Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Battery anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

One-Step Spark Plasma Erosion Processing of Carbon-Coated Sn-Si Nanoparticles for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes

High density portable energy storage is desirable owing to the energy requirements of portable electronics and electric vehicles. The Li-ion battery’s high energy density could be even further improved through the utilization of alternative materials (instead of carbon) for the anode, such as Sn or Si. Nonetheless, the large volume expansion upon lithiation, up to ~300% for Li 22 Si 5 , causes pulverization and rapid capacity degradation during cycling. Sn also forms a Li 22 Sn 5 compound with the equivalent stoichiometric Li capacity but with enhanced ductility. Nano-sized Si and Sn have demonstrated distinctive nanoscale properties, facilitating the retention of higher capacities, particularly when coated with carbon, which improves mechanical stability. To date, the methods of synthesizing coated Si, Sn, or Si-Sn alloyed nanoparticles are complicated, costly, and not readily scalable to meet the demands of cost-effective manufacturing. Spark plasma erosion in a hydrocarbon dielectric has been explored as a one-step process to produce Sn-Si alloy nanoparticles coated with a thin carbon film, offering a scalable and cost-effective processing route. The resulting Sn-Si particles exhibited a bi-modal size distribution at ~5 nm and ~500 nm and were carbon-coated, as intended, from the hydrocarbon dielectric breakdown. The spark-eroded nanoparticles were thoroughly characterized using TEM/EDS, XPS, AES, SSNMR, and TGA, and their improved electrochemical performance was assessed through half-cell experiments.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Lignite-Derived Carbon Materials for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes

This project involved collaboration between the University of North Dakota (UND) College of Engineering & Mines, Clean Republic, LLC (CR), and the North American Coal Corporation (NACoal) to develop advanced LIBs anodes from lignite-derived carbon materials. The overall goal of the project was to develop advanced anode materials for LIBs from lignite-derived carbon feedstocks.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2026

Experimental considerations and applications for time-resolved impedance on silicon-anode battery systems

Dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (dEIS) utilizes a superimposed multi-sinusoidal waveform and enables temporally resolved investigations on various electrochemical processes; however, the signal-to-noise ratio must be maximized while retaining linearity and stationarity within the system. In the present work, we probe the impact of the waveform’s total amplitude as well as the waveform and phase profiles. The equal amplitude multi-sinusoidal waveform with 35 mV total amplitude (<1 mV per frequency) and random phase profile exhibits the lowest impedance noise. This input signal is sufficient in avoiding the high frequency signal attenuation from the potentiostat’s low-pass filter. Additionally, we demonstrate the optimized dEIS waveform’s utility in investigating surface passivation within thin-film and composite silicon (Si) anodes. Within a two-electrode Si-lithium metal coin cell, the charge transfer resistance (RCT) associated with alloying kinetics dominates the overall impedance. RCT increases with state of charge indicating a kinetic bottleneck at higher lithiation states. To explore this further, we utilize a three-electrode Si-LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 pouch cell to deconvolute the Si impedance contributions. The evolution of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and charge transfer resistances correlate to specific Li–Si alloy phases. We attribute this to the influence of Si particle volume expansion on SEI instabilities and a kinetic bottleneck at higher lithiation states.

Lam, Steven [ORNL]↗
DOE OSTI2025

Alloying Interlayers for Anode‐Less Lithium‐Metal Polymer Batteries

Anode‐less lithium‐metal batteries potentially offer further increased energy densities. However, the Coulombic efficiency (CE) of lithium plating and stripping, as a classical measure of Li inventory reversibility, is commonly still insufficient for achieving long‐lasting rechargeable batteries. Herein, the potential benefits of employing thin (20 nm) metal interlayers of Ag, Pt, and Au on Cu to alloy with Li in Cu||Li half‐cells and induce homogeneous Li plating with poly(ethylene oxide)‐based electrolytes are investigated. Interestingly, not all alloying interlayers enable a higher CE compared to neat Cu foil with 84%—specifically Ag@Cu with only 81%, while the best performing one, Au@Cu, provides a substantially increased CE of 91%. While generally the formation of “dead lithium” is found to be the major source of CE, this appears to be less pronounced in the case of Au@Cu, indeed. Further improvement can be achieved by carefully adjusting the cell voltage to a region in which the continuous de‐/alloying is suppressed, yielding a further enhanced CE of 94%, thus highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to design suitable electrode chemistries and designs beyond a “simple” material improvement.

