Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “differential charging”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1979

Photoelectron charge density and transport near differentially charged spacecraft

The effects of photoelectron space charge and current density on differentially charged spacecraft are studied. The steady-state potentials of a sunlit cylinder are calculated using a two-dimensional computer code with a fully self-consistent treatment of space charge and an effective surface conductivity treatment of photoelectron currents. It is found that under conditions of strong differential charging the results do not differ greatly from NASCAP results, which neglect photosheath space charge and currents.

Mandell, M. J.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Observations of differential charging effects on ATS 6

Differential charging effects observed in the electron data of the University of California, San Diego, auroral particles experiment on Applied Technology Satellite 6 are described and analyzed. An electrostatic barrier around the environmental measurements experiment (EME) package on ATS 6 is shown to be the natural result of dielectrics around the spacecraft which are more negatively charged than the mainframe of the spacecraft. In particular, the large dish antenna on ATS 6 causes the formation of a barrier which traps particles emitted from the EME package surface and returns them to the spacecraft. The insulating surface of the rotating University of Minnesota detector on the otherwise conducting EME package is shown to be the source of accelerated fluxes of electrons during charging events.

Olsen, R. C.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Characteristics of differential charging of ATS-6

Thirteen days of data collected by the Auroral Particle Experiment onboard the ATS 6 were analyzed emphasizing peculiarities in the electron data attributed to differential charging. On one of these days the satellite was eclipsed by the earth at local midnight. Spectrograms were used to examine the data. It is concluded that differential charging is responsible for returning photoelectrons to the spacecraft up to a couple hundred eV, depending on the spacecraft charge. It is believed that the Minnesota experiment on ATS 6 is largely responsible for producing a potential barrier that returns particles and produces intense spon spots in the count rates.

Johnson, B.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Ram ion scattering caused by Space Shuttle v x B induced differential charging

Observations of secondary, high-inclination ions streams have been reported in the literature. The authors of these previous papers attributed the source of the secondary ions to a disturbed region in the plasma about 10 m from the Space Shuttle Orbiter. A new theory has been developed which shows how v x B induced differential charging on the plasma diagnostics package (PDP) can scatter the ram ion flux. Some of these ions are reflected back to the PDP and may be the sorce of the observed ion distributions. The effect is unique to large spacecraft; it occurs only when the magnitude of the induced v x B potentials are much larger than the electron thermal energy and of the order of the ion ram energy. That the ion streams observed at large angles must have been reflected from the PDP surface is demonstrated with three-dimensional sheath and particle trajectory calculations using the low earth orbit version of the NASA Charging Analyzer Program (NASCAP/LEO).

Katz, I.↗
NASA NTRS1978

The decrease in effective photocurrents due to saddle points in electrostatic potentials near differentially charged spacecraft

The reported investigation had the objective to illustrate the presence of important multidimensional effects in spacecraft charging. Two-dimensional codes have been under development by Parker (1976). A description is presented of a calculation which was performed using the three-dimensional NASA Charging Analyzer Program (NASCAP). NASCAP was run to calculate the electrostatic potentials on the surface of, and in the space surrounding, a sunlit Teflon-coated sphere. Currents to the sunlit surfaces were determined on the basis of an approximate photosheath model for strong differential charging.

Mandell, M. J.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Numerical calculations of high-altitude differential charging: Preliminary results

A two dimensional simulation program was constructed in order to obtain theoretical predictions of floating potential distributions on geostationary spacecraft. The geometry was infinite-cylindrical with angle dependence. Effects of finite spacecraft length on sheath potential profiles can be included in an approximate way. The program can treat either steady-state conditions or slowly time-varying situations, involving external time scales much larger than particle transit times. Approximate, locally dependent expressions were used to provide space charge, density profiles, but numerical orbit-following is used to calculate surface currents. Ambient velocity distributions were assumed to be isotropic, beam-like, or some superposition of these.

