Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium iron phosphate”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Three-dimensional phase evolution and stress-induced non-uniform Li intercalation behavior in lithium iron phosphate

A lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) olivine cathode displays rich phase transition behavior during charging/discharging. Despite extensive studies, the evolution of the LiFePO 4 /FePO 4 two-phase coexistence structure and the underlying mechanism are still a point of debate due to the intricate and often disparate phase morphologies observed. Here we apply phase-field simulations to provide detailed insights into the three-dimensional phase evolution process in LiFePO 4 upon delithiation under a large driving force. The simulation reveals that the coherency stress arising from the LiFePO 4 /FePO 4 lattice mismatch destabilizes the initially flat delithiation front and induces filamentary growth of the FePO 4 phase along [010], which is in excellent agreement with a recent operando X-ray imaging study. The combined simulation and experimental results provide the first illustration of the phenomenon of stress-induced instability of the lithium (de)intercalation front in battery electrode compounds. We show that this phenomenon is facilitated by the surface mode of coherent spinodal decomposition in LiFePO 4 and influenced by the anisotropies of misfit strain, elasticity and lithium diffusion. It is detrimental to battery performance and life by causing stress concentration and reducing the lithium (de)intercalation kinetics and thus should be mitigated.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2024

Status and prospects of lithium iron phosphate manufacturing in the lithium battery industry

Abstract Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 , LFP) has long been a key player in the lithium battery industry for its exceptional stability, safety, and cost-effectiveness as a cathode material. Major car makers (e.g., Tesla, Volkswagen, Ford, Toyota) have either incorporated or are considering the use of LFP-based batteries in their latest electric vehicle (EV) models. Despite LFP’s well-researched status as a cathode material, it is expected to fulfill additional demands in electric vehicle applications, such as fast-charging capabilities, wide temperature range adaptability, and higher energy density. This perspective examines the LFP supply chain, synthetic approaches, manufacturing processes, market trends, recent advancements, and evolving demands to better understand its future role in the EV market. Graphical abstract

Lu, Yanying↗
DOE OSTI2023

Probing the Formation of Cathode-Electrolyte Interphase on Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathodes via Operando Mechanical Measurements

Interfacial instabilities in electrodes control the performance and lifetime of Li-ion batteries. While the formation of solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) on anodes has received much attention, there is still lack of understanding about the formation of cathode-electrolyte interface (CEI) on the cathodes. To fill this gap, we report on dynamic deformations on lithium iron phosphate, LiFePO 4 cathodes during charge / discharge by utilizing in-operando digital image correlation, impedance spectroscopy and Cryo X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. LiFePO4 cathodes were cycled in either LiPF 6 , LiClO 4 or LiTFSI- containing organic liquid electrolytes. Beyond the first cycle, Li-ion intercalation results in a nearly linear correlation between electrochemical strains and the state of (dis)-charge, regardless of the electrolyte chemistry. However, during the first charge in LiPF 6 - containing electrolyte, there is a distinct irreversible positive strain evolution at the onset of anodic current rise as well as current decay at around 4.0V. Impedance studies show the increase in surface resistance in the same potential window, suggesting the formation of CEI layers on the cathode. The chemistry of the CEI layer was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. LiF is detected in CEI layer starting as early as 3.4 V and Li $x$ PO $y$ F $z$ appeared at voltages higher than 4.0 V during the first charge. In conclusion, our approach offers new insights into the formation mechanism of CEI layers on the cathode electrodes, which is crucial for the development of robust cathode and electrolyte chemistries for higher performance batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

ICL Commercial Production of Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Powder for the Global Lithium Battery Industry Final Technical Report

ICL was investing in producing cathode active material, Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), used in the production of batteries for both electric vehicles and stationary storage. The demand for LFP was increasing with the global focus on sustainable energy, and there was no current manufacturer of this material in the United States. As such, imported LFP is subject to the uncertainties around supply chain and control of a foreign supplier. This investment would have allowed ICL to be a United States leader in LFP production. To gain a position in this market, ICL licensed the technology from a firm that has the process technology and has reliably supplied LFP into the battery market and currently has customers purchasing their product.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS2007

Lithium Iron Phosphate Cell Performance Evaluations for Lunar Extravehicular Activities

