Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “licensing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1981

Alternative licensing arrangements and spectrum economics: The case of multipoint distribution service

At present, the Federal Communications Commission assigns radio licenses following a determination of the public interest. Whenever mutually conflicting license applications are filed, the Commission holds a comparative hearing. This assignment mechanism is criticized as cumbersome and unrealiable, and three alternatives are proposed: increasing the available spectrum, and either auctions or lotteries of radio licenses. An analysis is presented of the present system and these alternative arrangments for assigning rights to the frequency spectrum for the Multipoint Distribution Service (MDS). Although MDS is a relatively minor radio service, it serves as a prototype for message distribution services with a large potential for use in business communications. Moreover, the way in which the initial batch of MDS licenses was assigned provides a unique opportunity for empirical work on the economics of the licensing process.

Agnew, C. E.↗
NASA NTRS1990

A new licensing strategy for Canadian mobile earth stations

Initiatives presently under consideration by the Department of Communications which will greatly simplify the licensing process for mobile earth stations are addressed. The current licensing approach is reviewed and the limitations of that system identified. A new approach is needed to respond to the needs of mobile satellite users in the 1990's and beyond, one which will have a minimal impact on the user while still respecting the legislative responsibilities of the department under the new Radiocommunication Act and the General Radio Regulations. The objective of this new strategy is to lead to a transparent licensing scheme for the end user, which in turn could lead to license exemption of blanket licenses as soon as possible.

Amero, Ronald G.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Licensing of future mobile satellite systems

The regulatory process for licensing mobile satellite systems is complex and can require many years to complete. This process involves frequency allocations, national licensing, and frequency coordination. The regulatory process that resulted in the establishment of the radiodetermination satellite service (RDSS) between 1983 and 1987 is described. In contrast, each of these steps in the licensing of the mobile satellite service (MSS) is taking a significantly longer period of time to complete.

Lepkowski, Ronald J.↗
NASA NTRS1998

From the Chemistry Lab to Licensing

This is a story of technology maturation and transfer, and licensing. It traces the history of the recently patented ion- exchange material (IEM) from the accidental discovery that this polymer, a battery separator of marginal performance, picked up copper from distilled water passing through corroded copper tubing in the laboratory, to a point where five organizations and one individual have applied for licenses to manufacture and market it or to use it in a wide variety of applications. This story discusses in detail the problems of converting an immature technology into a mature and eventually commercialized technology, without dedicated resources. Readers will develop an appreciation for how the obstacles to maturation and licensing of the technology were faced and overcome. The lessons learned will be discussed, with the hope of enhancing the technology transfer process.

Savino, Joseph M.↗
NASA NTRS1992

The role of the University Licensing Office in transferring intellectual property to industry

Universities in the US have a significant impact on business through the transfer of technology. This transfer of technology takes various forms, including faculty communications, faculty consulting activities, and the direct transfer of technology through the licensing of patents, copyrights, and other intellectual property to industry. The topics discussed include the following: background of the MIT Technology Licensing Office (TLO), goals of the MIT TLO, MIT's technology transfer philosophy, and important factors for success in new company formation.

Preston, John T.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Intellectual Property and Licensing in the Commercial Space Age

The commercial space industry is undergoing a paradigm shift from the time when governments and very large space companies dominated the industry. A confluence of laws allowing commercial space companies to operate in unprecedented ways, new technologies enabling new commercial space applications, and an influx of risk capital has drastically changed the space industry landscape. As small and medium-sized companies enter the commercial space realm, they will seek a competitive advantage, and universities and the NASA space centers are positioned to offer such advantages. The commercial space industry has recently become an active area of technology partnering and licensing, even for technologies that have experienced poor licensing performance in the past. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory is seeing unprecedented technology transfer activity in the areas of spacecraft navigation, mission design, space antennas, thrusters, radio occultation, and specialized satellites. Intellectual property rights and partnering play a crucial role in the ability of the private sector to invest in these technologies and to drive space technologies forward. Participants in this burgeoning field seek the most cutting-edge innovations to attain a competitive advantage, and it is crucial for those in the university and public sector to gain an understanding of the market forces that are driving the commercial space business.

