Code verification and numerical error estimation for use in model validation of laminar hypersonic double-cone flows.
Abstract not provided.
Carnes, Brian↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “numerical error”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Numerical error analysis of SOLPS-ITER simulations of EAST
Abstract Plasma edge simulations with codes like SOLPS-ITER are widely employed to interpret fusion experiments. However, numerical errors appearing in such simulations are rarely investigated, despite their potential large impact on simulation results. These errors consist of the statistical error and the bias, both resulting from the finite number of employed EIRENE Monte Carlo particles and incomplete convergence, and the discretization error due to the finite resolution of the computational grids. In this contribution, the resulting numerical errors on simulations of pure deuterium and neon seeded H-mode EAST discharges are examined. The statistical error can be kept small compared to other numerical error contributions by averaging the plasma profiles. This allows investigating the bias and discretization errors using Richardson extrapolation. It is shown that grid refinement and the number of employed Monte Carlo particles have the largest influence on the result, in agreement with similar studies of an ITER deuterium case. For the first time, numerical error bars on the entire simulated target profiles are determined showing that the largest numerical error is 17.9%, mainly due to the plasma grid discretization. On top, also numerical errors on simulated neutral pressures are investigated in detail, for which the statistical error is dominant. The analysis demonstrates which setup is needed to keep numerical errors limited: the SOLPS-ITER averaging procedure should be employed including enough EIRENE particles, and the involved grids should be sufficiently refined to reduce discretization errors.
Boeyaert, Dieter (ORCID:0000000309208660)↗
Stochastic Richardson Extrapolation Based Numerical Error Estimation for Kinetic Plasma Simulations
We present a numerical error estimation technique specifically formulated to deal with stochastic code output with multiple discretization parameters. This method is based on multiple fits to an error model with arbitrary convergence rates and cross-coupling terms, performed using nonlinear optimization. The fitting approach varies by the type of residual norm which influences the importance of outliers, and weights which influences the relative importance of data points in the coarse and refined regions of discretization parameter space. To account for the influence of stochastic noise, these fits are performed on multiple bootstrap values based on the underlying response data set. Using an automated discretization domain selection scheme, the fits are performed on a series of reduced sets of discretization levels in order to find an optimal fully-converged result estimate in the minimum variance sense; this automated approach enables straightforward analysis of multiple quantities of interest and/or time and spatially-dependent response data. The overall numerical error analysis method is useful for verification and validation problems for stochastic simulation methods and forms a key component in the overall uncertainty quantification process. The method was demonstrated for steady and unsteady electron diode problems simulated using a particle-in-cell kinetic plasma code, demonstrating excellent results.
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
Numerical Errors in Ice Microphysics Parameterizations and their Effects on Simulated Regional Climate
The major characteristics of ice microphysics in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Double-Moment 6-class (WDM6) bulk-type cloud microphysics originate from the diagnosed ice number concentration, which is a function of the cloud-ice mixing ratio. In this study, we correct numerical errors in ice microphysics processes of the WDM6, in which the cloud-ice shape is assumed as single bullets and examine the impact on regional climate simulations. Here, by rederiving the relationships between cloud microphysics characteristics, including the one linking the cloud-ice mixing ratio and number concentration, we remove numerical errors intrinsic to the description of cloud-ice characteristics in the original WDM6 microphysics scheme. The revised WDM6 is tested using a WRF framework for regional climate simulations over the East Asian region. We find that our correction to the WDM6 improves the model’s performance in capturing the observed distribution of the monsoon rain band. A reduction in cloud ice is significant in the revised WDM6, which strengthens the Western North Pacific High. By conducting the additional sensitivity experiment in which the characteristics of cloud-ice shape are revised as the one for the column type, our study also finds out that the impacts of the existing numerical errors on the simulated monsoon is as large as the ones of the changes in cloud-ice shape.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
On numerical errors to the fields surrounding a relativistically moving particle in PIC codes
