Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “tritium extraction facility”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 34: US DOE Featured Site: Savannah River Operations Office: 70 Years of Service

The Savannah River Site celebrates its 70. anniversary on November 28, 2020. On this date in 1950, President Harry S. Truman requested the Dupont Company to design, build and operate what was then known as the Savannah River Plant in response to the Soviet Union's detonation of its first atomic weapon, which set the Cold War into motion. During the 1950's, six South Carolina towns were relocated for the construction of SRS and by 1953, the 310 square mile site was complete. Nearly 40,000 workers were employed t build five nuclear reactors and support facilities, two chemical separations plants, heavy water extraction plant, nuclear fuel and target fabrication facility tritium extraction facility and waste management facilities. SRS played a key role in winning the Cold War and for seven decades, SRS has been a leader within the DOE complex. Today, the site supports environmental stewardship and maintains the nation's nuclear deterrent while ensuring the safekeeping and disposal of domestic and international nuclear materials. The site continues to support the nation's nuclear defense as it explores new potential NNSA missions. SRS has a proud 70- year history and looks forward to a future of service as a national asset and strong community partner. The session was kicked off with a video message from Secretary of Energy, Dan Brouillette, who thanked employees past and current for their efforts. The video also provided an overview of the history and future of the Site. This panel provided an overview of the Savannah River Site's 70 years of service (history, challenges, opportunities, and future) presented by the SRS's Senior leadership and the local Aiken, South Carolina Mayor. Panelists with presentations: US DOE Secretary Dan Brouillette's Overview of DOE and SRS - A Legacy of 70 Years of Service (Amy Boyette); 70 Years of Service (Michael Budney); 70 Years of Service (Stuart MacVean); SRS Liquid Waste (Thomas Foster); National Nuclear Security Administration (Nicole Nelson-Jean)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Savannah River Site Composite Analysis (FY2019 Annual Review)

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a Department of Energy (DOE) site encompassing approximately 310 square miles in South Carolina. It is bounded on the southwest by the Savannah River (SR) and is situated approximately 12 miles south of Aiken, South Carolina, and 15 miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia. Construction of and subsequent operations at the SRS began in 1951 under the direction of the Atomic Energy Commission. The primary mission of the SRS was to produce tritium and plutonium for the national nuclear weapons complex. Between 1953 and 1955, SRS brought five reactors and various support facilities into operation in support of its primary mission. Support facilities included two chemical separations plants, a heavy water extraction plant, a nuclear fuel and target fabrication facility, a tritium extraction facility and waste management facilities. With the declining need for a large nuclear weapons stockpile since the end of the Cold War, many SRS facilities no longer produce or process nuclear materials. All reactors were shut down by 1993. However, the SRS Tritium Extraction Facility continues to supply DOE with tritium. Additionally, operations at the K-Area Complex currently provide interim safe storage for much of DOE’s excess plutonium (Pu) and high enriched uranium, in a building which formerly housed K Reactor. As the SRS mission has changed, many surplus facilities are being dispositioned safely and economically. SRS has completed extensive decommissioning activities in D-Area, M-Area, P-Area, R-Area, and T-Area, with groundwater (GW) remediation ongoing. High-level waste tanks continue to be emptied and closed.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rod (TPBAR) Cutterhead Test Report

The Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) Target Rod Preparation (TRP) Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rod (TPBAR) Cutterhead is a specialized remote tubing cutter used to breach TPBARs (approximately 0.381 inch outside diameter x 0.336 inch inside diameter 316 stainless steel tubing). The cutterhead was originally designed by an external engineering firm - RTS Wright Industries. The bearing housing and drive plate, the main drive components, are designed to be fabricated from Nitronic 60, an anti-galling stainless steel, and coated with Dicronite® (Tungsten Disulfide) lubricating coating. These parts have galled after a limited number of cycles, damaging the fine 3.25-32 UN threads which drive the system. In some cases, destructive sectioning is required to remove the failed parts from the cutterhead. Cutterheads have been fabricated by multiple machine shops, with some cutterheads failing very quickly and some lasting more than 1,000 cuts. In 2019, Emery Corporation, now Toner Machining Technologies (TMT) was contracted to fabricate four (4) new complete sets of cutterheads. The newly fabricated cutterheads have not been able to pass the required acceptance test without the bearing housing and drive plate threads galling. TMT has tried multiple sets of Nitronic 60 bearing housing and drive plates; all have galled after less than 10 cuts.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

