Benchmarking performance: A round-robin testing for liquid alkaline electrolysis
Not Available
08 HYDROGEN↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “liquid alkaline electrolysis”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Modeling the Effect of Material Properties on Liquid-Alkaline Water Electrolysis
Liquid-alkaline water electrolyzers (LAWEs) use electricity to drive the conversion of water to H 2 and O 2 gas. These devices benefit from the use of low-cost nickel electrodes and metal-oxide separators, but suffer from lower current densities and higher cell voltages than proton-exchange-membrane water electrolyzers. Identifying the inefficiencies that result in this poor performance is key to mitigating losses and optimizing LAWEs. Here, we report an experimentally-validated 1-D continuum model of a LAWE that elucidates the gradients within the cell, simulates H 2 crossover, and projects the energy improvements made possible by modulating the properties of the electrodes and separator. The model captures the Nernstian polarization losses and the distribution of gas- and liquid-phases within the electrodes, enabling quantification of energy losses associated with kinetic, ohmic, and bubble-induced (mass-transport) resistances. Simulations demonstrate that LAWE can achieve energy intensities of 50 kWh kg −1 of H 2 at 1 A cm −2 using improved electrode and separator properties.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Standardization and best practices in single-cell testing for liquid alkaline water electrolysis
The increasing demand for efficient and sustainable hydrogen production has driven significant advancements in water electrolysis technologies. Among these, liquid alkaline water electrolysis (LAWE) stands out for its cost-effectiveness and scalability. This manuscript establishes best practices and standardized testing procedures for single-cell LAWE, focusing on the use of nickel foam as both anode and cathode substrates, while incorporating catalysts such as nickel-iron layered double hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) as the anode material and nickel-molybdenum on carbon (NiMo/C) as the cathode material. By providing detailed guidelines on material preparation, cell assembly, and performance evaluation, this work offers a comprehensive framework to improve reproducibility and ensure consistency. The results demonstrate that applying these best practices minimizes variability across different laboratories and experimental setups, laying the groundwork for more robust comparisons and accelerating progress in LAWE research.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Thin, Highly Selective Polymer Membrane Separators for Advanced Liquid Alkaline Water Electrolysis
Our team will develop novel, dense, polymer electrolyte separators based on polybenzimidazole (PBI) derivatives that will enable tuning of water/KOH uptake in mechanically robust films for advanced liquid alkaline water electrolysis (LAWE). These material advances will enable thinner separators with increased selectivity (hydroxide conductivity/hydrogen permeability), thereby enabling higher operating currents, increased dynamic operating high-temperature stability, and catalyst-coated membranes (zero-gap design advantages) in direct alignment with stated lab call goals.
HYDROGEN↗
Accelerated Stress Test (AST) Development for Advanced Liquid Alkaline Water Electrolysis [Slides]
Outline. Alkaline Water Electrolyzers: Comparison of PEMEC and AWE systems and Components and degradation mechanisms in AWE; AST development: Electrolzyer AST development (AWE focus), PEMEC AST development, and AWE AST development.
42 ENGINEERING↗
Durable, Ultra-Thin Diaphragms for Liquid Alkaline Water Electrolysis
W. L. Gore & Associates assembled a world class team (De Nora Tech, LLC; New York University; and thyssenkrupp nucera) to develop durable, ultra-low resistance diaphragms that dramatically improve system efficiency, dynamic response, and operational flexibility. To enable the use of ultra-thin diaphragms, an optimized electrode package was chosen as part of an electrode down select study. Ultra-thin diaphragms based on microporous polymer scaffolds imbibed with zirconia nanoparticles were developed and tested. Performance and durability on par with incumbent materials was demonstrated. A transparent electrolyzer to directly observe in-situ diaphragm-bubble interactions was designed and built, and simultaneous optical and electrochemical performance tests were performed. A Pressurized Alkaline Water Electrolysis (PAWE) single cell test station was designed to support advanced R&D in high-pressure electrolysis, particularly for evaluating novel electrode and separator configurations under elevated temperature and pressure operating conditions. Due to early project termination, the original scope could not be fully achieved.
