Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “joint appointments”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Joint Appointments: General Principles for Joint Appointments between LANL and University Partners

The Joint Appointment Program provides opportunities for LANL and partner universities to recruit, retain, and recognize premier scientists and engineers by offering them the ability to work in both the LANL and university environments. These interactions enhance the ability of both institutions to achieve their respective research and development missions while providing increased academic strength to educational institutions.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
NASA NTRS2021

AIAA Ascend 2021 Conference On Demand Manufacturing of Electronics Panel Abstract

1. Session Proposal o Session Title NASA’s In Space Manufacturing and the On Demand Manufacturing of Electronics o Session Topic Primary -- Space Logistics, Autonomy, and Robotics; Secondary – Transformative Research and Technologies o Session Format: Panel Discussion. o Requested Session Duration: 60 minutes o Short Session Description: The goal of NASA’s On Demand Manufacturing of Electronics project is to develop and demonstrate the feasibility of a low-gravity, on-demand manufacturing system for flexible hybrid electronic devices on the International Space Station. This panel will feature several key collaborators and team members from the commercial sector, academia, and internal to NASA, each of which are contributing an unique and vital role to the design and implementation of this new technology system. o Extended Session Description (Please describe in detail the activity proposed, including how you intend to use the requested session duration. This session description will be provided to the reviewers for consideration and will not be displayed in the online agenda.): The session will be moderated by Curtis Hill, the Project Lead for the On Demand Manufacturing of Electronics (ODME), and he will start by giving a brief introduction to the ODME project which is working to produce a demo system for the manufacturing of electronic devices on the International Space Station. Panelists consisting of collaborators and team members to the ODME project will then give a brief (~5 min) introduction highlighting their contributions to the project, followed by time for Q&A from the audience. The panel will consist of: 1. Kenneth Church, nScrypt. nScrypt is a leader in multi-material printing with a modular system that incorporates a direct write thick film print head, a polymer fused filament fabrication print head, a laser sintering attachment, a drill head attachment for milling, and a pick and place. The system can print a layer and scan for accuracy of prints. The combination of multiple print heads and scanning allows for the on-demand production of intricate electronic components. 2. Andy Kurk, TechShot, Inc. Techshot, Inc. has collaborated extensively with NASA on the in space manufacturing of both printed electronics and fused metal materials. They are currently working to develop and integrate a test system for printed electronics, and a flight demonstration on the International Space Station is anticipated in 2024. 3. Ed Hendricks, NextFlex. NextFlex has the goal of advancing the manufacture of flexible hybrid electronics in the U.S. They are working with ODME on the development of AstroSense, an additively manufactured, wireless, flexible, and wearable health sensor. 4. Dr. Pradeep Lall, Auburn University. Professor Lall is the MacFarlane Endowed Distinguished Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering with a Courtesy Joint Appointment in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and a Courtesy Joint Appointment in the Department of Finance. He is collaborating with NASA’s ODME project to develop multilayer printable devices and to develop techniques to test the quality of a printed electronic device. 5. Dr. Wei Gao, California Institute of Technology. Professor Gao is an Assistant Professor of Medical Engineering. His group is developing fully printed, flexible, and wearable biosensors for crew health monitoring in collaboration with NASA’s ODME project. In addition, they are working on using sweat to power biofuel cells for wearable, self-powered electronic devices. 6. Beth Paquette, NASA Goddard. The ODME branch at NASA Goddard is spearheading a sounding rocket flight demo to prove the capability of a printed electronic device with multiple sensors. In addition, they focus on thin film and flexible energy storage evaluations. o Session Goal(s)/Outcome(s): Please list the learning objectives and/or tangible outcomes (technical paper or other publication). The goal of this session is to highlight the internal and collaborative efforts of NASA’s On Demand Manufacturing of Electronics project to develop a system for printing electronics that will be tested on the International Space Station in 2024. In addition, the session with facilitate discussion with the community on the state of the art of printable electronics, current challenges, and new avenues for collaboration.

Jennifer McInnis Jones↗
DOE OSTI2016

Virtual Special Issue on Catalysis at the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Laboratories

Catalysis research at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) National Laboratories covers a wide range of research topics in heterogeneous catalysis, homogeneous/molecular catalysis, biocatalysis, electrocatalysis, and surface science. Since much of the work at National Laboratories is funded by DOE, the research is largely focused on addressing DOE's mission to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. The catalysis research carried out at the DOE National Laboratories ranges from very fundamental catalysis science, funded by DOE's Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), to applied research and development (R&D) in areas such as biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals, fuel cells, and vehicle emission control with primary funding from DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
NASA NTRS2009

