Results for “decision rationale”

DOE OSTI2024

Avian Activity Classification Using Recurrent Networks to Fuse Videos with Metadata on Imbalanced Datasets

Activity classification plays a crucial role in various real-life scenarios involving both humans and animals. There is an increasing need for precise activity classification focused on avian-solar interactions, as the usage of solar energy facilities, such as photovoltaic array power stations, has been observed to impact bird species richness, behavior, and activity. However, there has been no work to develop an automated system to monitor and classify these avian-solar interactions. All current methods rely on human observers, which is time and human resources costly and subject to errors related to searcher efficiency. With the recent success of Deep Learning models in activity classification problems, this paper develops a recurrent neural network-based model to automatically classify six avian activities around solar energy facilities. Our proposed model integrates critical feature engineering metadata with video frame data, enabling improved learning and more accurate activity classification. Furthermore, we address the challenge of data imbalance during training and demonstrate the efficacy of our model in detecting and classifying different activities within video tracks. Additionally, we analyze the saliency/backpropagation map of the trained proposed model and validate its decision-making rationale.

Avian activity classification; bidirectional LSTM;↗

DOE OSTI2024

Data-Informed Evaluation Framework for Integrated Energy Systems: Insights from Power, Process Heat, and Hydrogen Production Applications

The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework provides a systematic evaluation of the diverse preferences and performance metrics associated with alternative solutions. This approach is advantageous over a single-criterion methodology, which are only valid under conditions that assume ceteris paribus or an "apples-to-apples" comparison. However, selecting suitable technologies for integrated energy systems (IES) can be likened to an "apples-to-oranges" comparison, given the heterogeneous factors at stake. These factors include economics and performance parameters, geological compatibility, and environmental impacts. Consequently, past research has often employed a mixture of qualitative and quantitative criteria tailored to the specific interests of each study. While the method proves effective in handling the intricate interplay of criteria, the resulting rankings and scores can vary from study to study. This inconsistency is introduced from the use of subjectively defined thresholds and weights. As a result, decision-makers frequently find it challenging to establish clear connections between specific criteria and the resulting scores, as the transformation of criteria into ordinal scores results in a substantial loss of information. To address this challenge, we introduce a data-informed IES evaluation framework that offers comprehensive, interpretable, and traceable evaluations backed by quantifiable rationale. First, we identified key IES evaluation criteria from a decade of literature, focusing on relevant IES applications in power, process heat, and hydrogen production. We leveraged state-of-the-art cost estimates from the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and technical data from 78 reactor designs from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD-NEA). Lastly, we established thresholds by analyzing the mean, variance, root mean square, and slope of values across alternatives, categorizing the preferences of decision-makers into distinct utility functions, such as linear, saturating, exponential, and stepwise. Our approach yielded two main outcomes: (1) it provided consistent assessments across different stakeholder groups and (2) it visualized uncertainties in the decision-making context via comprehensive sensitivity analysis. To demonstrate the impact of our framework, we conducted case studies on 6 reactor designs (AP1000, NuScale, BWRX-300, Xe-100, eVinci, iMSR) for the three applications. Our data-driven framework proved to be highly effective in addressing heterogenous uncertainties faced by varied decision-makers? preferences and IES applications, as well as cost and technical estimates of advanced reactors.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2024

Data-Informed Evaluation Framework for Integrated Energy Systems: Insights from Power, Process Heat, and Hydrogen Production Applications

The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework provides a systematic evaluation of the diverse preferences and performance metrics associated with alternative solutions. This approach is advantageous over a single-criterion methodology, which are only valid under conditions that assume ceteris paribus or an "apples-to-apples" comparison. However, selecting suitable technologies for integrated energy systems (IES) can be likened to an "apples-to-oranges" comparison, given the heterogeneous factors at stake. These factors include economics and performance parameters, geological compatibility, and environmental impacts. Consequently, past research has often employed a mixture of qualitative and quantitative criteria tailored to the specific interests of each study. While the method proves effective in handling the intricate interplay of criteria, the resulting rankings and scores can vary from study to study. This inconsistency is introduced from the use of subjectively defined thresholds and weights. As a result, decision-makers frequently find it challenging to establish clear connections between specific criteria and the resulting scores, as the transformation of criteria into ordinal scores results in a substantial loss of information. To address this challenge, we introduce a data-informed IES evaluation framework that offers comprehensive, interpretable, and traceable evaluations backed by quantifiable rationale. First, we identified key IES evaluation criteria from a decade of literature, focusing on relevant IES applications in power, process heat, and hydrogen production. We leveraged state-of-the-art cost estimates from the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and technical data from 78 reactor designs from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD-NEA). Lastly, we established thresholds by analyzing the mean, variance, root mean square, and slope of values across alternatives, categorizing the preferences of decision-makers into distinct utility functions, such as linear, saturating, exponential, and stepwise. Our approach yielded two main outcomes: (1) it provided consistent assessments across different stakeholder groups and (2) it visualized uncertainties in the decision-making context via comprehensive sensitivity analysis. To demonstrate the impact of our framework, we conducted case studies on 6 reactor designs (AP1000, NuScale, BWRX-300, Xe-100, eVinci, iMSR) for the three applications. Our data-driven framework proved to be highly effective in addressing heterogenous uncertainties faced by varied decision-makers? preferences and IES applications, as well as cost and technical estimates of advanced reactors.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2024

