Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Nuclear Engineering”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Characterization of radiation damage effects in high-energy neutrino target graphite using low-energy ions

Exposure of graphite targets to high intensity proton beams at neutrino production facilities causes changes in the target material that can result in a shortened operation lifetime. The dominant factors in this process are currently thought to be mechanical in nature resulting primarily from microstructural effects that lead to thermal and structural changes in bulk material properties. As currently planned beam facilities with increased proton energy and intensity begin to come online it will be important to thoroughly understand these processes, and ideally to be able to predict the effects of new beam designs on target properties. Direct analysis of targets exposed to existing high-energy proton beams is complicated by several factors, such as very limited access to proton beam facilities, high associated costs, irradiation times on the order of months, and the resulting radioactivity of irradiated samples that requires special facilities for post-irradiation examination. Much of the existing literature concerning irradiation damage in graphite has been focused on the needs of the nuclear engineering community, however high-energy proton targets operate in a much different environment. In comparison to graphite irradiated in a nuclear reactor, graphite used in proton beam targets receives a higher dose rate, have greater gas production, and experience short irradiation pulses as opposed to continuous irradiation. Low-energy ion irradiation offers a method of inducing similar levels of radiation damage to high-energy protons while avoiding many of the difficulties and limitations associated with high-energy proton beams and the corresponding activated specimen testing. My research described in this thesis focused on investigating how low-energy ion irradiation could be used to induce the same or similar types of microstructural alteration and mechanical property degradation as that seen in high-energy neutrino production target graphites by varying damage le vels and irradiation temperatures prior to post-irradiation characterisation.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Perspective on Scalable AI on High-Performance Computing and Leadership Class Supercomputing Facilities [Industrial and Governmental Activities]

Many scientific applications that support the mission of the US Department of Energy (US-DoE) require modeling complex engineering and/or physical systems. Here, examples of such complex systems arise from: (a) materials science to develop new compounds with exceptional mechanical and thermodynamical properties (e.g., resistance to mechanical stresses and high temperatures), (b) structural and nuclear engineering to model the temporal evolution of the structural damage of concrete shields exposed to continuous neutron and gamma radiations emitted by the nuclear reactor core, (c) urban sciences (e.g., transportation and smart buildings), and (d) power grid systems.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Nuclear Criticality Safety [Book Chapter]

Nuclear Criticality Safety is a field of nuclear engineering that involves worker and public safety during the handling, processing, transportation, and storage activities of fissile isotopes ( 233 U, 235 U, and 239 Pu) outside of nuclear reactors. Criticality accidents release energy as a result of accidentally producing a self-sustaining fission chain reaction. If these occur during hands-on operations the results can be lethal to worker within about 4.6 m (15 ft.) of the accident. There have been 22 process criticality accidents in the world between 1953 and 1999 resulting in physical injury, on and off-site dose, or death. Nuclear Criticality Safety involves work by qualified persons to preclude criticality accidents and their consequences by ensuring activities with fissionable materials remain subcritical, i.e., safe, during all normal and credible abnormal conditions. This article presents information about those nuclear fuel cycle steps presenting Nuclear Criticality Safety concerns that must be considered to ensure worker and public safety is assured.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

SAM Plug-in Development (Phase I Final Report)

The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) has created an extensive set of advanced modeling and simulation tools for nuclear engineering analysis. The advanced capabilities of these newer analysis codes require more in-depth training, skills, and knowledge in order to effectively utilize them for the design, analysis, and licensing of advanced nuclear systems and experiments. A high learning curve for inexperienced users may deter organizations from incorporating these tools into their internal processes. This project involved development of a plug-in to the Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package (SNAP) for the System Analysis Module (SAM) tool. SAM is an advanced system analysis tool for reactor transient analyses being developed at Argonne National Laboratory under the U.S. DOE Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program. SAM utilizes an object-oriented application framework (MOOSE), and its underlying meshing and finite-element library (libMesh) and linear and non-linear solvers (PETSc), to leverage modern advanced software environments and numerical methods. SNAP provides a highly flexible framework for creating, modifying and documenting input for engineering analysis codes such as SAM as well as extensive functionality for submitting, monitoring, and interacting with the codes through an intuitive graphical user interface (GUI). The common user interface provided by SNAP minimizes the learning curve for engineers starting with a new analysis code and provides an intuitive framework for transitioning between different analysis codes. SNAP provides a powerful but intuitive interface to facilitate access to advanced modeling and simulation tools for inexperienced users. Unlike many “form based” GUI’s, SNAP maps each engineering code’s component input to an internal database which manages all component input parameters along with component interconnections. This level of abstraction permits SNAP to support several advanced capabilities such as renodalization, model validation and consistency checks, embedded documentation, model notebook generation, data ownership and reviewer tracking, and variable assignment for inputs to name a few. SNAP includes a built-in Python interpreter and is interfaced to several commercial and open source packages including CPython, MATLAB/OCTAVE, Microsoft Office, Open Office, and SANDIA’s DAKOTA package which provides Uncertainty Quantification analysis through the SNAP plug-ins. Phase I of this project involved development a fully functional basic SAM plug-in to SNAP. This plug-in provides the ability to import existing models, graphically construct, edit and submit models using SNAP’s extensive functionality.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Toward Exascale: Overview of Large Eddy Simulations and Direct Numerical Simulations of Nuclear Reactor Flows with the Spectral Element Method in Nek5000