anode-less battery↗
DOE OSTI2025

The Origin of Improved Performance in Boron‐Alloyed Silicon Nanoparticle‐Based Anodes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Stabilizing the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) remains a key challenge for silicon‐based lithium‐ion battery anodes. Alloying silicon with secondary elements like boron has emerged as a promising strategy to improve the cycle life of silicon anodes, yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, how boron concentration influences battery performance is systematically investigated. These results show a near‐monotonic increase in cycle lifetime with higher boron content, with boron‐rich electrodes significantly outperforming pure silicon. Additionally, silicon‐boron alloy anodes exhibit nearly three times longer calendar life than pure silicon. Through detailed mechanistic analysis, alternative contributing factors are systematically ruled out, and it is proposed that improved passivation arises from a strong permanent dipole at the nanoparticle surface. This dipole, formed by undercoordinated and highly Lewis acidic boron, creates a static, ion‐dense layer that stabilizes the electrochemical interface, reducing parasitic electrolyte decomposition and enhancing long‐term stability. These findings suggest that, within the SEI framework, the electric double layer is an important consideration in surface passivation. This insight provides an underexplored parameter space for optimizing silicon anodes in next‐generation lithium‐ion batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Reductively Stable Electrolyte Realizes Deep Cycling Behavior in Anode‐free Sodium Batteries

For anode‐free sodium batteries to achieve practical consideration, highly reversible chemistries require exceptional ≥99.95% coulombic efficiencies that maintain over prolonged cycling periods. To do so, consumption of this severely limited sodium inventory must be restricted while metal nucleation processes that comprise the in situ formed metal anode are improved. Herein, we describe a fluorine‐free carborane electrolyte that satisfies these criteria by emphasizing reductive stability and weakly coordinating anion behavior as design principles. We find this approach promotes the development of a thin, robust SEI chemistry rich in both organic speciation and boron. The electrolyte described herein exhibits ideal metal nucleation behavior on one‐micron thin carbonaceous current collector surfaces and achieves a metal deposition/stripping efficiency near parity for 400 cycles. This novel anode chemistry is introduced to anode‐free full cell configurations where 87% of the initial discharge capacity is retained after 1000 cycles at 2.0 C. In conclusion, post‐test characterization of deep‐cycled anode‐free cells reveals suppressed capacity fade in these systems is attributed to the chemical stability of the carborane anion.

anode-free↗
DOE OSTI2024

Hydride-Based Interlayer for Solid-State Anode-Free Battery

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) are considered a promising approach to realizing an anode-free concept with high energy densities. However, the initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) has remained insufficient for anode-free batteries using sulfide-based solid electrolytes (SEs). Herein, we incorporated a hydride-based interlayer, 3LiBH 4 -LiI (LBHI), between a typical sulfide SE, Li 6 PS 5 Cl, and the Cu current collector. Further, by investigating the Li plating and stripping behaviors and the (electro)chemical stability between SEs and plated Li, we demonstrated that LBHI can effectively improve interfacial stability, leading to an ICE exceeding 94% in anode-free half cells. This interlayer also improves Coulombic efficiencies and specific capacities in anode-free full cells. Furthermore, the utilization of LBHI enables one to study Li plating behaviors without interference from interfacial (electro)chemical instabilities. The analysis of stack pressure evolution during electrochemical cycling reveals that soft shorting in SSBs arises from both dendrite formation and deformation, offering insights into further optimizing solid-state anode-free batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Multi-phase characterization of pitch-carbon coated nano-silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries

