Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium sulfur battery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Size-Selective Nanoporous Atomically Thin Graphene Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) are extensively researched for their high energy densities but are hindered by the lithium polysulfide (LiPS) shuttling effect, which results in poor cyclability. A popular mitigation strategy is separator modification, where a LiPS trapping material is slurry-coated onto a conventional microporous polypropylene (PP) separator. This additional mass and volume unfortunately compromise the overall energy density of the LSB. This study aims to take a separator modification approach that avoids this issue. Nanoporous atomically thin membranes (NATMs) made of graphene are gaining attention for their scalable synthesis, tunable pore size, and negligible pore length. Herein, we apply a well-characterized graphene NATM for reasons similar to those of a size-selective interlayer in LSBs. The tailored pore size of ∼0.7–1.0 nm and atomic thinness facilitate the passage of Li + (solvated ionic diameters ∼0.54–1.26 nm) and blockage of larger LiPS (solvated ionic diameters ∼0.81–1.69 nm) without adding significant impedances or mass. The sulfur confinement is confirmed through scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy elemental analysis of the Li anode. An LSB with a NATM@PP separator shows virtually no capacity loss over 150 cycles, demonstrating efficacy of size-selective molecular sieving using NATMs in LSBs.

battery separator↗
DOE OSTI2026

Fe-single atom catalysts facilitate fast electron transfer with MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes in lithium–sulfur batteries