SR19036 Improve TRP Cutter Head Performance

The Target Rod Preparation (TRP) cutter head motor suffers from overheating problems during Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rods (TPBAR) breaching operations. The TRP cell cutter head drive motor must remain below the administrative limit of 100°C during breaching operations. If temperatures in excess of 100°C are reached, work must be stopped, and the motor allowed to cool. The work stoppage due to overheating of the drive motor directly and drastically lowers the efficiency of the TPBAR breaching process, reducing the production of Tritium gas. Due to the increased need for Tritium gas, the overheating problem must be addressed to improve the overall efficiency of the TPBAR breaching process.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

SOFE2023 Presentation: "Tritium Safety and Sensitivity Analysis of Tritium Extraction eXperiment (TEX) PbLi Loop Using MELCOR-TMAP"

The efficient extraction of tritium from the breeder blanket (BB) in a fusion reactor is vital for maintaining the tritium economy for a sustainable and self-sufficient fusion power plant. The vacuum permeator (VP) design is one of several promising technology platforms for extracting tritium from the BB with the advantages of being capable of operating continuously at high temperatures with the aim of achieving high tritium extraction efficiencies. The Tritium Extraction eXperiment (TEX), under construction at the Safety and Tritium Applied Research (STAR) Facility at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is designed to test the viability of VP technology by introducing atomic hydrogen (H, D, and T) from a source permeator (SP) into a forced convection lead lithium eutectic (PbLi) loop and determining the hydrogen extraction rates from the vanadium VP. Presented here is a computational analysis of the hydrogen inventory and permeation behavior in TEX using the hydrogen transport and accident analysis code MELCOR-TMAP developed at INL. The results of a sensitivity analysis based on MELCOR-TMAP simulations of hydrogen extraction efficiencies from the TEX test section using varying PbLi flow rates, hydrogen source rates from the SP, and material property uncertainties are also reported. Operation scenarios for TEX in consideration of the analyses based on results from MELCOR-TMAP are discussed.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Deuterium Extraction from Helium with a Vanadium Vacuum Permeator: Commissioning of the Tritium Extraction eXperiment (TEX)

Here, the Tritium Extraction eXperiment (TEX) is a forced-convection lead-lithium (PbLi) loop in the Safety and Tritium Applied Research (STAR) facility at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) with the purpose of providing validation data for the vacuum permeator tritium extraction concept. A vanadium tube of 1000 mm length, 12.7 mm outside diameter, and 0.50 mm wall thickness is installed in the test section of TEX. The installed vanadium tube is characterized to quantify impurity concentrations, surface chemistry, and microstructure to elucidate permeation phenomena observed in experimentation. Herein, the permeation properties of the vanadium tube are characterized by measuring deuterium permeation at 300 °C, 325 °C, and 350 °C at 100 kPa, 125 kPa, and 150 kPa total pressures with 5000 ppm deuterium in helium gas mixture in a once-through flow configuration. The hydrogen isotope permeation through the vanadium tube in the test section is measured with quadrupole mass spectrometers and the hydrogen isotope concentration in the feed and retentate gas stream is measured with gas chromatography. The transient permeation results are modeled with MELCOR-TMAP, a thermal-hydraulic tritium transport code, and compared well with literature data.

70 - PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Comparison of Fuel Cycles for Lead-Lithium and Pure Lithium Liquid Metal Walls in a Magnetized Target Fusion Power Plant

General Fusion (GF) is developing an adaptable, commercial fusion power plant based on magnetized target fusion (MTF). The GF approach involves forming a spherical torus of deuterium-tritium plasma in a large (~4 m diameter) cavity formed in liquid metal, and then collapsing that cavity with an array of pneumatic piston drivers. The liquid metal is constantly flowing through the fusion chamber and out to processing systems where tritium and heat will be extracted using tritium extraction technologies and heat exchangers, respectively. Here, this study focuses on two candidate designs for the liquid metal blanket and first wall material for the General Fusion Magnetized Target Fusion (GF MTF) power plant and assesses their impact on the tritium fuel cycle. The first candidate is the lead lithium eutectic (LLE) and the second candidate is pure lithium (Li). It was found that the main differences between LLE and Li designs are the extraction technologies required to remove tritium from the blanket and the amount of tritium and its distribution within the facility. More than 80% of the in-process tritium inventory for the LLE design is contained in the isotope separation system, while for the Li design, over 60% of the in-process tritium inventory is contained within the blanket material. This is due to significant tritium retention by Li. For the Li blanket, the burden of tritium processing rests on the blanket extraction technology rather than the traditional exhaust processing route. Thus, the blanket extraction technology is a main driver of tritium inventory in the Li system and determines the subsequent interface with the tritium processing plant.

