NASA NTRSDate not supplied
Lunar pyroclastic deposits are low albedo deposits present throughout the lunar surface including both maria and highlands, nearside and farside, and high latitudes and equatorial regions [e.g., 1]. There are two main types of pyroclastic deposits based upon size: localized (<2500 km2) and regional pyroclastic deposits (>2500 km2) [1]. In this study, we focus on the smaller localized pyroclastic deposits. The first and most detailed study of localized pyroclastic deposits are the deposits in Alphonsus crater [2]. This study included examining the radar and volumetric properties of these deposits. They found that vulcanian-like eruptions are most consistent with their observations. They imagined that a dike intrudes into the crust and creates a cooled basaltic cap. With increasing pressure under the basaltic cap, the pressure eventually overwhelms the surrounding rocks and results in explosive decompression. Later studies examined several pyroclastic deposits across the lunar surface using radar [2–4], digital terrain models (DTMs) [2,4], visible and near-infrared spectrometers [1,4–7], and a radiometer [4] to determine the mineralogy (e.g., olivine, glass, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, and plagioclase), deposit thickness and volume, proportion of juvenile material, radar backscatter, surface rock abundance, and regolith density. These various properties were examined against one another to better group localized pyroclastic deposits and understand how they relate to one another [4]. One of the studies divided pyroclastic deposits into three groups based upon the shape of the 1-μm absorption feature. The three Groups could be interpretated as having highlands and pyroclastic material (Group I), mare and pyroclastic material (Group II), and glass and orthopyroxene material (Group III) [5]. Building on that foundation, another study divided the pyroclastic deposits into four groups based upon their surface rock abundance and glass abundance [4], where deposits are classified based upon low surface rock abundance and high glass abundance (Glassy deposits); high rock abundance, high glass abundance (Blocky deposits); moderate rock abundance and low glass abundance (Crystalline deposits); and high rock abundance and low glass abundance (Indistinct Group). In addition to these studies, we can now look at their water contents using the new Effective Single Particle Absorption Thickness (ESPAT) parameter map [8]. The ESPAT map measures the strength of the 3-μm absorption feature in single scattering albedo space. The strength of this feature and its relationship to water content has been calibrated to returned samples, which allows for water content to be derived from remote spectral data (i.e., Moon Mineralogy Mapper). The goal of this study is to examine how water content in the pyroclastic deposits varies with respect to the geometric, mineralogic, and physical properties of the localized pyroclastic deposits as measured by a previous study [i.e., 4]. A more complete version of this work is found in [9].