Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “in-pile instrumentation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Development of a full-length external-fuel thermionic converter for in-pile testing.

Description of an external-fuel thermionic converter which utilizes a thoriated-tungsten fuel-emitter body. Performance in out-of-pile tests was comparable to that of an arc-cast tungsten emitter body, with 400-eW output power (about 5 W/sq cm) at 10.8% efficiency. Maximum fuel clad temperature averaged from 1650 to 1700 C during the 300-hour test. This converter has been processed for in-pile testing. The various processing steps, including the installation of six emitter thermocouples, encapsulation in the secondary container, and joining to the fission-gas collection system, are described in detail. In addition to the converter assembly, a doubly contained fission gas collection assembly with radiation-hardened differential pressure transducers was fabricated. The experiment support plate required for the in-pile test, containing electrically insulated instrumentation feedthroughs and coolant line feedthroughs to the vacuum test chamber, was also fabricated.

Schock, A.↗

In-pile and out-of-pile testing of a molybdenum-uranium dioxide cermet fueled themionic diode

The behavior of Mo-UO2 cermet fuel in a diode for thermionic reactor application was studied. The diode had a Mo-0.5 Ti emitter and niobium collector. Output power ranged from 1.4 to 2.8 W/cm squared at emitter and collector temperatures of 1500 deg and 540 C. Thermionic performance was stable within the limits of the instrumentation sensitivity. Through 1000 hours of in-pile operation the emitter was dimensionally stable. However, some fission gases (15 percent) leaked through an inner clad imperfection that occurred during fuel fabrication.

Diianni, D. C.↗

Testing in Support of Fission Surface Power System Qualification

The strategy for qualifying a FSP system could have a significant programmatic impact. The US has not qualified a space fission power system since launch of the SNAP-10A in 1965. This paper explores cost-effective options for obtaining data that would be needed for flight qualification of a fission system. Qualification data could be obtained from both nuclear and non-nuclear testing. The ability to perform highly realistic nonnuclear testing has advanced significantly throughout the past four decades. Instrumented thermal simulators were developed during the 1970s and 1980s to assist in the development, operation, and assessment of terrestrial fission systems. Instrumented thermal simulators optimized for assisting in the development, operation, and assessment of modern FSP systems have been under development (and utilized) since 1998. These thermal simulators enable heat from fission to be closely mimicked (axial power profile, radial power profile, temperature, heat flux, etc.) and extensive data to be taken from the core region. For transient testing, pin power during a transient is calculated based on the reactivity feedback that would occur given measured values of test article temperature and/or dimensional changes. The reactivity feedback coefficients needed for the test are either calculated or measured using cold/warm zero-power criticals. In this way non-nuclear testing can be used to provide very realistic information related to nuclear operation. Non-nuclear testing can be used at all levels, including component, subsystem, and integrated system testing. FSP fuels and materials are typically chosen to ensure very high confidence in operation at design burnups, fluences, and temperatures. However, facilities exist (e.g. ATR, HFIR) for affordably performing in-pile fuel and materials irradiations, if such testing is desired. Ex-core materials and components (such as alternator materials, control drum drives, etc.) could be irradiated in university or DOE reactors to ensure adequate radiation resistance. Facilities also exist for performing warm and cold zero-power criticals.

Houts, Mike↗