General Fusion↗
DOE OSTI2023

Savannah River National Laboratory – General Fusion 2023 INFUSE Report (Rev.1)

This report describes the results from an INFUSE research project, where Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) in collaboration with General Fusion (GF) used process modeling to understand and optimize commercial power plant (CPP) fuel cycle designs based on parameters provided by GF. The study primarily focused on two candidate fuel cycles with different blanket materials, one with a lead lithium eutectic (LLE) blanket and the other with a pure lithium (Li) blanket. LLE benefits from a low melting point, favorable neutronics, and lower reactivity, but liquid lithium has the potential for higher tritium breeding ratios (TBR) and does not poison the plasma as a high Z contaminant. It was found that the main differences between LLE and Li designs are the extraction technologies required to remove tritium from the blanket and the amount of tritium and its distribution within the facility. More than 80% of the in-process tritium inventory for the LLE design is contained in the isotope separation system, while for the Li design, over 60% of the in-process tritium inventory is contained within the blanket material. This is due to significant tritium retention by Li. For the Li blanket, the burden of tritium processing rests on the blanket extraction technology rather than the traditional exhaust processing route. Thus, the blanket extraction technology is a main driver of tritium inventory in the Li system and determines the subsequent interface with the tritium processing plant.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Operations and Recent Upgrades to a Tritium Recycling Facility - 20375

Nuclear Sources and Services Inc. (NSSI) is a waste handling treatment company that has been operating since 1971. In 2000, NSSI began building a 1,000 m{sup 2} (∼10,000 sqft) tritium recycling facility on the Houston, Texas premises to address a growing need in the waste disposal market. Over the years, the capability of the facility grew to address many different waste streams with the goal of recycling > 99.9% of all tritium activity back into the fusion community. This is achieved by maintaining an effluent stack release well below the 150 GBq/year (C Ci/year) operating limit and maintaining all liquid and solid waste disposal below the low-level radioactive release limit of 0.C MBq/kg (10 μCi/kg). The unique processing systems in the facility attracts many challenging contracts. Within the past two years, NSSI has engaged with customers to treat; organic mixed wastes that simultaneously contain tritium and carbon-14, safely extract tritium from large quantities of exit sign lights, and remove tritium from uncharacterised legacy depleted uranium beds from a superfund site. This paper will outline the initial testing, the system upgrades to treat these varied streams, and the progress in processing the feedstocks provided by these projects. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Radiation Monitoring for Volatilized Zinc Contamination Using Gamma-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy

Gamma-ray imaging is a tool that has grown in importance in the applications of non-destructive assay (NDA) for radioactive survey and analysis of nuclear facilities. Imaging techniques have shown great promise in providing valuable information involving radioactive waste management and contamination prevention. For the application studied in this work, 65 Zn has been identified as a radioactive contaminant during tritium extraction. Due to the volatile nature of 65 Zn under the pressure and temperature changes during extraction operations, 65 Zn can easily travel through components of the extraction system as vapor, making it difficult to trap. Previous research involving the development of a filtration system showed that the 65 Zn can be trapped, mitigating product contamination. However, during the extraction process, direct analysis of the equipment to confirm that zinc contamination is trapped in the filter and has not spread to other components is impractical. Here, in this situation, the need to assay the location of the contamination with little-to-no interference with operations is vital. In this work, we demonstrate the use of a commercialized 3D position-sensitive CdZnTe (CZT) gamma-ray imaging spectrometer to provide analysis of the 65 Zn contamination. Onsite measurements during an extraction process are studied to assess the location and migration of the 65 Zn. The results obtained from real-time glovebox monitoring demonstrate the feasibility of gamma-ray imaging for localizing the contamination and providing a preliminary qualitative assessment that is intended to be used in future work quantifying the contamination build-up and activity over time.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2022

