Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1619218

PETN spark-gap detonators

Abstract

The well-developed theory of Lorentz plasma that is dominated by electron–ion interactions is used to calculate the PETN arc characteristics. The spark-gap discharge current is a ramp with 10 to 25 ns rise time to peak and remaining constant subsequently. The approximate formulas for the arc channel conductivity, arc temperature, arc radius, and shock pressure from the arc are obtained from a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, which is the similarity solution of hydrodynamic equations similar to the Braginskii approximation. These arc parameters are given for the peak current ranging from 100 A to 1000 A and with different rise times. Representative cases are compared to the nonlinear ordinary differential equation code results. The shock pressures at the peak current are comparable to those from a typical commercial EBW bridgewire burst reported in the literature; the arc radius at the peak current is comparable to a typical bridgewire diameter of 0.0375 mm (e.g., RISI detonators, RP-1, and RP-80). The relevant Pop-Plot for low-density PETN is converted into an empirical detonation criterion, which is applicable to explosives subject to shocks of variable pressure. Finally, this criterion is then used to determine the detonation thresholds, which are comparable with test data obtained by Tucker, et al.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chen, Kenneth C., Warne, Larry K.. 2020-05-18. PETN spark-gap detonators. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370652.2020.1756986

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