Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “mixing layer height”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Characterizing Seasonal Variation of the Atmospheric Mixing Layer Height Using Machine Learning Approaches

As machine learning becomes more integrated into atmospheric science, XGBoost has gained popularity for its ability to assess the relative contributions of influencing factors in the atmospheric boundary layer height. To examine how these factors vary across seasons, a seasonal analysis is necessary. However, dividing data by season reduces the sample size, which can affect result reliability and complicate factor comparisons. To address these challenges, this study replaces default parameters with grid search optimization and incorporates cross-validation to mitigate dataset limitations. Using XGBoost with four years of data from the atmospheric radiation measurement (ARM) (Southern Great Plains (SGP) C1 site, cross-validation stabilizes correlation coefficient fluctuations from 0.3 to within 0.1. With optimized parameters, the R value can reach 0.81. Analysis of the C1 site reveals that the relative importance of different factors changes across seasons. Lower tropospheric stability (LTS, ~0.53) is the dominant factor at C1 throughout the year. However, during DJF, latent heat flux (LHF, 0.44) surpasses LTS (0.22). In SON, LTS (0.58) becomes more influential than LHF (0.18). Further comparisons among the four long-term SGP sites (C1, E32, E37, and E39) show seasonal variations in relative importance. Notably, during JJA, the differences in the relative importance of the three factors across all sites are lower than in other seasons. This suggests that boundary layer development in the summer is not dominated by a single factor, reflecting a more intricate process likely influenced by seasonal conditions such as enhanced convective activity, higher temperatures, and humidity, which collectively contribute to a balanced distribution of parameter impacts. Furthermore, the relative importance of LTS gradually increases from morning to noon, indicating that LTS becomes more significant as the boundary layer approaches its maximum height. Consequently, the LTS in the early morning in autumn exhibits greater relative importance compared to other seasons. This reflects a faster development of the mixing layer height (MLH) in autumn, suggesting that it is easier to retrieve the MLH from the previous day during this period. The findings enhance understanding of boundary layer evolution and contribute to improved boundary layer parameterization.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
NASA NTRS1985

Airborne Lidar measurements of aerosols, mixed layer heights, and ozone during the 1980 PEPE/NEROS summer field experiment

A detailed summary of the NASA Ultraviolet Differential Absorption Lidar (UV DIAL) data archive obtained during the EPA Persistent Elevated Pollution Episode/Northeast Regional Oxidant Study (PEPE/NEROS) Summer Field Experiment Program (July through August 1980) is presented. The UV dial data set consists of remote measurements of mixed layer heights, aerosol backscatter cross sections, and sequential ozone profiles taken during 14 long-range flights onboard the NASA Wallops Flight Center Electra aircraft. These data are presented in graphic and tabular form, and they have been submitted to the PEPE/NEROS data archive on digital magnetic tape. The derivation of mixing heights and ozone profiles from UV Dial signals is discussed, and detailed intercomparisons with measurements obtained by in situ sensors are presented.

Browell, E. V.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Mixed Layer Heights Derived from the NASA Langley Research Center Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar

The NASA airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) has been deployed on board the NASA Langley Research Center's B200 aircraft to several locations in North America from 2006 to 2012 to aid in characterizing aerosol properties for over fourteen field missions. Measurements of aerosol extinction (532 nm), backscatter (532 and 1064 nm), and depolarization (532 and 1064 nm) during 349 science flights, many in coordination with other participating research aircraft, satellites, and ground sites, constitute a diverse data set for use in characterizing the spatial and temporal distribution of aerosols, as well as properties and variability of the Mixing Layer (ML) height. We describe the use of the HSRL data collected during these missions for computing ML heights and show how the HSRL data can be used to determine the fraction of aerosol optical thickness within and above the ML, which is important for air quality assessments. We describe the spatial and temporal variations in ML heights found in the diverse locations associated with these experiments. We also describe how the ML heights derived from HSRL have been used to help assess simulations of Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) derived using various models, including the Weather Research and Forecasting Chemistry (WRF-Chem), NASA GEOS-5 model, and the ECMWF/MACC models.

Scarino, Amy J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Further considerations on modeling the sea breeze with a mixed-layer model

Mixed-layer models have been used to simulate low-level flows under a variety of situations, including flow over complex terrain and in the vicinity of coastal zones. The advantage of mixed-layer models compared to multilevel models is their simplicity and minimal computational requirements. A disadvantage is that the atmosphere above the mixed layer is not modeled explicitly and approximations pertaining to this layer become necessary. This paper examines five approximations for treating this upper layer for a simple sea-breeze circulation. Approximating the flow immediately above the mixed-layer height h by the mixed-layer velocity and using this velocity to advect potential temperature above h gives a better simulation of the sea breeze than the approximation used by Anthes et al. (1980), which neglected horizontal advection at this level.

