Results for “iris recognition”

DOE OSTI2017

Iris recognition via plenoptic imaging

Iris recognition can be accomplished for a wide variety of eye images by using plenoptic imaging. Using plenoptic technology, it is possible to correct focus after image acquisition. One example technology reconstructs images having different focus depths and stitches them together, resulting in a fully focused image, even in an off-angle gaze scenario. Another example technology determines three-dimensional data for an eye and incorporates it into an eye model used for iris recognition processing. Another example technology detects contact lenses. Application of the technologies can result in improved iris recognition under a wide variety of scenarios.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DOE OSTI2019

Iris recognition via plenoptic imaging

Iris recognition can be accomplished for a wide variety of eye images by using plenoptic imaging. Using plenoptic technology, it is possible to correct focus after image acquisition. One example technology reconstructs images having different focus depths and stitches them together, resulting in a fully focused image, even in an off-angle gaze scenario. Another example technology determines three-dimensional data for an eye and incorporates it into an eye model used for iris recognition processing. Another example technology detects contact lenses. Application of the technologies can result in improved iris recognition under a wide variety of scenarios.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DOE OSTI2019

Iris recognition via plenoptic imaging

Iris recognition can be accomplished for a wide variety of eye images by using plenoptic imaging. Using plenoptic technology, it is possible to correct focus after image acquisition. One example technology reconstructs images having different focus depths and stitches them together, resulting in a fully focused image, even in an off-angle gaze scenario. Another example technology determines three-dimensional data for an eye and incorporates it into an eye model used for iris recognition processing. Another example technology detects contact lenses. Application of the technologies can result in improved iris recognition under a wide variety of scenarios.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2018

Assessing the Impact of Corneal Refraction and Iris Tissue Non-planarity on Iris Recognition

Assumptions regarding eye morphology are implicit in iris recognition algorithms. The cornea is assumed to have little to no effect on the view of the iris texture when the eye gaze is non-frontal, the iris is assumed flat, and the eye is assumed to be imaged via an orthographic projection. If these assumptions hold, affine transformations may be used to rectify non-frontally posed images to a frontal view and the rubber sheet model may be accurately used to normalize the iris annulus to a rectangular image. This work examines how iris recognition performance degrades when the first two assumptions are violated. Using a computer renderable eye model, a data set is created varying the presence of the cornea and a parameterized non-planarity of the iris shape across a large range of eye gaze angles. Matching scores are created using a commercial matcher. Thus, when comparing the relative impact of each assumption violation, it is observed that iris non-planarity presents a more significant problem than corneal refractive distortion with regard to iris recognition accuracy in non-frontal images.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2016

Off-Angle Iris Correction Methods

In many real world iris recognition systems obtaining consistent frontal images is problematic do to inexperienced or uncooperative users, untrained operators, or distracting environments. As a result many collected images are unusable by modern iris matchers. In this chapter we present four methods for correcting off-angle iris images to appear frontal which makes them compatible with existing iris matchers. The methods include an affine correction, a retraced model of the human eye, measured displacements, and a genetic algorithm optimized correction. The affine correction represents a simple way to create an iris image that appears frontal but it does not account for refractive distortions of the cornea. The other method account for refraction. The retraced model simulates the optical properties of the cornea. The other two methods are data driven. The first uses optical flow to measure the displacements of the iris texture when compared to frontal images of the same subject. The second uses a genetic algorithm to learn a mapping that optimizes the Hamming Distance scores between off-angle and frontal images. In this paper we hypothesize that the biological model presented in our earlier work does not adequately account for all variations in eye anatomy and therefore the two data-driven approaches should yield better performance. Results are presented using the commercial VeriEye matcher that show that the genetic algorithm method clearly improves over prior work and makes iris recognition possible up to 50 degrees off-angle.

iris recognition↗

DOE OSTI2018

A mathematical discussion concerning the performance of multilayer perceptron-type artificial neural networks through use of orthogonal bipolar vectors

This work proposes the use of orthogonal bipolar vectors (OBV) as targets for multilayer perceptron (MLP) Artificial neural networks pertaining to the pattern recognition field. Implications involving this proposal are supported by a proper mathematical discussion. This study shows that the use of OBV as targets improves the class identification performance of MLP networks for pattern recognition with more than two classes when compared to the widely used conventional target bipolar vector (CBV). In addition to the overall performance improvement, it is possible to obtain high recognition rates with fewer training epochs, while keeping a feasible generalization with other data. This behavior is related to the Euclidean distance of the points in the output space, which is much higher in the case of OBVs. Therefore, with a greater distance between the points in the output space, the MLP network becomes less prone to associate trained outputs with incorrect targets. The mathematical discussion in this study is based on the backpropagation training algorithm. In addition to the mathematical discussion, results from experiments with real data are presented. These results follow those obtained by mathematical derivations. Real data sets used in the experiments are available from: (a) the Semeion Handwritten Digit of Machine Learning Repository, international repository; (b) Iris Image Database from the Chinese Academy of Sciences—CASIA; (c) Australian Sign Language, signs of Machine Learning Repository, international repository. Experiments were conducted to measure the mean Euclidean distance between the MLP network output subjected to a given input pattern and outputs related to other pattern classifications. Experimental results show that MLP networks trained with OBVs were able to ensure a Euclidean distance between the output and incorrect targets greater than MLP networks trained with CBVs (by up to 4 times for handwritten, by up to 12 times for iris images and by up to 10 times for Auslan signs language). As such, the adoption of OBVs as target vectors for MLPs reduces the computational effort for training the network.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