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) emerge as promising next-generation energy storage systems offering cost-effectiveness, environmental friendliness, and high theoretical energy density. The practical implementation of LSBs faces significant hindrances due to the shuttle effect and sluggish redox reactions. To address these challenges, single-atom catalyst (SAC) based combination materials from d-block elements can offer increased active catalytic sites, rapid charge transfer, accelerated electron migration, and fast sulfur redox conversion kinetics of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). In this study, we fabricated three different LSB cathodes: pure S, S@MoS 2 /SnS 2 , and S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 . These cathodes were then used to explore the cycle life, capacity, rate capability, and redox kinetic reactions of LiPSs while assessing the influence of Fe-SACs on their performance. As a result, LSBs with S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes demonstrate an extended cycle life of 1000 cycles at a C-rate of 0.2C, maintaining a capacity close to 500 mA h g −1 , the highest initial discharge capacity of 1622 mA h g −1 and 1066 mA h g −1 at 0.05C and 0.2C, and excellent rate capabilities of 708 mA h g −1 and 558 mA h g −1 at 1C and 2C, respectively. The synergistic effect of the Fe-SAC-based combination cathode (S@Fe–MoS 2 /SnS 2 ) creates plentiful adsorptive and highly active catalytic sites, resulting in substantially enhanced capacity for adsorbing soluble long-chain LiPSs. This facilitates ultra-fast redox kinetics, surpassing the performance of the S@MoS 2 /SnS 2 and pure S cathodes. In the ex situ analysis, results from powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) to observe the new phase, soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to investigate the electronic structure, and hard X-ray photoelectron microscopy (HAXPES) with different energies (900 eV, 2000 eV, and 6000 eV) to track the chemical-state evolution of Fe-SACs in MoS 2 /SnS 2 cathodes displayed notable electrochemical reversibility involving S 8 ⇄ LiPSs ⇄ Li 2 S conversion even after 1000 cycles. Additionally, in situ, operando Raman analysis can unveil a novel catalytic mechanism of Fe-SACs in MoS 2 /SnS 2 “facilitating rapid electron transfer” during the discharge and charge processes of LSBs involving the conversion of S 8 ⇄ long-chain LiPSs ⇄ Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S. This study elucidates the working mechanism of Fe-SAC cathodes, offering insights into overcoming the shuttle effect and facilitating sulfur redox kinetics to advance commercial LSBs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Development of Electrolytes under Lean Condition in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries stand out as one of the promising candidates for next-generation electrochemical energy storage technologies. A key requirement to realize high-specific-energy Li–S batteries is to implement low amount of electrolyte, often characterized by the electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio. Low E/S ratio aggravates the known challenges for Li–S batteries and introduces new ones originated from the high concentration of polysulfides in limited electrolyte reservoir. Here, in this review, the connections between the fundamental properties of electrolytes and the electrochemical/chemical reactions in Li–S batteries under lean electrolyte condition are elucidated. The emphasis is on how the solvating properties of the electrolyte affect the fate of polysulfides. Built upon the mechanistic analysis, different strategies to design lean electrolytes to improve the overall process of Li–S reactions and Li anode protection are discussed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Quantitative insights for diagnosing performance bottlenecks in lithium–sulfur batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries hold significant promise for electric vehicles and aviation due to their high energy density and cost-effectiveness. However, understanding the root causes of performance degradation remains a formidable challenge, as the interplay of multiple factors obscures key failure mechanisms. A major limitation has been the inability to quantify soluble sulfur species within practical detection limits accurately and to correlate electrochemical processes with associated physical inventory changes. Here, we introduce the high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectroscopy and gas chromatography sequential characterization (HUGS) toolkit, capable of precisely quantifying seven distinct sulfur and polysulfide species at concentrations as low as 40 ppb. HUGS has been successfully applied to practical coin and pouch cells without requiring cell modification. Furthermore, our self-developed software, Dr HUGS, enhanced the data analysis speed by over 30 times, enabling multi-source data integration and delivering comprehensive analysis results within minutes. Using HUGS, we identify significant capacity losses from inactive lithium and sulfur during initial cycles and sulfide-rich solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation on the anode during later cycles. Notably, our findings reveal that soluble polysulfides have minimal contributions to capacity loss, challenging long-standing assumptions. Moreover, HUGS demonstrates that constant-pressure setups in Li–S pouch cells improve compositional uniformity compared to constant-gap configurations. For sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) cathodes, unique issues such as non-sulfide SEI formation and lithium pulverization are observed, which can be mitigated through localized high-concentration electrolytes to enhance lithium inventory retention. By enabling precise quantification of critical inventory components, HUGS provides transformative insights into failure mechanisms across various electrolytes and cathode chemistries, guiding rational design strategies for next-generation energy storage systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Modulating Li + and Polysulfide Solvation with Low-Density Moderately Solvating Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries show great promise as the next-generation rechargeable batteries, yet they still suffer from polysulfide shuttling and interphasial instability. Electrolyte, as the medium for ion transport and sulfur conversion, plays a crucial role in overcoming these challenges. Here, we introduce a moderately solvating electrolyte (MSE) based on low-density, low-viscosity, and nonfluorinated ether co-solvents that balances polysulfide suppression, Li metal stabilization, and redox kinetics. Through multiple solvent–solvent and solvent-ion interactions, the optimized MSE weakens Li + -solvent pairing while strengthening cation–anion interactions, thereby lowering the desolvation barrier and promoting the formation of a favorable solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI). Meanwhile, MSE limits the polysulfide dissolution but improves the accessibility of active material through better wettability and tailored solvation environment, leading to an altered sulfur deposition mechanism with β – α conversion. This approach enables a stable cycling of high-mass loading Li–S cells (> 3.5 mg cm -2 ) at both room temperature and 45 °C (where shuttling and side reactions are severer), and demonstrates a pouch cell with lean electrolyte content (4.5 µL mg s -1 ). This work highlights a practical route to develop high-performance electrolyte for Li–S cells and provides mechanistic insights into their operation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Revisiting the Impact of Anion Selection on Sulfur Redox Reaction Kinetics for High Sulfur Loading Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) is widely used in lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery electrolytes due to its stability with lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and moderate compatibility with lithium metal anodes. However, LiTFSI presents environmental concerns due to its association with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are environmentally persistent and potentially toxic, raises sustainability concerns. This research also reveals that LiTFSI limits sulfur redox reactions (SRRs), making it less effective than other lithium salts. Additionally, some salts previously considered incompatible with Li-S systems due to their reactivity with LiPSs are demonstrated to perform effectively. For the first time, a protective, porous cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) formed in situ through reactions between salt anions and LiPS is reported. The cells delivered a high specific capacity of 1230.8 mAh g −1 at 0.05 C with a sulfur loading of ≈6 mg cm −2 , limited lithium anode, maintaining a capacity retention of 76.2% after 100 cycles at 0.1 C. Under harsh conditions, such as high sulfur loading, lean electrolyte conditions (3 µL mg −1 ), and in anode-free cells, the cells continued to deliver outstanding capacity. This work provides valuable guidelines for understanding and selecting lithium salts to advance electrolyte design for Li–S batteries.