At the beginning of the last decade, Petascale supercomputers (i.e., computers capable of more than 1 petaFLOP) emerged. Now, at the dawn of exascale supercomputing, we provide a review of recent landmark simulations of portions of reactor components with turbulence-resolving techniques that this computational power has made possible. In fact, these simulations have provided invaluable insight into flow dynamics, which is difficult or often impossible to obtain with experiments alone. We focus on simulations performed with the spectral element method, as this method has emerged as a powerful tool to deliver massively parallel calculations at high fidelity by using large eddy simulation or direct numerical simulation. We also limit this paper to constant-property incompressible flow of a Newtonian fluid in the absence of other body or external forces, although the method is by no means limited to this class of flows. We briefly review the fundamentals of the method and the reasons it is compelling for the simulation of nuclear engineering flows. We review in detail a series of Petascale simulations, including the simulations of helical coil steam generators, fuel assemblies, and pebble beds. Even with Petascale computing, however, limitations for nuclear modeling and simulation tools remain. In particular, the size and scope of turbulence-resolving simulations are still limited by computing power and resolution requirements, which scale with the Reynolds number. In the final part of this paper, we discuss the future of the field, including recent advancements in emerging architectures such as GPUbased supercomputers, which are expected to power the next generation of high-performance computers.

computational fluid dynamics↗
DOE OSTI2024

Digital engineering implementation in nuclear demonstration and nonproliferation projects at Idaho National Laboratory

Digital engineering and digital twins are increasingly being used in nuclear energy projects with important impacts. At Idaho National Laboratory, these approaches have been applied in a variety of nuclear energy research, development, and demonstration projects, with key lessons and evolutions occurring for each. In this paper, we describe the use of digital engineering and digital twins in the Versatile Test Reactor design, National Reactor Innovation Center test beds, and nonproliferation analysis of the AGN-201 reactor design. We share key lessons learned for these projects related to tool selection, adoption and training, and working with existing assets versus beginning at the design phase. We also share highlights of future potential uses of digital twins and digital engineering, including using artificial intelligence to perform repetitive design tasks and digital twins to move towards semiautonomous nuclear power plant operations.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗
DOE OSTI2026

Tokamak Energy’s pre-concept design for a fusion power plant: an overview of ST-E1

Climate change and rapidly rising energy demand, driven in part by artificial intelligence and data-centre growth, create an urgent need for stable, low-carbon, and abundant power. Fusion is a promising long-term solution, yet its commercialisation faces a fundamental paradox in today’s investment environment: pilot plants are essential to de-risk physics, engineering, and operations, but their limited lifetime energy output and high upfront costs make them difficult to finance. This paper presents Tokamak Energy’s response: ST-E1, a pre-concept design for a low-aspect-ratio tokamak power plant engineered specifically to overcome this challenge. ST-E1 is designed from the outset for phased operation—pilot and commercial phases, with an upgrade phase in between—with emphasis on commercial viability, maintainability, nuclear engineering, modularity, and upgradability. A key design principle is the deliberate separation of long-lived assets, such as the magnet cage and vacuum vessel, from replaceable in-vessel systems. This provides an attractive and credible investment approach to generate operational data and de-risk key technologies while preserving most capital-intensive assets for later commercial phases. The architecture supports continuous optimisation toward high net electric power (targeting 800–1000 MW net electric), a normalised capital expenditure of $\$$ 12–14k/kW of net electric power, and high availability (targeting > 80%). A tokamak core with a 5 m major radius, aspect ratio of 2.3, and on-plasma axis toroidal field of 5.25 T was selected to meet these objectives. This paper summarises the ST-E1 design philosophy, principal features, and development methodology. It introduces a Focus Collection of 11 papers detailing the pre-concept design of the entire tokamak and corresponding plant.

