Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Horstman, C. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Horstman, C. C..

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1985

On the use of wall functions as boundary conditions for two-dimensional separated compressible flows

A new and improved wall function method for compressible turbulent flows has been developed and tested. This method is applicable to attached and separated flows, to both high- and low-Reynolds number flows, and to flows with adiabatic and nonadiabatic surfaces. This wall function method has been applied to the Launder-Spalding k-epsilon two-equation model of turbulence. The tests consist of comparisons of calculated and experimental results for: (1) an axisymmetrical transonic shock-wave/boundary-wave interaction flow at low Reynolds number in an adiabatic tube, (2) an axisymmetrical high-Reynolds number transonic flow over a nonadiabatic bump, and (3) a two-dimensional supersonic high-Reynolds number flow on a nonadiabatic deflected flap. Each of these experiments had significant regions of flow separation. The calculations are performed with an implicit algorithm that solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. It is shown that the results obtained agree very well with the data for the complex compressible flows tested.

Viegas, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Computation of three-dimensional shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction flows

Solutions of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, employing a two-equation turbulence model, are presented and compared with measurements from a series of supersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction experiments. The test flows include swept-compression corners and axisymmetric bodies with either skewed or segmented conical flares. The solutions correctly predict all major qualitative features of the flow field. However, for flow fields with large separated zones, significant quantitative differences are observed between the computed and experimental results. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Prediction of transonic separated flows

Johnson et al. (1982) have provided a detailed comparison between a thoroughly documented transonic flow with shock-induced separations and solutions of the flow using the Navier-Stokes equations. According to this comparison, there were several deficiencies in the computations. The present investigation takes into account new experimental data which have been obtained in a larger wind tunnel with the same test model for a wider range of freestream Mach numbers. The results of new Navier-Stokes computations using more compatible boundary conditions are shown, and the effects of the turbulence model choice on predicting Mach number trends are assessed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1984

A computational study of complex three-dimensional compressible turbulent flow fields

Solutions of the time dependent, Reynolds-averaged, Navier-Stokes equations are presented and are compared with a family of experimental results for the three-dimensional interaction of a shock wave with a turbulent boundary layer. The solutions correctly predict the major features of the flow field independent of the shock strength and the extent of separation when using a two-equation turbulence model with wall functions. The experimentally observed boundary between cylindrical and conical flow regimes is also predicted. However, for the flow fields with large separated zones, the details of the measured pressure distributions are not accurately computed, which indicates a need for improved turbulence modeling and/or grid resolution.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Flowfield scaling of a swept compression corner interaction A comparison of experiment and computation

Over the past decade, there has been some important progress in understanding the problems of three-dimensional (3D) shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. However, the problems are by no means solved. The present investigation has the objective to determine the flowfield structure of a swept compression corner interaction and to perform a test of an equation considered by Settles and Bogdonoff (1982). The experimental data obtained in a 20 x 20 cm high Reynolds number supersonic wind tunnel are compared with the predictions of a state-of-the-art numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. It is found that a 3D scaling law for Reynolds number effects, previously established for interaction 'footprints', is equally valid when applied to the present flowfield.

Settles, G. S.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Numerical simulation of turbulent trailing edge flows

Numerical simulations of the time-dependent, Reynolds-averaged, Navier-Stokes equations, employing a two-equation turbulence model, are presented and compared with measurements from a series of trailing edge experiments at transonic Mach numbers. The test flows include an asymmetric flow with no separation, an asymmetric flow with a small region of separation and a symmetric flow with a large shock-wave induced separated zone. Comparisons are made for mean surface quantities as well as for mean and fluctuating flow-field quantities. For the trailing-edge flows with little or no separation, the solutions correctly predict all the major features of the flow field. Treatment of the viscous-inviscid interaction was found to be important for predicting these test cases. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models were found to be adequate for these flows. However, for the shock-wave induced separation case, these turbulence models were inadequate to predict this flow field. Modifications of the turbulence model to correct these deficiencies are discussed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Prediction of separated asymmetric trailing-edge flows at transonic Mach numbers

