Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium recovery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1971

Damage and recovery characteristics of lithium-containing solar cells.

Damage and recovery characteristics were measured on lithium-containing solar cells irradiated by 1-MeV electrons. Empirical expressions for cell recovery time, diffusion-length damage coefficient immediately after irradiation, and diffusion-length damage coefficient after recovery were derived using results of short-circuit current, diffusion-length, and reverse-bias capacitance measurements. The damage coefficients were expressed in terms of a single lithium density parameter, the lithium gradient. A fluence dependence was also established, this dependence being the same for both the immediate-post-irradiation and post-recovery cases. Cell recovery rates were found to increase linearly with lithium gradient.

Faith, T. J.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Density and fluence dependence of lithium cell damage and recovery characteristics

Experimental results on lithium-containing solar cells point toward the lithium donor density gradient dN sub L/dw as being the crucial parameter in the prediction of cell behavior after irradiation by electrons. Recovery measurements on a large number of oxygen-rich and oxygen-lean lithium cells have confirmed that cell recovery speed is directly proportional to the value of the lithium gradient for electron fluences. Gradient measurements have also been correlated with lithium diffusion schedules. Results have shown that long diffusion times (25 h) with a paint-on source result in large cell-to-cell variations in gradient, probably due to a loss of the lithium source with time.

Faith, T. J.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Degradation and recovery mechanisms in lithium-doped solar cells

Several groups of lithium-doped solar cells have been evaluated under 1-MeV electron irradiation. Many of these groups indicated superior electrical output after irradiation and recovery as compared to similarly irradiated n/p solar cells. The superior cells are those with lithium concentrations of 2 to 5 x 10 to the 14th power atoms per cu cm at the junction. An irradiation of lithium-doped cells with 28-MeV electrons indicated a tenfold advantage of lithium-doped cells over n/p cells. Studies of the changes in the lithium concentration during recovery have shown the amounts of lithium reacting is highly nonlinear in regard to the electron fluence and varies greatly with distance from the junction. The results indicate that precipitation of lithium on radiation defects may be the cause of recovery rather than ion pairing.

Downing, R. G.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Forward Osmosis Brine Drying

The Forward Osmosis Brine Drying (FOBD) system is based on a technique called forward osmosis (FO). FO is a membrane-based process where the osmotic potential between brine and a salt solution is equalized by the movement of water from the brine to the salt solution. The FOBD system is composed of two main elements, the FO bag and the salt regeneration system. This paper discusses the results of testing of the FO bag to determine the maximum water recovery ratio that can be attained using this technology. Testing demonstrated that the FO bag is capable of achieving a maximum brine water recovery ratio of the brine of 95%. The equivalent system mass was calculated to be 95 kg for a feed similar to the concentrated brine generated on the International Space Station and 86 kg for an Exploration brine. The results have indicated that the FOBD can process all the brine for a one year mission for between 11% to 10% mass required to bring the water needed to make up for water lost in the brine if not recycled. The FOBD saves 685 kg and when treating the International Space Station brine and it saves 829 kg when treating the Exploration brine. It was also demonstrated that saturated salt solutions achieve a higher water recovery ratios than solids salts do and that lithium chloride achieved a higher water recovery ratio than sodium chloride.

Brine↗
NASA NTRS1971

Dependence of defect introduction on temperature and resistivity and some long-term annealing effects

The effort reported here represents data of lithium properties in bulk-silicon samples before and after irradiation for analytical information required to characterize the interactions of lithium with radiation-induced defects in silicon. A model of the damage and recovery mechanisms in irradiated-lithium-containing solar cells is developed based on making measurements of the Hall coefficient and resistivity of samples irradiated by 1-MeV electrons. Experiments on bulk samples included Hall coefficient and resistivity measurements taken as a function of: (1) bombardment temperature, (2) resistivity, (3) fluence, (4) oxygen concentration, and (5) annealing time at temperatures from 300 to 373 K.

Brucker, G. J.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Radiation damage annealing kinetics

Various spectral response studies are reported that assess lithium doping effects on the recovery process of electron damaged silicon solar cells. Measurements of both the minority carrier lifetimes and the energy level spectrum of the defects are used to predict lifetime damage constants and carrier removal rates relevant to the operation of the solar lithium-doped cell and its annealing kinetics.

Dresselhaus, M. S.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Radiation damage and annealing of lithium-doped silicon solar cells

Evidence has been presented that a lithium-diffused crucible-grown silicon solar cell can be made with better efficiency than the flight-quality n p 10 ohms-cm solar cell. When this lithium cell is exposed to a continuous radiation evironment at 60 C (electron spectrum from gamma rays) it has a higher power output than the N/P cell after a fluence equivalent to 1 MeV. A comparison of annealing of proton- and electron-damage in this lithium cell reveals a decidedly faster rate of recovery and higher level of recoverable power from the proton effects. Therefore, the lithium cell shows a good potential for many space missions where the proton flux is a significant fraction of the radiation field to be encountered.

Statler, R. L.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Voltage and power relationships in lithium-containing solar cells.

Photovoltaic characteristics have been measured on a large number of crucible-grown lithium-containing solar cells irradiated by 1-MeV electrons to fluences ranging from 3 x 10 to the 13th power to 3 x 10 to the 15th power electrons per sq cm. These measurements have established empirical relationships between cell photovoltaic parameters and lithium donor density gradient. Short-circuit current and maximum power measured immediately after irradiation decrease logarithmically with lithium gradient. Open-circuit voltage increases logarithmically with lithium gradient both immediately after irradiation and after recovery, the degree of recovery being strongly gradient-dependent at high fluence. As a result, the maximum power and the power at 0.43 V after recovery from 3 x 10 to the 15th power electrons per sq cm increase with increasing lithium gradient.

Faith, T. J.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Extended duration orbiter study: CO2 removal and water recovery

Two electrochemical depolarized carbon dioxide concentrator subsystems were evaluated against baseline lithium hydroxide for (1) the baseline orbiter when expanded to accommodate a crew of seven (mission option one), (2) an extended duration orbiter with a power extension package to reduce fuel cell expendables (mission option two), and (3) an extended duration orbiter with a full capability power module to eliminate fuel cell expendables (mission option three). The electrochemical depolarized carbon dioxide concentrator was also compared to the solid amine regenerable carbon dioxide removal concept. Water recovery is not required for Mission Option One since sufficient water is generated by the fuel cells. The vapor compression distillation subsystem was evaluated for mission option two and three only. Weight savings attainable using the vapor compression distillation subsystem for water recovery versus on-board water storage were determined. Combined carbon dioxide removal and water recovery was evaluated to determine the effect on regenerable carbon dioxide removal subsystem selection.

Marshall, R. D.↗