Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “multi-group diffusion”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Reduced-order modeling of parameterized multi-group diffusion k-eigenvalue problems

In this paper, a group-wise Reduced-Order Model, based on a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) technique, is presented for parameterized multi-group diffusion k-eigenvalue problems. The group-wise approach is shown to be more robust than model-order reduction based on monolithic multi-group POD modes. In addition, fewer POD modes are required. The method of snapshots is employed to generate the offline training set. Two Naïve and a Greedy snapshot-generation strategies are compared. The input parameter space is surveyed using Latin Hypercube Sampling techniques. The effectiveness of the group-wise model-order reduction method is demonstrated on two reactor-physics benchmarks, a two-group 3D Pressurized Water Reactor problem with 26 uncertain input parameters and a seven-group UO 2 -MOX fuel 3D mini-core with 287 uncertain input parameters. In both examples the Reduced-Order Models built using the snapshots generated by the Greedy algorithm proved to be slightly better. Model-order reduction yields results that are within 1 pcm of the full-order model, with speed-up factors of about 1000–3000, depending upon the test case.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Cross-code comparison of the impact of the fill tube on high yield implosions on the National Ignition Facility

Fill tubes are used to inject deuterium and tritium fuel into inertial confinement fusion capsules fielded on the National Ignition Facility. These fill tubes have been shown to have a detrimental effect on capsule performance, primarily by introducing a low-density pathway into the central fuel region that enables the jetting of ablation material into the hot spot. Due to the complexity of the highly nonlinear flow associated with the fill tube and the challenge of diagnosing the evolution of the fill tube jet late in the implosion experiments, the uncertainty in how this perturbation source evolves is great. In this work, we report on the results of a detailed code comparison performed to understand uncertainties in computational modeling of the impact of fill tubes on implosion performance. The study employed two radiation-hydrodynamics codes, HYDRA and xRAGE, which employ very different meshing strategies and hydrodynamics solvers, as well as two radiation transport methodologies, discrete ordinates and multi-group diffusion. Our results demonstrate generally good agreement between codes through most of the implosion although they indicate sensitivity to opacity averaging methods. Late in the implosion, differences arise in the distribution and amount of contaminant although these differences have a remarkably small impact on the amount of yield reduction due to the fill tube. While these results demonstrate sensitivity in fill tube modeling to algorithmic choices, the observed differences between codes are small relative to known sensitivities due to expected variations in the fill tube geometry. Finally, we have developed a methodology for performing multi-group diffusion simulations that show good agreement with the more accurate discrete ordinates method

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

CEFR simulation using diffusion code system RAST-F

In this study, the RAST-F code system, which is based on the two-step approach that couples a multi-group cross-section generation Monte-Carlo (MC) code and a multi-group nodal diffusion solver, was used for the neutronic simulation of the CEFR start-up experiments. The numerical solution of the RAST-F system was verified against the full core MC solution MCS at all control rods fully inserted and withdrawn states. The RAST-F solution of the selected experimental simulations was compared against the measurement data. A good agreement between RAST-F and MCS solutions was observed with less than 120 pcm discrepancies and 1.2% root-mean-square error in terms of k{sub eff} and power distribution, respectively. Meanwhile, the RAST-F result agreed well with the experimental data within two-sigma of experimental uncertainty. The good agreement of these results indicates that RAST-F can be used to neutronic steady-state simulations for small core-size SFR, which was challenged to deterministic code systems. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