08 HYDROGEN↗
H2NEW: Hydrogen (H2) from Next-Generation Electrolyzers of Water LTE Task 9: Liquid Alkaline
This presentation summarizes H2NEW consortium research on liquid alkaline electrolysis (Task 9).
electrolysis↗
La–Sr–Co oxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in anion exchange membrane water electrolyzer: The role of electrode fabrication on performance and durability
Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis is an attractive technology for low-cost generation of “green” hydrogen by combining the use of noble metal-free catalysts with pure water feed. By thus addressing main drawbacks of the liquid alkaline electrolysis and proton exchange membrane water electrolysis, anion exchange membrane water electrolysis stands an excellent chance of replacing the two technologies. The development of active and stable platinum group metal (PGM)-free catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is crucial for making anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) practical. For this work, we synthesized, characterized and tested two La–Sr–Co oxide-based OER catalysts. First, we characterized the catalysts by XRD, SEM, and N 2 physisorption and assessed their OER activity in a three-electrode cell. Next, we focused on electrode fabrication, demonstrating the importance of catalyst-ink application to the porous transport layers (PTLs) and a key role of adding a binder to the catalyst ink to prevent the catalyst detachment from the PTL in pure water. We tested three membrane electrode assemblies prepared using different formulations of the anode catalyst ink. The results show that the optimum ink formulation is essential for the performance on pure-water feed by maximizing OH - conductivity of the catalyst layer and catalyst-membrane interface.
47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
In Situ Catalyst Deposition for Liquid Alkaline Impure Water Electrolysis
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hietala, Kristen↗
Self-Adhesive Ionomers for Alkaline Electrolysis: Optimized Hydrogen Evolution Electrode
Hydrogen produced through low-temperature water electrolysis using anion exchange membranes (AEM) combines the benefits of liquid-electrolyte alkaline electrolysis and solid-polymer proton exchange membrane electrolysis. The anion conductive ionomers in the oxygen-producing anode and hydrogen-producing cathode are a critical part of the three-dimensional electrodes. The ionomer in the hydrogen-producing cathode facilitates hydroxide ion conduction from the cathode catalyst to the anode catalyst, and water transport from the anode to the cathode catalyst through the AEM. This ionomer also binds the catalyst particles to the porous transport layer. Here in this study, the cathode durability was improved by use of a self-adhesive cathode ionomer to chemically bond the cathode catalyst particles to the porous transport layer. It was found that the cathode ionomers with high ion exchange capacity (IEC) were more effective than low IEC ionomers because of the need to transport water to the cathode catalyst and transport hydroxide away from the cathode. The cathode durability was improved by using ionomers which were soluble in the spray-coated cathode ink. Optimization of the catalyst and ionomer content within the cathode led to electrolysis cells which were both mechanically durable and operated at low voltage.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Hydrogen Production Cost with Alkaline Electrolysis
Rigorous stakeholder-vetted techno-economic analysis was performed to assess the cost of hydrogen (H 2 ) produced using state-of-the-art Liquid Alkaline (LA) electrolysis. Projected high-volume, untaxed levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) range from 2020US $\$ 1.84$ to $\$ 2.88$/kg-H 2 depending on technology year, process design, and electrolyzer project scale, assuming an electricity price of $\$ 0.03$/kWh. The total installed capital cost for a LA electrolysis plant was estimated from bottom-up stack and installed cost models that account for purchased equipment, installation costs, site preparation, and general overhead costs. For this study, the LA electrolysis plant is assumed to be a stick-built, greenfield project developed by an EPC firm with electrolysis stacks purchased directly from an electrolysis stack manufacturer. The price of the electrolysis stacks is based on a bottom-up cost assessment with business markup for the electrolysis company fabricator. Methods from the Hydrogen Analysis (H 2 A) production model, a peer-reviewed national laboratory-developed discounted cash flow model, were used to calculate the LCOH production in 2020$/kg-H 2 . The baseline electricity price case ($\$ 0.03$/kWh) corresponds to average wholesale electricity prices currently possible in U.S. markets with plentiful wind. Similar low-cost electricity pricing is possible from solar Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) although these prices are typically limited by renewable energy capacity factors.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Technology Strategy Assessment: Findings from Storage Innovations 2030 Bidirectional Hydrogen Storage
Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe, comprising nearly 75% of all normal matter, and it has been used by scientists for centuries, but it was not fully recognized as an element until 1766, when it was isolated by Henry Cavendish. Early work focused on the generation of hydrogen through the oxidation of metals in water, which released hydrogen gas. Hydrogen’s lighter-than-air and flammable properties were immediately used in engines, zeppelins, and as feedstock for a wide variety of chemical reactions. Several approaches were developed for the production of hydrogen with the most common being associated with the production and conversion of hydrocarbon-based fuels. Coal gasification, steam methane reforming, and other reformation processes provide the majority of current hydrogen production due to the relatively low cost of hydrogen produced through these processes. More than 95% of hydrogen production is used for industrial processes rather than energy storage. To facilitate affordable decarbonization of these industrial processes and to advance the use of hydrogen as a fuel in transportation, DOE launched the Hydrogen Shot as part of the Energy Earthshots Initiative. The goal of the Hydrogen Shot is to reduce the cost of clean hydrogen by 80% to $1/kg of clean hydrogen production within one decade (known as the “1 1 1” goal). This is distinct from the Long-Duration Storage Shot, which is the primary focus of this report; however, it is intrinsically linked to bidirectional hydrogen storage. Several important chemical synthesis processes are dependent upon hydrogen, and the production and use of hydrogen is generally driven by its connection to one of these markets. For example, ammonia is one of the most highly produced chemicals in the world and it depends chiefly on hydrogen. Ammonia is primarily used for agricultural fertilizer and is considered to be largely responsible for a doubling of agricultural production per unit of land over the last century. Another one of hydrogen’s primary uses is as a catalyst in petroleum refining during the desulfurization process. Beyond chemical production, hydrogen is used as a reductant in the production of steel and has been demonstrated as a substitute for metallurgical coal in the production of raw iron. It is even used in the hydrogenation reaction for food products to create more shelf-stable semi-solid fats. However, while hydrogen is produced on the order of 100 million metric tons/year globally to feed these industries, more than 95% of hydrogen is produced from hydrocarbons that emit CO2 during the process. Conversely, electrolysis is a process by which electricity is used to separate hydrogen and oxygen in water molecules, usually across a membrane. Hydrogen production via electrolysis lowers the carbon intensity of produced hydrogen when coupled with low-carbon electricity. Currently, global electrolysis capacity is on the order of 1 GW, which equates to about 500 metric tons/day of hydrogen production. To support large-scale industrial decarbonization, capacity will likely need to increase by two to three orders of magnitude. Electrolysis technology is broadly separated into groups that are defined by the electrolyte used, with further subdivision based on the operating characteristics. The majority of commercial electrolyzer systems are based around three main technology groups: liquid alkaline, proton exchange membrane, and solid oxide. Liquid Alkaline (LA) electrolysis is the oldest, most mature, least expensive, and most common commercial technology, with 400 plants in operation by 1902. Its hydrogen output is low relative to the size of the system due to a low current density. LA electrolysis utilizes a liquid potassium hydroxide solution as the electrolyte. Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis (also known as polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis), described in 1960, relies on an acid-impregnated polymer membrane as the electrolyte and typically offers three to six times higher hydrogen production per unit cell area than LA electrolysis. Solid oxide electrolysis, or high-temperature electrolysis, utilizes a ceramic cell as the electrolyte and operates on steam rather than liquid water, enabling electrical efficiencies of more than 90%, which is up from 60% with PEM. Two pre-commercial electrolyzer technologies to note are alkaline exchange membrane (AEM) and proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC). AEM potentially has the advantages of both LA and PEM technologies in that it is able to use low-cost materials like LA but with the ability to operate at higher output pressures with a smaller footprint like PEM. Proton-conducting SOEC is similar to commercial SOEC, which uses an oxide-conducting ceramic; however, it uses a proton-conducting ceramic that has the potential to operate at lower temperatures and has lower capital costs. Each of these technologies is experiencing a rapid improvement in performance and a reduction in installed cost, and each appears to be well suited to specific applications. Besides differences in the type of electrolyzer used, the main difference in the architecture of bidirectional hydrogen systems is how the hydrogen is stored. Currently, the most cost-effective way to store large amounts of hydrogen gas is underground, such as in large salt caverns that have been hollowed out. These salt caverns are geographically concentrated in small portions of the United States and are not generally near large metropolitan areas; however, other subsurface architectures are being investigated to expand this reach. A more widely deployable option is aboveground pressurized tanks. These systems are about 10 times as expensive because of the materials and safety margins required to hold hydrogen at high pressures. A third option is using materials-based storage, such as liquid organic hydrogen carriers. By reversibly attaching the produced hydrogen to other molecules, it can be stored at near atmospheric pressure and room temperature. This has the potential to reduce the material cost of storage but may result in a reduction in the efficiency of the process because there are both hydrogen uptake and release processes. While materials-based storage has not been used extensively for large-scale hydrogen storage in the past, there is currently significant activity regarding developing materials and processes for use in large-scale hydrogen storage