Anthes, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Tropospheric nitric oxide measurements over the Amazon Basin

Horizontal and vertical distributions of nitric oxide (NO) were measured over the Amazon Basin during NASA's Global Tropospheric Experiment (GTE) Amazon Boundary Layer Experiment mission in July-August 1985. During transit flights between the Virginia coast and Manaus, Brazil, NO mixing ratios were 12-15 pptv at 5 km altitude. Values up to 200 pptv were observed in electrically active clouds. During longitudinal surveys over the Amazon region, NO mixing ratios in the lower planetary boundary layer decreased from 25-60 pptv over the central basin to 10-12 pptv in coastal regions. In the convective cloud layer or free troposphere, NO mixing ratios averaged 13 pptv in regions not influenced by biomass burning. No longitudinal trend above the mixed layer could be detected. A steep negative gradient with increasing altitude was noted within the mixed layer before midday. Mixing ratios decreased from 60 pptv at 0.2 km to about 15 pptv at the top of the mixed layer (1 km). By midday, growth of the mixed layer height and enhanced mixing reduced the gradient, and evidence for mixing of NO into the convective cloud layer was noted.

Torres, A. L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Airborne Lidar Measurements of Ozone and Aerosol Profiles Over Major US Metropolitan Areas

During field missions in 2021 and 2023, the airborne NASA Langley Research Center High Spectral Resolution Lidar 2 (HSRL 2) measured the temporal and spatial evolution of ozone and aerosol distributions impacting urban air quality over the four most populated cities in the United States. HSRL-2 measurements in 2021 were acquired over the Houston metropolitan region, including Galveston Bay and the Houston Ship Channel, as part of the NASA Tracking Aerosol Convection Experiment – Air Quality (TRACER-AQ) mission conducted in collaboration with the Department of Energy. HSRL-2 measurements were acquired over Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York City in 2023 as part of the NASA Synergistic TEMPO Air Quality Science (STAQS) mission conducted in collaboration with the NOAA Atmospheric Emissions and Reactions Observed from Megacities to Marine Areas (AEROMMA) mission. HSRL 2 provided nadir vertical profiles of ozone, aerosol backscatter, extinction, and depolarization as the aircraft flew lawnmower type patterns at 9 km for several hours over these urban areas. HSRL-2 measured profiles of aerosol extinction and aerosol optical depth (AOD) via the HSRL technique at 355 and 532 nm and profiles of aerosol backscatter and depolarization at 355, 532, and 1064 nm. Mixed Layer Heights (MLH) were derived by locating sharp vertical gradients in the profiles of aerosol backscatter. The flights were comprised of up to three repeating lawnmower patterns over each city showing the evolution of the ozone and aerosol distributions from the morning through the afternoon. The HSRL-2 measurements reveal ozone enhancements near the surface as well as in the free troposphere above the mixed layer. Some lidar measurements over Chicago and New York City show the daytime boundary layer growing into elevated layers of biomass burning aerosol. These layers complicate efforts to use column-integrated satellite measurements to infer surface air quality. As expected, mixed layer height (MLH) typically increased significantly during the day; however, during some flights, particularly over the Houston area, MLH also showed large spatial variability associated with changes in surface cover and/or small scale circulations. Often HSRL-2 measurements of AOD also showed large spatial and temporal variability throughout the day over these cities. We discuss how the ozone and aerosol profiles are averaged over different vertical and horizontal scales near the surface for use in assessments of regional air quality models and near-surface ozone retrievals from NASA’s recently launched Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring Pollution (TEMPO) satellite.

Lidar↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HSRL-2 Observations over the Houston, TX Region during TRACER-AQ