Lithium-ion battery cells are being evaluated for their ability to provide primary power and energy storage for NASA s future Exploration missions. These missions include the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle, the Ares Crew Launch Vehicle Upper Stage, Extravehicular Activities (EVA, the advanced space suit), the Lunar Surface Ascent Module (LSAM), and the Lunar Precursor and Robotic Program (LPRP), among others. Each of these missions will have different battery requirements. Some missions may require high specific energy and high energy density, while others may require high specific power, wide operating temperature ranges, or a combination of several of these attributes. EVA is one type of mission that presents particular challenges for today s existing power sources. The Portable Life Support System (PLSS) for the advanced Lunar surface suit will be carried on an astronaut s back during eight hour long sorties, requiring a lightweight power source. Lunar sorties are also expected to occur during varying environmental conditions, requiring a power source that can operate over a wide range of temperatures. Concepts for Lunar EVAs include a primary power source for the PLSS that can recharge rapidly. A power source that can charge quickly could enable a lighter weight system that can be recharged while an astronaut is taking a short break. Preliminary results of Al23 Ml 26650 lithium iron phosphate cell performance evaluations for an advanced Lunar surface space suit application are discussed in this paper. These cells exhibit excellent recharge rate capability, however, their specific energy and energy density is lower than typical lithium-ion cell chemistries. The cells were evaluated for their ability to provide primary power in a lightweight battery system while operating at multiple temperatures.

Reid, Concha↗
DOE OSTI2023

Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries' safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li 6 PS 5 Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFPAs delithiation, insulating the electrolyte-electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 , LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li 6 PS 5 Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO 3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP-sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon-electrolyte interface.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2019

A mechanism of defect-enhanced phase transformation kinetics in lithium iron phosphate olivine

Abstract Antisite defects are a type of point defect ubiquitously present in intercalation compounds for energy storage applications. While they are often considered a deleterious feature, here we elucidate a mechanism of antisite defects enhancing lithium intercalation kinetics in LiFePO 4 by accelerating the FePO 4 → LiFePO 4 phase transformation. Although Fe Li antisites block Li movement along the [010] migration channels in LiFePO 4 , phase-field modeling reveals that their ability to enhance Li diffusion in other directions significantly increases the active surface area for Li intercalation in the surface-reaction-limited kinetic regime, which results in order-of-magnitude improvement in the phase transformation rate compared to defect-free particles. Antisite defects also promote a more uniform reaction flux on (010) surface and prevent the formation of current hotspots under galvanostatic (dis)charging conditions. We analyze the scaling relation between the phase boundary speed, Li diffusivity and particle dimensions and derive the criteria for the co-optimization of defect content and particle geometry. A surprising prediction is that (100)-oriented LiFePO 4 plates could potentially deliver better performance than (010)-oriented plates when the Li intercalation process is surface-reaction-limited. Our work suggests tailoring antisite defects as a general strategy to improve the rate performance of phase-changing battery compounds with strong diffusion anisotropy.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Lithium-Ion Batteries with Lithium Manganese Iron Phosphate Cathodes and Lithium Titanate Anodes: Linking Electrode Dynamics to Cell Performance

This study examines the electrochemical performance, impedance behavior, and aging mechanisms of lithium-ion cells pairing lithium manganese iron phosphate (LiMn 0.6 Fe 0.4 PO 4 , LMFP64) cathodes with lithium titanate (Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 , LTO) anodes. LMFP64 half-cells display distinct Fe and Mn redox plateaus at ∼3.5 and ∼4.1 V, respectively, and deliver excellent rate capability. Three-electrode measurements show that LMFP64 dominates cell impedance, which changes sharply across the Fe–Mn redox transition and decreases with increasing temperature (30 °C–50 °C). Voltage hysteresis arises mainly from the cathode, with higher C-rates shortening redox plateaus and broadening the transition region. Elevated temperature lowers impedance, especially near the Mn-redox and transition regions, but accelerates capacity fade. Post-cycling analyses of electrodes confirm structural stability of LMFP64 and indicate loss of lithium inventory (LLI) as the source of capacity fade. This LLI causes potential slippage between the LMFP64 and LTO electrodes, which decreases the Fe-redox plateau width. Long-term cycling highlights the critical role of electrode overhang: cathode overhang mitigates capacity fade by buffering lithium loss, whereas anode overhang cells experience faster capacity decline due to uncompensated lithium depletion. These results clarify LMFP64/LTO battery impedance evolution, thermal effects, and degradation pathways and provide insights for their applications in electric vehicles.

