Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “sag”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiple Methods of Determining the Gravity-Sag of Light-Weighted Optics

Characterizing Gravity-sag (G-sag) is an essential part of developing a large space-based optic. A method to back out gravity sag of a light-weighted optic using a CGH will be demonstrated. The results from the G-sag CGH determination is compared to the G-sag and Zero-G figure obtained during horizontal G-sag testing. The results from the CGH testing are also compared to the G-sag figure determined from modeling.

gravity sag↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Absolute Characterization of Gravity Sag for Light-Weighted Optics

Gravity-sag (G-sag) for large space-based telescopes is a critical error budget element that must be taken in consideration. Absolute characterization of gravity sag provides necessary information when testing light weighted optics so that true optical performance can be determined. A method is presented for characterizing G-sag to obtain the 0-G optical surface.

wavefront error↗
NASA NTRS1932

Characteristics of an Airfoil as Affected by Fabric Sag

This report presents the results of tests made at a high value of the Reynolds Number in the N.A.C.A. variable-density wind tunnel to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of an airfoil as affected by fabric sag. Tests were made of two Gottingen 387 airfoils, one having the usual smooth surface and the other having a surface modified to simulate two types of fabric sag. The results of these tests indicate that the usual sagging of the wind covering between ribs has a very small effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of an airfoil.

AIRFOILS - GOTETTINGEN 387 - CHAR , C P & ORDINATE↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Absolute Characterization of Gravity Sag

G-release –defined as the knowledge uncertainty of a mirror’s gravity-sag or the residual error between the mirror’s predicted and actual on-orbit shape –is a critical error budget element for space telescopes. For a UV/Optical telescope, G-release needs to be less than 4 nm rms. Absolute metrology techniques developed for high-accuracy optical surface testing can be used for characterizing gravity-sag of space optics. This paper presents the importance of gravity sag for space optics and reviews methods for its compensation, characterization or correction.

H Philip Stahl↗
NASA NTRS2000

Minimizing Gravity Sag of a Large Mirror with an Inverted Hindle-Mount

A method of minimizing the optical distortion from gravity sag on a suspended large autocollimating flat mirror has been devised. This method consists of an inverted nine-point Hindle-Mount. A conventional Hindle-mount is located underneath a sky-viewing mirror and is primarily under compression loads from the weight of the mirror. It is not suitable for the situation where the mirror is viewing the ground, since a mirror would tend to fall out of the mount when in an inverted position. The inverted Hindle-Mount design consists of bonded joints on the backside of the mirror that allow the mirror to be held or suspended above an object to be viewed. This ability is useful in optical setups such as a calibration test where a flat mirror is located above a telescope so that the telescope may view a known optic.

Robinson, David W.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Experimental and Numerical Correlation of Gravity Sag in Solar Sail Quality Membranes

Solar sails are among the most studied members of the ultra-lightweight and inflatable (Gossamer) space structures family due to their potential to provide propellentless propulsion. They are comprised of ultra-thin membrane panels that, to date, have proven very difficult to experimentally characterize and numerically model due to their reflectivity and flexibility, and the effects of gravity sag and air damping. Numerical models must be correlated with experimental measurements of sub-scale solar sails to verify that the models can be scaled up to represent full-sized solar sails. In this paper, the surface shapes of five horizontally supported 25 micron thick aluminized Kapton membranes were measured to a 1.0 mm resolution using photogrammetry. Several simple numerical models closely match the experimental data, proving the ability of finite element simulations to predict actual behavior of solar sails.

Black, Jonathan T.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Precise Determination of the Zero-Gravity Surface Figure of a Mirror without Gravity-Sag Modeling

The zero-gravity surface figure of optics used in spaceborne astronomical instruments must be known to high accuracy, but earthbound metrology is typically corrupted by gravity sag. Generally, inference of the zero-gravity surface figure from a measurement made under normal gravity requires finite-element analysis (FEA), and for accurate results the mount forces must be well characterized. We describe how to infer the zero-gravity surface figure very precisely using the alternative classical technique of averaging pairs of measurements made with the direction of gravity reversed. We show that mount forces as well as gravity must be reversed between the two measurements and discuss how the St. Venant principle determines when a reversed mount force may be considered to be applied at the same place in the two orientations. Our approach requires no finite-element modeling and no detailed knowledge of mount forces other than the fact that they reverse and are applied at the same point in each orientation. If mount schemes are suitably chosen, zero-gravity optical surfaces may be inferred much more simply and more accurately than with FEA.

measurements↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Gravity Sag Test Tower

Gravity sag is the effect on optical surfaces due to gravity. Additionally, optics manufactured in a gravitational field are made with inherent stresses built in. When these optics are flown in space those stresses release. We call this effect gravity release or “G-release”. To characterize the 0-G shape of optics, theory provides two methods: n-rotation test and face-up/face-down test.