Space Studies Board Annual Report, 2009

The year 2009 was one of transition for the nation, for NASA, and for the Space Studies Board (SSB). The nation pulled back from 2008's economic precipice, but did not return to the path of economic growth that it had been on. The United States inaugurated a new president who set out to build his administration. By mid-year President Obama had announced the appointment of Charlie Bolden as NASA administrator, and Lori Garver as deputy administrator. The president and Charlie Bolden jointly appointed an independent commission, the now well-known Augustine Commission, to provide guidance on the future of NASA's human spaceflight program. Many had known for quite a while that NASA's human spaceflight program faced a profound change at the time of the retirement of the space shuttle. This year was also a year of transition for the SSB. In 2009, Marcia Smith stepped down as staff director for both SSB and ASEB, and Dick Rowberg had a very good turn at the plate as a pinch-hitter. We are deeply indebted to both of them. We are pleased that, after a successful run as study director for Astro2010, Michael Moloney is now director of SSB and ASEB. The profound work begun in 2009 on the decadal surveys will only see the light of day later as they are released and the scientific work begins. The SSB will have much to report for 2010.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration(NASA↗
DOE OSTI2016

Report in the Energy and Intensity Frontiers, and Theoretical at Northwestern University

The Northwestern (NU) Particle Physics (PP) group involved in this report is active on all the following priority areas: Energy and Intensity Frontiers. The group is lead by 2 full profs. in experimental physics (Schmitt and Velasco), 3 full profs. in theoretical physics (de Gouvea, Low and Petriello), and Heidi Schellman who is now at Oregon State. Low and Petriello hold joint appointments with the HEP Division at Argonne National Laboratory. The theoretical PP research focuses on different aspects of PP phenomenology. de Gouvea dedicates a large fraction of his research efforts to understanding the origin of neutrino masses, neutrino properties and uncovering other new phenomena, and investigating connections between neutrino physics and other aspects of PP. Low works on Higgs physics as well as new theories beyond the Standard Model. Petriello pursues a research program in precision QCD and its associated collider phenomenology. The main goal of this effort is to improve the Standard Model predictions for important LHC observables in order to enable discoveries of new physics. In recent years, the emphasis on experimental PP at NU has been in collider physics. NU expands its efforts in new directions in both the Intensity and the Cosmic Frontiers (not discussed in this report). In the Intensity Frontier, Schmitt has started a new effort on Mu2e. He was accepted as a collaborator in April 2015 and is identified with important projects. In the Energy Frontier, Hahn, Schmitt and Velasco continue to have a significant impact and expanded their CMS program to include R&D for the real-time L1 tracking trigger and the high granularity calorimeter needed for the high-luminosity LHC. Hahn is supported by an independent DOE Career Award and his work will not be discussed in this document. The NU analysis effort includes searches for rare and forbidden decays of the Higgs bosons, Z boson, top quark, dark matter and other physics beyond the standard model topics. Four students completed their PhD: Kubik is now contributing to the Cosmic Frontier program, Pollack to both the Intensity and Energy Frontiers and Pozdnyakov and Odell will continue in the Energy Frontier. All our research scientists, Anastassov, Oferzynski, Lusito, and Stoynev, have found new positions. The new post-docs are Trovato from Scuola Normale de Pisa, Odell from Northwestern and Bhattacharya from Brown. Trovato is now supported by Hahn, and so is Sung, previously at MIT.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Human Dimensions of Energy Systems Workshop - September 6-7, 2022: Findings and Next Steps

Advanced energy technologies and informed policies are necessary but not sufficient to accelerate the energy transition at the speed required to meet our shared climate and energy resilience goals. To fully understand and implement integrated energy systems, we need to be able to model and analyze the complete system-of-systems, including the behavior of people interacting with and being impacted by energy systems. The purpose of this workshop is: Understand how human behavior and decisions affect the performance of energy systems with a focus on resilience and human well-being; Identify opportunities to improve energy system design to explicitly consider human behavior and well-being; Enhance our capability to model and predict human actions. Develop the ability to stress test these integrated systems; Identify or develop requirements and tools for more robust system designs that can be used for human-in-the-loop exercises and training; Identify opportunities for joint research, joint appointments, and collaboration; and Guide internal investments and strategic hires.

analyze↗
DOE OSTI2014

TU-A-17A-01: Memorial to Benjamin M. Galkin - Memorial Lecture

This past year Medical Physics lost one of its active members, Benjamin M. Galkin. Ben Galkin was a Past-Treasurer of the AAPM. During his leadership role he played an important part in Securing membership, for the AAPM, in the American Institute of physics. As Treasurer he was also a prime mover in starting the journal, Medical Physics, and served as its business manager in the formative years.Ben Galkin received his Masters Degree at Columbia University in New York, under the mentorship of Dr. Edith Quimby, one of the pioneer Hospital Radiation Physicists in the country. He started his professional career at Jefferson Hospital in Philadelphia, joining Robert Gorson, and remained there until retirement. He served as the institution’s Radiation Safety Officer throughout his career. His research interest was Breast Imaging. He held joint faculty appointments in the Department of Radiology and the Department of Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, rising up to the rank of Full professor. He was a well respected teacher for the residents in Radiology.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗
NASA NTRS2002

