Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “poststarburst galaxies”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Fading AGNs in Poststarburst Galaxies

The role of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in quenching galaxies and driving the evolution from star forming to quiescence remains a key question in galaxy evolution. We present evidence from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO survey for fading AGN activity in 6/93 poststarburst galaxies. These six galaxies show extended emission line regions (EELRs) consistent with ionization from past AGN activity, analogous to "Hanny's Voorwerp" and other systems where the [O III] λ5007 emission is bright enough to be visible in broadband imaging. Using the infrared luminosities from IRAS to estimate the current AGN luminosities, we find that 5/6 of the poststarburst galaxies have current AGNs which have faded from the peak luminosity required to have ionized the EELRs. Given the rate at which we observe EELRs, the typical EELR visibility timescale, and an estimate of how often EELRs would be visible, we estimate the duty cycle of AGN activity during the poststarburst phase. The timescale for the galaxy to cycle between peaks in AGN luminosity is t EELR ~ 1.1–2.3 × 10 5 yr. Given the rate at which we observe current AGN activity during this phase, we estimate that the AGN spends only 5.3% of this time (or t ON = 0.6–1.3 × 10 4 yr) in its luminous phase, with the rest of the time spent "off" or in a low-luminosity phase. The length of this duty cycle may explain why so few luminous AGNs have been observed during the poststarburst phase, despite evidence for AGN feedback at work.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

DESI Massive Poststarburst Galaxies at z ~ 1.2 Have Compact Structures and Dense Cores

Poststarburst galaxies (PSBs) are young quiescent galaxies that have recently experienced a rapid decrease in star formation, allowing us to probe the fast-quenching period of galaxy evolution. In this work, we obtained Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/WFC3 F110W imaging to measure the sizes of 171 massive (log(M $\ast$ /M ⊙ ) ~ 11) spectroscopically identified PSBs at 1 < z 1.3 selected from the DESI Survey Validation luminous red galaxy sample. This statistical sample constitutes an order of magnitude increase from the ~20 PSBs with space-based imaging and deep spectroscopy. We perform structural fitting of the target galaxies with pysersic and compare them to quiescent and star-forming galaxies in the 3D-HST survey. We find that these PSBs are more compact than the general population of quiescent galaxies, lying systematically ~0.1 dex below the established size–mass relation. However, their central surface mass densities are similar to those of their quiescent counterparts (log(Σ 1kpc /(M ⊙ kpc -2 ))~10.1). These findings are easily reconciled by later ex situ growth via minor mergers or a slight progenitor bias. These PSBs are round in projection (b/a median ~ 0.8), suggesting that they are primarily spheroids, not disks, in 3D. We find no correlation between the time since quenching and light-weighted PSB sizes or central densities. This disfavors apparent structural growth due to the fading of centralized starbursts in this galaxy population. Instead, we posit that the fast quenching of massive galaxies at this epoch occurs preferentially in galaxies with preexisting compact structures.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Quenching in the Right Place at the Right Time: Tracing the Shared History of Starbursts, Active Galactic Nuclei, and Poststarburst Galaxies Using Their Structures and Multiscale Environments

This work uses multiscale environments and the structures of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey as consistency checks on the evolution from starburst to quiescence at redshift z < 0.2. The environmental indicators include fixed-aperture mass overdensities (δ xMpc , x ϵ {0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8} h –1 Mpc), k-nearest neighbor distances, the tidal parameter, halo mass (M h ), and satellite/central classification. The residuals of the specific star formation rates (Δ SSFRs) are used to select starbursts (ΔSSFR > 0.6 dex, N ≈ 8600). Quenched poststarbursts (QPSBs) are selected using Hα < 3 Å emission and Hδ A > 4 Å absorption (N ≈ 750). The environments of starbursts and QPSBs are compared with those of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and inactive galaxies of varying ΔSSFR. The environments of starbursts, AGNs, and QPSBs are unlike the environments of most quiescent galaxies (QGs). About 70%–90% of starbursts, AGNs with Hδ A > 4 Å, and QPSBs are centrals; ~80%–90% have M h < 10 13 M ⊙ , and only ~2%–4% have M h > 10 14 M ⊙ or live in clusters. Their M h and satellite fractions are also different from those of QGs. All QPSBs are matched to some SFGs, starbursts, AGNs, and QGs of similar M $\star$ , environments, concentration indices, and velocity dispersions. A significant fraction (~20%–30%) of starbursts cannot be matched to QPSBs or QGs. The implications are that: (1) some starbursts do not quench rapidly; (2) the satellite-quenching mechanisms operating in high-density environments cannot account for most QPSBs; (3) the evolution from starbursts to QPSBs to QGs is not the dominant path at z < 0.2; and (4) starbursts are not mainly triggered by tidal interactions.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