Towards Resilient Near Real-Time Analysis Workflows in Fusion Energy Science

Nuclear fusion holds the promise of an endless source of energy. Several research experiments across the world and joint modeling and simulation efforts between the nuclear physics and high performance computing communities are actively preparing the operation of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). Both experimental reactors and their simulated counterparts generate data that must be analyzed quickly and in a resilient way to support decision making for the configuration of subsequent runs or prevent a catastrophic failure. However, the cost if the traditional techniques used to improve the resilience of analysis workflows, i.e., replicating datasets and computational tasks, becomes prohibitive with explosion of the volume of data produced by modern instruments and simulations. Therefore, we advocate in this paper for an alternate approach based on data reduction and data streaming. The rationale is that by allowing for a reasonable, controlled, and guaranteed loss of accuracy it becomes possible to transfer smaller amounts of data, shorten the execution time of analysis workflows, and lower the cost of replication to increase resilience. We develop our research and development roadmap towards resilient near real-time analysis workflows in fusion energy science and present early results showing that data streaming and data reduction is a promising way to speed up the execution and improve the resilience of analysis workflows.

Suter, Fred↗

DOE OSTI2026

From binary to quinary: The rationale and development of GaInAsSbBi for mid- and long-wave infrared sensing applications

Given the added complexity in flux calibration and composition evaluation inherent to quinary alloy growth, what motivates compounding the challenges of III–V-Bi growth with the goal of producing a quinary alloy of GaInAsSbBi for mid- and long-wave infrared sensing applications? Each elemental constituent provides some additional design freedom to achieve the ultimate goal of producing a lattice-matched, bulk random alloy mid-wave infrared III–V material with smooth surface morphology and high optoelectronic quality to enable high performance elevated operating temperatures. Here, this paper reviews the evolution of Bi-containing semiconductor research, focusing on mid- and long-wave infrared materials and highlighting key research findings that motivated the decisions to accept the added complexity in going from binaries like InAs or InSb, to InAsBi, to InAsSbBi, and, finally, to GaInAsSbBi to meet the performance demands of advanced infrared sensing applications.

Webster, Preston T. [Air Force Research Laboratory↗

DOE OSTI2026

Bypassing the yellow phase for extremely stable formamidinium lead iodide perovskite solar cells

INTRODUCTION Formamidinium lead iodide (FAPI) emerged as an ideal material for single-junction perovskite solar cells owing to its near optimal bandgap of 1.45 to 1.5 eV and outstanding thermal stability. However, the photoactive cubic α-phase (3C-FAPI) of FAPI is structurally unstable and undergoes a reconstructive phase transition to the nonperovskite yellow hexagonal δ-phase (2H-FAPI) at ambient temperature. The phase reconstruction from 3C-FAPI to 2H-FAPI could be prevented by alloying methylammonium (MA) or Cs or both at the A-site and Br at the halide site, but this limits long-term durability owing to phase segregation or materials instability. Addressing these challenges requires a rational design strategy to stabilize 3C-FAPI by restricting lattice reconstruction without compromising thermal stability. RATIONALE Two main strategies have emerged to improve the phase stability and film quality of FAPI. Here, the first is a lattice-templating approach, which enables the slow formation of perovskite but it eventually degrades through the formation of yellow phases. The second approach, which has been widely explored, involves additive engineering, using alkyl ammonium halide or mostly chloride-based additives, which provide better control over the crystallization route. However, the FAPI films fabricated using these additives are often alloyed and compromise long-term stability. Moreover, the exact role of Cl has been unclear and speculative, specifically when Cl-based additives are used. Even after using a high additive concentration, the incorporation of Cl in perovskite lattice is rare. RESULTS Guided by synergistic modeling and experimental studies, we developed a coadditive strategy using 15 mol % FACl and 0.5 mol % BA 2 PbI 4 perovskites in combination (where BA is butylammonium) to enable a highly oriented (100) Cl-doped FAPI film with exceptional durability. Synchrotron-based in situ wide-angle x-ray scattering revealed a favorable transition for the coadditive-treated FAPI (FAPI-CA) to the corner-sharing 3C black phase through a progressive transformation through the 2H, 4H, 6H, and 8H phases. Moreover, solid-state 35 Cl nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) revealed Cl incorporation in the perovskite lattice and, as predicted by modeling, indicated that Cl plays a key role in altering the energetics of both the formation and degradation pathways. The Cl-doped perovskite can completely bypass the expected and energetically favorable degradation pathway via the yellow phase or the 2H-PbI 2 phase. Instead, it undergoes degradation only upon exposure to harsh conditions such as 15-sun illumination and 90°C through the energetically uphill 3R-PbI 2 phase path. A p-i-n device fabricated with FAPI-CA film demonstrated a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 25.1% with an average of 24.1% (40 devices). The notable film stability translated to other devices and retained 98% of its initial PCE under open-circuit conditions at 85° ± 5°C for 1200 hours. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the decisive role of chloride in regulating both the formation and degradation pathways. This regulation is critical for creating a perovskite film with commercially relevant durability.

Garai, Rabindranath [Rice Univ., Houston, TX (Unit↗