CESIUM-137 MEASUREMENTS OF SPENT CST COLUMNS FROM THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE TANK CLOSURE CESIUM REMOVAL (TCCR) PROJECT
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
DIPRETE, DAVID P.↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “cesium removal”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
SUMMARY OF BATCH OPERATIONS FOR THE TANK CLOSURE CESIUM REMOVAL CONTINUED OPERATIONS (TCCR 1A) AT SRS
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
MIKLIA, KURTIS R.↗
An Application of Molecular Recognition for the Efficient Removal of Cesium from Hanford Nuclear Waste by Modular Solvent Extraction
In this work, experimental results leading to flowsheet design are presented showing how a calixarene-crown ether based solvent-extraction process can meet the challenge of cesium removal from nuclear tank wastes stored at the US Department of Energy Hanford site. Cleanup of legacy Cold War nuclear waste stored in underground tanks represents one of the greatest environmental challenges facing the US Department of Energy in terms of risk, cost, and effectiveness of applicable science and technology. Planning for the cleanup at the Hanford Site calls for the removal of the radioactive fission product 137Cs from its alkaline salt waste, including the use of modular processes that can be deployed near the tank farms. To meet the resulting need for extremely high selectivity, the Next-Generation Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (NG-CSSX) process employing a calix[4]arene-crown ether in modified kerosene has been adapted to remove sub-millimolar cesium in competition with molar sodium and potassium in a high-nitrate alkaline matrix. Potassium loading in the solvent was determined in extraction, scrubbing, and stripping, leading to an empirical model closely approximating cesium distribution ratios for a variety of Hanford waste types. Process chemistry has been developed based on this molecular-recognition approach, focusing on the competitive effect of potassium loading and the mitigating process modifications needed, including extending the scrub section. The result is a modular flowsheet design that can achieve cesium decontamination factors well in excess of 15,000 even for the worst-case Hanford waste.
Williams, Neil [ORNL] (ORCID:000000023159226X)↗
Cesium Exchange onto Crystalline Silicotitanate from Blended Hanford Tank Wastes
The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system was developed to filter and remove cesium (Cs and 137 Cs) from Hanford tank waste supernate in preparation for vitrification. The Cs removal will be conducted with crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media. Under the planned waste-processing strategy, the tank waste supernate will be queued for TSCR processing in tank 241-AP-107 (AP-107). Once AP-107 tank waste volume is sufficiently depleted, the waste supernate from tank 241-AP-105 (AP-105, the holding tank before transfer to AP-107) will be transferred to tank AP-107. Supernate from another tank will be transferred to the holding tank, AP-105, for eventual transfer to tank AP-107. These supernate streams will undergo blending in tanks AP-107 and AP-105; the volume blend ratios will be driven by how much the tank waste supernate volumes are depleted before the next tank waste is added. The consequence of tank waste blending on Cs uptake by CST was of interest and was tested via batch contacts; results are reported herein.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Ion Exchange Processing of AP-105 Hanford Tank Waste through Crystalline Silicotitanate in a Staged 2- then 3-Column System (Rev.1)
The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, under development by Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS), will send initial low-activity Hanford waste tank supernate feeds to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility. In addition to entrained solids removal from the supernate, the primary goal of TSCR is to remove cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) by ion exchange, allowing contact handling of the liquid effluent product at the WTP. Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media, manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC (product IONSIVTM R9140-B), was selected as the ion exchange media at TSCR. CST is a non-elutable inorganic material that has demonstrated robust chemical, physical, and radiation tolerance while maintaining functionality. However, exchange kinetics of Cs onto CST is slow, resulting in low utilization of the CST Cs load capacity before unacceptable Cs breakthrough. Two process flow designs have been tested, as follows. 1. Lead-lag column processing: The lead column was removed after the lag column effluent reached the waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit, the lag column was moved into the lead position, and a new lag column was installed. This format used ~52% Cs load capacity on the lead column. 