Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “reactor physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Automated reactor physics analysis framework of High Flux Isotope Reactor low-enriched uranium silicide dispersion fuel designs

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is a versatile research reactor that provides one of the highest steady-state neutron fluxes of any reactor in the world. The HFIR reactor physics team investigated the conversion of the current 93 wt% highly enriched uranium U 3 O 8 -Al dispersion fuel to a 19.75% low-enriched uranium (LEU) U 3 Si 2 -Al dispersion fuel. The team continuously develops a Python module to streamline the analysis steps required for an LEU core design to ensure reproducible and agile design iteration. The Python module automates the data processing between analysis steps and automates the input perturbation for branch calculations and design changes. The automated framework has proven to significantly increase the efficiency and reproducibility of the reactor physics team to design High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) LEU cores and thoroughly analyze performance metrics, safety metrics, and thermal safety margins. Consequently, the team can now respond rapidly to fuel fabrication engineer and thermal-hydraulic-structural analyst requests. Numerous combinations of LEU fuel designs are explored, of which two LEU fuel designs are presented here in this paper: a low density silicide design, and a high-density silicide design. Results show that both designs meet or exceed safety and performance metrics with exception for minor differences caused by the hardened spectrum from LEU.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Griffin: A MOOSE-based reactor physics application for multiphysics simulation of advanced nuclear reactors

Griffin is a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) based reactor physics application for multiphysics simulations of advanced reactor designs jointly developed by Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory. This paper summarizes the motivation, significance, architecture, design, and features of Griffin. Griffin offers flexible and extensible features to address the challenges associated with advanced reactor designs. These features range from fundamental particle transport to specific reactor physics tasks. The features cover a wide range including on-the-fly and traditional two-step cross-section generation methods, steady-state and transient transport solvers suitable for both heterogeneous and homogeneous models, high-fidelity depletion where thousands of isotopes can be tracked and low-fidelity depletion characterized by burnup, etc. The most fundamental aspect that sets Griffin apart from other reactor analysis codes is that it is developed based on the MOOSE framework. A modular development approach is strongly enforced, with multiphysics being an essential element considered since the beginning of Griffin’s development. Griffin links various MOOSE physics modules and couples to other MOOSE-based applications and non-MOOSE-based applications for multiphyiscs simulations. Griffin includes three modules: ISOXML for preparing and managing multigroup cross sections, radiation transport for solving the neutron transport equation, and reactor analysis for user-oriented reactor physics analysis functionalities. Griffin uses various finite element methods for spatial discretization, multigroup approximation for energy discretization and discrete ordinates method, spherical harmonics expansion method, and diffusion approximation for streaming direction discretization to solve the neutron transport equation. Griffin’s flexibility is evidenced through Griffin’s various applications to fast reactor, high-temperature reactor, pebble bed reactor, molten salt reactor, and microreactor designs. Griffin development follows the software quality assurance procedure for MOOSE-based applications and with software requirements consistent with the ASME NQA-1 standard. Griffin has been adopted into the reactor analysis system for the U.S. NRC and is in use at U.S. companies, universities and national laboratories.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Summary Report Of The FY25 Reactor Physics Verification And Validation Exercises In The Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-cooled Reactor Program

Valdiation and verification of numerical tools is critical for ensuring reasonable predictions for design scoping, licensing, and safety analsyis. In this report, two reactor physics verification and validation exercises are presented. The first of these exercises focuses on burnup analysis with data from the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program. Simulations are performed with Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) and are compared with the experimental measurements for the AGR 1 and 2 experiments that utilize both UCO and UO2 fuel. The second exercises utilizes data from the HTR-Proteus experiments to perform reactor physics validation. Specifications of the experimental facility are provdied, along with a demonstration of initial modeling efforts in Serpent for one of the determistic packing experiments. Both cases are part of the Generation-IV international forum (GIF) Very High-Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Computational Methods, Validation, and Benchmarking (CMVB) program, an international collaborative organization dedicated to the verification and validation of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) analysis. Participation in the CMVB allows the US Department of Energy (DOE) to leverage these existing validation activities to provide extra value through benchmarking activities with other CMVB members.

and Benchmarking (CMVB) program↗
DOE OSTI2022

Reactor Physics Simulations of the High Flux Isotope Reactor Permanent Beryllium Reflector Number 5 Design

