Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “space reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Materials for Small Nuclear Reactors and Micro Reactors, Including Space Reactors

Small nuclear reactors, including small modular reactors (SMRs) or reactors for space applications, rely on different materials than those typically applied in large-scale nuclear power plants. Examples include molten salts as cooling medium or fuel carrier, metal hydrides as high-temperature moderators, and fuels allowing for higher burnup. All of these also require novel structural materials, for which material interactions have to be understood. Fissionable and fissile materials, such as uranium or plutonium, are rarely considered in materials design other than for nuclear fuels. Similarly, the aspects of radiation damage, occurring during irradiation when a reactor operates, are unique to nuclear materials research. The handling of these materials puts further limitations on the materials science conducted for nuclear materials. All of these issues move research for these materials off the “main stream” of materials science, and cause it to be more easily conducted at national laboratories. However, nuclear reactors offer unique opportunities for carbon-neutral energy generation and have great potential to address if not solve problems arising from global warming. This special topic, sponsored by the TMS Nuclear Materials Committee, focuses on materials research for small nuclear reactors, both experimental and simulation/modeling.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

EVOLUTION OF SPACE REACTOR QUALIFICATION METHODS AND A PATH FORWARD FOR NEW SPACE REACTORS UNDER CONSIDERATION

These slides outline the evolution of space reactor system qualifications and provide a potential framework for qualification of current space reactor concepts. Qualification approaches for SNAP 10A, SP-100, TOPAZ II, and Prometheus reactor systems will be discussed. Several qualification approaches from past reactors will be reviewed including: a component qualification approach demonstrated in the SNAP reactor program, a system level approach in the SP-100 program, adding additional features to an existing design in the TOPAZ program, and a combination of a computational and basic testing approach for the Prometheus reactor. Past and present test facilities will also be discussed and the impact of test facility availability (or existence) is discussed. A suggested approach that complies with the updated Presidential Directive (NSPM-20, August 2019) that is derived from previous program approaches will be discussed for qualification of future space reactors.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

White Paper – Use of LEU for a Space Reactor

Historically space reactors flown or designed for the U.S. and Russia used Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) for fuel. HEU almost always produces a small and lighter reactor. Since mass increases launch costs or decreases science payloads, HEU was the natural choice. However in today’s environment, the proliferation of HEU has become a major concern for the U.S. government and hence a policy issue. In addition, launch costs are being reduced as the space community moves toward commercial launch vehicles. HEU also carries a heavy security cost to process, test, transport and launch. Together these issues have called for a re-investigation into space reactors the use Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Kilopower Space Reactor Launch Safety - Maximum Credible Fissions for a Criticality Accident

This note examines potential accident conditions for the Kilopower space reactor going critical during a launch accident. The goal of this analysis is to postulate the total number of fissions that could be generated during an accident event. The total number of fissions is an approximate surrogate for what will be the maximum release (or source term) for the accident. From the source term an approximation of dose (based upon the fission products generated and released) can be estimated. This note will only attempt to app roximate the total number of fissions to the right order of magnitude. Dose consequences from the number of fissions will be documented in a separate note.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Kilopower Space Reactor Launch Safety - Maximum Credible Dose for a Criticality Accident

This note examines potential consequences for the Kilopower small space reactor going critical during a launch accident. The goal of this analysis is to postulate the dose at a distance that could be generated during a criticality accident event (with emphasis on potential public doses.) This note does not examine local consequences to an individual who would be close enough to the reactor (within several 10’s of meters) to receive a lethal dose from the direct shine of neutrons and gamma radiation present when the reactor is critical.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Investigation of High-Temperature Compatibility of Select Oxides with Yttrium Hydride for Micro and Space Reactor Applications

Yttrium hydride is a promising material for a high-temperature neutron moderator in advanced micro and space reactors due to its high hydrogen density and relative thermal stability compared to other metal hydrides. However, yttrium hydride desorbs hydrogen rapidly at temperatures above 800°C, which is below the operational temperature range of some reactor designs. A hydrogen barrier coating of oxide on the hydride surface may inhibit hydrogen loss at 800°C and beyond, but the high-temperature compatibility between yttrium hydride and many oxides is currently unknown. The high-temperature compatibility of Al 2 O 3 , MgO, and Y 2 O 3 with YH 1.92 was examined by subjecting mixed oxide–hydride pellets to a 1200°C heat treatment then using a combination of diffractometry, microscopy, and spectroscopy to determine changes in the pellet composition as a result. Yttrium scavenged oxygen from both Al 2 O 3 and MgO to form Y 2 O 3 , resulting in significant loss of YH 1.92 . Yttrium reacted with reduced aluminum to form YAl 2 and several other compounds. Reduced magnesium volatilized above 1091°C and vacated the pellet. Only Y 2 O 3 did not appreciably react with YH 1.92 . Of the three oxides tested, only Y 2 O 3 was compatible with YH 1.92 at 1200°C based on the experimental criteria.

