Composite Bonded Joint: Repair Development

Perez, Daniel; Cox, Sarah; Danley, Susan E.

Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20180008665

Composite Bonded Joint: Repair Development

Perez, Daniel·Cox, Sarah·Danley, Susan E.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This report documents the details of my work as a NASA KSC intern for the Fall Session from August 27th to December 14th, 2018. My efforts and contributions were with the Materials Science Branch, a staffed organization within the Laboratories, Development, & Testing (NE-L) Division of the Engineering Directorate. The principle responsibilities of the Materials Science group are to support the design, development, and operations activities for materials and processes with the purpose of providing unique solutions for flight hardware, ground support equipment, and customer requests. My role as an intern focused on assisting engineers in developing repair processes to mature bonded joint technology in support of SLS ? scale hardware. My primary goals for this internship were to become more familiar with composite materials and learn more about processes I was unfamiliar with, such as prepregs and out-of-autoclave processing. This project allowed me to learn new skills such as scarfing and curing composites. Additional goals I had were to learn more about NASA's laboratories and projects under development. This internship not only provided me with those experiences, but also allowed me to build relationships with inspiring engineers; a takeaway I will never forget.

Explore related subjects

Composite Materials Out-of-autoclave processing Prepregs

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Perez, Daniel, Cox, Sarah, Danley, Susan E.. 2018-11-13. Composite Bonded Joint: Repair Development. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180008665

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2024

Characterization of Low-Velocity Impact Damage in Toughened Non-Crimp Fabric Laminates

The damage response of resin-infused composites was investigated using quasi-static indentation (QSI) and instrumented drop-weight impact testing. The test specimens were composed of six layers of non-crimp fabrics where each layer contained +45°, 90°, −45°, and 0° plies. The goals of the testing were to identify damage responses that may differ from traditional thermoset materials and provide damage characterization data to evaluate current damage prediction analyses and aid improvements to current damage models. The damage was characterized using X-ray computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonic testing (UT). Incremental QSI loading was used on a single specimen to investigate damage growth in nine steps at progressively higher loads. Realtime acoustic emission data were used to determine the unloading points. Unlike typical thermoset composites, the force-displacement was smooth and showed no obvious indications of damage. The primary damage consisted of large lines of fiber fracture on the plies near the impact surface and delaminations through the thickness. Nine specimens were impacted at nominal impact energies of 25 ft-lbs, 30 ft-lbs, and 35 ft-lbs. The force histories at each energy followed nearly identical paths. Again, no obvious signs of damage were observed in any of the force histories. The general damage response in the dynamic tests was similar to the QSI-loaded specimens. However, repeat specimens impacted with a given impact energy showed variations in the damage. Some characteristics of the damage response were different than those typically observed in thermoset composites and will need to be evaluated using current analysis methods.

Composite Materials↗

NASA NTRS2023

Dynamic Crush Performance of Thermoplastic and Resin Infused Thermoset Triaxially Braided Composite Structures

Dynamic crush tests were conducted on triaxially braided composite tubes and C-channel structural elements to measure their relative energy absorbing characteristics. The elements were manufactured from triaxially braided [0/+60/-60] T700 fiber preforms with two different resin systems, a PR520 thermoset resin and a LM-PAEK thermoplastic resin. T700/PR520 composite tubes and C-channel elements were manufactured using a resin infusion process. T700GC/LMPAEK composite tubes were manufactured by braiding slit tape prepreg onto cylindrical mandrels. Consolidation pressure was applied through thermally activated shrink tape in an oven. The energy absorbing characteristics of the composite elements were measured using a pneumatically actuated sled with a flat-faced impacting mass, which provided several independent measurements of force, displacement, and energy absorption. The parameter primarily used for comparison between the systems was the specific energy absorption (SEA), a measure of energy absorbed per unit crushed length. The T700/LMPAEK tubes performed slightly better than T700/PR520 tubes, with an approximately 9% higher SEA. T700/PR520 tubes had over 20% higher SEA than C-channels made from the same material. Additional tests were conducted on tubes using a tapered-conical impactor to force the tubes to fail in circumferential tension. This type of impact significantly reduced the energy absorption.

Composite Materials↗

NASA NTRS2023

Modeling of Response of Thermoplastic Composites Under High Energy Impact

This work investigates the response of a thermoplastic panel under high energy ballistic impact. The composite material system is a carbon fiber reinforced low melt semi-crystalline resin TC1225 LMPAEK T700G (T700/LMPAEK3). Several high energy dynamic impact tests were performed where an aluminum projectile impacted various panels at different impact velocities. For this work, the test performed at an impact velocity of 73.2 m/s was investigated. The projectile rebounded upon impact, and the damage to the panel was characterized through ultrasonic and CT-scanning. Response of the panel under impact and the associated damage is discussed. Numerical simulation of the impact process was performed using the LS-DYNA® computer code [1] with a new material model MAT_COMPOSITE_DAMAGE_DGD (MAT 299), a modification over MAT 261 material model in terms of an improved representation of damage coupling and additional capability for strain rate effects. Delaminations were modeled using cohesive zone contact formulation in LS-DYNA®, wherein the mixed-mode fracture is captured via the Benzegaggh-Kenane (B-K) mode-dependent fracture energy interpolation law. Simulation of this impact test demonstrates a good match of results in terms of panel deflection and panel-projectile interactions. The overall extent of delaminations was under-predicted by the simulation. This work forms the basis to model tests performed at higher velocities, involving projectile penetration of panel.

Composite Materials↗