This study evaluates reactor physics aspects of the proposed High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) permanent beryllium reflector number 5 design. HFIR is a pressurized, light water–cooled, and beryllium reflected research reactor that operates at 85 MW for cycle lengths of approximately 24 to 26 days. A new permanent reflector design is highly desirable for increased versatility in irradiation experiments, to arrange the vertical experiment facilities (VXFs) to minimize their impact on neutron scattering if loaded with neutronabsorbing experiments, to enhance reflector thermal-structural-hydraulic performance, and to simplify the complex fabrication process. The current number 4 and concept number 5 reflectors have 22 and 28 VXFs, respectively, and are modeled and analyzed in this study with the MCNP5 and SCALE 6.1.3 nuclear simulation codes.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Data Testing with Zero Power Reactor (ZPR), Zero Power Physics Reactor (ZPPR), and New Thermal Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) Plutonium Benchmarks [Slides]

This presentation states that new TSLs in ENDF/B-VIII.0 will reduce the overprediction of the library for the most moderated cases. The differences between VII.1 and VIII.0 are driven by the 239 Pu changes and are consistently higher for all configurations. The VIII.0 239 Pu thermal cross sections were specifically adjusted lower to better predict plutonium thermal solutions criticality benchmarks, yet they overpredict the TEX thermal configurations, moderated by PE. Other, smaller differences have been seen for 240 Pu and 56 Fe. PMM-002 has shown utility in testing cross sections over a wide range of neutron energies.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Reactor physics benchmark experiments at the JSI TRIGA MARK II reactor - Current status and future outlook

Full text of publication follows. With the development of new high-fidelity computational methods, improvement of nuclear data, and multiphysics modelling, there is an increased need for benchmark experiments to experimentally validate the models, methods and input data. Many of the nuclear facilities designed to perform reactor physics benchmark experiments have been shut down. Therefore, research reactors offer a great opportunity for benchmark experiments, if they are well designed and performed with great care and accuracy. In this presentation we provide an overview of the past and ongoing activities related to benchmark experiments at the Jozef Stefan Institute TRIGA Mark II research reactor. The following experiments have been performed: criticality with fresh fuel, {sup 197}Au(n,γ) and {sup 27}Al(n,α) reaction rates in irradiation channels, absolute and relative {sup 197}Au(n,γ), {sup 235}U(n,f) and {sup 238}U(n,f) reaction rates in the core, burnup, kinetic parameters, control rod worth, isothermal reactivity coefficient, self-shielding, slow and fast (pulse) transients, nuclear heating, delayed and prompt gamma ray production, temperature profiles for multi-physics. Since the existing fleet of research reactors is ageing very rapidly and new experiments are needed, new research reactors should be designed and built to meet the needs of future advanced reactors, education and training, and other technologies in the coming years. We will review planned activities at the JSI TRIGA reactors and plans for the new research reactor in Slovenia. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Demonstration of MOOSE-based Griffin reactor physics, code for heterogeneous lead-cooled fast reactor analysis

The MOOSE-based reactor physics code Griffin was assessed on a heterogeneous pin-resolved model of a prototype lead-cooled fast reactor assembly. This model was developed in preparation for future use in MOOSE-based multiphysics calculations for computing hot channel factors. Heterogeneous multigroup cross sections were prepared using the fast reactor multi-group cross section processing code MC{sup 2}-3 using a two-step method. Griffin simulations were performed using the DFEM-SN solver on 576 cores on Argonne's LCRC cluster. Diffusion-based acceleration methods were applied (NDA and CMFD). Reference solutions were generated with continuous energy MCNP and the hybrid MOC/finite element solver PROTEUS-MOC for code-to-code comparison. Space-angle convergence studies were conducted to observe convergence in k-eigenvalue and axial pin power distributions. The fully resolved Griffin calculation was within 68 pcm of the MCNP eigenvalue and exhibited max 1.2% relative error in the axial pin power distribution. Griffin produced nearly identical results to PROTEUS-MOC when using the same 9-group multigroup cross-section set. Griffin demonstrated favorable scaling in wall-clock time and memory usage when using diffusion-based acceleration methods. Griffin is capable of simulating the pin-resolved heterogeneous LFR assembly with good accuracy and performance, and is suitable for future use in coupled high-fidelity hot channel factor simulations. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Sensitivity Studies, Gap Analysis, and Benchmark Experiment Optimization for Reactor Physics and Criticality Safety Applications

Many new reactor designs, such as advanced reactors and micro reactors, have materials that lack nuclear data validation. This is also true for many other applications in criticality safety and global security. Both differential and integral experiments are needed to validate cross-section data. Without this, a user cannot have confidence in the predicted results of a radiation-transport code. This work describes an approach called ARCHIMEDES (Application Relevant Critical/Subcritical HEU/Pu-based Integral Measurements for Enhancing Data and Evaluating Sensitivities) to design new criticality experiments that have similar k eff cross-section sensitivities to an application of interest. This process involves simulations to generate cross-section sensitivities to a parameter of interest (such as k eff ), a gap analysis to determine which existing benchmarks are most similar to the application, and an experiment optimization. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in the reactor physics community on advanced reactors, micro reactors, and accelerator driven systems (ADS). This work will apply the described method to specific examples in this area. The focus of this work will be on the sensitivity study and gap analysis, while future work will include experiment design.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Update on the International Reactor Physics Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) for EGPRS