Flaw Tolerance in Lap Shear Brazed Joints

Vacuum brazing is a viable process to achieve strong permanent and hermetic joints in space. As in any joining process, brazed Joints have various imperfections and defects. It is important to understand the impact that flaws have on the load carrying capacity and performance of the brazed joints. This study focuses on the behavior of lap shear joints due to their engineering importance in brazed aerospace structures. In Part 1 an average shear strength capabilitY and failure modes of the single lap joints are explored. Specimens comprised of 0.090 inch thick 347 stainless steel sheet brazed with pure silver are tested in accordance with the AWS C3.2 standard. Comparison of the measured loads and average shear stresses at failure with the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the same specimens as a function of the overlap lengths shows excellent correlation between the experimental and calculated values for the defect-free lap joints. In Part 2, various flaws will be introduced in the test specimens to simulate lack of braze coverage in the lap joints. Mechanical testing and FEA will be performed on these joints to verify if behavior of ductile ]appoints containing flaws is similar to the joints with the reduced braze area. Finally, in Part 3, the results obtained in Part 1 and 2 will be applied to the brazed assembly to evaluate a load carrying capability of the structural lap joint containing defects.

Flom, Yury↗
NASA NTRS1992

Flight 20 (STS-45) polysulfide gas path investigation

This report documents the results of the investigation into causes of gas paths on the 20A and 20B case-to-nozzle joints on STS-42. The investigation was conducted by the Investigation Board appointed by the senior vice president and general manager of Space Operations, Mr. R. E. Lindstrom, on 7 Feb. 1992. The probability of gas path occurrence in the nozzle-to-case-joint polysulfide had been identified during joint redesign. However, actual flight gas path incidence has been limited to RSRM-11 and the 20A and 20B segments. The blow-by condition on the 20A segment was a first time occurrence which was a special concern. The investigation covered all technical aspects associated with the gas path and blow-by conditions: materials and processing history, design requirements and as-built compliance to the design, thermal and structural analyses, computer modeling, and laboratory experimentation with the materials involved. The investigation was coordinated with Mr. Ken Jones at NASA Marshall in bi-weekly teleconferences. The Board also supported Dr. James C. Blair's independent NASA investigation team by providing copies of collected data, conducting requested analyses, and supporting several all-day teleconferences to provide understanding and resolve issues. The Dr. Blair support requirement was successfully concluded on 4 Mar. 1992.

Bjorkman, Rey C.↗
DOE OSTI2016

Strategy of the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research to Influence Laboratory Safety Among its Funded Researchers

In 2011, a team at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) was preparing a proposal for a Department of Energy (DOE)-funded project that called for the creation of an “Energy Innovation Hub.” The proposal team, well engrained in Argonne's and DOE's safety culture, was also aware of the high profile university laboratory accidents from 2009 and 2010 and many other high profile research laboratory safety incidents. They knew they wanted to influence safety by setting an expectation of safe science across the Hub they proposed. In 2012, the DOE awarded Argonne the contract to create the Hub, now known as the Joint Center for Energy Research (JCESR). JCESR promptly hired and appointed a Safety Lead charged with fulfilling JCESR's vision of influencing safety across their newly created Hub. This article discusses JCESR's implementation of a strategy to influence laboratory safety among its funded researchers.

Influencing Safety↗
DOE OSTI2022

Operation Dominic

A very tall (6’5”) Austin McGuire endured duty aboard the cramped confines of a submarine during World War II. After receiving a doctorate in physics from the University Rochester, he came to Los Alamos in 1954, later participating in the Koa shot of Operation Hardtack I. In 1962, he was appointed Deputy Commander of the Los Alamos task unit of Joint Task Force 8 (8.1.1) and sent to Christmas Island for Operation Dominic.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2018

Evaluating the Pharmacodynamics and Protective Efficacy of Catalytic Bioscavenger following Subcutaneous Administration in Guinea Pigs

