Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “physics of failure”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Simulation-based Study of Single-Event Burnout in 4H-SiC High-Voltage Vertical Superjunction DMOSFET: Physical Failure Mechanism and Robustness vs. Performance Tradeoffs

We explore and elucidate physical failure mechanisms in a 4H-SiC, high voltage, superjunction (SJ) vertical DMOSFET from a single heavy ion strike using three-dimensional electro-thermal transient simulations. The single-event burnout (SEB) failure is thermal runaway from second breakdown, initiated by impact ionization and terminated with mesoplasma formation, at the center of the P-pillar/N+ substrate interface. We also demonstrate that the SEB performance of this SiC SJ DMOSFET is insensitive to the pillar width but sensitive to the strike location with ion strike at the P-pillar causing SEB at a lower blocking voltage than at the N-pillar. Compared to commercially available 1.2 kV blocking-rated non-SJ DMOSFETs, which have been demonstrated to survive SEB up to 525 V, the SJ DMOSFET increases SEB survival threshold voltage (VSEB) by a factor of 2.2, making it close to 1200 V, while the on-resistance is increased by only 11%. Using our recently developed figure of merit (FoM), which considers the trade-off between VSEB and on-state performance, we find that the SiC SJ DMOSFET achieves a FoM that is 14 times better, making it superior to conventional 1.2 kV SiC DMOSFETs for long-term radiation-tolerant operation in space applications.

Silicon Carbide↗
NASA NTRS2008

Microelectronics reliability : physics-of-failure based modeling and lifetime evaluation

This handbook presents a physics-of-failure approach to microelectronics reliability modeling and assessment. Knowledge of the root cause and physical behavior of key failure mechanisms in microelectronic devices has improved dramatically over recent years and has led to the development of more sophisticated reliability modeling tools and techniques...

White, Mark↗
DOE OSTI2022

Modeling interconnections of safety and financial performance of nuclear power plants, part 3: Spatiotemporal probabilistic physics-of-failure analysis and its connection to safety and financial performance

Here, this paper is a byproduct of a line of research by the authors to analyze interrelationships of safety and financial performance of nuclear power plants (NPPs). The result of this line of research is summarized in three parts: Part 1 covers a categorical review of relevant literature and the theoretical bases that support the methodological developments in Part 2. Part 2 introduces an Integrated Enterprise Risk Management (I-ERM) methodological framework to quantify the interconnections of safety and financial performance with a focus on operation and maintenance (O&M) of NPPs. Part 2 has also demonstrated the applicability and values of the I-ERM methodology through an NPP case study. This paper is Part 3, where detailed development and implementation of one of the I-ERM modules, i.e., probabilistic physics-of-failure (PPoF) analysis, and its connection with safety and financial performance is reported. In this article, the physical failure modeling for hardware components is advanced by incorporating finite element analysis (FEA) into PPoF analysis and coupling the FEA-based PPoF with the maintenance performance through a renewal process model. This article covers two scientific contributions: (i) first-of-its-kind incorporation of FEA into the PPoF model of thermal fatigue for NPP components; and (ii) advancing the interface between the PPoF analysis and the renewal process model in order to deal with spatiotemporal FEA outputs and to efficiently estimate the physical transition rates even when the PPoF outputs are dominated by success data. Through the incorporation of FEA, the resolution of the PPoF analysis is enhanced as spatiotemporal conditions such as stress and temperature can be considered explicitly instead of relying on simplified assumptions or analytical models with reduced spatiotemporal dimensions. To demonstrate an application of the FEA-based PPoF analysis and its coupling with maintenance through the renewal process model, a case study is conducted using excess letdown elbow piping in the chemical and volume control system of a Pressurized Water Reactor.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS2022

NASA Physics of Failure (PoF) for Reliability

An item’s reliability or longevity is dependent not only on its design but also on how it is used, manufactured, tested, and the stresses it has or will experience. Stresses include operational and environmental exposures to thermal, voltage, current, age/exposure, mechanical, and radiation mechanisms. Therefore, in reliability analysis, it is important to consider the contributions of all of these factors when predicting the failure rates of components. Historically, there has been a reliance on handbook data (e.g., MIL-HDBK-217), but experience has shown that these values and distributions are not representative of actual performance (1,2). Therefore, to make more credible reliability and risk assessments for its missions, NASA must transition to estimating likelihoods of failure based on an item’s reliability/longevity factors (or the physical susceptibilities and strengths impacting the design’s performance) has or will experience, whenever possible. To facilitate this transition a “Handbook on Methodology for Physics of Failure Based Reliability Assessments” has been developed by NASA to assist in applying physics experiences or experiment physics for empirical analysis and conceptualized physics exposures or theoretical physics for deterministic analysis, to develop and aggregate realistic likelihoods of failure leading to more credible forecasts of item performance and longevity. In addition, since it is NASA’s intention that this document continues to evolve based on community lessons learned and the introduction of new assessment methodologies, NASA is encouraging and appreciates the contributions of current and future authors to maintain and enhance this handbook and its supporting case studies.

