Results for “voltage and current controllers”

DOE OSTI2025

Per-Phase Control for CHB Converters with Negative-Sequence Current and DC Voltage Balancing Control

This paper presents a per-phase controller for a grid-connected Cascaded H-Bridge (CHB) converter featuring negative sequence current regulation and DC bus voltage balancing capabilities. Unlike conventional three-phase controllers, each phase of the CHB can be separately and controlled to regulate the DC voltage and reactive power flow. per-phase negative sequence current control strategy is incorporated into the proposed controller to ensure compliance with IEEE Standard 2800-2022, which requires the absorption of negative-sequence reactive current during grid voltage disturbances. Furthermore, a feed-forward control-based DC bus voltage balancing method is employed, which eliminates the need for the integrator commonly used in traditional approaches. The performance of the proposed controller is validated under various unbalanced grid scenarios and DC bus voltage imbalances through electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation using a three-phase, three-level grid-connected CHB–Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter testbed developed on MATLAB/Simulink. Additionally, the performance of the negative-sequence current regulation is investigated through simulation under different unbalanced grid voltage scenarios.

negative sequence current↗

DOE OSTI2025

Enabling Grid-Forming Control Under Unbalanced Conditions

Standalone microgrids often experience unbalanced loading and faults, which can cause grid-forming control designed for balanced conditions to produce oscillatory responses. To address this issue, a compact time-domain transformation appropriate for inverter control is proposed, allowing the conversion of unbalanced three-phase signals to positive and negative synchronous reference frames. This transformation supports the development of a grid-forming control with fault ride-through, featuring frequency and voltage droop controllers and nested current and voltage control loops that seamlessly integrate an enhanced current limiter. The effectiveness of the proposed control and transformation is demonstrated through analytical results and electromagnetic transient simulation.

24 - POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

DOE OSTI2024

Impact of K-factor on Short Circuit Program Convergence for Inverter-Based Resources during Faults

Classical short-circuit programs that linearize the power network are no longer applicable for inverter based resources (IBRs), necessitating an iterative approach. Phasor domain programs can model the IBRs using an iterative approach considering nonlinear fault responses. In phasor domain models, the IBR can be modeled as a voltage controlled current source (VCCS) in tabular form with positive, negative, and zero sequence information for balanced and unbalance short-circuit faults. In the VCCS modeling of the IBR, positive and negative incremental reactive current, also known as the k-factor, plays an important role in short circuit program convergence. In this work, a few approaches: conventional VCCS modeling with a k-factor of 2, conventional VCCS modeling with a k-factor of 2 with modified pre-fault voltages, VCCS characteristics based on the power flow solution with a k-factor of 2, and VCCS characteristics based on the power flow solution with a k-factor of 1 are investigated for short circuit program convergence under higher IBR penetration. The IEEE 39 bus New England Test System is taken as the test system, and simulations are carried out in PSS®CAPE 15.0.26 simulation software. Simulation results demonstrate that IBR penetration is higher for the VCCS model, which corresponds to the power flow solution with k-factor 1, compared to other approaches.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2024

Deep Learning-enhanced Block-Diagram Modeling of Solar Power Systems

Data-driven models of power system inverter-based resources are desired to run simulations faster than with detailed electromagnetic transient models, to hide proprietary design details, to support control system design applications, and to aggregate the effects of distributed energy resources. This paper applies a customized Hammerstein Wiener framework to train block diagram models from thousands of electromagnetic transient simulations or experimental test records. The block diagram models integrate with larger grid simulations as voltagecontrolled current sources or current-controlled voltage sources for several simulators. Guidelines for block architecture and training are presented. Three-phase balanced, three-phase unbalanced, and single-phase examples all achieve an acceptable root mean square error of no more than 0.05 per-unit.

Mcdermott, Thomas E. [Private consulting company]↗

DOE OSTI2022

Technologies for providing secure emergency power control of high voltage direct current transmission system

Technologies for providing secure emergency power control of a high voltage direct current transmission (HVDC) system include a controller. The controller includes circuitry configured to receive status data indicative of a present physical status of a power system. The circuitry is also configured to obtain an emergency power control command triggered by a remote source. The emergency power control command is to be executed by an HVDC transmission system of the power system. Further, the circuitry is configured to determine, as a function of the status data, whether the emergency power control command is consistent with the present physical status of the power system and block, in response to a determination that the emergency power control command is not consistent with the present physical status of the power system, execution of the emergency power control command by the HVDC transmission system.