compatibility↗
DOE OSTI2015

Evaluation of a potassium filled UO{sub 2} core in a beryllium-reflected space reactor - 14371

The critical configuration of the small, compact critical assembly (SCCA) experiments performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in 1962-1965[1,2] have been evaluated for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and were determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments and are included in the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP Handbook)[3]. The initial intent of these experiments was to support the design of the Medium Power Reactor Experiment (MPRE) program, whose purpose was to study 'power plants for the production of electrical power in space vehicles'.[4] The third configuration in this series of experiments was a beryllium-reflected mockup of a stainless-steel-clad, highly enriched uranium (HEU)-O{sub 2} fuel, potassium-cooled, space power reactor. Reactivity measurements, cadmium ratio spectral measurements, and fission rate measurements were measured through the core and top reflector. Fuel effect worth measurements and neutron moderating and absorbing material worths were also measured in the assembly fuel region. The cadmium ratios, fission rate, and worth measurements were evaluated for the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) and are published in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments (IRPhEP Handbook)[5]. More recently, two additional critical configurations have been evaluated and added to the existing evaluation report in the ICSBEP Handbook. The new critical configurations measure the effect of filling the core with potassium. The critical configuration consisted of 30.48 cm tall fuel tubes of 93.15 wt.% enriched uranium dioxide (UO{sub 2}) pellets. Each fuel tube had 26 pellets with a total mass of 295.8 g UO{sub 2} per tube. There were 253 tubes were arranged with 1.506-cm center-to-center, triangular spacing and surrounded on all side by a beryllium reflected. The reactivity of the system was measured with the core tank empty and filled with potassium. The system reactivity was increased from 13.4 c to 32 c. This change in system reactivity represents the worth of the potassium. Simple benchmark models for the empty and potassium filled cores have been derived and evaluated and found to be acceptable as benchmark experiments. The benchmark experiment eigenvalues are 1.0001 ± 0.0008 and 1.0011 ± 0.0009 for the empty and filled cores, respectively. When calculated with MCNP5 and ENDF/B-VII.0 the calculated eigenvalues are 0.98906 ± 0.00002 and 0.98883 ± 0.00002, respectively. These results are concerning due to the drop of the calculated system reactivity when potassium is added to the system rather than the expected increase in system reactivity. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Benchmark Evaluation of Fuel Effect and Material Worth Measurements for a Beryllium-Reflected Space Reactor Mockup

The critical configuration of the small, compact critical assembly (SCCA) experiments performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in 1962-1965 have been evaluated as acceptable benchmark experiments for inclusion in the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. The initial intent of these experiments was to support the design of the Medium Power Reactor Experiment (MPRE) program, whose purpose was to study "power plants for the production of electrical power in space vehicles." The third configuration in this series of experiments was a beryllium-reflected assembly of stainless-steel-clad, highly enriched uranium (HEU)-O 2 fuel mockup of a potassium-cooled space power reactor. Reactivity measurements cadmium ratio spectral measurements and fission rate measurements were measured through the core and top reflector. Fuel effect worth measurements and neutron moderating and absorbing material worths were also measured in the assembly fuel region. The cadmium ratios, fission rate, and worth measurements were evaluated for inclusion in the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. The fuel tube effect and neutron moderating and absorbing material worth measurements are the focus of this paper. Additionally, a measurement of the worth of potassium filling the core region was performed but has not yet been evaluated Pellets of 93.15 wt.% enriched uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) were stacked in 30.48 cm tall stainless steel fuel tubes (0.3 cm tall end caps). Each fuel tube had 26 pellets with a total mass of 295.8 g UO 2 per tube. 253 tubes were arranged in 1.506-cm triangular lattice. An additional 7-tube cluster critical configuration was also measured but not used for any physics measurements. The core was surrounded on all side by a beryllium reflector. The fuel effect worths were measured by removing fuel tubes at various radius. An accident scenario was also simulated by moving outward twenty fuel rods from the periphery of the core so they were touching the core tank. The change in the system reactivity when the fuel tube(s) were removed/moved compared with the base configuration was the worth of the fuel tubes or accident scenario. The worth of neutron absorbing and moderating materials was measured by inserting material rods into the core at regular intervals or placing lids at the top of the core tank. Stainless steel 347, tungsten, niobium, polyethylene, graphite, boron carbide, aluminum and cadmium rods and/or lid worths were all measured. The change in the system reactivity when a material was inserted into the core is the worth of the material.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Evaluation of a Potassium Filled UO2 Core in a Beryllium- ??eflected Space Reactor