The particle-in-cell (PIC) method is widely used to model the self-consistent interaction between discrete particles and electromagnetic fields. It has been successfully applied to problems across plasma physics including plasma based acceleration, inertial confinement fusion, magnetically confined fusion, space physics, astrophysics, high energy density plasmas. In many cases the physics involves how relativistic particles (those with high relativistic γ factors) are generated and interact with plasmas. However, when relativistic particles stream across the grid, both in “vacuum” and in plasma, many numerical issues may arise which can lead to unphysical results. We present a detailed analysis of how discretized Maxwell solvers used in PIC codes can lead to numerical errors to the fields that surround particles that move at relativistic speeds across the grid. Expressions for the axial electric field as integrals in k space are presented that reveal two types of errors. The first arises from errors to the numerator of the integrand and leads to unphysical fields that are antisymmetric about the particle. Furthermore, the second arises from errors to the denominator of the integrand and lead to Cherenkov like radiation in “vacuum”. These fields are not anti-symmetric, extend behind the particle, and cause the particle to accelerate or decelerate depending on the solver and parameters. The unphysical fields are studied in detail for two representative solvers - the Yee solver and the FFT based solver. Although the Cherenkov fields are absent, the space charge fields are still present in the fundamental Brillouin zone for the FFT based solvers. In addition, the Cherenkov fields are present in higher order zones for the FFT based solvers. Comparison between the analytical solutions and PIC simulation results are presented. A solution for eliminating these unphysical fields by modifying the k operator in the axial direction is also presented. Using a customized finite difference solver, this solution was successfully implemented into OSIRIS [1]. Results from the customized solver are also presented. Additionally, this solution will be useful for a beam of particles that all move in one direction with a small angular divergence.
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
Characterization and quantification of numerical errors in threshold displacement energy calculated by molecular dynamics in bcc-Fe
Not Available
Park, Sehyeok (ORCID:000000034728527X)↗
Numerical Error Estimation for Particle-in-Cell Plasma Simulations.
Abstract not provided.
Radtke, Gregg Arthur↗
Should We Conserve Entropy or Energy when Computing CAPE with Mixed-Phase Precipitation Physics?
Abstract The rapidly increasing resolution of global atmospheric reanalysis and climate model datasets necessitates finding methods for computing convective available potential energy (CAPE) both efficiently and accurately. To this end, this article compares two common methods for computing CAPE which conserve either energy or entropy. Inaccuracies in these computations arise from both physical and numerical errors. For instance, computing CAPE with entropy conserved results in physical errors from nonequilibrium phase transitions but minimizes numerical errors because solutions are analytic at each height. In contrast, computing CAPE with energy conserved avoids these physical errors, but accumulates numerical errors that are grid-resolution-dependent because the numerical integration of a differential equation is required. Analysis of CAPE computed with large databases of soundings from the tropical Amazon and midlatitude storm environments shows that physical errors from the entropy method are typically 1%–3% as large as CAPE, which is comparable to the numerical errors from conserving energy with grid spacing of 25 and 250 m using explicit first-order and second-order integration schemes, respectively. Errors in entropy-based CAPE calculations are also insensitive to vertical grid spacing, in contrast to energy-based calculations whose error strongly scales with the grid spacing. It is shown that entropy-based methods are advantageous when intercomparing datasets with differing vertical resolution because they produce accurate and reasonably fast results that are insensitive to grid resolution, whereas a second-order energy-based method is advantageous when analyzing data with a consistent vertical resolution because of its superior computational efficiency. Significance Statement Convective available potential energy (CAPE) is a measure of instability in the atmosphere that helps forecasters and researchers understand when and where thunderstorms will form. The purpose of this article is to identify the most efficient and accurate methods for computing CAPE. Two methods are considered here, one that relates to the entropy (a measure of thermodynamic disorder) of an air parcel and one that relates to the energy of an air parcel. Results indicate that the entropy method is most accurate and insensitive to the resolution of the data used for the calculation (which can vary considerably), whereas the energy method uses the least computation time.