applications. Electrolysis-produced hydrogen offers an unusual opportunity for energy storage applications. Unlike more conventional energy storage approaches, such as batteries, which operate entirely within electrical markets, hydrogen is a valuable product beyond the electric market and can be directed to the most lucrative use. Hydrogen also can be directly converted back to electricity using either a fuel cell or turbine, or it can be sold to other markets, such as chemical synthesis, steel production, or even export. In this way, excess electricity can be upgraded to the most valuable product. Finally, its use can be actively managed between multiple off-takers; for example, local hydrogen storage can provide a specific amount of stored electricity and any excess can be exported to ammonia production. This flexibility is amplified by the fact that hydrogen storage has fully decoupled power and energy components, which allows for affordable scaling options. Together, this allows a substantial amount of creativity to enable the economic utilization of variable power resources while supporting decarbonization of the industry.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Insights into catalyst degradation during alkaline water electrolysis under variable operation
Energy conversion technologies that are key to decarbonization efforts face significant durability challenges due to variable operation. Understanding the impact of variable operation on catalytic stability and identifying the key variables that dictate degradation is crucial for developing robust technologies. Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of the effects of variable operation on liquid alkaline water electrolysis. Our findings reveal that variable operation induces severe degradation of Ni, Fe, and Co catalytic films that is not observed during steady-state operation. By systematically interrogating the electrode discharge during simulated shutdown tests using Raman spectroscopy and mass spectrometry techniques, we uncover significant alterations caused by reverse currents in real time. These include changes in crystal structure, composition, film thickness, electronic conductivity, and dissolution rates. Lab-scale electrolyzer experiments further highlight the impact of variable operation on catalyst materials under relevant conditions. Finally, we provide guidelines for leveraging these insights to advance electrocatalysis research. This work underscores the importance of integrating realistic stressors into stability testing and offers practical guidelines for catalyst design, performance evaluation, and industrial implementation. Collectively, insights from this study will drive the development of more resilient energy conversion technologies.
Marquez, Raul A. [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (Unit↗
Grid-responsive hydrogen production: Capital utilization and current density vs. efficiency in variable electricity markets
To achieve low-cost hydrogen production from water electrolyzers, grid tied electrolysis may need to operate dynamically to minimize the cost of supplying energy to the electrolyzer stack and produce hydrogen during low-cost hours and turn off/down during high-cost hours. Operating systems in this way can decrease capital utilization (capacity factor) and electricity costs. This strategy would shift the dominant cost drivers away from electricity (and thus efficiency) to the capital costs of the system, due to the underutilized capital when operating at low-capacity factors. Increasing the operational current density of the system could, in effect, reduce the capital cost of the system while producing hydrogen at a lower efficiency on a per unit energy basis. In the variable electricity cost profiles analyzed in this paper, increasing the current density for liquid alkaline from 0.5 A/cm2 to 1.5 Ac/m2 and proton exchange membrane electrolyzers from 2 A/cm2 to 4 A/cm2 resulted in substantial reductions in the levelized cost of hydrogen. Additionally, as capacity factors and electricity costs decrease, the optimal operating current density of the electrolyzer systems analyzed increases. These findings suggest R&D efforts should focus on increasing the operational current densities, reducing the turn down ratios, and understanding the durability implications of those strategies on low-temperature liquid alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolyzers.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Liquid Alkaline Water Electrolyzers: Comparing Performance across Design, Operation, and End-of-Life Scenarios
Liquid alkaline water electrolysis (LAWE) is a demonstrated technology for hydrogen production, yet a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of their deployment is lacking. Research leading to improvements to the core component, the electrochemical stack, along with auxiliary system materials and dynamic operation of stacks from variable electricity supply offers new data that allows for detailed modeling and evaluation. Here, we present an LCA of two facility designs based on the current state-of-the-art stack and an advanced stack with zero-gap between electrodes, and capture dynamic electricity use from solar, wind, and hybrid sources and stack recycling strategies. We present life cycle impact factors characterizing the production of 1 kg of hydrogen across 12 environmental, human health, and resource impact categories (TRACI and ReCiPe) in the contiguous United States. As expected, the source of electricity will drive impacts (e.g., 83-94% of carbon intensity); however, we find that operating using wind electricity can lower hydrogen leakage and the overall carbon intensity (1.03 kgCO 2 e/kgH 2 ) relative to solar electricity (2.57 kgCO 2 e/kgH 2 ) at matched 1:1 capacity between LAWE and the electricity source. The deployment of the advanced design and stack recycling lowers impacts across all life cycle stages. We highlight opportunities to further reduce potential impacts, including the balance of plant materials and operation cycles associated with the use of variable wind and solar electricity that result in hydrogen leakage.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Hydrogen and its Vital Role in a Clean Energy Future
