatant waste will be pretreated in the LAWPS to meet the WTP LAW waste acceptance criteria. The LAWPS will also facilitate the return of secondary liquid wastes from the WTP LAW Vitrification Facility to the Tank Farms. In November of 2015 DOE's Tank Operations Contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), awarded a contract to the AECOM team to design, fabricate and operate two test platforms to generate performance data at two different scales and demonstrate technology maturation. The first platform models the ion exchange (IX) columns at full scale, and the second platform models the integrated flowsheet (cross flow filter (CFF) and IX) at 1/9. scale. Overarching technical objectives of performing the full-scale ion exchange test and the engineering-scale integrated test are to: 1. Test interactions between unit process operations; 2. Test removal of non-radioactive cesium from process stream; 3. Test removal of undissolved solids from process stream; 4. Confirm operational flow rate range and stability; 5. Confirm volumetric throughput of waste stream over flow operating range; 6. Confirm range of process temperatures over planned operating range; 7. Establish system hydraulics and process criteria; 8. Coordinate key control and monitoring components; 9. Establish treated product chemistry meets requirements (cesium, solids, and pH); and 10. Test the hazard control strategy for a no flow condition through the IX column. Data collected during testing will be used by WRPS to validate the preliminary design, inform the final design of the permanent plant equipment, and demonstrate that the critical technology elements have advanced to a technology readiness level of 6 (prototypical system validation in a relevant environment). Testing on both platforms started in fall of 2016 generating NQA-1 data. This paper covers test results from the first five phases of testing on the 1/9. scale integrated test platform. A further three phases of testing are currently being executed, these including a 5.6 M sodium simulant containing foulant, a high viscosity simulant and finally a run performed with a lower Cs concentration (all earlier tests were spiked to 4 x Cs to reduce volume and cost). Results from these tests were not available at the time of writing available. Results are also presented from the full scale IX testing. Eight test were performed covering column loading, elution and regeneration; column loading, elution and regeneration with upflow displacement; IX column loading and gas migration; resin removal; solids accumulation; and IX column emergency recirculation and vent. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Developing and Testing a New Gas Distribution System for the Fluidized Bed of the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) Steam Reformer - 19219

The Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) has been tasked with using steam reforming technology to treat 3.4 million liters of radioactive sodium-bearing waste (SBW) at the INL. Progress in developing steam reforming for SBW treatment has been hampered by numerous processing issues associated with the existing process equipment during simulant testing. The primary issue was high differential temperatures that developed in the fluidized bed of the denitration mineralization reformer (DMR). Based on technical evaluations and computer modeling, it was determined that the primary cause of poor fluidization in the DMR was the existing fluidized gas distributor. This distributor consisted of a combination of a ring header and four removable fluidizing gas rails. The combined ring header/rail system was unable to effectively fluidize the bed at the bottom of the DMR (around and below the ring header). As a result, a decision was made to design and test a new fluidized gas distributor. Conceptual designs focused on three different distributors: a modified design of the current system; a flat plate with bubble caps; and a conical bottom with dual plena. After testing the conceptual prototypes at Hazen Research Inc., the conical bottom distributor was chosen. A 30-day test with simulant SBW feed was then performed with the new distributor. During testing, a temperature differential of less than 2 deg. C was maintained in the DMR fluidized bed. The results supported the conclusion that poor fluidized gas distribution was the primary cause of high temperature differentials in the DMR fluidized bed. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