Engineering PapersSearch

Engineering topics

Price, W. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Price, W. E..

At least 19 records

Comparison of the effects of ionizing radiation at twelve dose rates from 0.0015 to 100 rad(Si)/s

Evidence is presented that two competing failure mechanisms exist in the Si-SiO2 system, with one mechanism dominating at low dose rates and the other at high. Much lower dose failures than expected were discovered at low dose rates (less than 0.1 rad(Si)/s) and very low dose rates (about 0.001 rad(Si)/s) in commercial SGS 4007 CMOS devices. These failure doses plotted versus dose rate have a bell-shaped curve, rather than the expected straight line (decreasing with increasing dose rate), indicating that a different failure mechanism is dominant at low dose rates than at high.

Goben, C. A.

Single-Event Upsets Caused by High-Energy Protons

Heavy secondary ions do not significantly alter device responses. Conclusion that external reaction products cause no significant alteration of single-event-upset response based on comparison of data obtained from both lidded and unlidded devices and for proton beams impinging at angles ranging from 0 degrees to 180 degrees with respect to chip face. Study also found single-event-upset cross section increases only modestly as proton energy increased to 590 MeV, characteristic of maximum energies expected in belts of trapped protons surrounding Earth and Jupiter.

Price, W. E.

Total-dose radiation effects data for semiconductor devices. 1985 supplement. Volume 2, part A

Steady-state, total-dose radiation test data, are provided in graphic format for use by electronic designers and other personnel using semiconductor devices in a radiation environment. The data were generated by JPL for various NASA space programs. This volume provides data on integrated circuits. The data are presented in graphic, tabular, and/or narrative format, depending on the complexity of the integrated circuit. Most tests were done using the JPL or Boeing electron accelerator (Dynamitron) which provides a steady-state 2.5 MeV electron beam. However, some radiation exposures were made with a Cobalt-60 gamma ray source, the results of which should be regarded as only an approximate measure of the radiation damage that would be incurred by an equivalent electron dose.

Martin, K. E.

Total-dose radiation effects data for semiconductor devices. 1985 Supplement. Volume 2, part B

Steady-state, total-dose radiation test data are provided in graphic format, for use by electronic designers and other personnel using semiconductor devices in a radiation environment. The data were generated by JPL for various NASA space programs. The document is in two volumes: Volume 1 provides data on diodes, bipolar transistors, field effect transistors, and miscellaneous semiconductor types, and Volume 2 (Parts A and B) provides data on integrated circuits. The data are presented in graphic, tabular, and/or narrative format, depending on the complexity of the integrated circuit. Most tests were done steady-state 2.5-MeV electron beam. However, some radiation exposures were made with a Cobalt-60 gamma ray source, the results of which should be regarded as only an approximate measure of the radiation damage that would be incurred by an equivalent electron dose. All data were generated in support of NASA space programs by the JPL Radiation Effects and Testing Group (514).

Martin, K. E.

Trends in parts susceptibility to single event upset from heavy ions

New test data from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), The Aerospace Corporation, Rockwell International (ANAHEIM) and IRT have been combined with published data of JPL and Aerospace to form a nearly comprehensive body of single event upset (SEU) test data for heavy ion irradiations. This data has been arranged to exhibit the SEU susceptibility of devices by function, technology and manufacturer. Clear trends emerge which should be useful in predicting future device performance.

Nichols, D. K.

Testing Electronic Devices for Single-Event Upset

Report prepared describes equipment and summarizes both pretest and onsite procedures for testing of digital electronic devices for susceptibility to single-event upset. Term "single-event upset" denotes variety of temporary or permanent bit flips or latchup induced by single particles of ionizing radiation. Vacuum chamber houses device under test while exposed to ion beam. Vacuum chamber and associated equipment must be brought to ion-beam facility for test.

Nichols, D. K.

Single-Event-Upset Studies: A Compilation

Document summarizes 15 studies of single-event upsets covering 60 different types of semiconductor devices. Studies discussed in document include verification of basic reactions induced by heavy ions and protons and surveys of latchup and bit-flip susceptibility of several types of devices and device-fabrication technologies.

Nichols, D. K.

Trends in parts susceptibility to single event upset from heavy ions

New test data have been combined with published data to form a nearly comprehensive body of single event upset (SEU) test data for heavy ion irradiations. These data have been arranged to exibit the SEU susceptibility of devices by function, technology, and manufacturer. Clear trends emerge which should be useful in predicting future device performance.

Nichols, D. K.