2. Lead-lag-polish column processing: The processing was stopped when the polish column effluent reached the WAC limit. This format resulted in 81% Cs load capacity on the lead column. Testing with diluted feed from Hanford tank AP-105 (AP-105DF) incorporated a nuanced change to the lead-lag-polish column system where the polish column was inserted when the lag column effluent reached WAC limit. A 10.9-L volume of AP-105DF (diluted to 5.6 M Na) was processed through the Direct Feed Test Platform system, established at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to support small-scale waste qualification efforts. The columns consisted of 10-mL CST beds (CST Lot 2002009604, sieved to screen out >30-mesh particles) placed in 1.5-cm-inner-diameter columns. Feed was processed at 1.83 bed volumes (BV) per hour; the flowrate, in terms of contact time with the CST bed, matched the expected flowrate at TSCR. The <30-mesh CST sieve cut was expected to provide appropriate performance scaling to a full-height column. The installation of the polish column later in processing (after processing 523 BVs) did not appear to fundamentally change the utilization of the lead column for Cs exchange nor did it extend the total feed processing volume when compared to the previous test with AP-107 feed. Table ES.1 and Figure ES.1 summarize the measured AP-105DF Cs load performance.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: F-Area Pump Pit 3 (FPP-3) Sump Sample: December 2021 Sample
In December 2021, SRR-E sent an ~185 mL sample identified as FPP-3 from a F-Area pump pit sump to SRNL for analysis. The sample was pale yellow in color and contained a small amount of suspended solids visually estimated to be less than 1% by volume. SRNL analysis indicated that the sample contained 4.4 E+05 dpm/mL Cs-137, 6.2 E+05 dpm/mL total beta activity, 9.3 E+02 dpm/mL beta activity following cesium removal, and below detectable levels of alpha activity following cesium removal. In addition, the sample contained 0.015 M free OH- and 947 μg total organic carbon/mL.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Options for the Removal of Cesium and Strontium from Acidic Uranyl Sulfate Solutions from Molybdenum-99 Production: Part II The Effect of Sodium Carbonate Adjustment to pH 9 on Strontium Removal
A small laboratory-scale column process aimed at removing fission products from prototypical acidic sulfate solution wastes from a prototypical Mo-99 recovery process has been operated in a radioactive materials hood at Savannah River National Laboratory. This equipment has been operated with realistic concentrations of uranium (0.4 wt % 235 U), plutonium ( 239 Pu), neptunium ( 237 Np), non-radioactive surrogates of common fission products (including Cs and Sr) and two promising absorbents – AMP-PAN and CST R9120-B. The goal of this work was to demonstrate the removal and concentration of high specific activity isotopes which are expected to dominate the classification of the low-level waste from the production of 99 Mo. Both AMP-PAN and CST R9120-B are attractive absorbents for the removal of 137 Cs from an acidic sulfate waste stream. They do not provide a solution for the removal of 90 Sr from the acidic solutions. CST was shown to be useful at removing both Cs and Sr after adjustment of the acidic sulfate solution with sodium carbonate to pH 9. Limited removal of transuranic species and almost no removal of uranium was observed for CST R9120B absorbent. This could be important due to the relatively large amount of uranium expected to be present in such waste streams. The capacity of these absorbents for 137 Cs will likely be dependent on the Cs concentration in the solutions processed but loading in excess of 0.7 mg Cs per gram of CST absorbent while loading 0.14 mg Sr per gram of CST absorbent appears to be achievable from pH 9 carbonate solution.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Characterization of Infrequent Samples from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility: H-Area Diversion Box 7 (HDB-7) Sump Sample: December 2021 Sample
In December 2021, SRR-E sent an ~250 mL sample identified as HDB-7 from an H-Area diversion box sump to SRNL for analysis. The sample was clear and colorless and free from any solids. SRNL analysis indicated that the sample contained 2.97E+05 dpm/mL Cs-137, 3.74E+05 dpm/mL total beta activity, 1.04E+03 dpm/mL beta activity following cesium removal, and below detectable levels of alpha activity and alpha activity following cesium removal. In addition, the pH of the sample was 7.32, free hydroxide concentration was 2.09E-07 M, and the density was 0.991 g/mL.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Options for the Removal of Cesium and Strontium from Acidic Uranyl Sulfate Solutions from Molybdenum-99 Production
A small laboratory-scale column process aimed at removing fission products from prototypical acidic sulfate solution wastes from a prototypical Mo-99 recovery process has been operated in a radioactive materials hood at Savannah River National Laboratory. This equipment has been operated with realistic concentrations of uranium (0.4 wt % 235 U), plutonium ( 239 Pu), neptunium ( 237 Np), non-radioactive surrogates of common fission products (including Cs and Sr) and two promising absorbents AMP-PAN and CST R91290-B. The goal of this work was to demonstrate the removal and concentration of high specific activity isotopes which are expected to dominate the classification of the low-level waste from the production of 99 Mo. Both AMP-PAN and CST R9120-B are attractive absorbents for the removal of 137 Cs from an acidic sulfate waste stream. They do not provide a solution for the removal of 90 Sr from the acidic solutions, but CST should be investigated at a higher pH. Limited removal of transuranic species and almost no removal of uranium was observed in this testing. This could be important due to the relatively large amount of uranium expected to be present in such waste streams. The capacity of these absorbents for 137 Cs will likely be dependent on the Cs concentration in the solutions processed but loading in the range of 0.2 to 5 mg Cs per gram of absorbent appears to be achievable.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
