Data for EMSL Project 51400 from April 2022
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Marcial, Jose.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abstract Standard methods to assess the durability of vitrified radioactive waste were first developed in the 1980’s and, over the last 40 years, have evolved to yield a range of responses depending on experimental conditions and glass composition. Mechanistic understanding of glass dissolution has progressed in parallel, enhancing our interpretation of the data acquired. With the implementation of subsurface disposal for vitrified radioactive waste drawing closer, it is timely to review the available standard methodologies and reflect upon their relative advantages, limitations, and how the data obtained can be interpreted to support the post-closure safety case for radioactive waste disposal.
We report to attain a basic understanding of the primary foam structure and behavior, which affects the heat and mass transfer and the efficiency of the glass melting process, we investigated the primary foam layer under the glass batch floating on molten glass. The primary foam affects mass transfer during batch melting, in turn affecting the melting process. The recently performed direct in-situ three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography of the batch melting in a laboratory-scale melter vessel allowed us to visualize the features of the reacting batch layer and the foam that develops at its bottom, though with an insufficient resolution of images. In this study, we obtained better temporal and spatial resolution using the two-dimensional X-ray radiography and visual observation of the structure and behavior of transient primary foam as it formed and decayed. As soon as the batch was charged onto the melt surface, foam bubbles began to evolve, grow, and coalesce, forming a primary foam layer, 5-10 mm thick, within tens of seconds. This foam layer was sustained by ongoing gas evolving reactions counterbalanced by bubble coalescence into cavities that moved sideways and escaped to the atmosphere. Eventually, the entire remaining batch turned into foam that gradually decayed at the melt surface. The decay rate agreed with literature observations of surface foam produced by secondary foaming.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.