Numerical simulations of the time-dependent, Reynolds averaged, Navier-Stokes equations, employing various eddy viscosity turbulence models, are presented and compared with measurements from an investigation of a transonic trailing-edge flow at a high Reynolds number. Comparisons are made for mean surface quantities as well as mean and fluctuating flow-field quantities. Solutions employing two-equation turbulence models correctly predict all the major features of the flow field. Viscous-inviscid interaction effects were found to be extremely important for predicting this flow field and equally important to the turbulence modeling employed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Comparison Between Experiment and Prediction for a Transonic Turbulent Separated Flow

Solutions of the time-dependent, mass-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are compared In detail with experimental results obtained on an axisymmetric "bump" model at a transonic Mach number that produced an extensive separated now region. In addition, an inverse boundary method is evaluated for this type of flow. The Cebeci-Smith algebraic and the Wilcox-Rubesin two-equation turbulence models used in the Navier-Stokes calculations both predict the maximum boundary-layer displacement thickness generated by the interaction reasonably well, with the details of the now best described with the two-equation formulation. However, both models predict a shock location substantially farther aft on the bump than observed experimentally. This error in shock location was slightly less with the two-equation model (0.12 chord compared with 0.16 chord). In the vicinity of the shock, the calculations predict a more rapid increase in turbulent shear stress than observed in the experimental results; this more rapid increase is believed to be the cause or the poor predictions in shock position.

Johnson, D. A.↗
NASA NTRS1981

A reattaching free shear layer in compressible turbulent flow - A comparison of numerical and experimental results

An investigation of a two-dimensional, free turbulent shear layer reattaching on an inclined surface at Mach 2.92 and at a high Reynolds number is described. The test geometry is specifically designed to isolate the reattachment process of a high-speed separated flow. A numerical solution of the time-dependent, Reynolds-averaged, Navier-Stokes equations for the entire flow field, employing a two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence model, is presented. Detailed comparisons of prediction and experiment are made in the free shear layer, at reattachment, and in the developing boundary layer downstream. These comparisons include mean surface quantities as well as mean and fluctuating flowfield quantities. Although the overall features of this complex flow field are predicted, there are several deficiencies in the numerical solution, particularly in the region downstream of reattachment. Modifications of the turbulence model to correct these deficiencies are discussed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1981

A Reattaching Free Shear Layer in Compressible Turbulent Flow: A Comparison of Numerical and Experimental Results

An investigation of the two-dimensional, free turbulent shear layer reattaching on an inclined surface at Mach 2.92 and at a high Reynolds number is described. The test geometry is specifically designed to isolate the reattachment process of a high-speed separated flow. A numerical solution of the time-dependent, Reynolds-averaged, Navier-Stokes equations for the entire flow field, employing a two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence model, is presented. Detailed comparisons of prediction and experiment are made in the free shear layer, at reattachment, and in the developing boundary layer downstream. These comparisons include mean surface quantities as well as mean and fluctuating flow-field quantities. Although the overall features of this complex flow field are predicted, there are several deficiencies in the numerical solution, particularly in the region downstream of reattachment. Modifications of the turbulence model to correct these deficiencies are discussed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Investigation of a Three-Dimensional Shock Wave Separated Turbulent Boundary Layer

A detailed Investigation of a flow in which a three-dimensional shock wave separates a two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer is presented. The resulting flowfield is highly three dimensional with a significant portion of flow separation on the surface at the phi = 0 deg (windward) plane was well as a large zone of secondary surface flow off this plane. Mean and fluctuating experimental measurements were obtained throughout the entire flowfield. These measurements included mean pressures, flow angles and shear on the surface, as well as yaw angles, static pressures, turbulent shear stresses, and turbulent kinetic energies on selected planes throughout the flowfield. In addition, numerical predictions of this flow, obtained by solving the Navier-Stokes equations with an algebraic eddy viscosity turbulence model, are presented. These computations reasonably predict both the surface and flowfield quantities, despite the extremely complicated nature of the experimental flow.

Kussoy, M. I.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Asymmetric trailing-edge flows at high Reynolds number

Results from an experimental investigation of asymmetric trailing-edge flows at high Reynolds numbers and subsonic Mach numbers are presented. Measurements include skin friction; surface and flow-field pressures; and mean-velocity, turbulent shear-stress, and turbulent kinetic-energy profiles in the trailing-edge region. Comparisons are made with computed solutions using Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes and boundary-layer equations; two different turbulence models are used. Two attached flow are considered, one having a moderate adverse pressure gradient and the other a more severe gradient. From the comparisons, an evaluation is made of the predictions for these two pressure-gradient cases. Although the comparisons demonstrate reasonable agreement for the moderate pressure-gradient case, some differences are noted for the severe pressure-gradient case.