High Solids Performance Testing in a Scaled TSCR System
The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) project is a technology demonstration that will pretreat Hanford tank waste supernatant in support of the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) mission. The TSCR system employs two key separation technologies: dead-end filtration (DEF) and ion exchange (IX) using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) media. DEF will be used to remove undissolved solids from tank waste to protect the functionality of the IX columns and the IX system will remove Cs-137 from tank waste. The separation technologies (DEF and IX) used in TSCR are technically mature and have also been successfully deployed at the Savannah River site in a similar facility known as the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system. While testing with simulants and real waste has been successfully performed under conditions expected during the initial operation of TSCR, test data is absent for assessing off normal high solids loading that may be in the TSCR waste feed. Normal TSCR treatment operations are expected to handle wastes with solids content on the order of 200 ppm, and off normal solids loading could be much larger than the nominal level. The testing program described in this report was conducted to understand the consequence of operating the TSCR system at elevated solids loadings up to the high-solids limit of 15,000 ppm [i.e., 1.5-wt%] identified in the TSCR design basis. Although the system is not required to make throughput above the nominal solids loading, the testing was intended to provide important information related to potential off normal operations. At off normal levels near the high-solids limit, there are potential implications for TSCR performance in the areas of throughput, DEF pressure drop, filter backflush frequency, and IX column pressure drop. In addition, intrusion of solids into the IX column was postulated to impact the Cs-137 loading behavior by promoting channeling or flow maldistribution in the column; since the magnitude of the postulated effect was unknown, assessing it was also of interest. The testing was performed using representative waste simulants and a prototypic, integrated TSCR system designed and assembled specifically to conduct the high solids performance assessment. Overall, the scaled TSCR testing demonstrated that full-scale unit operations can succeed in fulfilling their processing objectives in the presence of solids up to 3,000 ppm, but there are potential performance challenges to filtration operations at solids loadings as low as ~500 ppm. The severity of the challenge is likely to be dependent on the type and size distribution of solids, of which the current testing only examined a single type and size distribution. To provide some flexibility for future full-scale operations, the results of the testing suggest two possible risk reduction strategies that can be implemented without any changes in TSCR design or configuration. One option would be to enact an administrative limit on the solids loading to protect TSCR from feeds that are likely to require a high DEF swap frequency. Another option is to permit operation of the DEFs at differential pressures greater than 2 psid before swapping filters. The selection of a higher differential pressure target is not anticipated to adversely impact DEF backflushing efficacy and would reduce both swap frequency and the amount of waste sent to AP-108.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
VERSE-LC TCCR Model Calibration using Batch 1A, Batch 2, and Batch 3 Column Data
The objective of this work is to utilize on-line gamma monitoring data collected during Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Column Batch 3 operations to calibrate the parameters (essentially, the correction/dilution factors (CF or DF)) used in the VERSE-LC models for the prediction of cesium breakthrough while processing Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H dissolved saltcake High-Level Waste through a packed cylindrical bed of Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST). Calibrated VERSE-LC models could be applied to aid in evaluating future TCCR operations.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Separation technique provides rapid quantitative determination of cesium-137 in irradiated nuclear fuel
Potassium cobalt ferrocyanide is used to determine cesium-137 activity in irradiated fuel samples. It preferentially removes cesium from an acid solution of the fuel material. The residue is filtered and analyzed with a gamma spectrometer.