VARI3D & PERSENT: Perturbation and Sensitivity Analysis

The nodal diffusion method is one of the most widely used approaches in modern reactor analysis. In the nodal diffusion method, a coarse multi-group set of “homogenized” parameters is constructed such that the complex geometry of a reactor core along with the energy dependence of neutron and gamma ray cross sections in a nuclear reactor are conserved in the simpler geometry. The homogenization is typically done on a fuel assembly level as is the case in the DIF3D code developed at Argonne National Laboratory. The nodal methodology is used primarily to predict fuel cycle behavior of nuclear systems of which there is a substantial amount of validation in the literature. Another use of the nodal method is to obtain reactivity coefficients and kinetics parameters for use in a safety analysis of a given nuclear reactor. While there are many ways to obtain reactivity worth and kinetics parameters, the work presented in this manuscript is unique as it provides the user with the ability to compute reactivity worths, kinetics parameters, and cross section sensitivities with a Cartesian and hexagonal geometry based transport code. This manuscript serves as a single manual for two separate codes: VARI3D and PERSENT. The VARI3D code (VARIational 3D) is based upon the classic finite difference diffusion theory solver available in DIF3D. The PERSENT code (PERturbation and SENitivity for Transport) is based upon the variational nodal method employed in DIF3D termed VARIANT. The VARIANT solver was added to DIF3D in 1995 and has seen continued development and use for the last 18 years. Because VARI3D primarily uses deprecated coding practices, rather than incorporating the perturbation and sensitivity treatments for transport within VARI3D, a new coding development was built using modern Fortran coding. The primary purpose of this manual is to describe the theory behind PERSENT (and by convenience, that of VARI3D) and discuss the input and output of PERSENT along with giving potential users an idea of how to use it. While this manuscript does describe the input and output of VARI3D, the PERSENT code is intended to be the replacement capability of VARI3D as PERSENT can generate nearly identical (if not superior) diffusion theory results. In this manuscript, the relevant aspects of generalized perturbation theory and exact perturbation theory that apply to both VARI3D and PERSENT are covered. The input and output of VARI3D is displayed by excerpting several of the example problems. Similarly, the input and output of PERSENT is displayed along with tips on how best to use the code. Note that the input and output of the inhomogeneous solver wrapped around DIF3D (DIF3D_IFS) is also discussed as it is needed to carry out some of the sensitivities in PERSENT such as reaction rate ratios. This manuscript describes several perturbation and sensitivity problems, and the results computed using PERSENT. From these sections, potential users should find that PERSENT provides not only the typical tables of numbers desired in perturbation and sensitivity analysis work, but also can visually plot the result for a more thorough understanding of the space and energy distribution (Section 5). Overall, PERSENT is observed to produce accurate reactivity worths and sensitivities for the displayed set of test problems and clearly demonstrates the need to have a transport-based sensitivity capability as evident from the thousands of percent errors observed in the 21-group hexagonal fast reactor problem (covered in Section 7). The uncertainty calculation capability is described in Section 3 and demonstrated in Section 7.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

VARI3D & PERSENT: Perturbation and Sensitivity Analysis

The nodal diffusion method is one of the most widely used approaches in modern reactor analysis. In the nodal diffusion method, a coarse multi-group set of “homogenized” parameters is constructed such that the complex geometry of a reactor core along with the energy dependence of neutron and gamma ray cross sections in a nuclear reactor are conserved in the simpler geometry. The homogenization is typically done on a fuel assembly level as is the case in the DIF3D code developed at Argonne National Laboratory. The nodal methodology is used primarily to predict fuel cycle behavior of nuclear systems of which there is a substantial amount of validation in the literature. Another use of the nodal method is to obtain reactivity coefficients and kinetics parameters for use in a safety analysis of a given nuclear reactor. While there are many ways to obtain reactivity worth and kinetics parameters, the work presented in this manuscript is unique as it provides the user with the ability to compute reactivity worths, kinetics parameters, and cross section sensitivities with a Cartesian and hexagonal geometry based transport code.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

VARI3D & PERSENT: Perturbation and Sensitivity Analysis

The nodal diffusion method is one of the most widely used approaches in modern reactor analysis. In the nodal diffusion method, a coarse multi-group set of “homogenized” parameters is constructed such that the complex geometry of a reactor core along with the energy dependence of neutron and gamma ray cross sections in a nuclear reactor are conserved in the simpler geometry. The homogenization is typically done on a fuel assembly level as is the case in the DIF3D code developed at Argonne National Laboratory. The nodal methodology is used primarily to predict fuel cycle behavior of nuclear systems of which there is a substantial amount of validation in the literature. Another use of the nodal method is to obtain reactivity coefficients and kinetics parameters for use in a safety analysis of a given nuclear reactor. While there are many ways to obtain reactivity worth and kinetics parameters, the work presented in this manuscript is unique as it provides the user with the ability to compute reactivity worths, kinetics parameters, and cross section sensitivities with a Cartesian and hexagonal geometry based transport code.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

VARI3D & PERSENT: Perturbation and Sensitivity Analysis (Revision 5)

The nodal diffusion method is one of the most widely used approaches in modern reactor analysis. In the nodal diffusion method, a coarse multi-group set of “homogenized” parameters is constructed such that the complex geometry of a reactor core along with the energy dependence of neutron and gamma ray cross sections in a nuclear reactor are conserved in the simpler geometry. The homogenization is typically done on a fuel assembly level as is the case in the DIF3D code developed at Argonne National Laboratory. The nodal methodology is used primarily to predict fuel cycle behavior of nuclear systems of which there is a substantial amount of validation in the literature. Another use of the nodal method is to obtain reactivity coefficients and kinetics parameters for use in a safety analysis of a given nuclear reactor. While there are many ways to obtain reactivity worth and kinetics parameters, the work presented in this manuscript is unique as it provides the user with the ability to compute reactivity worths, kinetics parameters, and cross section sensitivities with a Cartesian and hexagonal geometry-based transport code.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

The accuracy of multi-group models for nonlocal electron transport in magnetized plasmas