Silicon (Si) is a leading next-generation Li-ion battery anode candidate that meets rigorous performance demands for portable power including enhanced power and energy density with robust cycling performance. However, a series of complex and interrelated reactions lead to reduced calendar life in Si-containing systems and therefore challenge practical adoption. In the present work, we probe the mechanisms underlying observed performance improvements by adding a pitch-carbon coating onto nano-Si material. We pair solid-phase (X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared), semi-volatile phase (solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry), and gas-phase (gas chromatography-flame-ionization detector) characterization signals to comprehensively evaluate the impact of pitch-carbon coating on the evolution of the Si solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) and the associated impacts on electrode/electrolyte reactivity. The pitch-carbon is found to serve as a physicochemical barrier, reducing the electro-active surface area for Si/electrolyte reactivity and preventing Si oxidation. Further, the pitch-carbon coating promotes the evolution of a more-favorable SEI by subsuming substantial functionality typically associated with the fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) electrolyte additive - such as alkoxide scavenging and suppression of transesterification pathways - and by shifting the competitive electrolyte degradation pathways' favorability. The multi-phase characterization approach enables holistic end-products evaluation from complex (electro)chemical interfacial reactions, which informs a robust interpretation of the carbon coating's role in electrochemical performance improvements. The present mechanistic evaluation aids the rational design for improved nano-Si materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Evaluating Pressure‐dependent Discharge Behavior of Foil Versus In situ Plated Lithium Metal Anodes in Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract Anode‐free manufacturing of solid‐state batteries (SSBs) shows promise to maximize energy density by eliminating excess lithium (Li) and simplifying battery production. However, high reversibility during discharge (stripping of Li) is necessary for long‐lifetime SSBs with a limited Li reservoir. Further, the plastic flow of Li changes depending on the Li thickness, leading to possible differences in discharge performance under stack pressure. This work investigates the pressure‐dependent discharge performance of anode‐free manufactured SSBs with in situ plated Li and compares the performance to that of conventional thick Li foil cells. Distinct stripping behavior is observed at low pressures (0–1 MPa), where Li diffusivity and initial interfacial contact may control accessible capacity, compared to high pressures (3–10 MPa) where mechanical deformation of Li likely governs stripping behavior. Analysis of impedance spectra collected during stripping shows that additional stack pressure delays the formation of deep, as opposed to lateral, voids in the Li anode. These results provide insights to guide the transition from thick Li foil anodes to anode‐free manufactured SSBs.

Haslam, Catherine G.↗
DOE OSTI2026

In Situ Li Seed Formation Enables Uniform Plating in Anode-Free Solid-State Batteries

Anode-free solid-state batteries (AFSSBs) are a promising route toward achieving high energy density. In these cells, the anode contains no pre-stored lithium (Li). Instead, all Li inventory originates from the cathode and is freshly deposited onto a bare current collector during charging. However, achieving uniform and defect-free Li plating on this bare current collector remains a major challenging, often resulting in low Li plating/stripping efficiency and rapid capacity decay. Here, for the first time, operando neutron imaging is employed to visualize Li plating/stripping behavior in an anode-free full cell with LiNi 0.82 Mn 0.07 Co 0.11 O 2 (NMC) as the cathode. Operando measurements reveal that complete stripping of Li leaves isolated Li residues on the current collector, which degrades interfacial contact between the current collector and solid-state electrolyte. To mitigate this interfacial issue and promote more uniform Li deposition, we implement a discharge cutoff voltage strategy that intentionally retains a thin residual Li layer after stripping. This thin Li layer, serving as an in situ–formed seed layer, not only enables more homogeneous subsequent Li plating but also improves interfacial contact. As a result, the anode-free cell with a controlled discharge voltage of 3.5 V exhibits excellent long-term cycling stability, maintaining a discharge capacity of 116 mAh g -1 with a retention rate of 83.4% and an average Coulombic efficiency of approximately 99.9% after 430 cycles at 0.25 C. In contrast, the cell with a conventional discharge cutoff voltage of 2.8 V exhibits rapid capacity decay, retaining only 59.7 mAh g -1 after 50 cycles with a capacity retention of 40.7%. This work offers a practical strategy to unlock the long-term viability of anode-free solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Controlled lithium stripping enables a stable interface for long-cycling anode-free solid-state batteries

