Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium iron phosphate”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Three-dimensional phase evolution and stress-induced non-uniform Li intercalation behavior in lithium iron phosphate

A lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) olivine cathode displays rich phase transition behavior during charging/discharging. Despite extensive studies, the evolution of the LiFePO 4 /FePO 4 two-phase coexistence structure and the underlying mechanism are still a point of debate due to the intricate and often disparate phase morphologies observed. Here we apply phase-field simulations to provide detailed insights into the three-dimensional phase evolution process in LiFePO 4 upon delithiation under a large driving force. The simulation reveals that the coherency stress arising from the LiFePO 4 /FePO 4 lattice mismatch destabilizes the initially flat delithiation front and induces filamentary growth of the FePO 4 phase along [010], which is in excellent agreement with a recent operando X-ray imaging study. The combined simulation and experimental results provide the first illustration of the phenomenon of stress-induced instability of the lithium (de)intercalation front in battery electrode compounds. We show that this phenomenon is facilitated by the surface mode of coherent spinodal decomposition in LiFePO 4 and influenced by the anisotropies of misfit strain, elasticity and lithium diffusion. It is detrimental to battery performance and life by causing stress concentration and reducing the lithium (de)intercalation kinetics and thus should be mitigated.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2024

Status and prospects of lithium iron phosphate manufacturing in the lithium battery industry

Abstract Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 , LFP) has long been a key player in the lithium battery industry for its exceptional stability, safety, and cost-effectiveness as a cathode material. Major car makers (e.g., Tesla, Volkswagen, Ford, Toyota) have either incorporated or are considering the use of LFP-based batteries in their latest electric vehicle (EV) models. Despite LFP’s well-researched status as a cathode material, it is expected to fulfill additional demands in electric vehicle applications, such as fast-charging capabilities, wide temperature range adaptability, and higher energy density. This perspective examines the LFP supply chain, synthetic approaches, manufacturing processes, market trends, recent advancements, and evolving demands to better understand its future role in the EV market. Graphical abstract

Lu, Yanying↗
DOE OSTI2023

Probing the Formation of Cathode-Electrolyte Interphase on Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathodes via Operando Mechanical Measurements

Interfacial instabilities in electrodes control the performance and lifetime of Li-ion batteries. While the formation of solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) on anodes has received much attention, there is still lack of understanding about the formation of cathode-electrolyte interface (CEI) on the cathodes. To fill this gap, we report on dynamic deformations on lithium iron phosphate, LiFePO 4 cathodes during charge / discharge by utilizing in-operando digital image correlation, impedance spectroscopy and Cryo X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. LiFePO4 cathodes were cycled in either LiPF 6 , LiClO 4 or LiTFSI- containing organic liquid electrolytes. Beyond the first cycle, Li-ion intercalation results in a nearly linear correlation between electrochemical strains and the state of (dis)-charge, regardless of the electrolyte chemistry. However, during the first charge in LiPF 6 - containing electrolyte, there is a distinct irreversible positive strain evolution at the onset of anodic current rise as well as current decay at around 4.0V. Impedance studies show the increase in surface resistance in the same potential window, suggesting the formation of CEI layers on the cathode. The chemistry of the CEI layer was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. LiF is detected in CEI layer starting as early as 3.4 V and Li $x$ PO $y$ F $z$ appeared at voltages higher than 4.0 V during the first charge. In conclusion, our approach offers new insights into the formation mechanism of CEI layers on the cathode electrodes, which is crucial for the development of robust cathode and electrolyte chemistries for higher performance batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

ICL Commercial Production of Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Powder for the Global Lithium Battery Industry Final Technical Report

ICL was investing in producing cathode active material, Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), used in the production of batteries for both electric vehicles and stationary storage. The demand for LFP was increasing with the global focus on sustainable energy, and there was no current manufacturer of this material in the United States. As such, imported LFP is subject to the uncertainties around supply chain and control of a foreign supplier. This investment would have allowed ICL to be a United States leader in LFP production. To gain a position in this market, ICL licensed the technology from a firm that has the process technology and has reliably supplied LFP into the battery market and currently has customers purchasing their product.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries' safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li 6 PS 5 Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFPAs delithiation, insulating the electrolyte-electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 , LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li 6 PS 5 Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO 3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP-sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon-electrolyte interface.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2019

A mechanism of defect-enhanced phase transformation kinetics in lithium iron phosphate olivine