Pan, Jiuping↗

DOE OSTI2026

Enabling Grid-Forming Control with Fault Ride-Through in Unbalanced Distribution Networks

Distribution networks are often unbalanced, causing oscillatory responses in inverter control designed for balanced conditions. Here, to address this problem, this paper proposes a novel time-domain transformation appropriate for inverter control and enables the decomposition of three-phase unbalanced signals into constant positive and negative components. Relations useful for calculating unbalanced active and reactive power are derived from first principle, providing insight into vector products of unbalanced three-phase signals. Furthermore, a grid-forming control effective under unbalanced conditions is developed, which delivers superior performance while meeting UNIFI1 specifications for grid-forming control under unbalanced conditions. specifications applicable to category 4 inverter-based resource, like setting and regulating frequency/voltage, providing voltage support, sharing active power, injecting negative sequence current, and riding through faults. A current limiter is proposed for safe fault ride-through and integrates with the grid-forming control featuring frequency/voltage droop controllers and current and voltage control loops. The transformation of interconnected inverters is formulated and stability of the proposed control analyzed to support robust parameter selections. The effectiveness of the proposed transformation and grid-forming control is demonstrated through analytical results and real-time simulation of a IEEE 123 distribution network on the Real-Time Digital Simulator. Comparison with existing methods shows that the proposed strategy satisfies the UNIFI specifications with a much better performance.

24 - POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

DOE OSTI2024

Frequency Response Improvement in a Standalone Small Hydropower Plant Using Battery Storage

This paper proposes a control architecture for frequency, current, and voltage control that facilitates using battery storage to improve the response of standalone small hydropower plants. The frequency controller uses rate-of-change of frequency and frequency-Watt-based generations to produce active power commands. The distinctive feature of the controller design is that it nicely integrates response to frequency change with constraints on frequency and state of battery to enable power injections. The current and voltage control scheme allows incorporating the frequency controller. The distinctive feature of this controller is that it incorporates a bounded integral control strategy that guarantees stability. Results on the stability of the hydropower plant with proposed scheme are presented and robust ways to choose the controller gains are investigated via root locus analysis. In conclusion, simulations performed show that: the hydropower plant response is significantly improved with battery storage using the proposed scheme; the load carrying capability of the hydropower plant is significantly improved with battery storage; the proposed scheme has the capability to recharge the battery; and the proposed control scheme gives improved performance.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2026

Small-Signal Stability of Grid-Forming Converters Under Fault Conditions

Threshold virtual impedance (TVI)-based current limiting for grid-forming converters (GFMs) has gained great interest due to its ability to maintain voltage source behaviour during faults. However, sequence component extraction (SCE) and negative-sequence control (NSC) are often overlooked in small-signal stability assessments during faults. This paper develops small-signal sequence impedance models for GFMs under four well-known SCE methods based on TVI current limiting control during symmetrical fault conditions. Using the developed impedance models, the impacts of SCE and NSC, and the voltage and current control loop bandwidths, on system stability during faults are investigated. Additionally, since negative-sequence TVI (TVI-) is typically added along with its positive-sequence counterpart, which is often inductive, inductive and resistive TVI- are examined. The findings suggest that a higher voltage or current control loop bandwidth has a negative impact on system stability, while SCE and NSC largely reduce the stable range for voltage and current control loop bandwidth during faults, and that the severity of such impacts is determined by the particular SCE method. Furthermore, it is observed that inductive TVI- significantly degrades system stability, while resistive TVI- can enhance stability when suitable SCE methods are appropriately selected and designed. Matlab/Simulink electromagnetic transient simulations validate these analytical results.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

DOE OSTI2023

Analysis and Characterization of Four-quadrant Switches based Commutation Cell

A four-quadrant switch (FQS) blocks either polarity voltage and controls current flow in both directions. Unlike voltage-source converters, in which two-quadrant switches operate over a narrow voltage range, four-quadrant switches are required to operate over a wide range of both voltage and current in applications such as matrix converters and current-source converters. Furthermore, matrix converters require multi-step commutation schemes compared to two-step schemes for current-bidirectional switch based voltage-source converters and voltage-bidirectional switch based current-source converters. This paper provides a generalized overview of commutation schemes used for two and four quadrant switches based two-level commutation cells, identifies comparison indices for FQS commutation schemes, and discusses the need for adaptive commutation-step times for wide voltage and current variation applications. Also, the static and dynamic characteristics of 1.2 kV rated FQS implementations utilizing commercial SiC MOSFETs from four different manufacturers and novel monolithic SiC BiDirectional Field Effect Transistor (BiDFET) have been reported.

