Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Justin Littell

Publications and source records attributed to Justin Littell.

At least 19 records

TPSAS-NF1676L-32867-DND

During the summer of 2019, a Fokker F28 MK1000 aircraft was crash tested at the Landing and Impact Research Facility (LandIR) at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The test, which was conducted in cooperation with the FAA Technical Center and the FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute (CAMI), had multiple objectives. The first objective was to obtain data for aircraft undergoing a combined vertical plus horizontal impact condition, and then compare results to aircraft sections under vertical loading only. The second was to evaluate Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs, a.k.a. crash test dummies) of various sizes and positions for the determination of occupant injury. The third was to evaluate new and novel experimental ATDs including a larger Hybrid III, the Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR), and the Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin (WIAMan). Finally, the generated data was used to calibrate and validate computer simulation efforts. On-board data acquisition systems (DAS) captured loading on the airframe and the 24 on-board occupants while multiple high-speed cameras captured the motion. The port side of the airframe was painted with a stochastic monochromatic speckle pattern to allow for the collection of high-speed airframe deformation digital image correlation data. Airframe and occupant responses from each of the tests will be presented, and airframe and restraint performance will be discussed.

Justin Littell↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-15307-DND

Unique facility allows for the testing of items from coupons to airframes: - Composites, metals, honeycombs, foams, struts, ATDs, - MD-500, CH 46, Orion Boilerplates, Orion Pallets, “Iron Birds”.

Justin Littell↗

Crashworthiness of a Lift Plus Cruise eVTOL Vehicle Design within Dynamic Loading Environments

To aid in the development of electric Vertical Take-off and Landing (eVTOL) technology, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has undertaken research initiatives to evaluate and optimize design features of eVTOL aircraft. One such initiative has been to develop energy attenuating design mechanisms to improve eVTOL vehicle crashworthiness. In this study, crashworthiness design mechanisms, implemented within a six-passenger lift plus cruise (LPC) eVTOL concept vehicle, were evaluated under multi-axis dynamic loading conditions. This work builds upon crashworthiness design concepts previously optimized within a simplified vehicle-loading environment. The results of this study found the effectiveness of energy attenuating design mechanisms to be dependent on the complexity of load environment in which they were employed. An increase in off-axis loading resulted in a decrease in occupant protective capability. These results indicate the necessity for evaluating vehicle design across the range of possible dynamic impact conditions to characterize crashworthiness. This work provides preliminary methodology for implementing energy attenuating design mechanisms and evaluating crashworthiness for future UAM markets.

Jacob Putnam↗

Simulation of Lift plus Cruise Vehicle Models to Define a Full-Scale Crash Test Campaign

A series of dynamic simulations were completed on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration(NASA) Lift plus Cruise (LPC) concept electric Vertical Take-off and Landing (eVTOL) vehicle in preparation for an anticipated future full-scale crash-test campaign. The crash test campaign is envisioned as a data gathering exercise with an intent generating full-scale test data to inform eVTOL crashworthiness regulations, evaluate the use of energy absorbing concepts within vehicle design, and validate finite element modeling techniques used in crashworthiness predictions. This report discusses the two main objectives for the simulation efforts: the development of a structural cabin section, and a series of analyses utilized to determine the sensitivities of impact variables. A structural cabin section was created based from previous research efforts involving the LPC vehicle utilized for occupant response. To refine for the structural modifications, the wing and tail sections of the vehicle were removed. The tail was replaced with a representative mass at the aft of the fuselage. The overhead wing was replaced with a beam structure sized to approximate the bending response of the wing under crash loading conditions. The beam structure was fixed to the fuselage similar to the original Wingbox design in order to properly capture effects of this overhead mass on survivable volume within the vehicle. The fidelity of the fuselage frame structure within the FEM was increased to quantify the effect of frame sizing on structural response. From this an eVTOL test article design was developed, which satisfied basic crashworthiness requirements, was reconfigurable to assess the effect of various design avenues on structural response and optimized to improve manufacturability. The impact variable sensitivity results primarily show the orientation of the impact vector played a major role in types of injuries sustained, along with their severity. The vehicle was largely insensitive to small variations in pitch attitude but highly sensitive to both impact surface at certain angles and landing gear location.

eVTOL↗

Development and Analysis of Energy Absorbing Subfloor Concepts to Improve eVTOL Crashworthiness

To help ensure safe transportation within electric Vertical Take-off and Landing (eVTOL) vehicles the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been developing novel energy absorbing (EA) design technologies to improve crashworthiness within the unique design constraints of these vehicles. As part of this effort, a series of lightweight energy absorbing subfloor concepts were developed for potential use within eVTOL vehicle design. The capability of the subfloor designs was first evaluated through finite element (FE) model simulation in both component and vehicle level impact conditions. Knowledge gained from these analyses were used to iterate upon the design prior to fabrication. Fabrication and testing of the subfloor designs has begun and will be used to verify predicted capability. Results from FE model analysis was used to down select to a final subfloor geometry for additional component level optimization and full-scale test validation.

eVTOL↗

A Summary of Test Results from a NASA Lift + Cruise eVTOL Crash Test

On November 9, 2022, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) conducted a full-scale crash test of the NASA Lift+Cruise (LPC) reference vehicle at the NASA Langley Research Center Landing and Impact Research Facility (LandIR) under combined vertical and horizontal impact conditions to simulate a severe but survivable crash. The LPC test article is a carbon-composite skin/frame structure design, developed and fabricated for the cabin section only. The test utilized various configurations of seats and Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs, a.k.a. crash test dummies) intended to encompass a variety of occupant conditions. In addition, an in-house developed energy absorbing subfloor was utilized for the evaluation of load attenuation. Overhead mass was simulated using attached lifting hardware and other systems were simulated using ballast mass. The test article impacted the ground with velocities of 38.1 ft/s horizontal and 31.4 ft/s vertical. During the first approximately 38 milliseconds (ms), the cabin section experienced a large amount of acceleration on the belly which was attenuated by the subfloor structures and seats. Over the next approximately 160 ms, the test article experienced failure in the a-, b- and c-pillars, leading to a partial collapse of the overhead structure. Test data was collected on the belly, floors, seats, overhead mass, and tail. In addition, there was high speed full-field digital image correlation analysis data collected on the port side skin surface. Collected ATD data showed that the ATDs seated in the energy absorbing seats experienced loads at limits below the those in current regulations. Even without an energy absorbing seat, the energy absorbing subfloors crushed as intended, and limited the load on the large 95 th percentile ATD to 10% over suggested limits. The collapse of the roof did affect the 95 th percentile ATD, which showed high neck loading values due to head contact, whereas survivable volume was maintained for the other ATDs. While the energy absorbing subfloor and energy absorbing seats both contributed to occupant load attenuation, further optimization is suggested to increase their robustness.

evtol↗