ST-E1↗
DOE OSTI2023

Verifying MCNP Models of the TEX High 240 Plutonium Benchmark

Computational modeling programs are invaluable tools that allow us to understand systems, safely develop new processes, and make reliable predictions about future designs. However, the effectiveness of these codes is limited by the degree to which their parameters match the real world. In the field of nuclear engineering, cross section data is one of these vital parameters. Accurate cross section data on important fissile and fissionable isotopes promotes the design of safer and more efficient fabrication, transportation, storage, and stockpiling of nuclear fuel. Unfortunately, there are knowledge gaps in data on key isotopes. In 2011, a multinational meeting hosted by the US Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program ranked the priority of certain cross section data needs. In response, Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) designed the Thermal and Epithermal eXperiment (TEX) series of benchmark experiments. Benchmark experiments are used to validate current cross section data. They validate data by comparing the results of an actual experiment to the predicted results from a computational model. The data a benchmark applies to depends on the isotope and energy range the experiment’s neutron multiplication factor ( k eff ) is most sensitive to. The development and testing of the TEX High 240 Plutonium Benchmark will help validate 240 Pu cross section data. The configuration and materials of this benchmark are designed to be most sensitive to 240 Pu's intermediate energy range (from 0.625 ev to 100 keV ). MCNP® models of the assembly have been developed by LLNL and the results have been written in the final design report. In order for the discrepancies between benchmark models and experiments to be attributed to cross section inaccuracies, the accuracy of the models needs to be verified. The goal of this project is to verify of the results of LLNL's modeling by creating a new set of MCNP models and comparing the results.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

An agent-based blackboard system for multi-objective optimization

In the field of multi-objective optimization, there are a multitude of algorithms from which to choose. Each algorithm has strengths and weaknesses associated with the mechanics for finding the Pareto front. Recently, researchers have begun to examine how multi-agent environments can be used to help solve multi-objective optimization problems. In this work, we propose a multi-objective optimization algorithm based on a multi-agent blackboard system (MABS). The MABS framework allows for multiple agents to read and write pertinent optimization problem data to a central blackboard agent. Agents can stochastically search the design space, use previously discovered solutions to explore local optima, or update and prune the Pareto front. A centralized blackboard framework allows the optimization problem to be solved in a cohesive manner and permits stopping, restarting, or updating the optimization problem. The MABS framework is tested against three alternative optimization algorithms across a suite of engineering design problems and typically outperforms the other algorithms in discovering the Pareto front. A parallelizability study is performed where we find that the MABS is able to evaluate a set number of designs, which require an evaluation time ranging from 0 to 300 seconds, quicker than a traditional optimization algorithm: this fact becomes more apparent the longer it takes to evaluate a design. To provide context for the benefits provided by MABS, a real-world nuclear engineering design problem is examined. MABS is used to examine the placement of experiments in a nuclear reactor, where we are able to evaluate hundreds of configurations for experimental placement while maintaining a strict set of safety constraints.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Retractable Sensor for Reactor Experiments

This presentation is to orient a mechanical or nuclear engineering senior design team so that they can help solve an instrumentation problem found in high power test reactors. Test reactors such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory are used to irradiate nuclear fuels and materials to evaluate performance after high levels of exposure to a reactor in-pile environment. The purpose of the experiments is to determine property changes as the materials or fuels are bombarded with fast neutrons (and thermal (slow) neutrons as well). Typically, the irradiation must take place at a very specific temperature. Sometimes other parameters are monitored as well as properties such as creep, or gas composition, etc. However, the fast neutrons cause changes in not only the materials, but also in the transducers that are placed in the neutron flux, e.g., thermocouples or optical fibers. This task will be limited to considering temperature measurements. Thermocouples experience decalibration from not only the neutron flux, but also from the very high temperatures that are sometimes measured. Optical fibers darken in a neutron or gamma flux. However, it takes quite a few hours, or days for these changes to manifest. High power test reactors typically run at a constant power and so the temperature in an experiment is fairly stable over time. Because the changes are typically very slow, even a single temperature measurement per day, would provide 95% of a perfect data set. The basic concept of this effort is to push a very small diameter thermocouple or optical fiber into the location to be measured, leave it for 30 seconds or so for it to come to equilibrium, and transmit the signal, and then pull it up and away from the high neutron flux and high temperature region. The distance the thermocouple or fiber would need to move is on the order of 50 – 100 cm. By doing this, the thermocouple junction or optical fiber would spend only a few hours in the high flux/high temperature environment over the life of the irradiation.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2021