In the extreme conditions of inertial confinement fusion experiments, heat flow plays a vital role, but local diffusive models frequently break down and overestimate the heat flow. The situation becomes more complicated again in the significant magnetic fields generated during laser–plasma interactions or in magnetized fusion schemes. Accurate non-local and magnetized heat flow computations can be carried out using Vlasov–Fokker–Planck (VFP) simulations, but these are computationally expensive. There is, therefore, significant interest in using faster multi-group models to accurately calculate the non-local heat flow in magnetized plasmas. We benchmark two such multi-group models for calculating the heat flow, M1 and hybrid-AWBS-BGK, against diffusive models and full VFP simulations, before applying the models to realistic example test cases, both magnetized and unmagnetized. We find that the multi-group models generally perform very well for moderate non-localities up to kλmfp∼0.01, but the computational cost increases dramatically. hybrid-AWBS-BGK performs more effectively than M1 at high non-localities, up to kλmfp∼1, due to its adaptive solver and robust P1 closure, but tends to fail in very strong magnetic fields. Both codes are much faster than VFP simulations but are still slow in steep temperature gradients.

Arran, C. (ORCID:0000000286448118)↗

Development and benchmarking of transient nodal code SIMULATE5-K neutron kinetics solver

SIMULATE5-K is Studsvik's next generation best estimate transient code. The time dependent diffusion equation is solved with a nodal method consistent with that implemented in the licensed core design code SIMULATE5. Arbitrary number of neutron and delayed neutron precursor groups can be used. For the solution of the spatial problem, the coupling coefficients used to relate the node leakages are found by first converting the time dependent diffusion equation to a static diffusion equation with the use of flux and delayed neutron precursor dynamic frequencies. Once the static-like equations are obtained, the multi-group analytical nodal model is used to obtain the coupling coefficients, expressing the node leakage in terms of adjacent node average fluxes. The coupling coefficients are then inserted into the time dependent nodal balance equation. For the time integration, the time dependent neutron balance equation is solved with the frequency transformation method. The treatment of the temporal dependence yields a fixed source problem which can be solved utilizing the existing fixed-source methodology. The primary purpose of this paper is to describe the neutron kinetics methodology implemented in SIMULATE5-K. The accuracy of the method is demonstrated for a series of well-known, neutronic-only benchmark problems. (author)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Demonstration of MOOSE-based Griffin reactor physics, code for heterogeneous lead-cooled fast reactor analysis

The MOOSE-based reactor physics code Griffin was assessed on a heterogeneous pin-resolved model of a prototype lead-cooled fast reactor assembly. This model was developed in preparation for future use in MOOSE-based multiphysics calculations for computing hot channel factors. Heterogeneous multigroup cross sections were prepared using the fast reactor multi-group cross section processing code MC{sup 2}-3 using a two-step method. Griffin simulations were performed using the DFEM-SN solver on 576 cores on Argonne's LCRC cluster. Diffusion-based acceleration methods were applied (NDA and CMFD). Reference solutions were generated with continuous energy MCNP and the hybrid MOC/finite element solver PROTEUS-MOC for code-to-code comparison. Space-angle convergence studies were conducted to observe convergence in k-eigenvalue and axial pin power distributions. The fully resolved Griffin calculation was within 68 pcm of the MCNP eigenvalue and exhibited max 1.2% relative error in the axial pin power distribution. Griffin produced nearly identical results to PROTEUS-MOC when using the same 9-group multigroup cross-section set. Griffin demonstrated favorable scaling in wall-clock time and memory usage when using diffusion-based acceleration methods. Griffin is capable of simulating the pin-resolved heterogeneous LFR assembly with good accuracy and performance, and is suitable for future use in coupled high-fidelity hot channel factor simulations. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Investigations about iso-geometric analysis for self-shielding calculations with the subgroup method

The implementation of a self-shielding method for a neutron transport calculation code based on the iso-geometric analysis (IGA) method that can resolve the multi-group neutron transport equation for arbitrary spatial domain, is presented. The self-shielding model based on the subgroup theory is adopted because the subgroup method can be used to perform calculations for any arbitrary geometrical domain which is the main purpose of our IGA code. Some basic theory of the subgroup method is given. A self-shielding calculation based on the PWR fuel pin composed of MOX fuel is presented and compared with a Monte Carlo calculation. The result is that the combination of SN transport theory, IGA and the subgroup method gives correctly shielded cross sections. Validation of the combination of the IGA method and SN neutron transport for subgroup calculations in two steps are presented: the first step is to ascertain the correctness of the IGA solutions compared to a known analytical solution in diffusion theory; the second step is a validation of the IGA solutions compared to a reference calculation in SN transport theory. The relation between the settings for the IGA solver and the accuracy of the results are elucidated. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