Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Marsh, J. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Marsh, J. G..

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1973

Global detailed gravimetric geoid

A global detailed gravimetric geoid has been computed by combining the Goddard Space Flight Center GEM-4 gravity model derived from satellite and surface gravity data and surface 1 deg-by-1 deg mean free air gravity anomaly data. The accuracy of the geoid is + or - 2 meters on continents, 5 to 7 meters in areas where surface gravity data are sparse, and 10 to 15 meters in areas where no surface gravity data are available. Comparisons have been made with the astrogeodetic data provided by Rice (United States), Bomford (Europe), and Mather (Australia). Comparisons have also been carried out with geoid heights derived from satellite solutions for geocentric station coordinates in North America, the Caribbean, Europe, and Australia.

Vincent, S.↗
NASA NTRS1973

A global station coordinate solution based upon camera and laser data - GSFC 1973

Results for the geocentric coordinates of 72 globally distributed satellite tracking stations consisting of 58 cameras and 14 lasers are presented. The observational data for this solution consists of over 65,000 optical observations and more than 350 laser passes recorded during the National Geodetic Satellite Program, the 1968 Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales/Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) Program, and International Satellite Geodesy Experiment Program. Dynamic methods were used. The data were analyzed with the GSFC GEM and SAO 1969 Standard Earth Gravity Models. The recent value of GM = 398600.8 cu km/sec square derived at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) gave the best results for this combination laser/optical solution. Solutions are made with the deep space solution of JPL (LS-25 solution) including results obtained at GSFC from Mariner-9 Unified B-Band tracking. Datum transformation parameters relating North America, Europe, South America, and Australia are given, enabling the positions of some 200 other tracking stations to be placed in the geocentric system.

Marsh, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Mean elements of GEOS 1 and GEOS 2.

A combined analytical-numerical procedure for determining mean orbital elements is presented and applied to the orbits of GEOS 1 and GEOS 2. The precision of the mean semi-major axes of these orbits is a few tens of centimeters when optical flash data are used to determine 2 day orbital arcs. Four day Minitrack orbits give mean semi-major axes of a few meters precision. The mean orientation parameters determined from the optical data are obtained to a precision of about 0.1 sec.

Douglas, B. C.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Tidal perturbations on the orbits of GEOS-1 and GEOS-2

Analysis of the luni-solar tidal perturbations of the inclination of GEOS-1 (1965-89A) and GEOS-2 (1968-002A) yielded the values k2 = 0.22 (sigma = 0.02) and 0.31 (sigma = 0.01) respectively for the second degree Love number. For GEOS-1 a new, purely numerical method involving osculating elements was employed. For GEOS-2 it was necessary to analyze the variations of the mean elements because of the very long period (450d) of the dominant solar tidal perturbation. An additional analysis of the variation of the mean elements of GEOS-1 confirmed the value of k2 obtained from the osculating elements.

Douglas, B. C.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Mean elements of GEOS-1 and GEOS-2

A combined analytical-numerical procedure for determining precise mean orbital elements is presented and applied to the orbits of GEOS-1 and GEOS-2. The precision of the mean semi-major axes of these orbits is a few tens of centimeters when optical flash data is used to determine two-day orbital arcs. Four-day Minitrack orbits give mean semi-major axes of a few meters precision. The mean orientation parameters are obtained to a precision of about 0.1 sec (about 3m) or better from the optical orbits. This precision is adequate for determinations of tidal parameters, particularly in the case of GEOS-2, where the tidal perturbation of the inclination is 10 sec.

Douglas, B. C.↗
NASA NTRS1972

A detailed gravimetric geoid from North America to Eurasia

A detailed gravimetric geoid of the United States, North Atlantic, and Eurasia, which was computed from a combination of satellite derived and surface gravity data, is presented. The precision of this detailed geoid is + or - 2 to + or - 3 m in the continents but may be in the range of 5 to 7 m in those areas where data is sparse. Comparisons of the detailed gravimetric geoid with results of Rapp, Fischer, and Rice for the United States, Bomford in Europe, and Heiskanen and Fischer in India are presented. Comparisons are also presented with geoid heights from satellite solutions for geocentric station coordinates in North America, the Caribbean, and Europe.

