SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “utility programs”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
SUFFER - A program for console execution of utility programs
Computer program SUFFER for console execution of utility programs on IBM S/360 computer
National aeronautics and space administration technology utilization program.
NASA technology utilization program for acquisition and dissemination of technical information
The Government role in technology utilization programs.
NASA Technology Utilization Program, discussing information dissemination
NASA Technology Utilization Program.
NASA technology utilization program for civilian economy benefit, discussing scientific and technical documentation and transfer across industrial, disciplinary and regional boundaries
Southwest Research Institute assistance to NASA in biomedical areas of the Technology Utilization program
Technology utilization in biomedical areas, particularly for infants and handicapped persons
NASA's Technology Utilization Program.
NASA's Technology Utilization Program is described, illustrating how it can be useful in achieving improved productivity, providing more jobs, solving public sector challenges, and strengthening the international competitive situation. Underlying the program is the fact that research and development conducted in NASA's aeronautics and space programs have generated much technical information concerning processes, products, or techniques which may be useful to engineers, doctors, or to others. The program is based on acquisition and publication, working with the user, and applications engineering.
An overview of the NASA technology utilization program
The NASA technology utilization program is described. The transfer of that technology is described along with the publications which distribute the technological information.
Driving Affordable Energy Through Utility Program Design
The presentation is aimed to teach participants about achieving affordable energy through utility program design. Learning objectives include: identify key utility program characteristics that support affordability and consumer choice; apply best practices in outreach, eligibility, and evaluation to improve program design; and evaluate strategies for aligning program design with customer needs and regulatory goals.
Moon to Mars (M2M) Cross Program Utilization Payload Safety Process
It is the goal of Moon to Mars (M2M) to establish a single consolidated set of safety requirements and a safety review process for utilization payloads that will cross program vehicle hatches or operate externally on multiple program vehicles during transport or operation that satisfies Exploration Ground Systems (EGS), Orion, EVA, and Human Surface Mobility Program (EHP), Gateway (GW), and Human Landing System (HLS) programs. This document defines the Cross Program Utilization Payload (xPUP) safety review process for mission effectivity of Artemis III and beyond. This review process will help ensure protection of the overall Moon to Mars integrated system from potential hazards created by cross program payloads that either cross a program vehicle hatch or can interface with more than one M2M lunar exploration program vehicle. The process will identify payload hazards and controls that will protect ground personnel, flight crew, the integrated vehicle, ground equipment, or facilities. This process is also applicable to samples that cross hatches between vehicles including for return to Earth. The xPUP safety review process will be led by one of the M2M programs' integration safety panels, chosen on a per-payload basis. After the lead integration safety panel is determined, the common safety process is established, based on pre-determined criteria, which includes ad-hoc members from other stakeholder programs. Stakeholder programs are those that interface with the utilization payload in any way (e.g., operating on a lunar exploration vehicle or crossing program vehicle hatches). The xPUP will execute this safety review process for flight and ground utilization payload hardware design, its ground support equipment, and landing and recovery in accordance with the applicable safety requirements as specified in M2M-30043: Moon to Mars Cross Program Utilization Payload Safety Requirements. The xPUP safety process will follow the lead integration safety panel’s safety process requirements. Formal agreements will be communicated with the payload developer using the payload integration processes documented in M2M-30037, Artemis Payload Integration Implementation Plan.
Manual for Getdata Version 3.1: a FORTRAN Utility Program for Time History Data
This report documents version 3.1 of the GetData computer program. GetData is a utility program for manipulating files of time history data, i.e., data giving the values of parameters as functions of time. The most fundamental capability of GetData is extracting selected signals and time segments from an input file and writing the selected data to an output file. Other capabilities include converting file formats, merging data from several input files, time skewing, interpolating to common output times, and generating calculated output signals as functions of the input signals. This report also documents the interface standards for the subroutines used by GetData to read and write the time history files. All interface to the data files is through these subroutines, keeping the main body of GetData independent of the precise details of the file formats. Different file formats can be supported by changes restricted to these subroutines. Other computer programs conforming to the interface standards can call the same subroutines to read and write files in compatible formats.
The first NASA regional technology utilization program - A 3-year report
NASA Technology Utilization program for space science and industrial technology
Driving Affordable Decarbonization: Inclusive Utility Program Designs for Disadvantaged Communities
Our research team worked with 17 utility partners from various U.S. regions to study current utility program practices. We identified the key characteristics of these programs and the challenges and opportunities in implementing them. Through our research, we provide a pragmatic, design-oriented, and customer-centered perspective for effective program design and implementation. We identify 13 successful characteristics of program design that may be considered by utility partners.