Measurements of low-mode asymmetries in the areal density of laser-direct-drive deuterium–tritium cryogenic implosions on OMEGA using neutron spectroscopy

Areal density is one of the key parameters that determines the confinement time in inertial confinement fusion experiments, and low-mode asymmetries in the compressed fuel are detrimental to the implosion performance. The energy spectra from the scattering of the primary deuterium–tritium (DT) neutrons off the compressed cold fuel assembly are used to investigate low-mode nonuniformities in direct-drive cryogenic DT implosions at the Omega Laser Facility. For spherically symmetric implosions, the shape of the energy spectrum is primarily determined by the elastic and inelastic scattering cross sections for both neutron-deuterium and neutron-tritium kinematic interactions. Two highly collimated lines of sight, which are positioned at nearly orthogonal locations around the OMEGA target chamber, record the neutron time-of-flight signal in the current mode. An evolutionary algorithm is being used to extract a model-independent energy spectrum of the scattered neutrons from the experimental neutron time-of-flight data and is used to infer the modal spatial variations (l = 1) in the areal density. Experimental observations of the low-mode variations of the cold-fuel assembly (ρL 0 + ρL 1 ) show good agreement with a recently developed model, indicating a departure from the spherical symmetry of the compressed DT fuel assembly. As a result, another key signature that has been observed in the presence of a low-mode variation is the broadening of the kinematic end-point due to the anisotropy of the dense fuel conditions.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2025

EM-Enhanced HyPOR Loop for Fast Fusion Cycles

Vacuum pumps are the heart of a fusion energy facility – fusion power cannot be generated without them. Nevertheless, the vacuum technology needed to operate a viable fuel cycle for a compact fusion power plant does not exist. Commercial vacuum technology offers the best solution to this challenge, but a pump oil recycling and detritiation system is necessary. Conventional oil detritiation processes have only been developed to deal with legacy waste and are too slow and destructive to the oil. Further, post hoc detritiation strategies are intrinsically inefficient. Our approach is to rethink the challenge holistically by designing the pumping fluid and tritium extraction system in an integrated manner to achieve an innovative solution. By selecting an oil for the specific task of pumping tritium and then designing our catalytic system to selectively target the tritium-bearing functional groups, an effective detritiation system (hydrocarbon pump oil recycling, HyPOR, loop) for fusion power plants can be obtained. The project demonstrated a HyPOR loop process that can selectively remove heavier hydrogen isotopes from pump oil, reaching the target of 99.5 % removal, with an uptake of less than 0.01% of tritium throughput, while also purifying the oil of radiation-induced damage. The recycled oil retained its pumping characteristics over 7 recycles and gamma irradiation over 30 MGy. By meeting these targets, the project enable a reduction in pump operational costs from $\$$14.5M/year to $\$$103k/year (>140× reduction), reducing pump electric power consumption from 2.8 MW to 0.25 MW (>10× reduction), and reducing in-process tritium inventory from 2.03 kg to 0.48 kg (>4× reduction).

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

MEASUREMENT OF Fn 2 /Fp 2 FROM DEEP INELASTIC ELECTRON SCATTERING OFF A=3 MIRROR NUCLEI AT JEFFERSON LAB

This research is part of the Je?erson Lab MARATHON experiment (MeAsurement of the Fn 2 /Fp 2 , d/u RAtios and A = 3 EMC E?ect in Deep Inelastic Electron Scattering Off the Tritium and Helium MirrOr Nuclei). MARATHON is an experiment on electron deep inelastic scattering off the 3H, 3He mirror nuclei. It has extracted, from the measured deep inelastic scattering cross section ratio o? 3H and 3He, the ratio of the neutron to proton inelastic structure functions Fn 2 /Fp 2 . The extraction has taken advantage of the isospin symmetry of the A = 3 mirror nuclei within a novel technique, which avoids the theoretical uncertainties that are present in the SLAC experiments of the 1970s, which used hydrogen and deuterium targets. The experiment was performed using the upgraded 11 GeV beam of the Jefferson Lab electron accelerator, the Hall A Experimental Facility, and a newly designed cryogenic, high-pressure gas target system containing 3H and 3He cells. Electrons scattered o? the gas targets were detected in the two superconducting, high-resolution magnetic spectrometers of Hall A. The cross section data cover the four-momentum transfer squared range 2.0 < Q2 < 14.0 (GeV/c)2, and the Bjorken x scaling variable range 0.19 < x < 0.83. The experiment also measured, for calibration purposes, electron deep inelastic scattering off hydrogen and deuterium at selected kinematics.

