A tale of two polarization paradoxes: The diamagnetic polarization paradox
An accurate calculation of the total polarization charge density in a plasma is essential for a self-consistent determination of the electric field. Yet, the “diamagnetic polarization paradox” refers to the fact that there is a paradoxical factor of 1/2 difference between the pressure-driven “diamagnetic polarization” density calculated using real space drift theory vs action-angle space guiding center and gyrokinetic theory that has not been explained before. Here, we show that both results can be made consistent with one another. Half of the diamagnetic polarization is due to the transformation from the guiding center density to the real space density. The other half is due to the fact that, within the drift kinetic ordering assumptions, the guiding center density should be expressed as the gyroaverage of the density in the limit of vanishing Larmor radius. A comprehensive review of polarization is presented to complete the derivation, and then we derive results that are required for the polarization calculations to agree. Expressions for the diamagnetic polarization density are given that are accurate to first order in amplitude and all orders in gyroradius within the gyrokinetic theory for a constant magnetic field. Applications to Maxwell–Boltzmann particle distribution functions (PDFs), including anisotropic temperature, are presented. Local invariants, like total energy and toroidal momentum, do not generate net polarization effects; the electric and thermodynamic polarizations must precisely cancel. In contrast, anisotropic dependence on the magnetic moment generates a net polarization proportional to the temperature anisotropy. Finally, when sources are present, the equilibrium PDF is approximately the ratio of two orbit averages.