Cleary, J. W.↗
NASA NTRS1980

A comprehensive comparison between experiment and prediction for a transonic turbulent separated flow

Attempts to predict surface pressure distributions on lifting surfaces have been relatively unsuccessful in the transonic regime when the shock wave is of sufficient strength to produce an extensive region of turbulent separated flow. For these conditions, the viscous flow behavior must be accurately described even to obtain reasonable predictions of surface pressure. The present paper addresses this problem. Detailed comparisons between prediction and experiment are made for a transonic, turbulent boundary-layer separation (freestream Mach number = 0.875) for which the turbulent flow properties (including the turbulent Reynolds stress) had been measured by the laser velocimeter technique from upstream of the separated region through reattachment. The flow was generated on an axisymmetric 'bump' model designed to simulate the flow on an airfoil at transonic conditions. The numerical methods used in the comparisons include the solution of the time-dependent, mass-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, and the solution of the compressible boundary-layer equations by the inverse method. Solutions were obtained for the well established Cebeci-Smith algebraic turbulence model and the more recently developed Wilcox-Rubesin two-equation turbulence model.

Johnson, D. A.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Trailing-edge flows at high Reynolds number

An investigation of trailing-edge flows at high Reynolds number and subsonic Mach numbers is presented. Symmetric and asymmetric trailing-edge flows are studied, each flow having pressure gradient regions upstream of the trailing edge similar to an airfoil. Measurements include model surface pressures, mean velocity, turbulent shear stress, and turbulent kinetic energy profiles in the trailing-edge and near-wake regions. Comparisons of the symmetric data with numerical solutions of boundary layer as well as Navier-Stokes equations employing two different turbulence models show increasing effects on viscous interactions as the Mach number increases. Both turbulence models yielded solutions of the mean flow of comparable quality. The experimental results of the asymmetric case are discussed.

Viswanath, P. R.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Reynolds number effects on the turbulence field in compressible boundary layers

Detailed experiments were conducted in a zero pressure gradient, supersonic turbulent boundary layer, including measurements of the three components of velocity fluctuations and the turbulent shear stress, for Reynolds numbers ranging from 11.7 million to 105 million at a freestream Mach number of 2.3. The mean flow measurements established the fully developed and equilibrium nature of the boundary layer. Measurements of the turbulence field show that the vertical and transverse fluctuations are essentially equal throughout the boundary layer at all Reynolds numbers, a feature that is different from observations in incompressible flows. The data show that the boundary layer exhibits similarity in the turbulence profiles for the entire Reynolds number range and agrees with previous compressible and incompressible data using Morkovin's scaling to account for compressibility effects.

Acharya, M.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Computation of three-dimensional turbulent separated flows at supersonic speeds

Numerical solutions of the time-averaged Navier-Stokes equations employing a simple eddy-viscosity model have been obtained for three dimensional turbulent flow fields at supersonic speeds. The computer results are compared with a series of experimental test flows describing the interaction of a swept shock wave with a turbulent boundary layer for various shock-wave strengths. Very good agreement is obtained between the computed and experimental surface and flow-field results. The computed flow fields are examined in detail to investigate the physics of this type of flow field. Questions concerning the existence of a vortex and the relationship between converging surface oil streaks and the resulting flow field are addressed.

Horstman, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1978

An evaluation of several compressible turbulent boundary-layer models Effects of pressure gradient and Reynolds number

Computations, employing several turbulence models, are compared with a series of attached supersonic turbulent boundary-layer experiments over an extensive range of Reynolds numbers (11.7 x 10 to the 6th to 314 x 10 to the 6th). These experiments included measurements of surface pressure and skin friction for adverse pressure gradients ranging in magnitude from those of previous investigations to an order of magnitude greater. The turbulence models evaluated include algebraic and two-equation eddy-viscosity models and two full Reynolds stress models. In general all the models tested performed well independently of the magnitude of the pressure gradient or Reynolds number and could predict the measured skin friction for most cases with sufficient accuracy for engineering purposes.

Horstman, C. C.↗