Su, Tong↗
DOE OSTI2022

Predictive Contaminant Transport Simulation with the P2R Model for the Composite Analysis Recharge Sensitivity Case

The Plateau-to-River (P2R) model is a groundwater flow and contaminant fate and transport (F&T) simulation model used to support remedial activities conducted by the Central Plateau Cleanup Company (CPCCo) at the Hanford Site in south-central Washington State. The overall objective of the saturated zone modeling effort is to provide a basis for making informed remedial action decisions based on descriptions of current and expected future contaminant concentrations in groundwater at decision points within and downgradient of the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site. Specifically, the purpose of this environmental calculation file (ECF) is to describe a recharge sensitivity case of the CA base case. The recharge sensitivity case implements a change in the activity contribution from the vadose zone in the A Trenches Area model (for tritium [H-3] and iodine-129 [I-129]), BC Cribs and Trenches model (for I-129 and technetium-99 [Tc-99]), or the Plutonium Uranium Extraction (PUREX) Area model (for H-3 and I-129). All other simulated inventories are identical to the CA base case. The simulation of fate and transport of contaminants reported in this case will support dose predictions as part of the updated Hanford Site CA.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Flowsheet Evaluation of Dissolving Used Nuclear Fuel in PUREX Solvent

This study explores the potential benefit to the used nuclear fuel actinide recovery flowsheet of a process simplification and establish the experimental work needed to develop the simplified flowsheet. The simplification is based on replacing acid dissolution of used nuclear fuel with dissolution in the tri-butyl phosphate solvent used in the industrially mature Plutonium Uranium Reduction Extraction flowsheet. Though characterized by considerable uncertainty, simplified flowsheets appear feasible and potentially offer significant reductions in process complexity, nitrate inventory, secondary liquid effluent generation and plant footprint. Initial development of the technology should focus on key fission product and actinide dissolution as a function of process conditions and understanding the fundamental chemistry of tri-butyl phosphate solvent chemistry. Development of ancillary technologies for minor actinide separations and fuel pretreatment for tritium management is also recommended.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Facility Radionuclide Emission Points and Sampling Systems

Battelle–Pacific Northwest Division operates numerous research and development laboratories in Washington State. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) contracts to Battelle at Richland facilities on both the DOE Hanford Site and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Richland campus. These facilities have the potential for radionuclide air emissions. The PNNL contract with DOE also includes operations at the PNNL-Sequim campus in Sequim, where there is also the potential for radionuclide air emissions. This document is a periodic update that describes current PNNL facility emission units and sampling systems. The National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP [40 Code of Federal Regulations 61, Subpart H]) requires an assessment of all emission units that have the potential for radionuclide air emissions. Emission units are registered with the State of Washington. Potential emissions from emission units are assessed annually by PNNL staff. Sampling, monitoring, and other regulatory compliance requirements are designated based on the potential to-emit dose criteria, a graded approach to facility-identified potential impact categories, and regulatory requirements. The purpose of this document is to describe the facility radionuclide air emission sampling program and provide current and historical facility emission unit system performance, operation, and design information. For sampled emission units, the building, exhaust unit, control technologies, and sample extraction details are provided. Additionally, applicable configuration drawings, figures, and photographs are included. For non-sampled emission units, emission estimation and radionuclide source details are provided. Site-wide permits for the lowest potential impact category are described. Deregistered/transitioned emission unit details are also provided as necessary for at least 5 years post-closure/transition. Currently, five emission units are sampled continuously for particulate radionuclides at PNNL managed facilities on the PNNL-Richland campus (3 of the 5) and on the Hanford Site (2 of the 5). Four of these units have sampling systems that comply with the American National Standards Institute/Health Physics Society (ANSI/HPS) N13.1–2011 standard for sampling from stacks and ducts of nuclear facilities, and the fifth is grandfathered and compliant with the older ANSI N13.1–1969 standard. In addition, the PNNL-managed Hanford Site 325 Building EP 325-01-S stack is sampled continuously for emissions of tritium. No emissions sampling is required for the single licensed emission unit on the PNNL-Sequim campus.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Characterization of Nitrate, Nitrite, Ammonia, and Tritium in D0220 Cores