Area Specific Impedance↗
DOE OSTI2022

Solvent-Free Manufacturing of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes via Cold Plasma

Slurry casting has been used to fabricate lithium-ion battery electrodes for decades, which involves toxic and expensive organic solvents followed by high-cost vacuum drying and electrode calendering. This work presents a new manufacturing method using a nonthermal plasma to create inter-particle binding without using any polymeric binding materials, enabling solvent-free manufacturing electrodes with any electrochemistry of choice. The cold-plasma-coating technique enables fabricating electrodes with thickness (>200 μm), high mass loading (>30 mg cm -2 ), high peel strength, and the ability to print lithium-ion batteries in an arbitrary geometry. This crosscutting, chemistry agnostic, platform technology would increase energy density, eliminate the use of solvents, vacuum drying, and calendering processes during production, and reduce manufacturing cost for current and future cell designs. Here, lithium iron phosphate and lithium cobalt oxide were used as examples to demonstrate the efficacy of the cold-plasma-coating technique. It is found that the mechanical peel strength of cold-plasma-coating-manufactured lithium iron phosphate is over an order of magnitude higher than that of slurry-casted lithium iron phosphate electrodes. Full cells assembled with a graphite anode and the cold-plasma-coating-lithium iron phosphate cathode offer highly reversible cycling performance with a capacity retention of 81.6% over 500 cycles. For the highly conductive cathode material lithium cobalt oxide, an areal capacity of 4.2 mAh cm -2 at 0.2 C is attained. We anticipate that this new, highly scalable manufacturing technique will redefine global lithium-ion battery manufacturing providing significantly reduced plant footprints and material costs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS2017

Factors Limiting Li+ Charge Transfer Kinetics in Li-ion Batteries

Understanding the factors limiting Li+ charge transfer kinetics in Li-ion batteries is essential in improving the rate performance, especially at lower temperatures. The Li+ charge transfer process involved in the lithium intercalation of graphite anode includes the step of de-solvation of the solvated Li+ in the liquid electrolyte and the step of transport of Li+ in the preformed solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on electrodes until the Li+ accepts an electron at the electrode and becomes a Li in the electrode. Whether the de-solvation process or the Li+ transport through the SEI is a limiting step depends on the nature of the interphases at the electrode and electrolyte interfaces. Several examples involving the electrode materials such as graphite, lithium titanate (LTO), lithium iron phosphate (LFP), lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA) and solid Li+ conductor such as lithium lanthanum titanate or Li-Al-Ti-phosphate are reviewed and discussed to clarify the conditions at which either the de-solvation or the transport of Li+ in SEI is dominating and how the electrolyte components affect the activation energy of Li+ charge transfer kinetics. How the electrolyte additives impact the Li+ charge transfer kinetics at both the anode and the cathode has been examined at the same time in 3-electrode full cells. The resulting impact on Li+ charge transfer resistance, Rct, and activation energy, Ea, at both electrodes are reported and discussed.

Delp, Samuel A.↗
NASA NTRS2022

X-57 Mod II Avionics Power Analysis

The X-57 Mod II Avionics Power Analysis was developed to provide the design requirements for the X-57 Avionics Power System. In the Mod II configuration, the two stock Tecnam P2006T Rotax engines are replaced with two electric motors. A high voltage traction battery (460 VDC nominal) supplies power for the motors. The Mod II avionics power design uses the stock Tecnam avionics power architecture as a baseline. The stock Tecnam power system utilizes three 12 VDC power sources, a battery and two alternators, to provided redundant avionics power. This redundancy was preserved in the X-57 avionics power architecture. A block diagram of the X-57 avionics system can be found in the “Mod II Architecture” worksheet of this documents. Since the X-57 electric motors do not have alternators or generators, two 13.8V DC Converters were added to replace the stock Tecnam alternators. Input power to these DC Converters is provide by the high voltage traction battery. The Tecnam stock lead acid battery was replaced with a Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) battery. The Mod II Avionics Power Analysis provided the power requirements for the two 13.8V DC converters and the Lithium Iron Phosphate battery. Power requirement estimates for each subsystem used in this analysis were provided by manufacturer specifications, measured in the laboratory or provided by the subsystem design engineer. Typical power requirements and maximum power requirements were provided for each subsystem. The Mod II Avionics Power Systems consists of seven 13.8 VDC buses, two 28 VDC Buses and two 23 VDC buses. The avionics power requirements for Mod III configuration are the same as Mod II. The Mod III configuration replaces the stock Tecnam wing with a carbon fiber wing that is optimized for cruise conditions. The motors are located on the wingtips. The Mod IV Avionics Power Analysis is a separate analysis and is document number ANLYS-CEPT-032.

Keith Harris↗