Physics of Failure↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

OSMA Digital Evolution: R&M Physics of Failure (PoF) Handbook

At the intersection of mission, technology, and place is NASA’s need to modernize for a digital-forward future. Therefore, NASA’s Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Enterprise Data Sharing team is working to leverage both Digitization and Digital Transformation to develop and share best practices and methodologies across NASA. One such cutting edge methodology is Physics of Failure. Therefore NASA OSMA's R&M office is developing a Reliability Physics of Failure Handbook in order to keep our engineers current and on the cutting edge of anlayis methodologies to help ensure NASA’s optimize and achieve continued success.

Digital Transformation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

OSMA Digital Evolution: R&M Physics of Failure (PoF) Handbook

At the intersection of mission, technology, and place is NASA’s need to modernize for a digital-forward future. Therefore, NASA’s Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Enterprise Data Sharing team is working to leverage both Digitization and Digital Transformation to develop and share best practices and methodologies across NASA. One such cutting edge methodology is Physics of Failure. Therefore NASA OSMA's R&M office is developing a Reliability Physics of Failure Handbook in order to keep our engineers current and on the cutting edge of analysis methodologies to help ensure NASA’s optimize and achieve continued success. "

Digital transformation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Physics of Failure (PoF) Handbook Update

At the intersection of mission, technology, and place is NASA’s need to modernize for a digital-forward future. Therefore, NASA’s Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Enterprise Data Sharing team is working to leverage both Digitization and Digital Transformation to develop and share best practices and methodologies across NASA. One such cutting edge methodology is Physics of Failure. Therefore NASA OSMA's R&M office is developing a Reliability Physics of Failure Handbook in order to keep our engineers current and on the cutting edge of anlayis methodologies to help ensure NASA’s optimize and achieve continued success.

Digital transformation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Physics of Failure (PoF) for Reliability

An item’s reliability or longevity is dependent not only on its design but also on how it is used, manufactured, tested, and the stresses it has or will experience. Stresses include operational and environmental exposures to thermal, voltage, current, age/exposure, mechanical, and radiation mechanisms. Therefore, in reliability analysis, it is important to consider the contributions of all these factors when predicting the failure rates of components. Historically, there has been a reliance on handbook data (e.g., MIL-HDBK-217), but experience has shown that these values and distributions are not representative of actual performance. Therefore, to make more credible reliability and risk assessments for its missions, NASA must transition to estimating likelihoods of failure based on an item’s reliability or longevity factors (or the physical susceptibilities and strengths impacting the design’s performance) has or will experience, whenever possible. To facilitate this transition, a Handbook on Methodology for Physics of Failure Based Reliability Assessments has been developed by NASA to assist in applying physics experiences or experimental physics for empirical analysis and conceptualized physics exposures or theoretical physics for deterministic analysis, to develop and aggregate realistic likelihoods of failure leading to more credible forecasts of item performance and longevity. In addition, since it is NASA’s intention that this document continues to evolve based on community lessons learned and the introduction of new assessment methodologies, NASA is encouraging and appreciates the contributions of current and future authors to maintain and enhance this handbook and its supporting case studies.

PoF↗
DOE OSTI2025

Probabilistic physics of failure approach to fusion systems & Risk-efficiency optimization of nuclear co-generation [Slides]

An overview of the progress made towards two separate summer internship projects: a probabilistic physics of failure approach to fusion systems and a risk efficiency optimization of nuclear co-generation. Original version summarized the progress through end of June, and the revision version summarizes the progress through the entire internship to August 1st.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS1990

Design for validation, based on formal methods

Validation of ultra-reliable systems decomposes into two subproblems: (1) quantification of probability of system failure due to physical failure; (2) establishing that Design Errors are not present. Methods of design, testing, and analysis of ultra-reliable software are discussed. It is concluded that a design-for-validation based on formal methods is needed for the digital flight control systems problem, and also that formal methods will play a major role in the development of future high reliability digital systems.

Butler, Ricky W.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cyber-physical cascading failure and resilience of power grid: A comprehensive review

Smart grid technologies are based on the integration of the cyber network and the power grid into a cyber-physical power system (CPPS). The increasing cyber-physical interdependencies bring about tremendous opportunities for the modeling, monitoring, control, and protection of power grids, but also create new types of vulnerabilities and failure mechanisms threatening the reliability and resiliency of system operation. A major concern regarding the interdependent networks is the cascading failure (CF), where a small initial disturbance/failure in the network results in a seemingly unexpected large-scale failure. Although there has been a significant volume of recent work in the CF research of CPPS, a comprehensive review remains unavailable. This article aims to fill the gap by providing a systematic literature survey regarding the modeling, analysis, and mitigation of CF in CPPS. The open research questions for further research are also discussed. This article allows researchers to easily understand the state of the art of CF research in CPPS and fosters future work required towards full resolutions to the remaining questions and challenges.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2025

Physics of Failure Analysis of Nuclear Fusion Divertor Monoblock: An Analytical Approach

Original - A slide package that summarizes research progress of 2025 summer high school internship. To be presented at an internal group presentation to all the high school interns and mentors within C200, plus potential more interested audience from INL. Revision - Based on the original LRS-approved slide package, an updated slide package and a poster were prepared with slight changes (e.g., adjusting the layout of slides and reproducing some plots for better clarity) for the interns' final showcase on August 13. The showcase will be public-facing (i.e., not limited to INL attendees).

99 - GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