high loading batteries↗
DOE OSTI2025

Design Strategies Based on Electronic Interactions for Effective Catalysts in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) are considered promising next‐generation batteries due to their high energy density (>500 W h kg −1 ). However, LSBs exhibit an unsatisfactory energy density (<400 W h kg −1 ) and cycle life (<300 cycles) because of the shuttle effect caused by soluble lithium polysulfide (LiPS) intermediates and the sluggish conversion reaction kinetics caused by insulating sulfur (S 8 ) and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S). Although various types of catalysts, including metal‐based compounds to single‐atom catalysts, have been reported to address these issues, most catalysts exhibited limited catalytic activity under practical lean electrolyte conditions (<5 µL mg −1 ). A comprehensive understanding of the synthetic strategy and catalytic mechanism of catalysts is essential for their design, but understanding the electronic effects of the catalysts and LiPS is more important. Furthermore, the electronic design of these catalysts is not well understood. In this review, we introduce the catalytic mechanisms in LSBs and discuss catalyst design strategies in terms of electronic effects on the interactions between reactants and catalysts, with a primary focus on heterogeneous catalytic systems. We additionally consider how the electronic property of homogeneous systems, particularly redox mediators, affects catalytic behavior under lean electrolyte conditions and propose future research directions for catalyst development in LSBs.

Chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2026

Effect of Antagonistic Binder–Catalyst Interactions on Catalytic Activity in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are a promising next-generation energy storage solution, as they can reduce reliance on critical transition metals while offering high energy densities. However, their deployment is hindered by low sulfur utilization and the formation/diffusion of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). While transition-metal catalysts and polymeric binders have been independently developed to enhance redox kinetics and LiPS adsorption, their mutual compatibility has remained largely unexplored. We show here that binder-catalyst interactions can significantly impact catalytic performance. Employing TiO 2 as a generic catalyst, the electrochemical performance is shown to depend strongly on the binder environment. TiO 2 paired with lithiated polyacrylic acid (LiPAA) shows benign interactions, resulting in enhanced cycle life. In contrast, pairing TiO 2 with protonated PAA produces antagonistic interactions that hinder Li 2 S growth. A mechanistic analysis unveils that the carboxylic H atom in PAA promotes COO − coordination to Ti sites, occupying catalytic centers and suppressing LiPS adsorption, increasing charge transfer and diffusion resistances. This phenomenon is observed across multiple catalysts, indicating that COOH-functionalized binders may broadly hinder catalytic activity. Overall, this study underscores the need for holistic cathode design and identifies binder-catalyst compatibility as an important parameter for high-performance Li-S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Metal–Organic Framework-derived Atomic Metal Sites Promoting Sulfur Cathode for All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

All-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) offer high energy density and intrinsic safety; however, they still face major challenges, including sluggish redox kinetics and poor sulfur utilization. Incorporating conductive materials into sulfur cathodes is an effective strategy to mitigate these limitations. Here, a highly conductive cobalt–nitrogen–doped carbon (Co–NC) derived from a metal–organic framework (MOF) is introduced to accelerate charge transfer and promote reversible sulfur conversion. Co−NC provides atomically dispersed Co–N sites and conductive carbon pathways that correlate with improved charge transfer, sulfur utilization, and rate capability. Co–NC@S cathode delivers 1499 mAh g–1 at C/20 with a high sulfur loading (5 mg cm–2) and retains 1292 mAh g–1 after five cycles (vs 443 mAh g–1 without Co–NC). Moreover, Co–NC derived ASSLSB achieves 903 mAh g–1 at 5C at 60 °C. This work provides a practical and effective approach to develop high energy, high-rate ASSLSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

3D printing of architected sulfur cathodes with dual-site atomic catalysts for accelerated polysulfide kinetics and Li-ion transport in high areal-loading lithium–sulfur batteries

The practical deployment of lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is hindered by fundamental limitations in conventional slurry-cast cathodes, including poor sulfur utilization, sluggish ion transport, and low areal capacity, particularly in thick electrodes required for high energy density. To address these challenges, we present direct ink writing (DIW) as an additive manufacturing strategy to fabricate advanced current-collector-free, 3D-printed sulfur cathodes (3DP S@CoNi-DSACs/NC) with hierarchically porous architectures that enhance lithium-ion diffusion, promote electrolyte penetration, and reduce interfacial resistance. The synergistic effects of Co/Ni dual-atom sites accelerate redox kinetics and mitigate polysulfide shuttling. As a result, the optimized 3DP cathode with a sulfur loading of 5.4 mg cm −2 demonstrated excellent rate capability, delivering a high reversible capacity of 1041.4 mAh g −1 at 1C with 85.5% capacity retention after 1000 cycles, significantly outperforming its cast counterpart. Remarkably, even at a higher sulfur loading of 8.1 mg cm −2 , the 3DP cathode maintains outstanding performance, achieving a discharge capacity of 1538.4 mAh g −1 and an areal capacity of 12.5 mAh cm −2 at 0.1C. This study not only demonstrates the functional integration of catalytically active materials into 3D printable sulfur cathode architectures but also offers a scalable and transformative platform for building high-performance LSBs beyond conventional electrode manufacturing methods.