During field missions in 2021 and 2023, the airborne NASA Langley Research Center High Spectral Resolution Lidar 2 (HSRL 2) measured the temporal and spatial evolution of ozone and aerosol distributions impacting urban air quality over the four most populated cities in the United States. HSRL-2 measurements in 2021 were acquired over the Houston metropolitan region, including Galveston Bay and the Houston Ship Channel, as part of the NASA Tracking Aerosol Convection Experiment – Air Quality (TRACER-AQ) mission conducted in collaboration with the Department of Energy. HSRL-2 measurements were acquired over Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York City in 2023 as part of the NASA Synergistic TEMPO Air Quality Science (STAQS) mission conducted in collaboration with the NOAA Atmospheric Emissions and Reactions Observed from Megacities to Marine Areas (AEROMMA) mission. HSRL 2 provided nadir vertical profiles of ozone, aerosol backscatter, extinction, and depolarization as the aircraft flew lawnmower type patterns at 9 km for several hours over these urban areas. HSRL-2 measured profiles of aerosol extinction and aerosol optical depth (AOD) via the HSRL technique at 355 and 532 nm and profiles of aerosol backscatter and depolarization at 355, 532, and 1064 nm. Mixed Layer Heights (MLH) were derived by locating sharp vertical gradients in the profiles of aerosol backscatter. The flights were comprised of up to three repeating lawnmower patterns over each city showing the evolution of the ozone and aerosol distributions from the morning through the afternoon. The HSRL-2 measurements reveal ozone enhancements near the surface as well as in the free troposphere above the mixed layer. Some lidar measurements over Chicago and New York City show the daytime boundary layer growing into elevated layers of biomass burning aerosol. These layers complicate efforts to use column-integrated satellite measurements to infer surface air quality. As expected, mixed layer height (MLH) typically increased significantly during the day; however, during some flights, particularly over the Houston area, MLH also showed large spatial variability associated with changes in surface cover and/or small scale circulations. Often HSRL-2 measurements of AOD also showed large spatial and temporal variability throughout the day over these cities. We discuss how the ozone and aerosol profiles are averaged over different vertical and horizontal scales near the surface for use in assessments of regional air quality models and near-surface ozone retrievals from NASA’s recently launched Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring Pollution (TEMPO) satellite.

Lidar↗
NASA NTRS1984

Mixed Layers and Satellite Retrievals

As part of the process to determine whether it is possible to retrieve boundary layer structure with the current sounding techniques, temperature retievals were performed for radiosonde profiles that showed temperature inversions. It was found that when temperature inversions exceed 8 to 10 C a retrieval will indeed show a temperature increase with height over a limited vertical distance. For weaker inversions retrieved temperatures are generally smoothly decreasing with height. It is, however, impossible to determine the actual mixed layer height from the retrievals. Whether the water vapor channels could be used in observing mixed layer structure was investigated. Temperature inversions are accompanied by significant drops in relative humidity. While this effect is very pronounced in parts of the trade wind regimes with relative humidity drops of up to 60%, it is widespread in other areas of the ocean as well. A simulation experiment was performed in which brightness temperatures were computed for smooth temperature and humidity profiles and compared with those computed from inversion profiles.

Boers, R.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Testing Extensions of Our Quantitative Daily of San Joaquin Wintertime Aerosols Using MAIAC and Meteorology Without Transport/Transformation Assumptions

The Western US and many regions globally present daunting difficulties in understanding and mapping PM2.5 episodes. We evaluate extensions of a method independent of source-description and transport/transformation. These regions suffer frequent few-day episodes due to shallow mixing; low satellite AOT and bright surfaces complicate the description. Nevertheless, we expect residual errors in our maps of less than 8 ug/m^3 in episodes reaching 60-100 ug/m^3; maps which detail pollution from Interstate 5. Our current success is due to use of physically meaningful functions of MODIS-MAIAC-derived AOD, afternoon mixed-layer height, and relative humidity for a basin in which the latter are correlated. A mixed-effects model then describes a daily AOT-to-PM2.5 relationship. (Note: in other published mixed-effects models, AOT contributes minimally. We seek to extend on these to develop useful estimation methods for similar situations. We evaluate existing but more spotty information on size distribution (AERONET, MISR, MAIA, CALIPSO, other remote sensing). We also describe the usefulness of an equivalent mixing depth for water vapor vs meteorological boundary layer height. Each has virtues and limitations. Finally, we begin to evaluate methods for removing the complications due to detached but polluted layers (which don't mix to the surface) using geographical, meteorological, and remotely sensed data.

Chatfield, Robert B.↗
DOE OSTI2026

The Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Clear Convective Boundary Layer at the ARM SGP Supersite

The convective boundary layer (CBL), also known as the mixing layer, constitutes the critical lower segment of the atmosphere that significantly influences daily human activities. The growing demand for precise weather forecasts is driven by the requirements of agriculture, transportation, and routine societal functions. Here, to enhance understanding of the CBL, this study investigates the spatiotemporal variability in the CBL and its controlling factors using four-year Doppler lidar, surface flux, and profiling measurements at five ARM Southern Great Plains sites within a 100 km radius. This investigation utilizes data collected exclusively under clear-sky conditions or scattered low-cloud conditions. Results reveal significant spatial differences in CBL evolutions. Daily mixing layer heights (MLHs) vary up to 1 km (30% of the mean) in late afternoon. There is a clear east–west contrast: western sites (C1, E32, E37) exhibit higher summer MLH (1.9–2.1 km) and vertical velocity variances (1.0–1.2 m 2 s −2 ) than eastern sites (1.6–1.8 km), reversing in winter. Temporally, the MLH peaks at 70% of the sunrise–sunset interval, the lagging heat flux (HF) peaks at 50%; and the seasonal MLH maxima lag the HF by approximately one month, influenced by nighttime PBL (planetary boundary layer) properties. The HF and lower tropospheric stability are the main factors of influence for the CBL, but site-specific dependencies highlight the critical roles of local factors, underscoring the need for including them in CBL modeling.