Laframboise, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Importance of differential charging for controlling both natural and induced vehicle potentials on ATS-5 and ATS-6

Three techniques of discharging satellites used on the P78-2 satellite were the ejection of a beam of electrons from an electron gun; the emission of electrons from a heated, biased filament; and the ejection of a plasma containing energetic positive xenon ions and low energy electrons. When the P78-2 satellite ground to plasma potential difference reached several hundred volts, each of the three techniques was able to completely discharge the satellite. The comparative effctiveness of the techniques were clearly shown. Two days later, the satellite charged to -8 keV upon entering eclipse. The electron gun, emitting 1 mA of electrons with 150 eV energy, reduced the difference in potential between satellite ground and the ambient plasma to -1 kV, but could not completely discharge the satellite. The plasma source completely discharged the satellite.

Whipple, E. C.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Differential charging of high-voltage spacecraft - The equilibrium potential of insulated surfaces

A theory is presented for the steady-state potential of insulated surfaces near exposed high voltages. The term 'insulated surfaces' is used to mean either dielectric surfaces or electrically isolated metallic surfaces. The potential is bounded below by the zero of the material's I-V curve assuming total suppression of secondary electrons, and above by assuming total extraction of secondaries. Within these bounds, the material's surface potential is determined consistently with the solution to Poisson's equation external to the vehicle. The theory is compared with rocket experiments and with SCATHA satellite data. Also, an explanation is suggested for the observed 'snapover' of solar cell coverslips from near plasma ground potential to near the potential of positively biased interconnects with increasing bias voltage.

Katz, I.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Wakes and differential charging of large bodies in low Earth orbit

Highlights of earlier results using the Inside-Out WAKE code on wake structures of LEO spacecraft are reviewed. For conducting bodies of radius large compared with the Debye length, a high Mach number wake develops a negative potential well. Quasineutrality is violated in the very near wake region, and the wake is relatively empty for a distance downstream of about one half of a Mach number of radii. There is also a suggestion of a core of high density along the axis. A comparison of rigorous numerical solutions with in situ wake data from the AE-C satellite suggests that the so called neutral approximation for ions (straight line trajectories, independent of fields) may be a reasonable approximation except near the center of the near wake. This approximation is adopted for very large bodies. Work concerned with the wake point potential of very large nonconducting bodies such as the shuttle orbiter is described. Using a cylindrical model for bodies of this size or larger in LEO (body radius up to 10 to the 5th power Debye lengths), approximate solutions are presented based on the neutral approximation (but with rigorous trajectory calculations for surface current balance). There is a negative potential well if the body is conducting, and no well if the body is nonconducting. In the latter case the wake surface itself becomes highly negative. The wake point potential is governed by the ion drift energy.

Parker, L. W.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Differential spacecraft charging on the geostationary operational environmental satellites

Subsystems aboard the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites 4 and 5 showed instances of anomalous changes in state corresponding to false commands. Evidence linking the anomalous changes to geomagnetic activity, and presumably static discharges generated by spacecraft differential charging induced by substorm particle injection events is presented. The anomalies are shown to be correlated with individual substorms as monitored by stations of the North American Magnetometer Chain. The relative frequency of the anomalies is shown to be a function of geomagnetic activity. Finally a least squares fit to the time delay between substorm initiation and spacecraft anomaly as a function of spacecraft local time is shown to be consistent with injected electron populations with energy in the range 10 keV to 15 keV, in agreement with present understanding of the spacecraft charging mechanism. The spacecraft elements responsible for the differential charging were not satisfactorily identified. That question is currently under investigation.

Farthing, W. H.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Analysis of differential and active charging phenomena on ATS-5 and ATS-6

Spacecraft charging on the differential charging and artificial particle emission experiments on ATS 5 and ATS 6 were studied. Differential charging of spacecraft surfaces generated large electrostatic barriers to spacecraft generated electrons, from photoemission, secondary emission, and thermal emitters. The electron emitter could partially or totally discharge the satellite, but the mainframe recharged negatively in a few 10's of seconds. The time dependence of the charging behavior was explained by the relatively large capacitance for differential charging in comparison to the small spacecraft to space capacitance. A daylight charging event on ATS 6 was shown to have a charging behavior suggesting the dominance of differential charging on the absolute potential of the mainframe. Ion engine operations and plasma emission experiments on ATS 6 were shown to be an effective means of controlling the spacecraft potential in eclipse and sunlight. Elimination of barrier effects around the detectors and improving the quality of the particle data are discussed.