Vincent, S. F.↗
NASA NTRS1972

GSFC orbit computations for ISAGEX operations

The objective of the program is to collect a set of homogeneous and well distributed precise laser and camera satellite observations for the purpose of dynamic and geometric geodesy. The data gathering portion of the experiment extended from December 15, 1970 to August 31, 1971 and consisted of seven three-week saturation tracking periods. The seven geodetic satellites tracked were BE-B, BE-C, GEOS-1, GEOS-2, DI-C, DI-D, and PEOLE. The techniques employed to generate acquisition data for the two lasers are described. Analyses of the quick-look Astrosoviet NAFA-25 camera data indicated that the accuracy of these data was on the order of a few minutes of arc. These data were useful in definitive orbit determination.

Agreen, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Tracking-station coordinates from Geos 1 and Geos 2 optical flash data.

Center-of-mass coordinates for 28 NASA MOTS and SAO Baker-Nunn camera sites have been obtained from optical flash data from Geos 1 (1965 89A) and Geos 2 (1968 002A). More than 25,000 observations in about 100 two-day arcs were used in dynamical solutions (SAO 1969 AGU gravity model). Comparison of results with local survey solutions and with solutions from deep-space vehicle tracking suggests accuracy of about 2 meters in longitude and height and 5 meters in latitude. The relatively larger error in latitude arose from propagation of gravity-model error largely along the track of these high-inclination satellites. The results have also been compared with the solutions of the SAO 1969 standard earth for station coordinates on the North American datum. The solution obtained in the present work is much closer to the survey results in chord length between stations.

Marsh, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Detailed gravimetric geoid for the United States.

A detailed gravimetric geoid was computed for the United States using a combination of satellite-derived spherical harmonic coefficients and 1 by 1 deg mean gravity values from surface gravimetry. Comparisons of this geoid with astrogeodetic geoid data indicate that a precision of plus or minus 2 meters has been obtained. Translations only were used to convert the NAD astrogeodetic geoid heights to geocentric astrogeodetic heights. On the basis of the agreement between the geocentric astrogeodetic geoid heights and the gravimetric geoid heights, no evidence is found for rotation in the North American datum. The value of the zero-order undulation can vary by 10 to 20 meters, depending on which investigator's station positions are used to establish it.

Strange, W. E.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Tests and comparisons of gravity models.

Optical observations of the GEOS satellites were used to obtain orbital solutions with different sets of geopotential coefficients. The solutions were compared before and after modification to high order terms (necessary because of resonance) and were then analyzed by comparing subsequent observations with predicted trajectories. The most important source of error in orbit determination and prediction for the GEOS satellites is the effect of resonance found in most published sets of geopotential coefficients. Modifications to the sets yield greatly improved orbits in most cases. The results of these comparisons suggest that with the best optical tracking systems and gravity models, satellite position error due to gravity model uncertainty can reach 50-100 m during a heavily observed 5-6 day orbital arc. If resonant coefficients are estimated, the uncertainty is reduced considerably.

Marsh, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1971

The relation of the European Datum to a geocentric reference system

Over 31,000 precision reduced optical observations of GEOS-1 and 2 in 70 two-day orbital arcs were used at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) in a dynamical solution to determine center-of-mass coordinates for 15 tracking stations on the European Datum. Comparisons with the results obtained at Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) give agreement of about 1.5 ppm for chord lengths. After considering a scale correction to the European Datum (ED) of 1950 to account for the absence of geoid heights at the time of its reduction, agreement to a few ppm between the CNES/GSFC and the ED chords is obtained. However, a small systematic difference between survey and satellite results remains for stations in southeastern France and Switzerland.

Marsh, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1971

A comparison and evaluation of satellite derived positions of tracking stations

A comparison is presented of sets of satellite tracking station coordinate values published in the past few years by a number of investigators, i.e. Goddard Space Flight Center, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Ohio State University, The Naval Weapons Laboratory, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, and Wallops Island. The comparisons have been made in terms of latitude, longitude and height. The results of the various solutions have been compared directly and also with external standards such as local survey data and gravimetrically derived geoid heights. After taking into account systematic rotations, latitude and longitude agreement on a global basis is generally 15 meters or better, on the North American Datum agreement is generally better than 10 meters. Allowing for scale differences (of the order of 2 ppm) radial agreement is generally of the order of 10 meters.

Vincent, S. F.↗