Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “safety reviews”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Recycling facility periodic safety review: Application of a methodology used for the nuclear criticality safety review of geometrically safe or favorable equipment - 14610

In France, for all fuel cycle facilities, the reference safety frame is continuously adapted to take into account technical developments such as changes in process and/or maintenance operations. Every ten years according to French law, the facility operator is required to launch a process of Periodic Safety Review (PSR), whose conclusions are sent to the Nuclear Safety Authority (NSA). This PSR is split in two parts: first, a review of the facility to its safety documentation and authorization, second, a safety reassessment. Actually, this PSR takes account for topics (actual aging for instance) which require several years of feedback from experience to be integrated in safety evaluations, or which cannot be done on a daily basis (documentation reorganization). It also incorporates the new regulatory safety requirements. A specific methodology was developed for the first PSR of UP3-A since the publication of the law. UP3-A is a used fuel reprocessing facility of La Hague plant. This methodology, adapted for large plants with numerous process and fissile media, is based on a two-step approach intending to focus the analysis on the real hard spots. First, 'sensitive' systems are identified. Second, a specific review is performed on these systems. After a reminder of the methodology, this paper presents the results of its application on the UP3-A scope. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Panel Resource Management (PRM) Implementation and Effects within Safety Review Panel Settings and Dynamics

While technical training and advanced degree's assure proficiency at specific tasks within engineering disciplines, they fail to address the potential for communication breakdown and decision making errors familiar to multicultural environments where language barriers, intimidating personalities and interdisciplinary misconceptions exist. In an effort to minimize these pitfalls to effective panel review, NASA's lead safety engineers to the ISS Safety Review Panel (SRP), and Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) initiated training with their engineers, in conjunction with the panel chairs, and began a Panel Resource Management (PRM) program. The intent of this program focuses on the ability to reduce the barriers inhibiting effective participation from all panel attendees by bolstering participants confidence levels through increased communication skills, situational awareness, debriefing, and a better technical understanding of requirements and systems.

Taylor, Robert W.↗

Safety Review of the Hydrogen Components of a Reference Design of the Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia Project

The Department of Energy Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Office and Wind Energy Technologies Office's Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia project is an initiative to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of GW-scale integrated energy systems. The team designed reference facilities that utilize wind- and solar-produced hydrogen for industrial steel and ammonia production. This novel concept warranted review of safety codes and standards as they apply to the designs and the identification of codes and standards gaps. This report reviews hydrogen production and storage codes and standards using reference design specifications from a Minnesota steel plant. Requirements, recommendations, and exclusions for the system were identified. Observed gaps included non-specific salt cavern storage requirements, electrolyzer capacity beyond regulated ranges, and lack of requirements for iron reduction via hydrogen. This report will aide future project design efforts and may provide a basis for safety reviews in new designs for industrial facilities with hydrogen production integration.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Safety Review of the Hydrogen Components of a Reference Design of the Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia Project

The Department of Energy Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Office and Wind Energy Technologies Office’s Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia project is an initiative to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of GW-scale integrated energy systems. The team designed reference facilities that utilize wind- and solar-produced hydrogen for industrial steel and ammonia production. This novel concept warranted review of safety codes and standards as they apply to the designs and the identification of codes and standards as they apply to the designs and the identification of codes and standards gaps. This report reviews hydrogen production and storage codes and standards using reference design specifications from a Minnesota steel plant. Requirements, recommendations, and exclusions for the system were identified. Observed gaps included non-specific salt cavern storage requirements, electrolyzer capacity beyond regulated ranges, and lack of requirements for iron reduction via hydrogen. This report will aide future project design efforts and may provide a basis for safety reviews in new designs for industrial facilities with hydrogen production integration.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Enhancing the NASA Expendable Launch Vehicle Payload Safety Review Process Through Program Activities

The safety review process for NASA spacecraft flown on Expendable Launch Vehicles (ELVs) has been guided by NASA-STD 8719.8, Expendable Launch Vehicle Payload Safety Review Process Standard. The standard focused primarily on the safety approval required to begin pre-launch processing at the launch site. Subsequent changes in the contractual, technical, and operational aspects of payload processing, combined with lessons-learned supported a need for the reassessment of the standard. This has resulted in the formation of a NASA ELV Payload Safety Program. This program has been working to address the programmatic issues that will enhance and supplement the existing process, while continuing to ensure the safety of ELV payload activities.