An Atlas of Current Customer-Facing Utility Program Designs and Pricing
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Kevala conducted a targeted literature review and leveraged extensive expertise, including team members with four decades of experience in the utility sector, to characterize utility programs and rate designs. This analysis delves into the motivations behind these programs and the various hurdles they face. Through this in-depth study, the team provides critical insights into the operational dynamics of utility programs, identifying key drivers and barriers that influence their effectiveness and implementation.
Verification of EvaluateFLux Utility Program
The EvaluateFlux program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3D-VARIANT which handles Cartesian and hexagonal geometries. The EvaluateFlux program was developed to allow users to obtain flux and power traverses through the geometry domain, and its initial purpose was to facilitate foil analysis by evaluating the flux solution from DIF3D-VARIANT and combining it with foil cross section data. The EvaluateFlux program can calculate the neutron flux, as well as the reaction rates, at any user provided evaluation point. It does this by identifying the spatial mesh associated with the evaluation point and then evaluates the polynomial based neutron flux moments stored in the NHFLUX file at that point. The output of EvaluateFlux varies depending on the input setup. The maximum output includes the neutron flux and microscopic and macroscopic reaction rates at each evaluation point. The purpose of this work is to verify the outputs of EvaluateFlux. Simple models that have hand calculatable results are first defined and used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. More complex cases are then added where a duplicate program of EvaluateFlux that uses PrintTables outputs of the binary files is used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. In those complex cases, hand calculations of selected evaluation points were also displayed to confirm the software verification. For all the tests done, the hand calculations agreed well with those calculated by EvaluateFlux. For the larger complex problems, the duplicate program that can process hundreds of evaluation points was able to identify that zero points within some meshes have large errors. This aspect was attributed to the truncation error on the input provided to the duplicate program and is not a concern for the accuracy of the EvaluateFlux software.
Verification of the EvaluateFlux Utility Program
The EvaluateFlux program is a post-processing utility program for DIF3D, specifically DIF3D-VARIANT which handles Cartesian and hexagonal geometries. The EvaluateFlux program was developed to allow users to obtain flux and power traverses through the geometry domain, and its initial purpose was to facilitate foil analysis by evaluating the flux solution from DIF3D-VARIANT and combining it with foil cross section data. The EvaluateFlux program can calculate the neutron flux, as well as the reaction rates, at any user provided evaluation point. It does this by identifying the spatial mesh associated with the evaluation point and then evaluates the polynomial based neutron flux moments stored in the NHFLUX file at that point. The output of EvaluateFlux varies depending on the input setup. The maximum output includes the neutron flux and microscopic and macroscopic reaction rates at each evaluation point. The purpose of this work is to verify the outputs of EvaluateFlux. Simple models that have hand calculatable results are first defined and used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. More complex cases are then added where a duplicate program of EvaluateFlux that uses PrintTables outputs of the binary files is used to verify the EvaluateFlux outputs. In those complex cases, hand calculations of selected evaluation points were also displayed to confirm the software verification. For all the tests done, the hand calculations agreed well with those calculated by EvaluateFlux. For the larger complex problems, the duplicate program that can process hundreds of evaluation points was able to identify that zero points within some meshes have large errors. This aspect was attributed to the truncation error on the input provided to the duplicate program and is not a concern for the accuracy of the EvaluateFlux software.
EvaluateFlux, VARPOW, VARPEAK, and DIF3DtoVTK Utility Programs for DIF3D
The DIF3D-VARIANT solver is part of the DIF3D code which was developed at ANL for engineering level predictive analysis of nuclear reactor cores. Over the course of the last 20 years, the DIF3D-VARIANT option of DIF3D has become increasingly more used because of improvements in computer memory capabilities and performance. This is beneficial to the users of DIF3D as DIF3D-VARIANT is able to apply both p- and h- spatial mesh refinement strategies in diffusion and transport theory. Given its greater use, utility programs were created to assist in post-processing the DIF3D output. This document discusses the basic execution process of DIF3D and the output files it creates but is primarily focused on being the manual for the utility programs EvaluateFlux, VARPOW, VARPEAK, and DIF3DtoVTK.
EvaluateFlux, VARPOW, VARPEAK, and DIF3DtoVTK Utility Programs for DIF3D (Rev. 1)
The DIF3D-VARIANT solver is part of the DIF3D code which was developed at ANL for engineering level predictive analysis of nuclear reactor cores. Over the course of the last 20 years, the DIF3D-VARIANT option of DIF3D has become increasingly more used because of improvements in computer memory capabilities and performance. This is beneficial to the users of DIF3D as DIF3D-VARIANT is able to apply both p- and h-spatial mesh refinement strategies in diffusion and transport theory. Given its greater use, utility programs were created to assist in post-processing the DIF3D output. This document discusses the basic execution process of DIF3D and the output files it creates but is primarily focused on being the manual for the utility programs EvaluateFlux, VARPOW, VARPEAK, and DIF3DtoVTK.