Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “free-boundary problem”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

A Parallel Cut-Cell Algorithm for the Free-Boundary Grad--Shafranov Problem

A parallel cut-cell algorithm is described to solve the free-boundary problem of the Grad--Shafranov equation. The algorithm reformulates the free-boundary problem in an irregular bounded domain and its important aspects include a searching algorithm for the magnetic axis and separatrix, a surface integral along the irregular boundary to determine the boundary values, an approach to optimize the coil current based on a targeting plasma shape, Picard iterations with Aitken's acceleration for the resulting nonlinear problem, and a Cartesian grid embedded boundary method to handle the complex geometry. Here the algorithm is implemented in parallel using a standard domain-decomposition approach and a good parallel scaling is observed. Numerical results verify the accuracy and efficiency of the free-boundary Grad--Shafranov solver.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

An Adaptive Newton-Based Free-Boundary Grad–Shafranov Solver

Equilibria in magnetic confinement devices result from force balancing between the Lorentz force and the plasma pressure gradient. In an axisymmetric configuration like a tokamak, such an equilibrium is described by an elliptic equation for the poloidal magnetic flux, commonly known as the Grad–Shafranov equation. It is challenging to develop a scalable and accurate free-boundary Grad–Shafranov solver, since it is a fully nonlinear optimization problem that simultaneously solves for the magnetic field coil current outside the plasma to control the plasma shape. In this work, we develop a Newton-based free-boundary Grad–Shafranov solver using adaptive finite elements and preconditioning strategies. The free-boundary interaction leads to the evaluation of a domain-dependent nonlinear form of which its contribution to the Jacobian matrix is achieved through shape calculus. The optimization problem aims to minimize the distance between the plasma boundary and specified control points while satisfying two nontrivial constraints, which correspond to the nonlinear finite element discretization of the Grad–Shafranov equation and a constraint on the total plasma current involving a nonlocal coupling term. The linear system is solved by a block factorization, and AMG is called for subblock elliptic operators. The unique contributions of this work include the treatment of a global constraint, preconditioning strategies, nonlocal reformulation, and the implementation of adaptive finite elements. Furthermore, it is found that the resulting Newton solver is robust, successfully reducing the nonlinear residual to 1e-6 and lower in a small handful of iterations while addressing the challenging case to find a Taylor state equilibrium where conventional Picard-based solvers fail to converge.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Combined plasma–coil optimization algorithms

Combined plasma–coil optimization approaches for designing stellarators are discussed and a new method for calculating free-boundary equilibria for multiregion relaxed magnetohydrodynmics (MRxMHD) is proposed. Four distinct categories of stellarator optimization, two of which are novel approaches, are the fixed-boundary optimization, the generalized fixed-boundary optimization, the quasi-free-boundary optimization, and the free-boundary (coil) optimization. These are described using the MRxMHD energy functional, the Biot–Savart integral, the coil-penalty functional and the virtual casing integral and their derivatives. The proposed free-boundary equilibrium calculation differs from existing methods in how the boundary-value problem is posed, and for the new approach it seems that there is not an associated energy minimization principle because a non-symmetric functional arises. We propose to solve the weak formulation of this problem using a spectral-Galerkin method, and this will reduce the free-boundary equilibrium calculation to something comparable to a fixed-boundary calculation. In our discussion of combined plasma–coil optimization algorithms, we emphasize the importance of the stability matrix.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Feedforward equilibrium trajectory optimization with GSPulse

One of the common tasks required for designing new plasma scenarios or evaluating capabilities of a tokamak is to design the desired equilibria using a Grad-Shafranov (GS) equilibrium solver. However, most standard equilibrium solvers are time-independent and do not include dynamic effects such as plasma current flux consumption, induced vessel currents, or voltage constraints. Another class of tools, plasma equilibrium evolution simulators, do include time-dependent effects. These are generally structured to solve the forward problem of evolving the plasma equilibrium given feedback-controlled voltages. In this work, we introduce GSPulse, a novel algorithm for equilibrium trajectory optimization, that is more akin to a pulse planner than a pulse simulator. GSPulse includes time-dependent effects and solves the inverse problem: given a user-specified set of target equilibrium shapes, as well as limits on the coil currents and voltages, the optimizer returns trajectories of the voltages, currents, and achievable equilibria. This task is useful for scoping performance of a tokamak and exploring the space of achievable pulses. The computed equilibria satisfy both Grad-Shafranov force balance and axisymmetric circuit dynamics. The optimization is performed by restructuring the free-boundary equilibrium evolution equations into a form where it is computationally efficient to optimize the entire dynamic sequence. GSPulse can solve for hundreds of equilibria simultaneously within a few minutes. GSPulse has been validated against NSTX-U and MAST-U experiments and against SPARC feedback control simulations, and is being used to perform scenario design for SPARC. The computed trajectories can be used as feedforward inputs that are connected to the feedback controller to inform and improve feedback performance. The code for GSPulse is available open-source at github.com/jwai-cfs/GSPulse_public.

equilibrium↗
DOE OSTI2021

Alluvial fan morphology: A self-similar free boundary problem description

In this work, we examine approximate geometrically self-similar solutions to a parabolic free boundary value problem applied to alluvial fan surface morphology and growth. Alluvial fans are fan- or cone-shaped sedimentary deposits caused by the rapid deposition of sediment from a canyon discharging onto a flatter plain. Longitudinal, topographic profiles of fans can be readily described by a seemingly time independent dimensionless profile (DeChant et al., 1999). However, because an alluvial fan can be expected to grow over time, it is clear that this “steady” profile is certainly time dependent and can be described using a space-time self-similar solution. In an experimental and theory-based study, Guerit et al. (2014) developed a self-similar (or as they describe it a self-affine) linear solution based upon an approximate first order small parameter expansion solution for a 1-d homogeneous nonlinear diffusion equation. Direct substitution of this result into a linear diffusion equation suggests that this first order expression may not fully satisfy the associated governing equation. In contrast, we develop a more complete solution based upon a modeled approximation for the axi-symmetric formulation such that the associated temporal behavior is consistent with a 1/3 time power-law as described by Reitz and Jerolmack (2014). The resulting expression is an exact solution to a linear heat equation. Furthermore, we emphasize that a small parameter is not inherent to the resulting profile result and is not included in our model development. Though developed using rather different approaches, the formal solution developed here is in good agreement with the simple polynomial described by DeChant et al. (1999) suggesting that this self-similar solution is a suitable time dependent representation of alluvial fan longitudinal profile form and improves on earlier work.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