Commutation cell, four quadrant switch, SiC Bidire↗

DOE OSTI2026

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition for Electrochemical Separation Experimentation

The Python-based program is a laboratory automation tool designed to control and monitor electrochemical systems. The tool was developed for capacitive deionization (CDI) experiments, but it can be used for any system that requires controlled voltage or current segments and multi-parameter monitoring. The program integrates hardware components to run user-defined experimental parameters, providing operational control of a programmable power supply, peristaltic pump, and data acquisition devices. Currently, the program is structured with a workflow that includes an initialization (or pre-run) phase, a main loop, and a post-experiment stabilization (or post-run) phase. The initialization phase prepares and stabilizes the cell, ensuring that the electrodes and solution reach a baseline state before the experiment begins. The main loop consists of multiple voltage segments that repeat, controlling the experiment while recording key parameters such as time, voltage, current, pH, and conductivity. Finally, the post-experiment stabilization phase allows the system to stabilize after the experiment, returning the cell and solution to equilibrium conditions before ending the sequence. The program is designed with four variations, each tailored to different experimental needs. All variations include both the initialization and post-experiment stabilization stages, which run for a set amount of time, voltage, current, and flow rate before and after the main experiment block. The main loop runs for a set number of cycles, as defined by the user input, and each cycle is composed of 2 or 4 segments. The 4 program variations are described as follows: Program 1: The main program includes 2 segments. Each segment is defined to have a set duration, flow rate, voltage, and current. This program measures conductivity, flow rate, voltage, and current. Program 2: The main program expands Program 1 to include 4 segments. Each segment has a specified duration, flow rate, voltage, and current. Like Program 1, it measures conductivity, flow rate, voltage, and current. Program 3: The main program consists of 2 segments, each defined by time, flow rate, voltage, and current. In addition to conductivity, flow rate, voltage, and current, Program 3 collects pH and temperature data through a 4-channel data acquisition device. Program 4: This program independently controls two channels of a multi-channel power supply simultaneously. While conductivity can only be measured for one cell at a time, the dual-channel control makes it possible to operate two cells simultaneously under different voltage/current conditions. The main program includes 2 segments.For each program, all measurements are automatically logged and integrated into a single Excel output file. Data are displayed in numerical format and plotted, both in real time, to track system performance. A key feature of the program is its ability to synchronize all outputs so that every measurement shares a single timestamp, ensuring accurate alignment of voltage, current, pH, conductivity, and pH data.By combining hardware control, real-time monitoring, and unified data collection, this program significantly reduces manual workload and minimizes errors, making it a reliable platform for researchers, engineers, and laboratory technicians conducting CDI experiments, among other electrochemical tests.

Valentino, Lauren [Argonne National Laboratory (AN↗

DOE OSTI2023

Hierarchical Control of Grid-Connected Hydrogen Electrolyzer Providing Grid Services

This paper presents the operational modes and control architecture of the grid-connected hydrogen electrolyzer systems for the provision of frequency and voltage supports. The analysis is focused on the primary and secondary loops in the hierarchical control scheme. At the power converter inner control loop, the voltage- and current-control modes are analyzed. At the primary level, the droop and opposite droop control strategies to provide voltage and frequency support are described. Coordination between primary control and secondary, tertiary reserves is briefly discussed. The case studies and real-time hardware-in-the-loop simulation results are provided using Typhoon HIL to back the theoretical investigation.

ancillary services↗

DOE OSTI2025

A Comparison of Battery Charge Controller Technologies for Wave Energy Converters

Wave energy is a uniquely challenging field for electrical system designers. High peak and low average power potential with a constantly varying energy input is difficult to harness and control through conventional means. To power the blue economy, low-powered wave energy converters (WECs) need batteries for energy storage. Safely and effectively charging batteries from waves requires a charge controller to properly monitor and control voltage and current going to the battery. Currently, off-the-shelf charge controllers exist for other renewable generation such as wind, hydro, and solar. Two topologies were validated: a buck converter and a pulse width modulation (PWM) charge controller. Using an in-lab dry testbed, wave energy power inputs were simulated to properly validate the effectiveness of existing charge controller technologies, identifying the shortcomings and improvements needed to effectively harness wave energy.

battery storage↗

DOE OSTI2024

A Comparison of Battery Charge Controller Technologies for Wave Energy Converters: Preprint

Wave energy is a uniquely challenging field for electrical system designers. High peak and low average power potential with a constantly varying energy input is difficult to harness and control through conventional means. To power the blue economy, low-powered wave energy converters (WECs) need batteries for energy storage. Safely and effectively charging batteries from waves requires a charge controller to properly monitor and control voltage and current going to the battery. Currently, off-the-shelf charge controllers exist for other renewable generation such as wind, hydro, and solar. Two topologies were validated: a buck converter and a pulse width modulation (PWM) charge controller. Using an in-lab dry testbed, wave energy power inputs were simulated to properly validate the effectiveness of existing charge controller technologies, identifying the shortcomings and improvements needed to effectively harness wave energy.

battery storage↗

DOE OSTI2023

Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of the Controls and Operations of High Voltage Direct Current (HVdc) Converters in Interconnected Electric Power Systems