Ellenburg, E. J.↗
Investigation into Na and Cs activity coefficients in high salt solutions to support Cs removal in Hanford tank waste
The treatment of Hanford tank waste is one of the most technically challenging environmental cleanup activities for the U.S. Department of Energy to date. To expedite the processing of liquid waste stored in underground tanks in southeastern Washington state, it is necessary to remove the significant dose contributor, 137 Cs. Toward this effort, ion exchange with crystalline silicotitanate (CST) has been employed as part of the Tank Side Cesium Removal system. The model used to predict Cs exchange onto CST was developed using activity coefficients calculated from the Bromley equation. A series of batch contact tests that varied in [Na] were conducted to look at the impact of Na concentration on Cs distribution. Experimental distribution ratios ( K d ) were compared to the distribution ratios predicted using three different activity coefficient models: (1) commercially available HSC software, (2) the Bromley equation, and (3) a simplified approach adapted from Marcos-Arroyo et al. Ultimately, the Bromley method underpredicted the effect of ionic strength on the Na activity coefficient ( γ Na+ ), HSC overestimated the impact of ionic strength on the expected performance due to the Cs activity coefficient ( γ Cs+ ), but the simplified approach predicted the experimental K d values quite well in a binary matrix. In conclusion, expansion of this approach in complex matrices is necessary for application to Hanford tank waste.
38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) Ion Exchange Media Performance Evaluations to Support TSCR DSA IX Media Equilibrium Contacts
The primary objective of this work is to calculate the maximum loading expected on the Hanford Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) ion exchange columns. A key consideration in the design of the columns is the amount of 137 Cs that loads onto the Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) and the heat generated by the loaded column during storage. Per request of Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has utilized ZAM, a computer program developed by the research group of Professor Rayford G. Anthony of Texas A&M University, to predict the cesium loading on the CST for a variety of waste compositions expected to be processed by TSCR. The study evaluated cesium loadings for the following waste compositions: 1. Seventeen DFLAW campaign batches to cover projected supernate composition ranges within which TSCR may be expected to operate within the first ten years, 2. Hanford tank AP-105 and AP-107 waste solutions that will be processed by the TSCR system.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Effect of Na Concentration on Cs Distribution with Crystalline Silicotitanate in Tank Waste Simulants
Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media is currently utilized in the tank side cesium removal (TSCR) system on the Hanford site to remove Cs-137 from the tank waste supernate. As the main dose contributor to the liquid supernate in Hanford tank waste, it is necessary to remove the Cs-137 to expedite low activity waste processing and immobilization. Ongoing batch contact experiments with CST have been done to tease out the impact of group II metals, anions, potassium, and temperature on Cs removal to better understand bounding conditions for operations as well as aid in development of a wholesome isotherm model to predict Cs behavior in the tank waste. This paper discusses the impact of Na concentration on Cs exchange and provides insight into the challenges associated with activity coefficient estimations for modeling Cs distribution in tank waste matrices.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
An Aluminum-Based Metal–Organic Cage for Cesium Capture
Metal–organic cages are a class of supramolecular structures that often require the careful selection of organic linkers and metal nodes. Of this class, few examples of metal–organic cages exist where the nodes are composed of main group metals. Herein, we have prepared an aluminum-based metal–organic cage, H 8 [Al 8 (pdc) 8 (OAc) 8 O 4 ] (Al-pdc-AA), using inexpensive and commercially available materials. The cage formation was achieved via solvothermal self-assembly of solvated aluminum and pyridine-dicarboxylic linkers in the presence of a capping agent, acetic acid. The obtained supramolecular structure was characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), thermogravimetric analysis, and NMR spectroscopy. Based on crystal structure and computational analyses, the cage has a 3.7 Å diameter electron-rich cavity suitable for the binding of cations such as cesium (ionic radius of 1.69 Å). Here, the host–guest interactions were probed with 1 H and 133 Cs NMR spectroscopy in DMSO, where at low concentrations, Cs + binds to Al-pdc-AA in a 1:1 ratio. The binding site was identified from the crystal structure of CsH 7 [Al 8 (pdc) 8 (OAc) 8 O 4 ] (Cs + Al-pdc-AA), and a binding affinity of ~10 6 –10 7 M –1 was determined from NMR titration experiments. The Al-pdc-AA showed improved selectivity for cesium binding over alkali metal cations (Cs + > Rb + > K + >> Na + ~ Li + ). Collectively, the study reports a novel aluminum cage that can serve as a promising host for efficient and selective cesium removal.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