3D electrode↗
DOE OSTI2025

Electrolyte strategies for practically viable all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

All-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising platform due to their high gravimetric energy density and enhanced safety. However, they face numerous challenges that currently obstruct commercial adoption. The key to overcoming these challenges lies in the rational selection and targeted development of solid-state electrolytes, where different materials classes present distinct trade-offs between performance and practicality. We assert that sulfide electrolytes offer the best compatibility with the cathode and anode requirements for practical sulfur cells, with halides and borohydrides also showing potential for use in the cathode with further development. We provide cell-level target parameters to ensure that the field moves consistently towards commercial relevance. Looking forward, we call for the adoption of the chlorinated argyrodite with a composition range of Li 6-x PS 5-x Cl 1+x (x = 0 - 0.5) as a standardized solid-state electrolyte to enable rigorous benchmarking across the field and accelerate battery development.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Fluorinated Lewis Acidic Organoboron Tunes Polysulfide Complex Structure for High–Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Many challenges in lithium-sulfur (Li–S) batteries are associated with the radical change in lithium polysulfide (LPS) solubility during cycling, but chemical approaches to address such inconsistency are still lacking. Here, the use of a strong Lewis acidic fluorinated organoboron, tri(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) borate (TFEB), is reported as a multi-functional mediator to simultaneously overcome multiple technical barriers in practical Li–S batteries. TFEB acts as an anion acceptor and forms strong molecular complexes with Lewis basic LPS. The TFEB-LPS complexes have consistent solubility across the full polysulfide spectrum and deliver several times improved better redox kinetics, unlocking a true redox catalytic mechanism that covers the majority of redox events in thick sulfur cathodes. As a result, Li–S batteries evaluated under practical conditions exhibit significantly improved discharge capacity, rate capability, and cycling stability with the addition of the TFEB additive. More importantly, TFEB also contributes to the stabilization of lithium anode in the presence of polysulfides by generating strong interfacial film. These attributes significantly improve the cycling stability of practical Li–S pouch cells, which are assembled with a unit energy density of 219 Wh kg –1 . Finally, the results provide new molecular insights on the design of unlocking solvation networks of practical Li–S systems.

77 NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2026

Deciphering the Dynamic Balance Between Solvation Strength and Polysulfides Reaction Heterogeneity in Practical Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Achieving stable interfacial chemistry in lithium–sulfur batteries under practical conditions remains a key barrier to commercialization. Here, we demonstrate that interfacial dynamics can be effectively regulated by coupling solvation-power control with intrinsic heterogeneity of sulfur redox chemistry through the introduction of a weakly solvating fluorinated cosolvent, LIB 1200ET (1200ET). Compared with conventional fluorinated ethers, 1200ET efficiently shifts Li + solvation environment toward a more non-coordinated configuration at low volume fractions, enabling substantial solvation modulation without significantly impairing sulfur redox kinetics. This solvation transition weakens Li + –solvent interactions while strengthening Li + –anion and Li + –lithium polysulfide (LPS) coordination, suppressing LPS solubility and promoting reconstruction of solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI). Regulated LPS chemistry, together with 1200ET, leads to formation of a S 4+ -rich, LiF-reinforced SEI with enhanced ionic conductivity and mechanical robustness. Spatially resolved sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy on pouch cells reveals pronounced current-density-dependent chemical heterogeneity, distinguishing kinetically dominated and solvation-controlled regions. Under practical conditions (3.7 mg cm −2 sulfur loading, E/S = 6 µL mg −1 ), a single-layer pouch cell delivers 527 mAh g −1 over 200 cycles at C/3, while an Ah-level multilayer pouch cell achieves an energy density of 358 Wh kg −1 . These results establish non-coordinating cosolvent-driven solvation engineering as a scalable strategy for practical Li–S batteries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Improving Cell-Level Specific Energy for All-Solid-State Lithium Sulfur Batteries

All-solid-state lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are considered as one of the top choices toward 500 Wh/kg of specific energy, a key metric for an energy storage system to enable large regional electric aircrafts. Many obstacles remain, such as S utilization in the cathode, cyclability regarding both cathode and anode as well as electrode-electrolyte interfaces, and effective means to increase the S content within the all-solid-state cell architecture. The latter is directly related to cell-level specific energy when considering the weights of all battery cell components. In this presentation, we discuss the efforts in both cathode optimization and cell-level improvement toward increasing the overall specific energy. Various strategies for improving S utilization and reducing the solid electrolyte layer thickness will be presented.