The critical configuration of the small, compact critical assembly (SCCA) experiments performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) in 1962-1965[1,2] have been evaluated for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and were determined to be acceptable benchmark experiments and are included in the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP Handbook)[3]. The initial intent of these experiments was to support the design of the Medium Power Reactor Experiment (MPRE) program, whose purpose was to study “power plants for the production of electrical power in space vehicles.”[4] The third configuration in this series of experiments was a beryllium-reflected mockup of a stainless-steel-clad, highly enriched uranium (HEU)-O2 fuel, potassium-cooled, space power reactor. Reactivity measurements, cadmium ratio spectral measurements, and fission rate measurements were measured through the core and top reflector. Fuel effect worth measurements and neutron moderating and absorbing material worths were also measured in the assembly fuel region. The cadmium ratios, fission rate, and worth measurements were evaluated for the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) and are published in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments (IRPhEP Handbook)[5]. More recently, two additional critical configurations have been evaluated and added to the existing evaluation report in the ICSBEP Handbook. The new critical configurations measure the effect of filling the core with potassium. The critical configuration consisted of 30.48 cm tall fuel tubes of 93.15 wt.% enriched uranium dioxide (UO2) pellets. Each fuel tube had 26 pellets with a total mass of 295.8 g UO2 per tube. There were 253 tubes were arranged with 1.506-cm center-to-center, triangular spacing and surrounded on all side by a beryllium reflected. The reactivity of the system was measured with the core tank empty and filled with potassium. The system reactivity was increased from 13.4 ¢ to 32 ¢. This change in system reactivity represents the worth of the potassium. Simple benchmark models for the empty and potassium filled cores have been derived and evaluated and found to be acceptable as benchmark experiments. The benchmark experiment eigenvalues are 1.0001 ± 0.0008 and 1.0011 ± 0.0009 for the empty and filled cores, respectively. When calculated with MCNP5 and ENDF/B-VII.0 the calculated eigenvalues are 0.98906 ± 0.00002 and 0.98883 ± 0.00002, respectively. These results are concerning due to the drop of the calculated system reactivity when potassium is added to the system rather than the expected increase in system reactivity.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

The Paucity Problem: Where Have All the Space Reactor Experiments Gone?

The Handbooks of the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) together contain a plethora of documented and evaluated experiments essential in the validation of nuclear data, neutronics codes, and modeling of various nuclear systems. Unfortunately, only a minute selection of handbook data (twelve evaluations) are of actual experimental facilities and mockups designed specifically for space nuclear research. There is a paucity problem, such that the multitude of space nuclear experimental activities performed in the past several decades have yet to be recovered and made available in such detail that the international community could benefit from these valuable historical research efforts. Those experiments represent extensive investments in infrastructure, expertise, and cost, as well as constitute significantly valuable resources of data supporting past, present, and future research activities. The ICSBEP and IRPhEP were established to identify and verify comprehensive sets of benchmark data; evaluate the data, including quantification of biases and uncertainties; compile the data and calculations in a standardized format; and formally document the effort into a single source of verified benchmark data. See full abstract in attached document.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Space Fission Reactors

An overview of space fission reactors, both historical and current programs. Intended for university student audiences

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Space Nuclear Reactor Engineering

We needed to find a space reactor concept that could be attractive to NASA for flight and proven with a rapid turnaround, low-cost nuclear test. Heat-pipe-cooled reactors coupled to Stirling engines long identified as the easiest path to near-term, low-cost concept.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