Stephen Cheney↗
NASA NTRS2017

NExSS/NAI Joint ExoPAG SAG 16 Report on Remote Biosignatures for Exoplanets

Future exoplanet observations will soon focus on the search for life beyond the Solar System. Exoplanet biosignatures to be sought are those with global, potentially detectable, impacts on a planet. Biosignatures occur in an environmental context in which geological, atmospheric, and stellar processes and interactions may work to enhance, suppress or mimic these biosignatures. Thus biosignature scienceis inherently interdisciplinary. Its advance is necessary to inform the design of the next flagship missions that will obtain spectra of habitable extrasolar planets. The NExSS NAI Joint Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls brought together the astrobiology, exoplanet, and mission concept communities to review, discuss, debate, and advance the science of remote detection of planetary biosignatures. The multi-meeting workshop began in June 2016, and was a process that engaged a broad range of experts across the interdisciplinary reaches of NASA's Nexus for Exoplanet System Science (NExSS) program, the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI), NASAs Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP), and international partners, such as the European Astrobiology Network Association (EANA) and Japans Earth Life Science Institute (ELSI). These groups spanned expertise in astronomy, planetary science, Earth sciences, heliophysics, biology, instrument mission development, and engineering.

Kiang, Nancy Y.↗
NASA NTRS2008

Scientific Goals and Objectives for the Human Exploration of Mars: 1. Biology and Atmosphere/Climate

To prepare for the exploration of Mars by humans, as outlined in the new national vision for Space Exploration (VSE), the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG), chartered by NASA's Mars Exploration Program (MEP), formed a Human Exploration of Mars Science Analysis Group (HEM-SAG), in March 2007. HEM-SAG was chartered to develop the scientific goals and objectives for the human exploration of Mars based on the Mars Scientific Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities.1 The HEM-SAG is one of several humans to Mars scientific, engineering and mission architecture studies chartered in 2007 to support NASA s plans for the human exploration of Mars. The HEM-SAG is composed of about 30 Mars scientists representing the disciplines of Mars biology, climate/atmosphere, geology and geophysics from the U.S., Canada, England, France, Italy and Spain. MEPAG selected Drs. James B. Garvin (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) and Joel S. Levine (NASA Langley Research Center) to serve as HEMSAG co-chairs. The HEM-SAG team conducted 20 telecons and convened three face-to-face meetings from March through October 2007. The management of MEP and MEPAG were briefed on the HEM-SAG interim findings in May. The HEM-SAG final report was presented on-line to the full MEPAG membership and was presented at the MEPAG meeting on February 20-21, 2008. This presentation will outline the HEM-SAG biology and climate/atmosphere goals and objectives. A companion paper will outline the HEM-SAG geology and geophysics goals and objectives.

Levine, Joel S.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Defining Pupil Knowledge Requirements for Roman Space Telescope Integrated Payload Assembly Testing

This thesis examines the use of phase retrieval to characterize an optical system under testing conditions with pupil knowledge error. The purpose of this investigation is to define pupil knowledge requirements for the integrated payload testing of the Roman Space Telescope. We have conducted a Monte Carlo study to determine how location uncertainty of the ground support equipment relative to the payload caused by the temperature deformation in the Space Environment Simulator will affect our ability to use image-based wavefront sensing during the test to characterize system alignment. This test will be conducted with significant wavefront error (WFE) present due to gravity sag on the primary mirror. The study incrementally decenters two pieces of ground support equipment and evaluates how the phase retrieval algorithm attempts to fit the wavefront. We conducted this investigation in two steps. First, we used an ideal optical model of the test configuration without the gravity sag on the primary mirror to see the fitting effects related only to pupil knowledge error introduced by the decentering. Then, we used perturbed and gravity sag models to investigate the effects of decentering dependent wavefront effects in addition to pupil knowledge error. The results from the ideal model provided a clear limit of the amount of pupil knowledge error that can be present before seeing significant WFE in the phase retrieval. For the second study, we used the decentering tolerances from the ideal model results to determine the WFE effects of decentering in the presence of gravity sag and system misalignments. The second part of this study will be factored into the overall integrated payload assembly testing WFE budget.

Roman Space Telescope↗
NASA NTRS1981

Transonic airfoil calculations using solution-adaptive grids

A new algorithm for generating solution-adaptive grids (SAG) about airfoil configurations embedded in transonic flow is presented. The present SAG approach uses only the airfoil surface solution to recluster grid points on the airfoil surface, i.e., the reclustering problem is one dimension smaller than the flow-field calculation problem. Special controls automatically built into the elliptic grid generation procedure are then used to obtain grids with suitable interior behavior. This concept of redistributing grid points greatly simplifies the idea of solution-adaptive grids. Numerical results indicate significant improvements in accuracy for SAG grids relative to standard grids using the same number of points.

Holst, T. L.↗