Previous studies determined the guinea pig was a viableanimal model for evaluating subcutaneous ( s.c. )injection as an alternative route of administration of catalytic Bioscavengers:enzymes designed to render nerve agents non‐toxic in systemic circulation following exposure. Recent studies have focused on evaluating the pharmacodynamics (PD) and protective efficacy (PE) of the lead bioscavenger candidate, organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) variant, YT, as both unmodified and modified (PEGylated) versions of the enzyme. A comparative study was conducted with YT and three progressively sized PEG‐YT variants (934, 935, and 936) following a single bolus s.c. dose (5 mg/kg). Bioavailability increased linearly with molecular size such that the largest sized PEG‐YT variant, 936, afforded the highest bioavailability, thus promoting 936 to subsequent PD and PEstudies. Dose dependence on bioavailability was also examined via three cohorts of guinea pigs receiving doses (5, 15, 20 mg/kg) of either YT or 936 in which a linear dose response was also found. Guinea pigs receiving either YT or 936 (5 mg/kg) via intramuscular (i.m. )or s.c. routes had superimposable PD profiles regardless of route, suggesting an identical absorption pathway for the drugs. Protective efficacy was also evaluated by exposing the animals to 2xLD 50 of sarin (GB) 7 dayspost‐enzyme administration; only the animals receiving 936 ( i.m. and s.c. ) survived 24 hours post‐exposure. Periodic s.c. dosing strategies were also evaluated with 936 in which three injections were administered either 2 or 24 hours apart for a total dose of 15 mg/kg followed by a protective efficacy assessment 8 days post‐administration. Overall these data support the use of s.c . injection as a practical route of administration for catalytic bioscavenger with PE Gylation, synergistically enhancing both bioavailability and extending drug half‐life in circulation. Support or Funding Information The views expressed in this abstract are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of ChemicalDefense and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the principlesstated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the AnimalWelfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89–544), as amended. This work was supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency‐Joint Science and Technology Office, MedicalS&T Division. *Thisresearch was supported in part by an appointment to the Postgraduate ResearchParticipation Program at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of ChemicalDefense administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Educationthrough an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and USAMRMC. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Dao, Thuy↗
DOE OSTI2018

Quantitative Method Development and Validation of Naloxone and 6α‐naloxol from Male African Green Monkey Plasma.

Theopioid epidemic is a rapidly growing crisis around the world. Current models forpharmacokinetic assessment of countermeasures use African green monkeys (AGM). Arapid, sensitive and selective method was developed and validated usingLC‐MS/MS for the determination of naloxone and 6α‐naloxol in AGM plasma. Samplepreparation involved a simple solid phase extraction (SPE) using ahydrophilic‐lipophilic‐balanced reversed‐phase cartridge. Separation of naloxoneand 6α‐naloxol was achieved on a Halo C18, 2.1 × 50 mm, 2.7μ analytical columnusing an Agilent 1290 Infinity HPLC. A solvent system of methanol‐water‐formicacid was used for the elution of analytes. The analytes were detected and monitoredby a SCIEX QTRAP 6500 + triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer operatedin electrospray ionization (ESI) positive mode and multiple reaction monitoring(MRM). Molecular ion transitions for naloxone, 6α‐naloxol and naloxone‐D5 were 328.0/212.0,330.0/185.0, and 333.1/212.0 m/z, respectively. The method was validated usingcalibration and recovery assays with spiked samples. Linear calibration curveswere generated over the range of 1.5–100 ng/ml with values for the coefficientof determination (R 2 ) of >0.9950. The values for both inter‐dayand intra‐day precision and accuracy were well within the generally acceptedcriteria for analytical methods (≤15%). This method was subsequentlyused to measure plasma concentrations of naloxone and 6α‐naloxol in male AGMs administerednaloxone subcutaneously and intravenously. The developed method demonstratedexcellent recovery, repeatability, accuracy and sensitivity. Support or Funding Information DISCLAIMERS. The views expressed in this abstractare those of the authors (s) and do not reflect the official policy of theDepartment of Army, Department of Defense, or U. S. Government. This researchwas supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency – Joint Science andTechnology office, Medical S&T Division. Thisproject was supported in part by an appointment to the Research ParticipationProgram for the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command administratedby the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an agreementbetween the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Bandaru, Veera Venkata Ratnam↗
NASA NTRS1990

Ulysses - An ESA/NASA cooperative programme

Cooperation between ESA and NASA is discussed, noting that the Memorandum of Understanding lays the framework for this relationship, defining the responsibilities of ESA and NASA and providing for appointment of leadership and managers for the project. Members of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and ESA's ESTEC staff have been appointed to leadership positions within the project and ultimate control of the project rests with the Joint Working Group consisting of two project managers and two project scientists, equally representing both organizations. Coordination of time scales and overall mission design is discussed, including launch cooperation, public relations, and funding of scientific investigations such as Ulysses. Practical difficulties of managing an international project are discussed such as differing documentation requirements and communication techniques, and assurance of equality on projects.

Meeks, W.↗