Peters, John M.↗
Characterizing the Sample Selection for Supernova Cosmology
Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are used as distance indicators to infer the cosmological parameters that specify the expansion history of the universe. Parameter inference depends on the criteria by which the analysis SN sample is selected. Only for the simplest selection criteria and population models can the likelihood be calculated analytically, otherwise it needs to be determined numerically, a process that inherently has error. Numerical errors in the likelihood lead to errors in parameter inference. This article presents toy examples where the distance modulus is inferred given a set of SNe at a single redshift. Parameter estimators and their uncertainties are calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. The relationship between the number of Monte Carlo realizations and numerical errors is presented. The procedure can be applied to more realistic models and used to determine the computational and data management requirements of the transient analysis pipeline.
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
Numerical Uncertainties vs. Model Uncertainties in Two-phase Flow Simulations
In recent years, verification, validation and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) have become a common practice in thermal-hydraulics analysis. In general, these activities deal with propagations of uncertainties in computer code simulations, e.g., through system analysis codes. However, most existing such activities in thermal-hydraulics analysis have been primarily focused on model uncertainties, while numerical uncertainties were largely overlooked. Numerical uncertainties (or numerical errors) can appear in many different forms, e.g., round-off error, statistical sampling error, and discretization error. As pointed out by Oberkampf and Roy, discretization error is usually the largest however the most difficult type of error to estimate reliably. In thermal-hydraulics analysis, especially two-phase flow simulations commonly encountered in reactor safety analysis, the lack of consideration on discretization error is mainly due to the difficulty in estimating them. Accurate estimations on discretization error require continuous mesh refinement and/or implementation of high-order numerical schemes in system analysis code, both of which are unfortunately difficult to achieve for existing codes. At first, it should be emphasized that mesh refinement (or mesh sensitivity study) is a well-understood concept in the thermal-hydraulics field. However, it is not commonly practiced for many reasons, e.g., lack of understanding on numerical errors by code users, consideration on computational cost, deteriorated numerical stability performance with refined meshes, and etc. Secondly, high-order (e.g., second-order) numerical schemes are simply unavailable in almost any existing system analysis code. Implementation of high-order numerical schemes in these codes is difficult, if not impossible, given the complexity of these codes. On the other hand, people tend to argue that numerical uncertainties (or discretization error as we have emphasized) are not as important as the commonly large uncertainties in two-phase flow models, e.g., closure correlations. As a result, nodalization is sometimes played unintentionally, or maybe intentionally, to match experimental data, which is referred as 'user effects' or 'compensating errors' in thermal-hydraulics community. Such a practice is highly criticized by Levy. In this work, we will at first build a computer code that incorporates both first-order and second-order numerical methods to solve the two-phase flow problems. The first-order method resembles the one used in many existing system analysis codes; and the second-order method works as the reference to estimate numerical errors. Numerical verifications on spatial discretization schemes will be presented in the form of mesh convergence study. It will also be demonstrated that, in practical scenarios, discretization errors can be as large as, or even larger than, model uncertainties via case studies.
42 ENGINEERING↗
EFFECT OF DISCRETIZATION ERROR ON THE QUANTIFICATION OF MODEL UNCERTAINTY IN TWO-PHASE FLOW SIMULATIONS
Verification, validation and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) have become a common practice in thermal-hydraulics analysis. In general, these activities deal with propagations of uncertainties in computer code simulations, e.g., through system analysis codes. However, most existing such activities in thermal-hydraulics analysis have been primarily focused on input and model uncertainties, while numerical errors were largely overlooked. Numerical errors can appear in many different forms, e.g., round-off error, statistical sampling error, and discretization error. In thermal-hydraulics analysis, especially two-phase flow simulations commonly encountered in reactor safety analysis, the lack of consideration of discretization error is mainly due to the difficulty in estimating them. Accurate estimations of discretization error require continuous mesh refinement and/or implementation of high-order numerical schemes in system analysis code, both of which are difficult to achieve in existing codes. In this work, we will build a computer code that incorporates both first-order and second-order numerical methods to solve the two-phase flow problems. The first-order method resembles the one used in many existing system analysis codes; and the second-order method works as the reference to estimate numerical errors. Numerical verification of spatial discretization schemes will be presented in the form of mesh convergence study. It will also be demonstrated via case studies that, in practical scenarios, discretization errors can be as large as, or even larger than, model uncertainties.