ARM SGP site↗
NASA NTRS1988

Efficiency of shear induced entrainment in convectively mixed layers

Lidar data of mixed layer height are used to compare the model of process partitioning to that of Eulerian partitioning. It is found that the Eulerian partitioning model more closely follows the data and that the process partitioning model underpredicts the mixed layer depth. The results suggest that shear production and consumption of turbulent kinetic energy at the mixed layer top are local processes.

Boers, Reinout↗
NASA NTRS1990

Stratus: An interactive steady state mixed layer model for personal computers

A steady-state, horizontally homogeneous, cloud-topped marine boundary layer model based primarily on the work of Lilly (1968) and Schubert et al., (1979) is presented. The conservative thermodynamic variables are equivalent potential temperature, theta(sub e), and total water mixing ratio, q + l. Some of the differences between this and Lilly's (1968) model are: radiation is allowed to penetrate into the boundary layer; cloud top values of longwave radiation, equivalent potential temperature, and water vapor mixing ratio are linear functions of height derived from climatological data at California coastal stations; and the closure assumption assumes a weighted average of Lilly's (1968) maximum and minimum entrainment theories. This model was programmed in FORTRAN and will run interactively on an IBM-compatible personal computer. The program allows the user to specify the geographical location, the wind speed, the sea-surface temperature, the large scale horizontal divergence, and the initial guess for cloud top height. Output includes the steady state values of cloud top and cloud base height, mixed layer equivalent potential temperature and total water mixing ratio, and the associated convective and radiative fluxes.

Guinn, Thomas A.↗
DOE OSTI2025

WFIP3 - NOAA SHIP site - NREL Ceilometer (Vaisala CL51) / Derived Data

NOAA SHIP ceilometer: netCDF L3 data files have level 3 (L3) data that have gone through the calculation service and contain all the data from the algorithms, including mixing layer height values, and quality index data. L3 default files contain L3 data that use the default preset for a live plot. File naming schema: L3_DEFAULT_ _YYYYMMDDHHMM_ _ .nc Name Description: L3 Identification of the data level DEFAULT Identification of the L3 file type CUSTOM OFFLINE STATION_NUMBER WMO station number, if defined YYYYMMDDHHMM UTC time ParameterKey Identification of the advanced algorithm settings. See the table below for an explanation. FREE_FORMAT File suffix, if defined

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

WFIP3 - CACO site - NREL Ceilometer (Vaisala CL51) / Derived Data

CACO ceilometer: netCDF L3 data files have level 3 (L3) data that have gone through the calculation service and contain all the data from the algorithms, including mixing layer height values, and quality index data. L3 default files contain L3 data that use the default preset for a live plot. File naming schema: L3_DEFAULT_ _YYYYMMDDHHMM_ _ .nc Name Description: L3 Identification of the data level DEFAULT Identification of the L3 file type CUSTOM OFFLINE STATION_NUMBER WMO station number, if defined YYYYMMDDHHMM UTC time ParameterKey Identification of the advanced algorithm settings. See the table below for an explanation. FREE_FORMAT File suffix, if defined

17 WIND ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS1980

Summary of aircraft results for 1978 southeastern Virginia urban plume measurement study of ozone, nitrogen oxides, and methane

Ozone production was determined from aircraft and surface in situ measurements, as well as from an airborne laser absorption spectrometer. Three aircraft and approximately 10 surface stations provided air-quality data. Extensive meteorological, mixing-layer-height, and ozone-precursor data were also measured. Approximately 50 hrs (9 flight days) of data from the aircraft equipped to monitor ozone, nitrogen oxides, dewpoint temperature, and temperature are presented. In addition, each experiment conducted is discussed.

Gregory, G. L.↗
NASA NTRS1981

In situ correlative measurements for the ultraviolet differential absorption lidar and the high spectral resolution lidar air quality remote sensors: 1980 PEPE/NEROS program

In situ correlative measurements were obtained with a NASA aircraft in support of two NASA airborne remote sensors participating in the Environmental Protection Agency's 1980persistent elevated pollution episode (PEPE) and Northeast regional oxidant study (NEROS) field program in order to provide data for evaluating the capability of two remote sensors for measuring mixing layer height, and ozone and aerosol concentrations in the troposphere during the 1980 PEPE/NEROS program. The in situ aircraft was instrumented to measure temperature, dewpoint temperature, ozone concentrations, and light scattering coefficient. In situ measurements for ten correlative missions are given and discussed. Each data set is presented in graphical and tabular format aircraft flight plans are included.

Gregory, G. L.↗