Missimer, David M. | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2019

Particle Size Analysis and Distribution

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) is a instrument used for examining samples at magnifications from 32 X to 500,000 X (for our instrument). The SEM is attached with an electron gun and is directed onto the sample. The sample then produces an image where it is read on the monitor. The electron gun is positioned at the top because it needs to shoot at the sample that is being tested. The electrons are then shot in a downward motion traveling through several lenses, such as the condenser lens for a more precise reading. Once the samples have been read by the instrument, it will show a picture that has a certain number of particles. Particle size distribution have many uses that are essential to life habits (health) or even conventional use for example construction. Here are just a few examples of how particle size analysis and distribution are being used even today. This Standard Reference Material (SRM) is primarily intended for use in the calibration of equipment used to measure particle size distributions (PSD) in the 9 μm to 30 μm range. A unit of SRM 1984 consists of a single bottle containing approximately 14 g of tungsten carbide/cobalt powder. Certified values: The PSD values at five mass percentiles were measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser light scattering (LLS). The NIST certified PSD values by SEM are listed. These certified values were determined by the measurement of over 10 000 individual particles from three bottles. Comparing the certified NIST SRM 1984 tungsten carbide/cobalt powder with our results are almost identical. This is great because more accurate work can be done and proves that our laboratory is able to reproduce NIST results. In conclusion, the scanning electron microscope is used to capture the sampled element and display it to be counted. Without the use of particle distribution, it would be a difficult time to get necessities such as medicine, asthma pumps, constructing materials, or as simple as ink. Overall, our study is an experimental comparison of the techniques we have in house, which are LLS and SEM (combined with the NIH ImageJ software) using the NIST SRM-1984 as a common, well characterized sample so that we have an idea of how the results from the techniques compare.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2019

X-Ray Fluorescence Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Using Micro Glass Beads

The fused glass bead method is the accepted 'best practice' method of preparation of samples for X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. It minimizes the effects of sample heterogeneity and simplifies calibration by dissolving the sample into a uniform glass matrix. Glass fusion XRF samples are typically prepared by grinding sample powder with Lithium Tetraborate / Lithium Bromide and fusing the mixture at 1000 deg. C. In most cases sample-to-flux ratios of between 1:1 to 1:10 are used (1:1 for determination of trace elements and 1:10 for major elements). Typical sample mass consumed is in the range of 1000 to 2500 mg. It would be advantageous to reduce this sample mass in cases where the sample material is rare, valuable or highly radioactive. This study examines the effects of using lower sample-to-flux ratios and smaller fusion bead size on the detection and quantification of major and trace elements by XRF analysis. We have employed a micro fused glass bead process, using sample-to-flux ratios of 1:10, 1:15 and 1:25, to determine the effects on measurement precision, accuracy and detection limit. Objectives: - Created micro fused glass beads of a series of standards and andesite sample with sample-to-flux ratios of 1:10, 1:15 and 1:25. - Perform an qualitative analysis of the different sample-to-flux ratio micro beads and compare the results with the 1:5.3 beads routinely used at SRNL. - Quantitate the major components in the different sample-to-flux ratio micro beads using a wavelength dispersive x-ray fluorescence instrument. Advantages: - Reduce sample amount needed. - Speed up waste tank characterization. - Reduce personnel exposure. - Potential sealed source. Fused micro glass beads with sample-to-flux ratios of 1:10, 1:15 and 1:25 were created using sample amounts of 123 mg, 82 mg and 52 mg respectively. It was possible to detect most of the major oxides and some trace elements in the fused micro glass beads with different sample-to-flux ratios. The quantitative analysis showed good linear correlation between the intensity of the analysis and the concentration of the elements. Good precision and accuracy results were obtained for the majority of the major oxides in the three fused micro glass beads with different sample-to-flux ratios. Path Forward: Enhance the precision and accuracy of the method by optimizing different sample preparation steps, such as weighing and sample transfer. Continue to increase the sample-to-flux ratio to determine the minimum amount of sample needed to perform a multielement analysis. Consider the use of synthetic standards to lower the detection limit of the analysis. Used the micro bead sample preparation method to analyze radioactive samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