Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Guillaume Gronoff

Publications and source records attributed to Guillaume Gronoff.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Observation of O3 events with LMOL during the TRACER-AQ campaign

The TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston TX, happened in August-September 2021 in Houston, Texas. The Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) was located on the Houston campus and performed observations of ozone alongside basic estimation of aerosol backscatter. In presentation, we highlight the latest results from LMOL during that campaign. We show how the latest improvements of the lidar along with secondary measurements, such as from ozonesondes, and modeling enable better observations and understanding of ozone events in coastal environments.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

SO2 Plumes Observation with LMOL: Theory, Modeling, and Validation

LMOL, the NASA Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar, is located near NASA’s LaRC steam plant when not deployed in campaigns. The plant produces steam through the incineration of local trash, and its exhaust plume occasionally contains SO2 . SO2 is a known, regulated, pollutant that affects O3 observations in the UV, as is the case with LMOL. In this work, we show how we modified LMOL to detect the plant SO2 plumes and compute its density when the O3 background is stable; we observed densities compatible with what is expected from the typical plume exhaust. The selection of laser lines so that an O3 variation would not get confused with a SO2 detection is explained in details, and a model capable of simulating the Lidar signal with (notably) O3 and SO2 absorption for the validation of the retrieval resolution and uncertainty is presented. Finally, the comparison between the modeled and observed performances of the system is shown: the maximum altitude, resolution, and error in the modeled signal and the observed signals are the same within reasonable margins. This work demonstrates that LMOL is fully capable of working with SO2 . The next step being the addition of an additional laser channel, which is simplified by the tunable aspect of the LMOL laser, to address O3 and SO2 simultaneously, allowing the assessment of SO2 when O3 has variations. Note: This presentation is accompanied by an mp4 video of the given talk.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

Modeling and Observations of OH UV-emissions in the Lunar Exosphere

The discovery of water on the Moon has led to several questions about lunar water’s origin, evolution, and total amount. One of the technique used to better understand the origin of the water, notably by the NASA LADEE/UVS instrument, is the observation of OH fluorescence. However, to better interpret the data, it is important to understand the processes leading to that emission. We present an application of the Aeroplanets model to the simulation of the OH emissions from the solar fluorescence and the dissociation of H2O from photon and electron impact in function of the solar activity. We applied the model to several cases of Lunar exosphere affected or not by meteor impacts that are known to release water in the exosphere.We show how we can retrieve the amount of OH and H2O on the line of sight of the different instruments and how the solar activity can affect that retrieval.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

NAIRAS Model Nowcasting and Forecasting of the Aviation Radiation Environment

The Nowcast of Aerospace Ionizing RAdiation System (NAIRAS) predicts dosimetric quantities for quantifying human radiation exposure and differential/integral flux/fluence quantities for assessing single event effects (SEE) in avionic systems from galactic cosmic rays (GCR), trapped inner belt protons, and solar energetic particle (SEP) events from the Earth’s surface to the space environment. Real-time predictions of the aviation radiation environment are available at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) integrated Space Weather Analysis (iSWA) data feeds and cygnets, and a run-on-request (RoR) capability has also been deployed at CCMC. Recent model improvements include a more accurate atmospheric ionizing radiation transport methodology and more robust and reliable SEP nowcast dose predictions. In addition, preliminary results of SEP dose forecasts are shown by coupling the University of Malaga Solar Energetic Particle (UMASEP) model of integral proton flux forecasts with the NAIRAS model. These model updates and improvements are presented, and results are shown for aircraft, high-latitude balloon, and low-Earth orbit flights during quiescent and solar-geomagnetic disturbed conditions. Model comparisons with flight measurements are also shown.

NAIRAS↗

Observations of So2, O3, and Aerosols With the Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar

LMOL, the NASA Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar, is located near NASA's LaRC steam plant when not deployed in campaigns. The steam plant is an incinerator, and when SO2 was in the plume, it would affect the LMOL O3 measurements at the plume altitudes of 100m-200m. In 2022, we modified LMOL to observe four wavelengths simultaneously to distinguish between and measure both O3 and SO2. With an optimized selection of wavelengths, based on an analysis of the cross-sections, it is possible to retrieve both O3 and SO2 densities from three wavelengths. Adding a fourth wavelength enables better constrains the aerosol's backscatter and extinction. In this work, we present the dual observations of SO2 and O3 with the new channels of LMOL, and we present the advances in constraining the aerosol parameters from these multiple wavelengths. We highlight the SO2 and Ozone Water-Land Environmental Transition Study (SOWLETS) campaign in preparation for the validation of the new system.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

Comparison of the NAIRAS Trajectory Dose Model With ISS Measurements: Effects of Trapped Particles and Solar Energetic Particle Events.