42 ENGINEERING↗
Acoustic Codes in 2D Spherical Coordinate
Finite-difference methods are widely used to simulate infrasound propagation in the atmosphere. Flexibility of finite-difference scheme allows implementation of highly heterogeneous media for sound propagation as well as complex source models for sound generation. While full 3-D finite-difference methods have been utilized for local infrasound propagation with pronounced topography, 2-D modeling approach has been preferred for regional and global propagation as full 3-D methods generally require enormous computational resources. Infrasound propagation is often simulated with a second-order finite difference scheme. This lowest-order finite-difference scheme is robust and straightforward to implement complex boundary conditions, but the solution includes large error with numerical dispersion and dissipation. This large numerical error may make the second-order finite-difference not optimal for long range infrasound propagation modeling as the numerical dispersion degrades the accuracy of the solution unacceptably. Here, we developed a high-order finite-difference solver for long-range infrasound simulation. The high-order scheme is particularly popular for linear wave modeling in aeroacoustics owing to its low-dispersive and low-dissipative behavior. We develop and evaluate a high-order finite difference scheme in 2-D axisymmetric coordinates. The axisymmetry allows to approximate 3-D spherical sound propagation and amplitude attenuation by a 2-D method. AC2Dr is developed to simulate infrasound propagation in realistic atmosphere, but can be used for linear acoustic waves in general materials with background flow. AC2Dr in an axisymmetric coordinates allows for spherical radiation of acoustic waves from compact sources.
Sjogreen, Bjorn↗
Numerical discreteness errors in multispecies cosmological N -body simulations
ABSTRACT We present a detailed analysis of numerical discreteness errors in two-species, gravity-only, cosmological simulations using the density power spectrum as a diagnostic probe. In a simple set-up where both species are initialized with the same total matter transfer function, biased growth of power forms on small scales when the solver force resolution is finer than the mean interparticle separation. The artificial bias is more severe when individual density and velocity transfer functions are applied. In particular, significant large-scale offsets in power are measured between simulations with conventional offset grid initial conditions when compared against converged high-resolution results where the force resolution scale is matched to the interparticle separation. These offsets persist even when the cosmology is chosen so that the two particle species have the same mass, indicating that the error is sourced from discreteness in the total matter field as opposed to unequal particle mass. We further investigate two mitigation strategies to address discreteness errors: the frozen potential method and softened interspecies short-range forces. The former evolves particles under the approximately ‘frozen’ total matter potential in linear theory at early times, while the latter filters cross-species gravitational interactions on small scales in low-density regions. By modelling closer to the continuum limit, both mitigation strategies demonstrate considerable reductions in large-scale power spectrum offsets.
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
Numerical Uncertainty Estimation for Stochastic Particle-in-Cell Simulations Applied to Verification and Validation.
Systematic veri cation and validation (V&V) is necessary to establish the credibility for high consequence simulations. In this paper, we focus on a radiation-induced plasma experimental validation exercise for simulations which uses both numerical error estimation and input parameter uncertainty quanti cation to provide a direct comparison between Particle-In-Cell (PIC) plasma simulations and experiments. This approach demonstrates how careful validation can uncover missing physics in the simulation. Three di erent validation examples are shown; a vacuum space charge limited cavity, a gas lled space charge limited cavity, and a vacuum non space charge limited cavity. Two of the example are picked to show the importance of error estimation in uncovering inaccuracy/incomplete simulation models. We also report on a newly-developed numerical error estimation approach, StREEQ, which is a notable improvement to past approaches. In the StREEQ approach, a multi- tting scheme based on L 1 , L 2 , and L$\infty$ error norms and alternate weightings is used to propagate uncertainties in the relative importance of outliers and coarse/re ned discretization levels. Bootstrap sampling is used to represent the stochasticity in the response data. The resulting method appears to robustly and conservatively predict the fully-converged response within estimated numerical error bounds for stochastic simulations. The StREEQ approach is demonstrated on two related prototype electron diode problems, and preliminary results are reported for a radiation-induced plasma simulation.