Fiscal Year 2021 Filtration of Hanford Tank 241-AP-107 Supernatant Samples Obtained at Prototypic Tank Level and Filtered at 16 °C
Bench-scale filtration testing of 8.5 liters of supernatant from Hanford waste tank 241-AP-107, chilled to 16 °C, was conducted using a backpulse dead-end filter (BDEF) filtration system equipped with a feed vessel and a Mott inline filter Model 6610 (Media Grade 5) in the hot cells of the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. This was done to assess the impact of a lower sampling location within the tank as well the lowered filtration temperature on supernatant stability and fouling. The as-received samples were transferred to 1.5-liter poly bottles and held at 16 °C for approximately 1 week prior to filtration. The feed was filtered through the BDEF system at a targeted flux of 0.065 gpm/ft 2 to match the prototypic operation of the TSCR system. During the initial period of filtration, the differential pressure required to effect filtration at 0.065 gpm/ft 2 increased until it reached 2 psid [the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) action limit] at 26 hours. After this, the filter was backpulsed to dislodge accumulated solids and reduce this pressure differential. An additional eight backpulses were conducted during the initial filtration period; each time, the target pressure was reached sooner than during the previous interval. Volume filtered decreased from 0.9 to 0.03 m 3 /m 2 over the course of 14 processing hours. After the ninth backpulse, the backpulse frequency had become unsustainable, and it was decided to perform an extensive filter cleaning. The filter was cleaned by draining the chilled AP-107 feed into chilled holding containers, introducing 0.1 M NaOH into the feed vessel, and recirculating the NaOH through the system for 20 minutes before allowing the system to soak for 2 hours without temperature control. A measurable decrease in filter resistance during this recirculation indicated that the 0.1 M NaOH was likely dissolving some of the solids that had deposited on the filter. Post cleaning, the filter resistance was effectively restored to initial conditions as the initial transmembrane pressure was restored to original levels. However, resumed processing of the AP-107 feed at 16 °C continued to result in an increased rate of filter resistance. An additional five backpulses were conducted (four during feed processing, one during subsequent cleaning) before the conclusion of the test. Solids concentrated from the backpulse solutions displayed sodium oxalate-type phases, Al-oxides and sodium Al-oxides/carbonates, iron oxides, and Ca-bearing phases (calcite). The scanning electron microscopy analyses also revealed a large distribution of particles, with some particles, notably sodium phosphate dodecahydrate, having diameters close to 0.5 mm.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Characterization of CST Post-Processing AP-105 Hanford Tank Waste
The primary goal of the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, under development by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS), is to remove entrained solids and 137 Cs from the Hanford tank waste supernate to expedite production of low-activity waste. Ion exchange (IX) testing of 10.9 L of waste from Hanford tank 241-AP-105 (AP-105), performed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, used a lead-lag-polish column format, with a bed volume of 10 mL per column, to decontaminate tank waste supernate using crystalline silicotitanate (CST) as the IX media. The AP-105 Cs IX processing test, discussed elsewhere, resulted in a shorter transition zone (i.e., steeper load curve) than those defined by wastes from tanks 241-AP-107 and 241-AW-102.1 The shorter transition zone was indicative of a matrix effect retarding Cs capacity. Therefore, aliquots of spent CST from the lead, lag, and polish columns were subjected to a digestion protocol to quantify analytes retained by the CST and extrapolate the impact on Cs capacity. The spent CST was digested using a combination of 5 M HNO 3 and H 2 O 2 with vigorous heating and stirring. Due to the radiation dose accompanying the 137 Cs on the CST columns, a secondary Cs separation by ammonium molybdophosphate embedded in polyacrylonitrile (AMP-PAN) was performed to separate the 137 Cs from the CST so the samples could be contact-handled for analysis outside of a shielded facility.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