This report describes characterization of nitrogen species (nitrate, nitrite, ammonia) in aqueous and solid phases in cores taken in borehole D0220 (well 299-E25-245) under crib 216-A-37-1 at the Hanford Site in 2022 to evaluate (a) the types of nitrogen species currently in the vadose zone and (b) the migration of nitrogen species in the vadose zone. Ammonia and tritium from PUREX decladding condensate were sporadically discharged to the crib from 1977 to 1989. During discharge operations, the estimated travel time through the vadose zone to groundwater was 2.5 to 9 months. By 2003, a characterization borehole (C4106) showed residual pore water with elevated tritium and nitrate in the first 100 ft of the vadose zone, which is likely from the crib. However, there was significantly more nitrate present at the shallowest depth (15 to 22 ft), which may indicate a different source for nitrate, such as adsorbed ammonia slowly being oxidized or nitrogen species precipitates slowly dissolving. In this study, more extensive nitrogen species characterization was done on D0220 cores (drilled in 2022) at 40- and 262-ft depths, which included (a) aqueous nitrate, nitrite, and tritium; (b) adsorbed ammonia; (c) nitrogen in carbonates (or other minerals dissolved in acidic acid); (d) nitrogen in iron oxides (or other minerals dissolved in oxalic acid); and (e) nitrogen in hard-to-extract minerals (minerals dissolved in nitric acid). High pore water nitrate (226 to 331 mg/L) at 40-ft depth measured in D0220 (2022) compared to 60 mg/L at 40-ft depth in C4106 (2003) may indicate nitrate is migrating deeper. Tritium concentrations (pore water 132,000 to 148,000 pCi/L) measured in D0220 at 40-ft depth in 2022 were considerably higher than in C4106 at 40-ft depth (160 pCi/L). Additional nitrogen species mass was present in adsorbed and precipitated phases in D0220 cores. Low adsorbed ammonia was measured at 40.1- and 261.7-ft depths. Low concentrations of carbonate associated nitrogen and iron oxide-associated nitrogen were present at 40.1 and 40.6 ft depths. Nitrogen species in solid phase extractions indicate nitrogen precipitates or aqueous nitrate or ammonia trapped in sediment microfractures that are coated by precipitates. Overall, the nitrogen species and tritium characterization at two depths in D0220 showed that additional nitrogen species were present in the vadose zone. In addition, elevated pore water nitrate in D0220 at 40 ft depth from 2022 may indicate vertical migration compared to C4106 nitrate profile from 2003. Analysis of additional depths in D0220 and spatial variability of the nitrate plume along the length of the crib (from surface electrical resistivity) would be extremely useful for this comparison.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Plasma Facing Components with Capillary Porous System and Liquid Metal Coolant Flow

Liquid metal can create a renewable protective surface on plasma facing components (PFC), with an additional advantage of deuterium pumping and the prospect of tritium extraction if liquid lithium (LL) is used and maintained below 450 C, the temperature above which LL vapor pressure begins to contaminate the plasma. LM can also be utilized as an efficient coolant, driven by the Lorentz force created with the help of the magnetic field in fusion devices. Capillary porous systems can serve as a conduit of LM and simultaneously provide stabilization of the LM flow, protecting against spills into the plasma. Recently a combination of a fast-flowing LM cooling system with a porous plasma facing wall (CPSF) was investigated [Khodak and Maingi (2021)]. The system takes an advantage of a magnetohydrodynamics velocity profile, as well as attractive LM properties to promote efficient heat transfer from the plasma to the LL at low pumping energy cost, relative to the incident heat flux on the PFC. In case of a disruption leading to excessive heat flux from the plasma to the LM PFCs, LL evaporation can stabilize the PFC surface temperature, due to high evaporation heat and apparent vapor shielding. The proposed CPSF was optimized analytically for the conditions of a Fusion Nuclear Science Facility [Kessel et al. (2019)]: 10T toroidal field and 10 MW/m2 peak incident heat flux. Computational fluid dynamics analysis confirmed that a CPSF system with 2.5 mm square channels can pump enough LL so that no additional coolant is needed.

High Heat Flux↗