Total-dose radiation effects data for semiconductor devices: 1985 supplement, volume 1

Steady-state, total-dose radiation test data are provided, in graphic format, for use by electronic designers and other personnel using semiconductor devices in a radiation environment. The data were generated by JPL for various NASA space programs. The document is in two volumes: Volume 1 provides data on diodes, bipolar transistors, field effect transistors, and miscellaneous semiconductor types, and Volume 2 provides total-dose radiation test data on integrated circuits. Volume 1 of this 1985 Supplement contains new total-dose radiation test data generated since the August 1, 1981 release date of the original Volume 1. Publication of Volume 2 of the 1985 Supplement will follow that of Volume 1 by approximately three months.

Martin, K. E.

A summary of JPL single event upset test data from May 1982, through January 1984

A summary of single event upset data for 42 device types (including RAMs, 4-bit slices, microprocessors, 4-bit counters, and flip-flops) studied at 11 different accelerator tests (performed chiefly with the Berkeley 88-inch cyclotron and the Cal Tech Van de Graaff) is presented. All bipolar and NMOS RAMs were found to be SEU sensitive, some with very low LET thresholds. Some CMOS or CMOS/SOS RAMs were hard; and the CMOS microprocessors were hard, but the bipolar and NMOS microprocessors were soft. Several devices were found to exhibit a cross section that depends strongly on LET, even when the LET is well above the LET threshold. A ranking of hardness is presented for the logic devices tested.

Nichols, D. K.

The Single Event Upset (SEU) response to 590 MeV protons

The presence of high-energy protons in cosmic rays, solar flares, and trapped radiation belts around Jupiter poses a threat to the Galileo project. Results of a test of 10 device types (including 1K RAM, 4-bit microP sequencer, 4-bit slice, 9-bit data register, 4-bit shift register, octal flip-flop, and 4-bit counter) exposed to 590 MeV protons at the Swiss Institute of Nuclear Research are presented to clarify the picture of SEU response to the high-energy proton environment of Jupiter. It is concluded that the data obtained should remove the concern that nuclear reaction products generated by protons external to the device can cause significant alteration in the device SEU response. The data also show only modest increases in SEU cross section as proton energies are increased up to the upper limits of energy for both the terrestrial and Jovian trapped proton belts.

Nichols, D. K.

Radiation-Hardness Data For Semiconductor Devices

Document presents data on and analysis of radiation hardness of various semiconductor devices. Data specifies total-dose radiation tolerance of devices. Volume 1 of report covers diodes, bipolar transistors, field effect transistors, silicon controlled rectifiers and optical devices. Volume 2 covers integrated circuits. Volume 3 provides detailed analysis of data in volumes 1 and 2.

Price, W. E.

The Effect of Cosmic Rays on MSI Devices

Low-power devices susceptible to cosmic-ray particles. Five MSI device technologies, including TTL, low power TTL, Schottky, CMOS, and low-power Schottky, subjected to 120-MeV krypton-ion beam from cyclotron and monitored for single-event upset. Results find terrestrial application for radiation hardening of electronic devices and systems.

Nichols, D. K.

A guideline for heavy ion radiation testing for Single Event Upset (SEU)

A guideline for heavy ion radiation testing for single event upset was prepared to assist new experimenters in preparing and directing tests. How to estimate parts vulnerability and select an irradiation facility is described. A broad brush description of JPL equipment is given, certain necessary pre-test procedures are outlined and the roles and testing guidelines for on-site test personnel are indicated. Detailed descriptions of equipment needed to interface with JPL test crew and equipment are not provided, nor does it meet the more generalized and broader requirements of a MIL-STD document. A detailed equipment description is available upon request, and a MIL-STD document is in the early stages of preparation.

Nichols, D. K.

Single event upset (SEU) of semiconductor devices - A summary of JPL test data

The data summarized describe single event upset (bit-flips) for 60 device types having data storage elements. The data are from 15 acceleration tests with both protons and heavier ions. Tables are included summarizing the upset threshold data and listing the devices tested for heavy ion induced bit-flip and the devices tested with protons. With regard to the proton data, it is noted that the data are often limited to one proton energy, since the tests were usually motivated by the engineering requirement of comparing similar candidate devices for a system. It is noted that many of the devices exhibited no upset for the given test conditions (the maximum fluence and the maximum proton energy Ep are given for these cases). It is believed, however, that some possibility of upset usually exists because there is a slight chance that the recoil atom may receive up to 10 to 20 MeV of recoil energy (with more energy at higher Ep).

Nichols, D. K.