Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Aaron Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Aaron Johnson.

11 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Analysis of 2018 Aerothermal Calibration Test at the NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory

This report documents some of the key findings from an aerothermal calibration test that was conducted at the NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL) as part of a series of fundamental ice-crystal icing tests in 2018. The purpose of the aerothermal calibration test was to characterize the cloud-off temperature and flow of the PSL test facility prior to performing the cloud-on icing experiments. This report presents the temperature measurements and analysis of that test day which examined uniformity and the influence of spray bars and wall temperature effects. Air temperature profiles were measured just upstream of the test section, and at the test section, for several cases across a range of parameters, including, but not limited to, spray-bar air temperature (Tnozz), altitude, air flow velocity, and spray-bar atomizing pressure (Pnozz).

NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory↗
NASA NTRS2020

Development of a Flow Field for Testing a Boundary-Layer-Ingesting Propulsor

In order to test embedded-propulsor technology, modifications were required of the 8x6 Supersonic Wind tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center. The extent of the modifications required that a new tunnel calibration be completed to generate a new calibration dataset and operational procedures for the tunnel, as well as to map the boundary layer on the raised floor. This report describes the propulsor inflow that was to be simulated, documents the tunnel modifications that were required, and conveys the results of the calibration test that was completed to measure the resulting flow properties.

boundary layer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Test Section Characterization of the 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel

Following completion of the 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel acoustic improvement modification project, a characterization of the flow field throughout the 9- by 15-foot test section was conducted in 2019. The acoustic improvement modifications project included several large-scale tunnel loop modifications and reconstruction of the 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel test section and diffuser to decrease the noise floor in the test section. Data were collected at three cross-sectional planes in the 9- by 15-ft test section using a 15-foot traversing calibration rake and a set of eight boundary layer rakes. The data from the characterization test were used to generate calibration relationships for facility operation and understand the flow quality in the new test section, including uniformity, flow angularity, turbulence intensity, and boundary layer characteristics. Additionally, the subsonic quick check rake was used to baseline the check calibration data set for the new test section.

Calibration↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Static Pressure Orifice Imaging & Data Correlation

The quality of static pressure ports has historically been shown to be capable of biasing the resulting measurements of static pressure over the surface. Some of the flaws in the port quality can be recognized visually through magnified imaging of the port with a microscope. Through digital analyses of images of a large quantity of existing pressure ports and estimation of the deviations from the true static pressure for each port, a correlation could potentially be constructed to estimate whether a port will generate a significant error based upon its surface-level appearance. This presentation pursues this hypothesis through attempted correlation of subsonic data collected on the 4-inch-diameter cone cylinder during the 2019 characterization tests in the NASA Glenn Research Center's 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel (8x6 SWT).

8x6 SWT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flow Quality Parameter Study Low-Speed Regime Review

The flow quality parameters study is an investigation into the importance of flow quality parameters and the current ability of wind tunnel characterization personnel to measure those parameters. The study is divided into five flow regimes, low-speed, subsonic, transonic, supersonic, and hypersonic. This presentation provides an overview of the results for the low-speed flow regime and prompts for a discussion about how to best proceed with the study.

WTCWG↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uncertainty Improvement in the NASA Glenn Research Center 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel

Within the past decade, a measurement uncertainty analysis (MUA) team was assembled at NASA Glenn Research Center to assist the wind tunnel characterization team with quantification of uncertainty estimates for variables of interest in wind tunnels and test cells across the center. The initial analysis performed by the team was conducted on the 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel using results from the 1996/97 full calibration test entry. These MUA results were published in 2016 which included recommendations for methods to improve the uncertainty estimates for various variables of interest, such as changes to regression models, tunnel operation philosophy, and instrumentation choices. The wind tunnel characterization team utilized the proposed methods in 2019 during a full characterization test entry. Following publication of the 2019 test section characterization results, the MUA team pursued an update to the uncertainty estimates for the facility, which validated previous recommendations and revealed significantly reduced systematic uncertainties across most variables of interest. Inclusion of within-test repeat points in the 2019 test entry allowed for higher fidelity estimates of random uncertainty to be generated, as well. This collaboration between the facility, wind tunnel characterization, and MUA teams serves as an example of the data quality benefits that can be achieved through rigorous analysis of the sources of uncertainty in a ground-test facility.

Uncertainty↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Humidity Measurements at NASA Glenn Research Center Wind Tunnels

This presentation reviews the humidity measurements systems used at the large-scale wind tunnels at the NASA Glenn Research Center (as of July 2023), including the 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel, 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel, and the 10- by 10-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel. Effects of hygrometer accuracy and saturation vapor pressure model choice on Mach number are also investigated. Information in this presentation is intended for discussion with the AETC-supported Wind Tunnel Characterization Working Group during the 2023 Face-to-Face Meetings July 25-27 at NASA Glenn Research Center.

Humidity↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Thermal Recovery Testing & Investigations in CE-12 Free Jet Calibration Facility

This presentation reviews thermal recovery testing practices in the CE-12 Free Jet Probe Calibration Facility at the NASA Glenn Research Center. Investigations were conducted to diagnose errors identified in test results, as compared to theory. Proposed solutions and future monitoring of the facility conditions are also discussed. Information in this presentation is intended for discussion with the AETC-supported Wind Tunnel Characterization Working Group during the 2023 Face-to-Face Meetings July 25-27 at NASA Glenn Research Center.

WTCWG↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Review of IRT CFD & Diffuser Study Results - February 2024 Test Entries

In February 2024, multiple test entries were conducted in the NASA Glenn Research Center Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) to collect CFD validation data, particularly near the facility heat exchanger inlet and outlet planes, measure the boundary layer characteristics in the test section, and survey the diffuser flow field. The CFD validation testing utilized ultrasonic anemometers to acquire 3-components of flow velocity at the inlet and outlet planes across a row of heat exchanger blocks. The test section boundary layer surveys used 18-inch boundary layer rakes centered on each of the four test section surfaces with pitot tubes at turntable centerline. The diffuser study included surveys at three streamwise positions within the diffuser with a 5-hole flow angularity probe at between 3 and 7 lateral locations at a given streamwise position. All IRT diffuser data were acquired with the flow angularity probe at the centerline of the test section. An ultrasonic anemometer was also used in the diffuser to survey near-wall velocity profiles.

Icing↗