This project will seek to build a fundamental understanding, and capability, to model and simulate the controls and operations of high voltage direct current (HVdc) converter stations in an electromagnetic simulation environment. While HVdc stations have been operated in the United States for over 50 years, these are typically simple two terminal point-to-point systems. Recently multi-terminal systems have begun to be deployed. The challenge with these new multi-terminal systems is that they often use different control schemes on the different terminals. The interactions of existing and new controls, and the fact that HVdc systems are rates in the 1,000’s of MWs means that small control instabilities can have dramatic impacts to bulk power systems. Despite these challenges, the operational capabilities of HVdc make them an attractive option for the transfer of the large amounts of renewable electricity that will be necessary for decarbonization of the nation’s electrical infrastructure and other sectors.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2022

Study of Inverter Control Strategies on the Stability of Low-Inertia Microgrid Systems

This paper investigates the stability of low-inertia microgrid systems with two control strategies that have different percentages of grid-forming (GFM) inverters. The first control strategy has approximately 50% GFM inverters, and all the battery inverters are working in GFM control mode. Originally, the second control strategy has approximately 10% GFM inverters, with only two battery inverters working in GFM control mode and the rest working in grid-following (GFL) PQ control mode based on current control, which cannot stabilize the microgrid system. Then, the second control strategy is modified to change the GFM inverters from droop control to isochronous control and the GFL battery inverters from traditional current control to voltage control for power control. Both control strategies can maintain system stability; however, the first control strategy can better handle contingency events. The study indicates that 1) a microgrid system with a higher percentage of GFM inverters has better stability; and 2) a microgrid with a lower percentage of GFM inverters can have poor stability, but improved control strategies in inverters can improve system stability. This study improves the understanding of how different percentages of GFM inverters and inverter control strategies affect the system stability of low-inertia microgrids.

droop control↗

DOE OSTI2022

Study of Inverter Control Strategies on the Stability of Low-Inertia Microgrid Systems: Preprint

This paper investigates the stability of low-inertia microgrid systems with two control strategies that have different percentages of grid-forming (GFM) inverters. The first control strategy has approximately 50% GFM inverters, and all the battery inverters are working in GFM control mode. Originally, the second control strategy has approximately 10% GFM inverters, with only two battery inverters working in GFM control mode and the rest working in grid-following (GFL) PQ control mode based on current control, which cannot stabilize the microgrid system. Then, the second control strategy is modified to change the GFM inverters from droop control to isochronous control and the GFL battery inverters from traditional current control to voltage control for power control. Both control strategies can maintain system stability; however, the first control strategy can better handle contingency events. The study indicates that 1) a microgrid system with a higher percentage of GFM inverters has better stability; and 2) a microgrid with a lower percentage of GFM inverters can have poor stability, but improved control strategies in inverters can improve system stability. This study improves the understanding of how different percentages of GFM inverters and inverter control strategies affect the system stability of low-inertia microgrids.

droop control↗

DOE OSTI2022

Study of Inverter Control Strategies on the Stability of Low-Inertia Microgrid Systems

This paper investigates the stability of low-inertia microgrid systems with two control strategies that have different percentages of grid-forming (GFM) inverters. The first control strategy has approximately 50% GFM inverters, and all the battery inverters are working in GFM control mode. Originally, the second control strategy has approximately 10% GFM inverters, with only two battery inverters working in GFM control mode and the rest working in grid-following (GFL) PQ control mode based on current control, which cannot stabilize the microgrid system. Then, the second control strategy is modified to change the GFM inverters from droop control to isochronous control and the GFL battery inverters from traditional current control to voltage control for power control. Both control strategies can maintain system stability; however, the first control strategy can better handle contingency events. The study indicates that 1) a microgrid system with a higher percentage of GFM inverters has better stability; and 2) a microgrid with a lower percentage of GFM inverters can have poor stability, but improved control strategies in inverters can improve system stability. This study improves the understanding of how different percentages of GFM inverters and inverter control strategies affect the system stability of low-inertia microgrids.

droop control↗

DOE OSTI2024

Equivalent-Circuit Models of Grid-Forming IBRs for Electromagnetic-Transient Simulations

We derive equivalent-circuit models of control- and physical-layer subsystems of grid-forming (GFM) inverter-based resources (IBRs) for electromagnetic-transient (EMT) simulations. Three different primary controllers are considered: Droop, Virtual Synchronous Machine (VSM), and dispatchable Virtual Oscillator Control (dVOC). In addition, the models include cascaded voltage- and current-control loops, and LCL output filters. Simulations for a single-inverter setup and for a network of five inverters in a modified IEEE 14-bus topology are presented. The equivalent-circuit models simulated with analog electronic circuit-simulator software (in our case, LTspice) offer the same accuracy, and with no explicit tuning of the solver, lower computational burden compared to block-diagram-based implementations in commercial off-the-shelf EMT software (in our case, MATLAB-Simulink).

electromagnetic transient simulation↗