This set of slides provides an overview of benchmarking work for the International Reactor Physics Evaluation (IRPhE) project, to be presented to the Expert Group on Physics of Reactor Systems (EGPRS), which is an expert group within the OECD/NEA Working Party on Scientific Issues and Uncertainty Analysis of Reactor Systems (WPRS).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

SCALE 6.2.4 Validation: Reactor Physics

This report is the third volume in a report series documenting the validation of SCALE 6.2.4, which is used herein with ENDF/B-VII.1 libraries, for nuclear criticality safety, reactor physics, and radiation shielding applications. This report focuses on validating SCALE capabilities that affect reactor physics applications. The experimental data used as basis for validation consists of measurement data for nuclide inventory, decay heat, and full-core experiments and include the following: 1. radiochemical assay measurements of 40 nuclides of importance to burnup credit, decay heat, and radiation shielding in 169 light-water reactor (LWR) spent nuclear fuel samples that cover burnups up to 70 GWd/MTU and initial enrichments up to 4.9% 235 U; 2. full-assembly decay heat measurements for 236 LWR assemblies with: a. initial fuel enrichments up to 4% 235 U, b. assembly burnups of 5–51 GWd/MTU, and c. cooling times after discharge in the 2- to 27-year range (of importance to spent nuclear fuel storage, transportation, and disposal); and 3. pulse fission irradiations for fissionable materials at cooling times of interest to severe accident analyses (<10 5 s). Validation examples for full-core analysis are based on startup experiments for the Watts Bar Nuclear Unit 1 (WBN1) pressurized water reactor (PWR) and two high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) benchmarks for the HTR-10 pebble bed and the prismatic HTTR reactor.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Need for advanced research reactors for the next-generation reactor physics, analysis tools, and technology

Full text of publication follows. There is an urgent need for design and deployment of advanced research and test reactors in support of design, licensing and operation of advanced power reactors and education of next generation nuclear workforce. Existing research reactors mostly were designed and constructed decades ago with the main objectives of training operators, performing reactor physics experiments, and educating nuclear engineers and scientists. There are already gaps and significant concern about future capabilities for the existing research reactor facilities to address modern instrumentation and/or flexible environments for: performing reactor physics studies for advanced designs which have significantly different core materials forms and compositions, reactor shapes and size; validation of advanced high-fidelity software; development of machine learning algorithms for enhancement of human-machine collaboration in support of reactor monitoring, operation and safeguards; and, effective education of the next-generation workforce. The authors will focus on the need for advanced research reactors to improve and validate fast and accurate simulation tools for high-fidelity modeling and analysis of nuclear reactors in support of their design, optimization, licensing, operation, and monitoring. In the past, simulation tools were limited to relatively coarse models using approximate methodologies that benefited from two main factors: i) allowance for large margins and tolerances; ii) ability to construct prototype (e.g., zero power) reactors for adjustment of approximate methodologies. The next generation reactors have to be designed mainly by using novel high-fidelity computational tools that are accurate and fast, and therefore can be used for parametric studies and uncertainty quantification. To sufficiently demonstrate the accuracy of these tools, advanced research reactors are needed. The authors argue the need for new computational paradigms such as the MRT (Multistage, Response- function Transport) methodology which has resulted in the development of the novel high-fidelity RAPID (Real-time Analysis for Particle-transport and In-situ Detection) code system. Such code systems have to be robust in modeling any complex system, and should be fast and accurate, henceforth their uncertainties can be quantified at reasonable costs. Again, advanced research reactors are needed for the validation of the fidelity and accuracy of new computational tools. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Module 10 Reactor Physics

Students will gain a understanding of some basic reactor physics concepts, which will prepare them for learning more detailed concepts about the design and operations of the experiments performed using the NCERC critical assemblies.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

INL's Reactor Physics Capabilities

I was invited to give a seminar to students and faculty of nuclear engineering and radiological sciences (NERS) at the university of Michigan, Ann Arbor. the presentation is about reactor physics capaibility at INL

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Transient Multiphysics Simulations with Pin Power Reconstruction in the Griffin Reactor Physics Code

This work introduces the pin power reconstruction capability available in the Griffin reactor physics code. This capability is implemented in an unstructured mesh framework, and the methods introduced are applied to the 2D SIMBA reactor core, which has assemblies and pins arranged in a hexagonal lattice. Since this reactor has a non-Cartesian geometry and also operates in the thermal spectrum, a general approach to pin power reconstruction is adopted, where SPH-based equivalence is leveraged to preserve assembly-wise reaction rates, while computing full-core form functions to preserve pin-wise fission production rates within the fuel pins of the reactor core. In a 2D microreactor benchmark problem, this pin power reconstruction approach was shown to reproduce pin powers compared to the Serpent2 Monte Carlo code for fixed temperature conditions and control drum rotation angles, yielding a core-wide RMS error level of 0.6\% and a maximum absolute pin error of 2.3\%. In addition, a tabulated library of multigroup cross sections, SPH factors, and form functions was generated to demonstrate the applicability of pin power reconstruction to a thermal feedback problem. Finally, a control drum transient was successfully simulated, showcasing the application of pin power reconstruction in a transient multiphysics feedback problem.

