DOE OSTI2020
This DOE Phase I SBIR project has developed a glow discharge-based plasma process to convert carbon dioxide to sold carbon and water. By adding natural gas, the additional enthalpy can be used to reform the output carbon dioxide to value added carbon and EPA-compliance-grade water, thus creating a process that has no gaseous products at all, such as: CO 2 + CH 4 → 2C + 2H 2 O, which is simply the exothermic reverse of the syngas reaction. During the Phase I work, several milestones were accomplished successfully. a. First, a synthesis reactor was designed, assembled, and successfully operated using the combined simultaneous operation of glow discharge and microwaves. DC discharge and microwaves can also be operated individually, allowing multiple configurations to be used This is one of the first reactors of its kind, and perhaps the first ever. b. Second, the research team successfully produced carbon nanomaterials using carbon dioxide as the source of carbon via CO 2 + 2H 2 → C + 2H 2 O. This is certainly one of the first processes to use plasma to convert carbon dioxide to nanocarbon, and perhaps the first ever demonstration. c. Third, it was also shown that carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide can be used with methane to reduce the synthesis temperature of ASI graphene decorated carbon nanotubes (GDCNT). Hitherto GDCNT were only fabricated above 1200 °C. GDCNT was synthesized at 780 °C. CO 2 + C → 2CO; 2 CO + CH 4 → 3 C + 2H 2 O, and also, CH 4 + CO 2 → 2 C + 2H 2 O. d. Fourth, closed cycle synthesis of nanomaterial was demonstrated with over 80% conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon and water was achieved, on the basis of pressure drop during glow discharge. e. Fifth, plasma operation was achieved via glow discharge and microwaves at 500 Torr, demonstrating a path forward to atmospheric pressure operation f. Sixth, using carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in an electrothermal furnace, we produced 350 grams per hour of high-quality nanotubes in a single furnace, compared to 200 grams per hour for the commercial process. Controlling the enthalpy prevents self-extinguishing hot gas pyrolysis. Thus, carbon dioxide enhances the properties and reduces the production cost. This is a near term advance that can go into trial production in the near term. g. Seventh, economic analysis suggests an economic plan forward, producing carbon nanotubes for less than $50 per pound. The use of hydrogen and carbon dioxide as the feedstocks is acceptable from a cost basis, and in fact hydrogen is less expensive than carbon monoxide. Niche applications are available in the near term, though quantities relevant to sequestration remain a far-term goal. h. Eighth, though it was not the research team’s intention to create a new process for producing carbon monoxide, it was realized that almost by accident we demonstrated plasma reforming of carbon dioxide via a plasma version of the reverse Boudouard reaction. Accordingly, we have contacted a major gas manufacturer (Matheson Gas) to determine whether there is interest in creating an industrial version of the process. i. Ninth, a long-range strategy is identified in which a progressively more carbon-conscious world will seek to create solid carbon as a means of sequestering carbon dioxide, impeding its return to the atmosphere. In the long term the price must drop by orders of magnitude with larger production, and assuming success, solid carbon could be the preferred form for sequestration rather than underground storage. If carbon can be made as cheaply as dirt, or nearly so, then it can serve a useful purpose as structural material for housing, soil amendments in agriculture and fillers to modify low areas.