The NAIRAS(Nowcast of Aerospace Ionizing RAdiation system) model was initially developed for fast computation of GCR and SEP events in the Earth's atmosphere. It was recently improved for computing the effects of trapped particles and its domain of validity was extended to the near space environments, which notably includes the international space station (ISS). To validate the new capabilities of the model, we compared its outputs with some measurements made in the ISS. Historical data contained several SEP events while newer measurements made with the ARMAS instrument flying in the experience bay of KIBO show the influence of trapped particles and GCR over the total dose received.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

Comparison of the Nowcast of Aerospace Ionizing Radiation System (NAIRAS) With ISS Measurements

The Nowcast of Aerospace Ionizing Radiation System (NAIRAS) is a sophisticated physics-based model that has been providing real-time global predictions of cosmic radiation exposure, pertinent to both galactic and solar sources, to air travelers for a decade. The utility of NAIRAS, however, extends beyond the atmospheric ionizing radiation environment. The recently developed NAIRAS 3.0 version demonstrates an expansion of its domain to the space radiation environment. This extension incorporates an additional trapped inner belt proton source, coupled with altitude-dependent and rigidity-dependent geomagnetic shielding for galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and solar energetic particle (SEP) protons. The latest version of NAIRAS operates in two modes: real-time global predictions of the atmospheric radiation environment and a user-specified run-on-request service for global dosimetric calculations or predictions of dosimetric and particle flux quantities along user-uploaded flight path. It is available to the public at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC). In this work, we present the validation exercises that have been conducted using the Automated Radiation Measurements for Aerospace Safety (ARMAS) onboard the International Space Station (ISS), thereby establishing NAIRAS's efficacy in predicting space radiation exposure. As such, NAIRAS 3.0 holds significant potential for human safety and technological advancement in aerospace travel and exploration.

Daniel Phoenix↗

Atmospheric Escape and Planetary Atmosphere Evolution. the Complex Role of Magnetization

Exoplanetary research is currently steered by investigations into the characteristics and evolution of their atmospheres. The fundamental inquiries encompass whether a given exoplanet possesses an atmosphere and, if so, how its attributes have evolved over time. The atmospheric composition reflects a delicate equilibrium between the inbound and outbound flows of volatiles, whether between space, surface, or between liquid and solid phases. Understanding atmospheric escape is, therefore, a critical facet of such studies. Especially, exoplanets that are relatively light and situated near their host stars are prone to substantial atmospheric loss, potentially resulting in barren celestial bodies. Thus, it becomes vital to comprehend the atmospheric responses to the host stars' activities, alongside other factors influencing atmospheric evolution. In that context, there persists a common narrative in the scientific community that frames a planetary magnetic field as a 'shield' against atmospheric escape. However, this study challenges the oversimplification of this premise, taking a closer look at the nuanced role magnetization plays in planetary atmospheric defense mechanisms. We will review the escape processes in the light of the different mechanisms and of the recent observations to highlight which processes have to carefully be taken into account.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

The Effect of a SEP Event on Astronauts Doing a Spacewalk As Computed By the Nowcast of Aerospace Ionizing Radiation System (NAIRAS)

The Nowcast of Aerospace Ionizing Radiation System (NAIRAS) is a sophisticated physics-based model that has been providing real-time global predictions of cosmic radiation exposure, pertinent to both galactic and solar sources, to air travelers for a decade. The utility of NAIRAS, however, extends beyond the atmospheric ionizing radiation environment. The recently developed NAIRAS 3.0 version demonstrates an expansion of its domain to the space radiation environment. This extension incorporates an additional trapped inner belt proton source, coupled with altitude-dependent and rigidity-dependent geomagnetic shielding for galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and solar energetic particle (SEP) protons. The latest version of NAIRAS operates in two modes: real-time global predictions of the atmospheric radiation environment and a user-specified run-on-request service for global dosimetric calculations or predictions of dosimetric and particle flux quantities along user-uploaded flight path. It is available to the public at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC). In this work, we present the computations of the dose in the ISS vicinity during the SEP event of August 8, 2023; which happened a day before a scheduled spacewalk. We demonstrate that astronauts would not have suffered a dose equivalent in excess of 1 mSv if the event happened a day later. As such, NAIRAS 3.0 holds significant potential for human safety and technological advancement in aerospace travel and exploration.

Guillaume Gronoff↗

Observation of Pollution Events at Low Altitude During TRACER-AQ – The Advantage of Adaptive Resolution Lidar

The TRACER-AQ campaign happened in August-September 2021 in Houston, Texas. Its objective was to better understand the pollution events in the coastal environment and to evaluate models and satellite observations. As a supporting instrument, NASA’s Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (LMOL) was installed on the Houston campus, adjacent to University of Houston’s air-quality site, and performed observations of ozone and aerosols. Co-located instrumentation included a Pandora spectrophotometer, in-situ trace-gas measurements, and ozonesonde launches. Thanks to an adaptive resolution retrieval scheme, LMOL was able to detect thin-layer O3 structures at low (~200m) altitude that are not captured by the ozonesondes, and would ordinarily be missed with traditional coarse TOLNet lidar vertical averaging. We show that some of these features are not present in the models and are likely coming from local, industry-generated, emissions.

Guillaume Gronoff↗