Solid state batteries↗
DOE OSTI2026

A Holistic Stabilization of the Anode in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries Through a Ternary Alloy Fusion

The anode in lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is plagued by not only inhomogeneous lithium (Li) deposition, but also by parasitic side-reactions. Often, a thick anode (∼400 µm) is used to compensate for these drawbacks, lowering gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. In this work, we demonstrate a ternary alloy anode fabricated via scalable thermal fusion of Li with aluminum (Al) and tellurium (Te) to cohesively address these issues. The Al–Li skeleton serves to homogenize Li deposition as well as reinforce the anode, allowing it to be rolled down to low thicknesses. Te incorporation suppresses the reaction of Li with polysulfides (Li 2 Sn) to form lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) and electrolyte degradation. It can also facilitate the formation of polytellurosulfides (Li 2 Te x Sy), which are far more conducive to Li + -ion diffusion. Even under a lean electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio of 8 µL mg −1 and a low negative/positive (N/P) ratio of 3, capacities over 900 mA h g −1 at a C/5 rate are obtained in cells with Li–Te–Al anodes with a capacity retention of 80% after 70 cycles. In comparison, the baseline lithium-metal anode retains only 35% after 50 cycles. Furthermore, the Li–Te–Al anodes confer a 24% boost to gravimetric energy density at the pouch cell level.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Designing Moderately‐Solvating Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

New electrolytes are critical for high‐energy lithium (Li)–sulfur (S) batteries (LSBs) to ensure their stability against Li metal anode and polysulfides (PSs) shuttling which hinder the large‐scale application of LSBs. In this study, the design principle of moderately solvating electrolytes (MSEs) for LSBs is demonstrated by using a multiple‐solvent system comprising of a highly solvating solvent, a weakly solvating solvent, and a non‐solvating solvent to create a well‐balanced electrolyte system. This resulting electrolyte significantly improves the cycle life of LSBs, achieving 300 cycles, which is twice as long as that of similar cells with the conventional electrolyte and it also ensures stable calendar life for at least seven months. The optimal MSE forms robust passivation layers enhancing the structural integrity of both S and Li metal electrodes after cycling. These virtues effectively hinder parasitic side reactions and self‐discharge behavior of LSBs. This electrolyte design principle is versatile and can be applied to other battery chemistries, providing a potential path toward the development of a more efficient and stable battery system. By addressing key challenges such as the instability of electrodes and shuttling of polysulfides, this electrolyte approach offers promising solutions for advancing LSB technology.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

High‐Loading Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries with Solvent‐Free Dry‐Electrode Processing

Abstract Lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries, with their high energy density, nontoxicity, and the natural abundance of sulfur, hold immense potential as the next‐generation energy storage technology. To maximize the actual energy density of the Li‐S batteries for practical applications, it is crucial to escalate the areal capacity of the sulfur cathode by fabricating an electrode with high sulfur loading. Herein, ultra‐high sulfur loading (up to 12 mg cm −2 ) cathodes are fabricated through an industrially viable and sustainable solvent‐free dry‐processing method that utilizes a polytetrafluoroethylene binder fibrillation. Due to its low porosity cathode architecture formed by the binder fibrillation process, the dry‐processed electrodes exhibit a relatively lower initial capacity compared to the slurry‐processed electrode. However, its mechanical stability is well maintained throughout the cycling without the formation of electrode cracking, demonstrating significantly superior cycling stability. Additionally, through the optimization of the dry‐processing, a single‐layer pouch cell with a loading of 9 mg cm −2 and a novel multi‐layer pouch cell that uses an aluminum mesh as its current collector with a total loading of 14 mg cm −2 are introduced. To address the reduced initial capacity of dry‐processed electrodes, strategies such as incorporating electrocatalysts or employing prelithiated active materials are suggested.

Chemistry↗