Palo, Thomas E.↗

Proposal for Ground Safety Review Coordination at ISS Launch Sites

As the transportation of ISS payloads and cargo shifts from KSC to other launch sites, close coordination of ground safety review processes would be of benefit to all parties. The benefit would have the launch sites receiving consistent data that would require less effort to review while still meeting their needs. Until recently, ground safety focus for the ISS program has been almost exclusively for prelaunch processing at KSC/post-landing processing at KSC/DFRC Each launch site, used by the ISS Program, has a ground safety review process. Ground safety viewed as local prerogative. Up till now, ground processing has consisted of low risk/low hazard items; but this will not always be the case. Recent coordination issues associated with the ground safety review of ORU's to be processed at Tanegashima for HTV-2, illustrate that IP ground safety review processes are not well understood by the ISS community at large. Confusion for data providers (US only?). Lack of internal review process for data being submitted to launch sites can lead to inconsistent submittals. NCRs/HRs. Majority of IP ground safety requirements are based upon old KHB 1700.7 (now KNPR 8715.3, Chapter 20). Proposals include: Establish a ground safety working group as part of the MS&MAP. Search for efficiencies in requirements and data submittal processes. Document processes in NSTS 13830/SSP 30599. Each launch site report out its payload ground safety status at the F2F (Monthly's as required). Completions/due dates/NCRs/issues/changes. Establish internal processes for review of ground safety submittals.

Kirkpatrick, Paul D.↗

Conduct and results of the Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Panel's evaluation of the Ulysses space mission

After over a year of detailed independent review, a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) was prepared for the nuclear-powered Ulysses spacecraft mission. An overview is presently given of the Ulysses mission as well as the conduct and results of the evaluation process; in the final analysis, the SER was supportive of a positive launch decision. Eleven key accident scenarios were carried through to complete analysis, out of a total of 19 possible accidents involving a potential for fuel release to the spacecraft environment.

Sholtis, Joseph A., Jr.↗

Safety Review Panel (SRP) Special Topic Presentation on the Iodine Compatible Water Container (ICWC)

This viewgraph presentation reviews the safety requirements for the Iodine Compatible Water Container (ICWC). The topics include: 1) ICWC Team; 2) Purpose of presentation; 3) Background/Description of ICWC System; 4) Current status of ICWC Project; 5) HTV launch NCR Processing; 6) Tox 1 containment NCR processing; and 7) ISS on-orbit failure propagation and fault tolerance NCR processing.

Thomas, Evan A.↗

Overview of the Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Board Playbook

National Security Presidential Memorandum #20 (NSPM-20) directed the NASA Administrator to establish an Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Board (INSRB), replacing the ad hoc safety review panels used for space nuclear system launch reviews since the 1960s. NSPM-20 provides over-arching direction regarding the Board’s purpose and intent. Upon formation of this new entity, its members recognized that more detailed guidance was needed to ensure predictable and reliable performance of the Board’s functions. The Board drafted and later approved a guidance document referred to as “the Playbook” for this purpose. This paper will summarize the main features of this publicly-available document, along with providing context for its initial drafting and revision. The goal of this paper is to broaden the degree of awareness by the space nuclear system community of INSRB’s activities and intents.

INSRB↗

Experience on Safety Review of Liquid and Gaseous Effluent Monitoring System for Nuclear Power Plants in Korea - 16237

The liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring systems are important components in order to evaluate and minimize the radiation environmental impacts from Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). Therefore, licensee should install liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring systems and these systems should be reviewed by regulatory body. In Korea, the criteria of liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring systems for NPPs are stipulated in Nuclear Safety Act (NSA) and subordinate statute, and it is stated in 'Regulation on Technical Standards for Nuclear Reactor Facilities, etc.' that 'Instrumentation shall be provided to monitor related variables, including the following, and systems over their anticipated ranges of normal operations, anticipated operational occurrences, and accident conditions'. RG-1.97(Rev. 3, 1983) of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was used as criterion for accident monitoring instrumentations for NPPs in Korea. Licensee, however, started to apply RG-1.97(Rev. 4, 2006) as new criterion for accident monitoring instrumentation of the Construction Permit (CP) of new NPPs (Shin-kori Unit 5 and 6). Licensee submitted the report for type selection criteria and this report shows selection criteria of from 'Type A variables' to 'Type E variables'. Licensee of Korea has plans to submit the validation report regarding the criteria for accident monitoring instrumentation during Operation License (OL) and regulatory body of Korea also will conduct safety review of these reports. A graded approach to establishing a sampling program is required in ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999. Because deaerator release pipe of Shin-kori unit 5, 6 was integrated into condenser vacuum system release pipe, regulatory body reviewed application of a graded approach on this integration. Output of PWR GALE shows that iodine released from turbine building is 0.12% of total iodine release amount and this value is potential impact categories (PICs) 3 in ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999. So, periodic sampler installed in condenser vacuum system release pipe in Shin-kori unit 5, 6 is suitable. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Timing of Formal Phase Safety Reviews for Large-Scale Integrated Hazard Analysis

Integrated hazard analysis (IHA) is a process used to identify and control unacceptable risk. As such, it does not occur in a vacuum. IHA approaches must be tailored to fit the system being analyzed. Physical, resource, organizational and temporal constraints on large-scale integrated systems impose additional direct or derived requirements on the IHA. The timing and interaction between engineering and safety organizations can provide either benefits or hindrances to the overall end product. The traditional approach for formal phase safety review timing and content, which generally works well for small- to moderate-scale systems, does not work well for very large-scale integrated systems. This paper proposes a modified approach to timing and content of formal phase safety reviews for IHA. Details of the tailoring process for IHA will describe how to avoid temporary disconnects in major milestone reviews and how to maintain a cohesive end-to-end integration story particularly for systems where the integrator inherently has little to no insight into lower level systems. The proposal has the advantage of allowing the hazard analysis development process to occur as technical data normally matures.

Massie, Michael J.↗

Safety Review Process: International Space Station Program (Revision F)

The International Space Station (ISS) Program has developed a safety review process to execute its responsibilities for the overall integrated safety of the ISS. This process will assess the design and operations of the ISS hardware/elements(including visiting vehicles during integrated ISS operations)and its ground support equipment in accordance with the applicable safety requirements as specified in Section2.0.

ISS↗

Safety Review Board review of explosive pressing initiation event

On June 30, 2020, a 0.87 gram PETN charge being pressed in the Rapid Prototyping Facility (RPF), unexpectedly initiated, resulting in destruction of the pressing fixture but no injuries or facility damage. In response, the Safety Review Board (SRB) met on Aug. 13, 2020 and Oct. 1, 2020 to review information collected following the incident, consider likely direct causes, and form recommendations.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Achievements and challenges of Space Station Freedom's safety review process

The most complex space vehicle in history, Space Station Freedom, is well underway to completion, and System Safety is a vital part of the program. The purpose is to summarize and illustrate the progress that over one-hundred System Safety engineers have made in identifying, documenting, and controlling the hazards inherent in the space station. To date, Space Station Freedom has been reviewed by NASA's safety panels through the first six assembly flights, when Freedom achieves a configuration known as Man Tended Capability. During the eight weeks of safety reviews spread out over a year and a half, over 200 preliminary hazard reports were presented. Along the way NASA and its contractors faced many challenges, made much progress, and even learned a few lessons.

Robinson, David W.↗

HFE safety reviews of advanced nuclear power plant control rooms

Advanced control rooms (ACR's) will utilize human-system interface (HSI) technologies that may have significant implications for plant safety in that they will affect the operator's overall role and means of interacting with the system. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of HSI's to ensure that they are designed to good HFE principles and support performance and reliability in order to protect public health and safety. However, the only available NRC guidance was developed more than ten years ago, and does not adequately address the human performance issues and technology changes associated with ACR's. Accordingly, a new approach to ACR safety reviews was developed based upon the concept of 'convergent validity'. This approach to ACR safety reviews is described.

Ohara, John↗

Evaluation and Analysis of a Few International Periodic Safety Review Summary Reports (Technical Letter Report)

At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRC’s assessment processes.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