Anode-free solid-state batteries (AFSSBs) are a promising route toward achieving high energy density. In these cells, the anode contains no pre-stored lithium (Li). Instead, the entire Li inventory originates from the cathode and is freshly deposited onto a bare current collector during charging. However, achieving uniform and defect-free Li plating on this bare current collector remains a major challenge, often resulting in low Li plating/stripping efficiency and rapid capacity decay. Here, for the first time, operando neutron imaging is employed to visualize Li plating/stripping behavior in an anode-free full cell with LiNi0.82Mn0.07Co0.11O2 (NMC) as the cathode. Operando measurements reveal that complete stripping of Li leaves isolated Li residues on the current collector, which degrades the interfacial contact between the current collector and the solid-state electrolyte. To mitigate this interfacial issue and promote more uniform Li deposition, we implement a discharge-cutoff-voltage strategy that intentionally retains a thin residual Li layer after stripping. This preserved Li-containing interfacial reservoir not only improves interfacial contact but also serves as an in situ formed seed layer that enables more homogeneous subsequent Li plating. As a result, the optimized anode-free cell with limited stripping depth exhibits excellent long-term cycling stability, maintaining a discharge capacity of 112.1 mAh g−1 with a capacity retention of 80.6% and an average coulombic efficiency of approximately 99.9% after 500 cycles at 0.25 C. In contrast, the cell with a conventional discharge cutoff voltage of 2.8 V exhibits rapid capacity decay, retaining only 59.7 mAh g−1 after 50 cycles with a capacity retention of 40.7%. This work demonstrates that limiting deep stripping to preserve a thin Li-containing interfacial layer can effectively improve the cycling stability of sulfide-based AFSSBs.

Wang, Jiwei [Northeastern University, Boston]↗
DOE OSTI2025

Energy, greenhouse gas, and water life cycle analysis of synthetic graphite anode production in the United States

This study presents a comprehensive life cycle analysis of potential synthetic graphite battery anode material (BAM) production in the U.S. based on industrial-scale data. The analysis focuses on three impacts: greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, total energy use, and water consumption. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the effect of variation in process parameters and energy sources used for synthetic graphite BAM production on its life cycle GHG emissions. A detailed supply chain analysis of graphite BAM in the U.S. was also undertaken, along with a study of its associated GHG emissions. The results show GHG emissions of 29.7 kg CO 2 -eq. per kg BAM, total energy use of 580 MJ kg −1 BAM, and water consumption of 121 L kg −1 BAM for the baseline condition. The graphitization step is a major process hotspot, contributing to over 74% of all impacts. This is attributed to the energy and material input requirements for this step, particularly through the use of crucibles. Across the entire synthetic graphite production process, electricity is the primary contributor, followed by crucibles used in graphite block production, and then calcined petroleum coke. Sensitivity analyses indicate that improvement in micronization yield, reuse of crucibles, and use of low-carbon nuclear energy can significantly reduce GHG emissions of potential domestic graphite production (by ∼70%). Supply chain analysis identified major graphite BAM sources in the U.S. and showed that the U.S. has a competitive advantage in domestic production of synthetic graphite BAM in terms of reduced life cycle GHG emissions compared to present-day imported sources (by ∼20%).

Battery anode↗
DOE OSTI2024

Upcycling Polyethylene Waste to Advanced Carbon Materials for Energy Storage Applications

Polyethylene is notoriously difficult to upcycle because it decomposes into light gases at approximately 350-400 °C which prevents processing it at higher temperatures to convert it into high-value carbon materials, such as graphene or graphite. We address this challenge by using an air-based, thermo-oxidation process, which heats polyethylene (PE) just below the decomposition point to initiate oxidation and cross-linking of PE alkyl chains. These molecular transformations allow PE to be further graphenized or graphitized at higher temperatures without decomposing. The PE-derived graphene has a specific surface area up to 1,800 m 2/g and Raman ID/IG ratio of 0.85, which enables it to be used as an electrode material for a symmetric supercapacitor with the 1 M H2SO4 electrolyte. The PE-derived graphene material has a comparable electrochemical capacitive performance, such as power density, specific capacitance, and long cycle stability, to the commercial state of art porous carbon electrode. The stabilized PE could also be converted into highly crystalline flake graphite via low-temperature catalytic graphitization. The PE-derived graphite is used for the lithium-ion battery anode, which showed comparable electrochemical battery performance, such as reversible rate performance and long-term cyclic stability, to the current use battery-grade graphite, thus providing a scalable method to upcycle PE plastic waste into high-value carbon material.

Gao, Yuan↗