Abstract Antisite defects are a type of point defect ubiquitously present in intercalation compounds for energy storage applications. While they are often considered a deleterious feature, here we elucidate a mechanism of antisite defects enhancing lithium intercalation kinetics in LiFePO 4 by accelerating the FePO 4 → LiFePO 4 phase transformation. Although Fe Li antisites block Li movement along the [010] migration channels in LiFePO 4 , phase-field modeling reveals that their ability to enhance Li diffusion in other directions significantly increases the active surface area for Li intercalation in the surface-reaction-limited kinetic regime, which results in order-of-magnitude improvement in the phase transformation rate compared to defect-free particles. Antisite defects also promote a more uniform reaction flux on (010) surface and prevent the formation of current hotspots under galvanostatic (dis)charging conditions. We analyze the scaling relation between the phase boundary speed, Li diffusivity and particle dimensions and derive the criteria for the co-optimization of defect content and particle geometry. A surprising prediction is that (100)-oriented LiFePO 4 plates could potentially deliver better performance than (010)-oriented plates when the Li intercalation process is surface-reaction-limited. Our work suggests tailoring antisite defects as a general strategy to improve the rate performance of phase-changing battery compounds with strong diffusion anisotropy.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Lithium-Ion Batteries with Lithium Manganese Iron Phosphate Cathodes and Lithium Titanate Anodes: Linking Electrode Dynamics to Cell Performance

This study examines the electrochemical performance, impedance behavior, and aging mechanisms of lithium-ion cells pairing lithium manganese iron phosphate (LiMn 0.6 Fe 0.4 PO 4 , LMFP64) cathodes with lithium titanate (Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 , LTO) anodes. LMFP64 half-cells display distinct Fe and Mn redox plateaus at ∼3.5 and ∼4.1 V, respectively, and deliver excellent rate capability. Three-electrode measurements show that LMFP64 dominates cell impedance, which changes sharply across the Fe–Mn redox transition and decreases with increasing temperature (30 °C–50 °C). Voltage hysteresis arises mainly from the cathode, with higher C-rates shortening redox plateaus and broadening the transition region. Elevated temperature lowers impedance, especially near the Mn-redox and transition regions, but accelerates capacity fade. Post-cycling analyses of electrodes confirm structural stability of LMFP64 and indicate loss of lithium inventory (LLI) as the source of capacity fade. This LLI causes potential slippage between the LMFP64 and LTO electrodes, which decreases the Fe-redox plateau width. Long-term cycling highlights the critical role of electrode overhang: cathode overhang mitigates capacity fade by buffering lithium loss, whereas anode overhang cells experience faster capacity decline due to uncompensated lithium depletion. These results clarify LMFP64/LTO battery impedance evolution, thermal effects, and degradation pathways and provide insights for their applications in electric vehicles.

Area Specific Impedance↗
DOE OSTI2022

Solvent-Free Manufacturing of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes via Cold Plasma

Slurry casting has been used to fabricate lithium-ion battery electrodes for decades, which involves toxic and expensive organic solvents followed by high-cost vacuum drying and electrode calendering. This work presents a new manufacturing method using a nonthermal plasma to create inter-particle binding without using any polymeric binding materials, enabling solvent-free manufacturing electrodes with any electrochemistry of choice. The cold-plasma-coating technique enables fabricating electrodes with thickness (>200 μm), high mass loading (>30 mg cm -2 ), high peel strength, and the ability to print lithium-ion batteries in an arbitrary geometry. This crosscutting, chemistry agnostic, platform technology would increase energy density, eliminate the use of solvents, vacuum drying, and calendering processes during production, and reduce manufacturing cost for current and future cell designs. Here, lithium iron phosphate and lithium cobalt oxide were used as examples to demonstrate the efficacy of the cold-plasma-coating technique. It is found that the mechanical peel strength of cold-plasma-coating-manufactured lithium iron phosphate is over an order of magnitude higher than that of slurry-casted lithium iron phosphate electrodes. Full cells assembled with a graphite anode and the cold-plasma-coating-lithium iron phosphate cathode offer highly reversible cycling performance with a capacity retention of 81.6% over 500 cycles. For the highly conductive cathode material lithium cobalt oxide, an areal capacity of 4.2 mAh cm -2 at 0.2 C is attained. We anticipate that this new, highly scalable manufacturing technique will redefine global lithium-ion battery manufacturing providing significantly reduced plant footprints and material costs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Feasibility of Prelithiation in LiFePO 4

Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) is widely applied as the cathode material for the energy storage Li-ion batteries due to its low cost and high cycling stability. However, the low theoretical specific capacity of LiFePO 4 makes its initial capacity loss more concerning. Therefore, lithium compensation by way of prelithiation and applications of sacrificial Li-rich additives in LiFePO 4 is imminent in elevating the energy density and/or prolonging the lifetime of the LiFePO 4 -based Li-ion batteries (LIBs). Prelithiation in LiFePO 4 is herein carried out by electrochemical and chemical methods and its feasibility is proved on the basis of the electrochemical evaluations such as the initial charge capacity and the cycling stability. In addition, the site of the pre-intercalated Li-ions is found via comprehensive physical characterizations and the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Furthermore, these findings open a new avenue for elevating the energy density and/or prolonging the lifetime of the high-energy-density batteries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

On the Efficacy of Repeat Voltage Holds for Conditioning and Calendar Life Testing of Graphite and Silicon Cells

Voltage-hold (V-hold) protocols have shown promise toward calendar lifetime analysis of cells with graphite (Gr) and silicon (Si) anodes. In this work, repeat V-holds are performed on Gr and Si cells paired with lithium iron phosphate cathodes to delineate their beneficial role in formation and conditioning. We find that V-hold at the top of charge supplements constant current cycling in conditioning the cell to higher capacities for both Gr and Si cells after the first V-hold. A reduced order model provides the irreversible capacity proportions of each V-hold. With each repeat V-hold, parasitic loss of lithium to the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) decreases on both Gr and Si cells. Gr cells show the square-root-of-time capacity loss behavior within 200 h of V-hold, indicative of its fast relaxation and low impact of reference performance test cycles on the SEI growth. Lifetime estimates from repeat V-holds on Gr can reach years. Si exhibits longer transition times from kinetic to diffusion-limited SEI growth, evidenced by the 400 h and 200 h holds showing square-root-of-time and linear behavior, respectively. Lifetime predictions from repeat V-holds on Si only reach 1–2 months, highlighting its limitations. Recommended duration of V-holds for Si cells should be ≥400 h.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Degradation and Modeling of Large-Format Commercial Lithium-Ion Cells as a Function of Chemistry, Design, and Aging Conditions

Demand for large-format (>10 Ah) lithium-ion batteries has increased substantially in recent years, due to the growth of both electric vehicle and stationary energy storage markets. The economics of these applications is sensitive to the lifetime of the batteries, and end-of-life can either be due to energy or power limitations. Despite this, there is little information from cell manufacturers on the sensitivity of cell degradation to environmental conditions or battery use. This work reports accelerated aging test data from four commercial large-format lithium-ion batteries from three manufacturers, with varying design (thickness, casings, ...), chemistry (lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) or lithium-nickel-manganese-cobalt-oxide positive electrodes (NMC), with graphite (Gr) negative electrodes), and capacity (50 to 250 Amp hours). The tested LFP|Gr cell is found to be relatively insensitive to cycling conditions like temperature or voltage window, while NMC|Gr cells have varying sensitivity. Degradation trends are further investigated by training predictive models: simple polynomial trend lines, a semi-empirical reduced-order model, and an empirical reduced-order model identified using machine-learning based on symbolic regression. Calendar and cycle life are simulated over a variety of conditions to directly compare the various batteries. Cell size and thickness are found to substantially impact sensitivity to temperature during cycle aging, while electrode chemistry impacts depth-of-discharge sensitivity. Real-world battery lifetime is evaluated by simulating residential energy storage and commercial frequency containment reserve systems in several U.S. climate regions. Predicted lifetime across cell types varies from 7 years to 20+ years, though all cells are predicted to have at least 10 year life in certain conditions.

battery lifetime↗
DOE OSTI2020

Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries

The world is shifting to electric vehicles to mitigate climate change. Here, we quantify the future demand for key battery materials, considering potential electric vehicle fleet and battery chemistry developments as well as second-use and recycling of electric vehicle batteries. We find that in a lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide dominated battery scenario, demand is estimated to increase by factors of 18–20 for lithium, 17–19 for cobalt, 28–31 for nickel, and 15–20 for most other materials from 2020 to 2050, requiring a drastic expansion of lithium, cobalt, and nickel supply chains and likely additional resource discovery. However, uncertainties are large. Key factors are the development of the electric vehicles fleet and battery capacity requirements per vehicle. If other battery chemistries were used at large scale, e.g. lithium iron phosphate or novel lithium-sulphur or lithium-air batteries, the demand for cobalt and nickel would be substantially smaller. Closed-loop recycling plays a minor, but increasingly important role for reducing primary material demand until 2050, however, advances in recycling are necessary to economically recover battery-grade materials from end-of-life batteries. Second-use of electric vehicles batteries further delays recycling potentials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