Large-scale, low -cost hydrogen production can enable an economically competitive, secure, and environmentally beneficial future energy system across multiple sectors. Furthermore, clean hydrogen can address specific sectors that are hard to decarbonize (e.g., heavy-duty trucking, load-following electricity, iron, steel, and cement) and can help the U.S. meet the net zero carbon goal by 2050. To achieve this goal, tens of millions of metric tons of clean, reliable, and affordable hydrogen will be needed annually1. In 2021, the Hydrogen Energy Earthshot was launched, and its goal is to reduce the cost of clean hydrogen to $1 per $1 kilogram in 1 decade (1 1 1) 2. One very promising pathway for large-scale hydrogen production is water splitting. Water splitting technologies range from commercial technologies such as electrolyzers to approaches that are at a much earlier stage of development, such as photoelectrochemical (PEC) and thermochemical (TCH) processes. All these water splitting pathways offer diverse benefits in energy storage, grid services, and cross-sector emissions reductions while taking advantage of the diverse domestic resources. However, critical materials-, component- and system-level challenges must be addressed to improve efficiency and durability and reduce cost. To address these barriers and move these promising and high impact technologies forward, the HydroGEN Advanced Water Splitting Materials (AWSM) and the H2 from the Next-generation of Electrolyzers of Water (H2NEW) consortia were formed and supported by the Department of Energy (DOE) EERE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO). HydroGEN (https://www.energy.gov/eere/h2awsm/) consortium, established in 2016, is an Energy Materials Network (EMN) that aims to accelerate the materials R&D of low technology readiness level (TRL) advanced water splitting (AWS) technologies. The consortium comprises five core national laboratories and focuses on four early-stage AWS pathways: alkaline exchange membrane (AEM) electrolysis, proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis (p-SOEC), photoelectrochemical, and thermochemical water splitting. Liquid alkaline and PEM electrolyzers are already commercial and significant advancements in oxygen conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells (o-SOECs) have been realized. Yet, these systems are still too expensive and not sufficiently durable for wide-scale commercialization. To enable high-volume manufacturing of affordable, durable, efficient electrolyzers, H2NEW (https://h2new.energy.gov/), another multi-lab consortium, was established in 2020. This comprehensive, concerted effort is focused on overcoming barriers related to components and materials integration and scale-up to achieve performance, durability, with an initial focus to achieve $2/kg H2 by 2026.
AEM↗
Simple processing via thermal treatment and catalyst infiltration to enhance nickel electrode performance for liquid alkaline water electrolyzers
Two simple processes for enhancing liquid alkaline water electrolyzer performance are demonstrated. Both enhance 3D Ni electrodes by introducing a micron-scale rough structure throughout the bulk of the electrode. Oxidation/reduction relies on a simple thermal treatment cycle to create surface roughening through the volumetric expansion during NiO formation and volume contraction during reduction back to Ni metal. Catalyst infiltration introduces a washcoat of additional metal particles throughout the electrode, by flooding the electrode with catalyst precursor and converting it to micron-scale particles via a reducing thermal treatment. Further, the largest improvement in performance (211mV at 1.8Acm -2 ) is observed for infiltrated NiFe-3x catalyst. For Fe-free Ni-only electrodes, oxidation/reduction provides a larger improvement (157 mV at 1.8Acm -2 ) than infiltrated Ni-3X (106mV at 1.8Acm -2 ). For both processes, the observed electrode surface structure and performance is quite sensitive to the thermal treatment temperature.
08 HYDROGEN↗
Electrochemical Separation of Alkaline-Earth Elements from Molten Salts Using Liquid Metal Electrodes
Closing the nuclear fuel cycle requires recycling used nuclear fuel. Additional waste is generated during recycling due to fission products accumulating in processing salts (LiCl-KCl). Reducing waste generated during recycling entails recovering alkaline-earth fission products (Ba 2+ /Sr 2+ ) from molten chlorides with a minimal loss of bulk electrolyte constituents (Li + /K + ). Electrochemical co-deposition of Ba 2+ /Li + and Sr 2+ /Li + into liquid metal (Bi, Sb, Sn, Pb) and alloy (Bi-Sb) electrodes was investigated in LiCl-KCl-(BaCl 2 , SrCl 2 ) electrolytes at 500 °C and 650 °C. For the pure Bi (500 °C) and Sb (650 °C) electrodes, the greatest percentage of charge was used to deposit Ba and Sr. Effective recovery of Ba/Sr by liquid Bi and Sb electrodes is supported via experimentally determined activity values of Ba/Sr in Bi and Sb. Alloying Sb with Bi increased Ba recovery but decreased Sr recovery, as compared to recovery using the liquid Bi electrode. Here, the results suggest that alkaline-earth fission products can be recovered from molten chlorides by liquid metal electrodes via electrochemical separation, thereby providing a methodology to reduce the generation of nuclear waste from nuclear fuel recycling.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