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
Extended Forward Sensitivity Analysis for Uncertainty Quantification
Verification and validation (V&V) are playing more important roles to quantify uncertainties and realize high fidelity simulations in engineering system analyses, such as transients happened in a complex nuclear reactor system. Traditional V&V in the reactor system analysis focused more on the validation part or did not differentiate verification and validation. The traditional approach to uncertainty quantification is based on a 'black box' approach. The simulation tool is treated as an unknown signal generator, a distribution of inputs according to assumed probability density functions is sent in and the distribution of the outputs is measured and correlated back to the original input distribution. The 'black box' method mixes numerical errors with all other uncertainties. It is also not efficient to perform sensitivity analysis. Contrary to the 'black box' method, a more efficient sensitivity approach can take advantage of intimate knowledge of the simulation code. In these types of approaches equations for the propagation of uncertainty are constructed and the sensitivities are directly solved for as variables in the simulation. This paper presents the forward sensitivity analysis as a method to help uncertainty qualification. By including time step and potentially spatial step as special sensitivity parameters, the forward sensitivity method is extended as one method to quantify numerical errors. Note that by integrating local truncation errors over the whole system through the forward sensitivity analysis process, the generated time step and spatial step sensitivity information reflect global numerical errors. The discretization errors can be systematically compared against uncertainties due to other physical parameters. This extension makes the forward sensitivity method a much more powerful tool to help uncertainty qualification. By knowing the relative sensitivity of time and space steps with other interested physical parameters, the simulation is allowed to run at optimized time and space steps without affecting the confidence of the physical parameter sensitivity results. The time and space steps forward sensitivity analysis method can also replace the traditional time step and grid convergence study with much less computational cost. Several well defined benchmark problems with manufactured solutions are utilized to demonstrate the extended forward sensitivity analysis method. All the physical solutions, parameter sensitivity solutions, even the time step sensitivity in one case, have analytical forms, which allows the verification to be performed in the strictest sense.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
A flexible method to calculate the distributions of discretization errors in operator-split codes with stochastic noise in problem data
This report investigates a technique to calculate the distributions of discretization errors for a model of advection-diffusion-reaction with stochastic noise in problem data. The focus is on operator-split discretization methods. The error is decomposed into components due to the splitting and due to the discretization within each component. We present a method to estimate the distributions of the total discretization error for a quantity of interest as well as the aforementioned error components. These computations require information about the propagation of uncertainty within and between code modules, for which purpose we use a flexible code framework for uncertainty quantification. Computational examples illustrate that in certain cases the distribution of numerical error can have a significant impact on the code output. Using information about the components of the numerical error, decisions can be made regarding discretization parameters to efficiently reduce the impact of numerical error on the distribution of model outputs.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
A Study on Particle Trajectory Error in Finite-Element Particle-in-Cell Algorithms
Particle-in-cell (PIC) algorithms are widely used for the simulation of kinetic plasmas. PIC algorithms account for the interaction between charged particles in a plasma and the electromagnetic field in ambient space, including self-field interactions. The objective of this article is to study the error in charged particle trajectories present in finite-element (FE)-based PIC algorithms on unstructured meshes. We study how the trajectory error behaves according to the FE mesh resolution and the matrix solver employed in the FE algorithm. The study is performed by considering a trajectory established by a parabolic electric potential and an axial magnetic force acting on the charged particle. Under a proper choice combination of electric and magnetic field parameters, the 2-D particle trajectories comprise closed orbits. Numerical errors cause small perturbations on the trajectories, with cumulative effects. As a result, the resulting orbital trajectories exhibit distortions including spurious apsidal precession. These distortions provide a clear imprint of the numerical error. Here, we also study the numerical error in a quantitative fashion by computing the distance norm between the trajectories obtained by the exact fields and numerical fields.
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