97 - MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

MOOSE Reactor Module Meshing Enhancements to Support Reactor Physics Analysis

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program develops an integrated suite of advanced reactor physics tools built upon the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework. Each code generally requires an input finite element mesh on which the physics solution is calculated, reported, and transferred to other physics codes. The meshing process is often burdensome for the complex geometries present in reactors due to lack of easy-to-use, open-source meshing tools. To address the bottleneck associated with meshing complex geometries found in nuclear reactors, NEAMS initiated the development of the MOOSE Reactor Module starting in FY21. The Reactor Module builds off the existing MOOSE Mesh System to include targeted meshing capabilities such as the ability to generate hexagonal pin cells, assemblies with ducts, rotating control drums, cores, peripheral zones around a core, as well as the automatic labeling (“reporting IDs”) of pin, assembly, and planar zones to simplify post-processing of results. As a Physics Module in MOOSE, the Reactor Module is open-source, available with any MOOSE installation, directly compatible with MOOSE-based tools, and can be invoked from MOOSEbased applications to generate meshes. Functionality from the Reactor Module has been applied to several advanced reactor concepts to demonstrate user workflow improvements and accuracy. The primary objective of the Reactor Module is to improve useability of MOOSEbased tools by streamlining mesh generation and output inspection processes. During FY22, the functionality of the Reactor Module (and accompanying Mesh System) has been expanded based on user needs. First, the Reactor Geometry Mesh Builder capability developed primarily in FY21 has been refactored and merged to the public MOOSE repository. This capability wraps underlying Reactor Module mesh generators into a “Pin – Assembly – Core” workflow appropriate for conventional Cartesian and hexagonal geometries, and notably assigns material IDs during mesh generation stage and generates only the minimal number of blocks needed in order to reduce computational burden. Biasing and boundary layer options have been added to the base mesh generators as required by thermal hydraulics solvers. The reporting ID functionality has been expanded to differentiate ring-wise and azimuthal sectors within a pin for use with depletion algorithms, and VectorPostProcessor and Reporter objects are now available to integrate solution variables across zones based on ID combinations. Functionality to trim hexagonal meshes along the center or periphery has been developed so users may leverage symmetry and reflective boundary conditions to reduce the mesh size. A flexible and powerful tool to fill the space between two sidesets has been introduced to the framework and can be used for transition layers such as stitching two assemblies together with different numbers of pins, or for complex geometries which do not follow conventional Cartesian/hexagonal patterns. Finally, additional verification problems were performed with NEAMS physics tools in complement with existing NEAMS work.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

The international research reactor conversion effort and its contribution to the validation of reactor physics and thermal-hydraulics codes

Full text of publication follows. With about 200 reactors in operation, civilian Research and Test Reactors (RTRs) represent approximately a third of the global nuclear fleet. RTRs make use of core designs that are drastically different from commercial power plants to perform a wide variety of non-power applications that greatly benefit society. Because they often rely on high neutron fluxes, RTRs are designed with relatively compact cores and as a result, prior to the 1980's, were often deployed using Highly Enriched Uranium fuel (HEU, {sup 235}U/U = 20 wt. %). Due to proliferation concerns, the international community aims at eliminating the use of HEU in civilian facilities and favor instead the use of Low Enriched Uranium fuel (LEU, {sup 235}U/U < 20 wt. %). A program to support conversion of the world's RTRs to LEU fuel has been initiated in 1978 by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This program is still alive today and has achieved more than 103 conversion metrics. Today, the program focuses heavily on the conversion of so-called high-performance RTRs, which are far more challenging than previous conversions as they require new fuel element designs and the use of new, higher density LEU fuel forms. Development and qualification of new LEU fuel elements is ongoing and requires extensive engineering analysis and testing. Both activities require the development and validation of codes and methods for reactor physics, thermal-hydraulics, and multi-physics, which in turn rely on experiments performed in RTRs or other experimental facilities. This talk will present the collection of RTR experimental data and benchmark analyses from the international conversion program that contribute to the validation of computer codes and methods.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