Olsen, R. C.↗
NASA NTRS1987

High spacecraft potentials on ISEE-1 in sunlight

Data from two electric field experiments and from the plasma composition experiment on ISEE-1 show that the spacecraft charged to close to -70 V in sunlight at about 0700 UT on March 17, 1978. Data from the electron spectrometer experiment show that there was a potential barrier of some -10 to -20 V about the spacecraft during this event. The potential barrier was effective in turning back emitted photoelectrons to the spacecraft. Potential barriers can be formed by differential charging on the spacecraft or by the presence of space charge. The stringent electrostatic cleanliness specifications imposed on ISEE made the presence of differential charging seem unlikely, if these precautions were effective. Modeling of the event to determine if the barrier was produced by the presence of space charge suggested that this could not explain the observed barrier. The angular shape of the distribution could be successfully modeled as a product of differential charging on the solar arrays. This implies that the conductive coating was not completely effective in preventing differential charging, and that differential charging did occur.

Whipple, E. C., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Ground testing in a simulated auroral environment

Shuttle polar orbit missions are being planned in which astronaut extravehicular activities (EVA) will eventually include external operations or repair and refurbishment of satellites. Recent satellite data and model calculations show that significant spacecraft charging and differential charging occurs in that environment and could endanger equipment and personnel involved in the EVA. These spacecraft charging events take place in response to an intense flux of high energy electrons accompanied by a large drop in the ambient plasma density. The extent of which the auroral environment can be simulated in a large vacuum chamber are determined so that conditions which lead to significant charging and discharging may be observed and controlled. A large chamber would be required in order to simulate the effects of an aurora-like, large cross-section, energetic electron precipitation on a target system the size of an astronaut with a life support system. The precipitating electrons can be simulated with an array of multipactor sources and the background ionization produced by the beam can be limited to the range of the auroral density if the chamber pressure is not significantly above 1 x .000001 Torr. Some small chamber work has shown that the plasma in the beam will diffuse radially at a rate determined by the Bohm diffusion coefficient.

Mcintyre, Bernard↗
NASA NTRS1988

An unusual charging event on ISEE 1

Electrostatic cleanliness requirements on ISEE 1 were expected to prevent negative charging in sunlight. This has largely been true, but on three occasions, ISEE 1 has been observed to charge to significant negative potentials in sunlight. Data from the two electric field experiments and from the plasma composition experiment on ISEE 1 show that the spacecraft charged to close to -70 V in sunlight at about 0700 UT on March 17, 1978. Data from the electron spectrometer experiment show that there was a potential barrier of some -10 to -20 V about the spacecraft during this event. The potential barrier was effective in turning back emitted photoelectrons to the spacecraft. Potential barriers can be formed by differential charging on the spacecraft or by the presence of excess space charge in the plasma. The shape of the barrier suggests that it is due to the former, even though electrostatic cleanliness specifications imposed on ISEE were intended to eliminate differential charging. Modeling of this event showed that the barrier could not be produced by the presence of space charge but that it was most likely produced by differential charging of the solar arrays.

Olsen, R. C.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Conductive spacecraft materials development program

The objectives of this program are to provide design criteria, techniques, materials, and test methods to ensure control of absolute and differential charging of spacecraft surfaces. The control of absolute and differential charging of spacecraft cannot be effected without the development of new and improved or modified materials or techniques that will provide electrical continuity over the surface of the spacecraft. The materials' photoemission, secondary emission, thermooptical, physical, and electrical properties in the space vacuum environment both in the presence and absence of electrical stress and ultraviolet, electron, and particulate radiation, are important to the achievement of charge control. The materials must be stable or have predictable response to exposure to the space environment for long periods of time. The materials of interest include conductive polymers, paints, transparent films and coatings as well as fabric coating interweaves.

Lehn, W. L.↗