NEAMS-Multiphysics Technical Assistance in FY21

The Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) [1] is a massively parallel finite-element/volume package for multiphysics simulation in science and engineering. The package focuses on providing rapid-development capabilities for engineering applications by leveraging well-built features from libMesh [2] and the Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation (PETSc) [3]. Fiscal year 2021 (FY-21) was the first year with funding dedicated to supporting MOOSE-derived applications relevant to the Nuclear Engineering Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program. In this report we outline the work done to support NEAMS applications such as BISON, Griffin, Pronghorn, and System Analysis Module (SAM).

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

INL's Reactor Physics Capabilities

I was invited to give a seminar to students and faculty of nuclear engineering and radiological sciences (NERS) at the university of Michigan, Ann Arbor. the presentation is about reactor physics capaibility at INL

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Review of recent activities with MOOSE, an open-source finite element & finite volume multi-fidelity simulation framework

Modeling and simulation are an increasing part of engineering. This is undoubtedly driven by the high costs of constructing experimental facilities, but also enabled by the exponential increase in computing powers over the last decades, which allows computational models to be closer than ever to reality. One of the main drivers for the development of MOOSE is supporting advanced nuclear reactor simulations. A challenging aspect of modeling advanced nuclear reactors is the plurality of physics involved, including neutronics, thermal hydraulics and fuel performance. These physics are all coupled to some extent and are generally solved in a sequential but iterative fashion. The United States (U.S.) national laboratories have been developing MOOSE, an open source multiphysics framework since its inception at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in 2008. This framework enables seamless coupling of multiphysics simulations and facilitates the implementation of new physics and material governing laws. It is continuously expanded with novel numerical methods and new pre-implemented physics module. Numerous applications, developed within the Department of Energy (DOE) laboratories, academia, and industry, including outside of nuclear engineering, have been developed to study specialized physics problems. International collaborations are welcome on this open-source modeling and simulation project.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Challenges and Opportunities in Staffing and Knowledge Transfer at Research Reactors

University research reactors have been a cornerstone of nuclear engineering research and education since the first reactor was deployed at North Carolina State University in the 1950s. The population of university reactors grew to a high of almost 80 in 1970 but has dropped to 24 operating today. The US Department of Energy – Office of Nuclear Energy supports the remaining reactors through fuel and infrastructure funding. The Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) collaborated with the National Organization of Test, Research, and Training Reactors (TRTR) to study the needs of the university research reactor community. Staffing and knowledge transfer were identified as critical areas. The panel will discuss challenges and opportunities in these areas including how COVID-19 has affected their facilities.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Research R&D [Slides]

Included are slides for a MIT nuclear engineering department invited seminar. The talking points are: (1) Current R&D at INL in safety, risk, and reliability; (2) Technical focus; and (3) Future directions.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Summary of Structural Material Modeling Development for the NEAMS Program in Fiscal Year 2020

This report summarizes work performed during Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for the U.S. Department of Energy?s Nuclear Engineering Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program for the Structural Materials and Chemistry Technical Area in the work package entitled "MS- 20IN050104 - Structural Materials - INL." The Structural Materials and Chemistry Technical Area is a relatively new component of the NEAMS program, and is currently focusing on developing simulation capabilities to support the deployment of nuclear energy in the areas of molten salt reactor chemistry, light water reactor (LWR) structural material degradation, and structural material behavior for advanced reactor applications. INL performed work for to advance capabilities for simulation of structural material behavior in both LWR and advanced reactor applications in the work described here.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Reactors Development in USA

Small and micro-reactor advanced reactor development in the USA. Advanced Reactor programs, nuclear renaissance, and INL as a test bed facility. These slides are for presentations in general on the past, INL and nuclear engineering worldwide, GEN IV reactor designs, SMRs and micro Rx designs, multiple commercial designs, and what INL as a test bed means and who uses this to their advantage.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