SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “running-in”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

7 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2025

Multiphysics Running-In Simulations for Pebble-Bed Reactors with Griffin

Griffin, a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE)–based application targeting transient modeling of advanced reactors, has been used recently to model pebble-bed reactors (PBRs). The modeling effort has focused thus far on equilibrium core calculations. A new capability to simulate the running-in phase of PBR operation has been added to Griffin. This work demonstrates the new capability with a coupled multiphysics running-in simulation. Griffin computes power densities in the core at each time step of the running-in simulation and passes these to Pronghorn, which models fluid flow and heat transfer to calculate pebble surface temperatures. These surface temperatures are used along with the power densities in a heat conduction model to compute average fuel and moderator temperatures, which are passed back to Griffin and accounted for with temperature-dependent cross sections. This work also describes a novel methodology for determining appropriate pebble feed rates and control rod positioning during the running-in simulation. Furthermore, the RZ-geometry model used in this work requires minimal computational resources and can be used for optimization and uncertainty studies in future works.

Griffin↗

DOE OSTI2025

Parameter Study of the Running-In Process for the Generic Pebble Bed Reactor (GPBR200)

The run-in period of a pebble bed reactor is complex and difficult to model given significant heterogeneity in core composition, power, and temperature. While it is understood that the initial composition of the core should eventually result in the same equilibrium core composition, the approach to equilibrium can vary significantly depending on factors such as start-up fuel enrichment and power ramp rate. To explore this, a high-fidelity model of the General Pebble Bed Reactor was used to vary power ramp schemes and start-up core compositions. It was found that both the initial core composition and power ramp rate had a significant impact on the flow rate of pebbles during early time steps, with higher ramp rates and low enrichment resulting in non-physical flow rates. Power ramp rate alone was found to dictated maximum pebble power peaking observed during the run-in process, with higher ramp rates resulting in greater peak pebble powers. Start-up fuel enrichment and power ramp were found to both impact total fuel consumption, although the impact of start-up fuel enrichment was generally secondary to ramp rate.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2026

Sliding friction and wear behavior of nuclear graphite in high temperature inert environment: Influence of contact load, speed and temperature

Repeated dynamic interactions of graphitic components in pebble-bed gas-cooled nuclear reactors can cause abrasive wear-induced pebble surface damage, generate hazardous fine graphite debris, and alter fuel circulation dynamics due to changes in friction behavior. Comprehensive tribological characterization of nuclear graphitic materials in conditions relevant to reactor operation is needed to assess reactor long-term safety and performance. This work reports sliding friction and wear behavior of self-mated nuclear graphite ET-10 at various elevated temperatures (650 °C and 750 °C), sliding speeds (1 and 10 mm/s) and contact loads (20 and 40 N) in a controlled argon environment. The results revealed nonmonotonic frictional behavior with a higher running-in coefficient of friction (COF) followed by a lower steady-state COF, as a result of transition from two-body abrasion to three-body abrasion along with formation of a tribofilm. A key finding of this work is the sensitivity of the running-in COF to experimental conditions; maximum running-in values were lower at either elevated temperature (0.52–0.54) or reduced sliding speed (0.51–0.54). Conversely, the steady-state COF remained invariant at approximately 0.3 across all tested parameters. Transmission electron microscopy revealed a 0.5–2.0 μm thick nanocrystalline tribofilm that was thought to be formed by the compaction of the graphitic wear debris on the contact surface during the sliding process. The nanocrystalline nature of the tribofilm was further confirmed by Raman spectroscopy. As a result, the combination of tribological testing and morphological characterization provided a mechanistic understanding of the frictional behavior of nuclear graphite upon sliding.

Friction↗

DOE OSTI2025

Demonstration of Monte Carlo Reference Equilibrium Core Solutions for Pebble Bed Reactors Using Shift in kugelpy

This report describes how to produce reference solutions for the equilibrium core search of pebble bed reactors using the pyrates Python library. The pyrates library uses the kugelpy methodology to perform running-in calculations to reach an equilibrium core. This approach relies on full-core Monte Carlo neutron transport calculations and the shifting of fuel pebble inventory through the reactor to simulate pebble movement in the core from one step to the next of a running-in scenario. In addition to the use of Serpent for the Monte Carlo neutron transport calculations, as part of this work, updates for the use of the Shift Monte Carlo code were integrated into the official pyrates GitHub repository. Comparisons of running-in simulations for a generic pebble bed reactor produced by using pyrates with Serpent and Shift are shown. Although consistent trends are shown between the use of the two Monte Carlo codes, the limiting factor in either calculation is the computation time due to the need to perform several hundred full-core neutron transport calculations before an equilibrium core is reached.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Demonstration of Monte Carlo Reference Equilibrium Core Solutions for Pebble Bed Reactors Using Shift in kugelpy

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Reduced-order modeling for efficient cross section library development in high-temperature gas reactor pebble-bed depletion analysis

Accurate modeling of running-in and equilibrium conditions in pebble-bed reactors (PBRs) requires precise microscopic multigroup neutron cross sections. In Griffin, deterministic neutronics calculations rely on multivariate interpolation over large cross section libraries, resulting in significant memory usage and performance bottlenecks. This work, together with a companion paper on Griffin integration, explores reduced-order models (ROMs) to replace interpolation with lightweight surrogates. Several ROM techniques are benchmarked, with deep neural networks (DNNs) demonstrating superior memory efficiency, scalability, and predictive accuracy. A total of 295 DNNs were trained to build a comprehensive isotope library, integrated into Griffin through a custom LibTorch interface for depletion analysis. Initial results demonstrate that DNN-based ROMs drastically reduce memory demands while preserving accuracy, enabling finer tabulations and additional state variables without overhead. In conclusion, the framework also supports online cross section generation and real-time DNN updates through transfer learning, improving fidelity by capturing self-shielding and evolving nuclide compositions during burnup.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2025

High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Multiphysics Simulation Demonstration and Code Validation

This study presents a comprehensive benchmarking and verification effort of several thermal-hydraulic and multiphysics capabilities for high-temperature gas-cooled reactor applications. The first part of this effort focuses on the running-in verification of Griffin’s multiphysics capabilities, specifically for simulating the evolution of pebble-bed reactor cores from startup to equilibrium. Since Fiscal Year 2024, improvements and enhancements have been implemented in Griffin, including simplifying the process to specify streamlines and developing the online cross-section generation capability. In the absence of validation data, code-to-code comparisons are conducted with kugelpy, showing good agreement for integral quantities like k-eff predictions and predictions for maximum power density. However, accuracy issues are noted for more detailed quantities like the spatial distribution of fission rate densities which will require further work to address. The second part of this report presents an improved System Analysis Module (SAM) core channel model where the effects of cross flow are considered during the pressurized loss of forced cooling transient, resulting in an improved agreement of the predicted pebble temperature with respect to the predictions from the SAM 2D porous media model. Additionally, the wall channeling effect due to variable porosity at the near wall region of the core is also investigated. Furthermore, to demonstrate Griffin’s online cross-section generation capability, a Multiphysics simulation is performed by coupling Griffin to the SAM core channel model. In the third part of the report, as a part of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA) thermal-hydraulic code validation benchmark activity for a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor, the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is investigated first using the NekRS computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code to study the flow mixing phenomenon in the lower plenum of the facility. Then, code-to-code and code-to-data comparisons are performed for Test PG27, which is a pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC) test, using five different codes by six organizations from five countries. The different simulations show good agreements in terms of the general trend but there are differences in some results such as the peak temperatures of different regions and heat removal rate.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