Broderick, Daniel↗
NASA NTRS2020

Intellectual Property and Licensing in the Commercial Space Age

The commercial space industry is undergoing a paradigm shift from the time when governments and very large space companies dominated the industry. A confluence of laws allowing commercial space companies to operate in unprecedented ways, new technologies enabling new commercial space applications, and an influx of risk capital has drastically changed the space industry landscape. As small and medium-sized companies enter the commercial space realm, they will seek a competitive advantage, and universities and the NASA space centers are positioned to offer such advantages. The commercial space industry has recently become an active area of technology partnering and licensing, even for technologies that have experienced poor licensing performance in the past. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory is seeing unprecedented technology transfer activity in the areas of spacecraft navigation, mission design, space antennas, thrusters, radio occultation, and specialized satellites. Intellectual property rights and partnering play a crucial role in the ability of the private sector to invest in these technologies and to drive space technologies forward. Participants in this burgeoning field seek the most cutting-edge innovations to attain a competitive advantage, and it is crucial for those in the university and public sector to gain an understanding of the market forces that are driving the commercial space business.

Broderick, Daniel↗
NASA NTRS1995

Troika partnership model for licensing NASA-LaRC technologies

The Technology Applications (TAG) Group at NASA Langley Research Center has currently more than 100 technologies that are ripe for commercialization. These technologies are categorized by various sectors including: Energy and the Environment; Materials and Structures; Manufacturing; Information and Communications; Transportation, and Medical/Sensor/ Instrumentation. A requirement that TAG has placed on all technologies ready for licensing is that there will be some university involvement in the technology transfer or knowledge transfer process. This model involves the troika of government (LaRC), industry and university. A number of variations on the Troika Partnership Model (TPM) were developed as a part of this ASEE Fellowship. Furthermore, five technologies were identified - three of which industrial interests have been matched: LaRC-SI, a thermoplastic that can be used as a coating; Variable Geometry Truss Manipulator Arm that can be used for nuclear waste clean -up and as scaffolding; and ADAPT (Approach to Data Management, Archive Protection, and Transmission) is a technology that could be used for a variety of multi-tasking operations over the Internet. The aim of this work was to initiate a Space Act Agreement (SAA) for at least one of these technologies using one of the options of the TPM. A preliminary partnership agreement using the SAA is currently being negotiated with NASA-LaRC, VPI and Virginia Power for the LaRC-SI thermoplastic that will be used as a coating.

Maclin, Arlene P.↗
NASA NTRS2009

NASA Johnson Space Center Medical Licensing Opportunities

This presentation reviews patented medical items that are available for licensing in the areas of Laboratory Technologies, Medical Devices, Medical Equipment and other technologies that are of interest to the medical community.

Hernandez-Moya, Sonia↗
NASA NTRS2011

Figures of Merit Software: Description, User's Guide, Installation Notes, Versions Description, and License Agreement

Figures of Merit (FoMs) and the FoM software provide a method for quantitatively evaluating the quality of a regolith simulant by comparing the simulant to a reference material. FoMs may be used for comparing a simulant to actual regolith material, specification by stating the value a simulant s FoMs must attain to be suitable for a given application and comparing simulants from different vendors or production runs. FoMs may even be used to compare different simulants to each other. A single FoM is conceptually an algorithm that computes a single number for quantifying the similarity or difference of a single characteristic of a simulant material and a reference material and provides a clear measure of how well a simulant and reference material match or compare. FoMs have been constructed to lie between zero and 1, with zero indicating a poor or no match and 1 indicating a perfect match. FoMs are defined for modal composition, particle size distribution, particle shape distribution, (aspect ratio and angularity), and density. This TM covers the mathematics, use, installation, and licensing for the existing FoM code in detail.

hoelzer, H. D.↗